Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Apr 24;27(6):655–661. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2008.03.010

INCREASED MORTALITY AFTER PULMONARY FUNGAL INFECTION WITHIN THE FIRST YEAR AFTER PEDIATRIC LUNG TRANSPLANTATION

LA Danziger-Isakov 1, S Worley 2, S Arrigain 2, P Aurora 3, M Ballmann 4, D Boyer 5, C Conrad 6, I Eichler 7, O Elidemir 8, S Goldfarb 9, GB Mallory 8, MG Michaels 10, P Michelson 10, PJ Mogayzel 11, D Parakininkas 12, M Solomon 13, G Visner 5, S Sweet 14, A Faro 14
PMCID: PMC2447528  NIHMSID: NIHMS53483  PMID: 18503966

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk factors, morbidity and mortality from pulmonary fungal infections (PFI) within the first year after pediatric lung transplant have not previously been characterized.

METHODS

A retrospective multi-center study from 1988–2005 was conducted with institutional approval at 12 centers in North America and Europe. Data were recorded for the first posttransplant year. Log-rank test assessed for association between PFI and survival. Associations between time to PFI and risk factors were assessed by Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Of 555 subjects transplanted, 58(10.5%) had 62 proven (Candida, Aspergillus or other) or probable (Aspergillus or other) PFI within the first year posttransplant. The mean age for subjects with PFI was 14.0 years verses 11.4 years without PFI (P<0.01). Candida and Aspergillus species were recovered equally for proven disease. Comparing subjects with PFI (n=58) to those without fungal infection (n=404), pre-transplant colonization was associated with PFI(HR = 2.0; 95% CI 0.95, 4.3, p=0.067). CMV-mismatch, tacrolimus-based regimen, and age over 15 years were associated with PFI (P<0.05). PFI was associated with any prior rejection greater than A2 (HR 2.1; 95% CI 1.2,3.6). Cystic fibrosis, induction therapy, transplant era and type of transplant were not associated with PFI. PFI was independently associated with decreased 12-month survival (HR 3.9, 95% CI 2.2,6.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors for PFI include A2 rejection, repeated acute rejection, CMV-positive donor, tacrolimus-based regimen and pre-transplant colonization.

Keywords: Lung transplantation, Fungal, Pediatrics, Aspergillus

Introduction

Pediatric lung transplantation is an established therapy for end-stage lung disease in children. Infectious complications occur frequently following lung transplantation with up to 60–90% of recipients experiencing at least one episode of infection 13. In particular, fungal infection remains a serious complication after lung transplantation. Invasive Aspergillus infection has been reported in 3–16% of adult lung transplant recipients with a mortality of 41–50% for invasive pneumonia 49. Additional studies in adults demonstrate transmission of fungal infection from colonized donors 10, increased colonization after transplant with pretransplant colonization 11, 12, increased infection in subjects with cystic fibrosis 11, and decreased rates of infection with antifungal prophylaxis 7, 13.

The impact of fungal infections in the pediatric lung transplant population is undetermined. A report from France indicated only 2 of 49 developed post-transplant mycotic lung infection, while another group reported invasive fungal infections diagnosed postmortem in conjunction with bronchiolitis obliterans 14, 15. Cases of Paecilomyces variotii and zygomycetes in pediatric lung recipients have been reported 16, 17.

A comprehensive evaluation of pulmonary fungal infections (PFI) including associated risks after pediatric lung transplantation has not been previously reported. This multi-center retrospective cohort reports the incidence of and risk factors for PFI within the first year after primary pediatric lung transplantation. We hypothesize that PFI in the first year after transplantation is associated with increased mortality in primary pediatric lung transplant recipients.

Materials and Methods

Study Design

Members of the International Pediatric Lung Transplant Collaborative (IPTLC) were invited to participate in this multi-center retrospective cohort with 12 of 15 centers contributing data for this study. Participating centers obtained Institutional Review Board (United States centers) or Ethics Committee (European centers) approval. The principal investigator performed a chart review on the medical records of all primary lung transplants performed between January 1988 and the time of data collection (August 2004 to September 2006). Patient data were de-identified at data extraction from the medical record. Information was collected from the time of transplant for one year or until either death or retransplantation if they occurred before the end of the one-year observational period.

Therapy Regimens

Patients underwent standard pre-transplantation evaluation at their participating center. Induction immunosuppressive therapy varied during the study period and across participating centers, ranging from no therapy to receipt of lympholytic agents or IL-2 receptor antagonists. After transplantation, most recipients received triple-drug immunosuppression with a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), prednisone and either azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. Immunosuppression was gradually decreased as time from transplantation increased if substantial graft rejection did not occur. Target CNI trough serum concentrations varied by center. Additionally, prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus (CMV) and routine transbronchial biopsies to assess for rejection were not standardized across centers and changed over time within centers. Fungal prophylaxis was not standardized across participating centers, was individualized and changed over time. Data on individual patient prophylaxis was not available. Fungal cultures were obtained based on the protocol at each participating center. Some centers obtained routine fungal cultures with each surveillance bronchoscopy or with suspicion of infection, and other centers obtained fungal cultures only with suspicion of infection.

Definitions

Pretransplant colonization or infection

Evidence of a positive culture for fungus from sputum, trachea, bronchoalveolar lavage or explanted lung prior to or at the time of transplantation.

Posttransplant infection definitions are adapted from those proposed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group 18 and previously reported studies of fungal infection after transplantation 19.

Proven Fungal Infection

Defined as one of the following: (1) positive histopathology for fungal organisms with tissue damage from affected site or (2) culture from sterile site with radiographic or clinical evidence of infection at the cultured site including new radiographic infiltrate, pleural effusion or cough with fever without evidence of concurrent respiratory viral infection or acute rejection (excludes cultures of mucous membranes and urine).

Probable Fungal Infection

Defined as a positive culture of yeast (other than Candida species) or mould from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid with clinical evidence of infection as noted above.

Acute rejection

Based on pathology specimens obtained from transbronchial biopsy according to the working formulation for pulmonary allograft rejection classification in 1990 and 1996 20, 21. Additionally, clinical suspicion of acute rejection resulting in augmentation of immunosuppression was recorded.

Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome/Bronchiolitis Obliterans

Diagnosis was based on pulmonary function testing with standardization of FEV1 at 3 months after transplantation and measurement of deterioration from this level or by pathology specimen as outlined by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation 22.

Statistical analysis

Data were entered into an ORACLE database, analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC), and graphics were produced using R version 2.0.1 software (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Associations between PFI and continuous and categorical risk factors were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests, respectively. Associations between PFI and survival time, and between time to PFI and risk factors were assessed by univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models; subjects were also considered censored at death for the time to PFI model. For each proportional hazards model, the proportional hazards assumption was assessed by entering risk-factor-by-time interactions into the model; this assumption was also assessed graphically using log-log-survival plots. Events that occurred during post-transplant follow-up, such as PFI, CMV infection, and rejection were modeled as time-dependent covariates. The functional form for age at transplant was chosen by modeling deciles of age as risk factors for time to PFI and assessing the resulting parameter estimates. The multivariable model for time to PFI was chosen by performing backwards selection, with a significance criteria of 0.05, on an initial model containing all risk factors. Interactions suggested by the data or by clinical importance were included in the model selection process. Subjects with fungal infections localized to the urinary tract, central nervous system, and bloodstream as well as superficial skin infections were excluded from all analyses. One subject with a PFI diagnosed on the day of transplant was also excluded. All tests were two-tailed.

Results

PFI occur frequently within the first year after pediatric lung transplantation

From this retrospective cohort, 555 subjects met eligibility criteria for inclusion in the study. Subjects were transplanted between 1988 and 2005 at 12 centers in the United States and Europe. Of these 555 subjects, 58 (10.5%) developed 62 pulmonary fungal infections categorized as either proven or probable based on the diagnostic criteria. Candida species and Aspergillus species were equally represented for proven infections; other fungal organisms were less common (Table 1 & Table 2). PFI were noted to occur early in the first post-transplant year (median 100 days posttransplant), Figure 1. The majority (55%) of PFI occurred by 3 months post-transplant, and 70% occurred within 6 months after transplantation. PFI were common within the first posttransplant year after pediatric lung transplantation.

TABLE 1.

Identified organisms from Proven and Probable Pulmonary Fungal Infections

SITE All organisms Candida species Aspergillus species Other
Pulmonary (Total) 62 10 39 13
     Proven 20 8 11 1
     Probable 42 2* 28 12
*

Candida species recovered in same culture as Aspergillus probable episode.

TABLE 2.

Organisms recovered in PFI

Organism Number (%) Mortality due PFI
Aspergillus 38 patients 9/38 (24%)
Aspergillus 23
Aspergillus fumigatus 16
Aspergillus niger 1
Candida 10 patients 3/8(38%)
Candida species 4
Candida albicans 6
Candida krusei 1
Other 13 patients 0/13 (0%)
Fungus 2
Mold 1
Mucormycosis 1
Ochroconis humicola 1
Paecilomyces 2
Penicillium 2
Saccharyomyces 1
Scedosporium 2

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Time to first PFI after Pediatric Lung Transplantation

PFI associated with death

Subjects with PFI (n=58) within the first post-transplant year were compared to pediatric lung transplant recipients without any fungal infections (n=404). Mortality related directly to PFI was 24% (9 of 38) for Aspergillus species, 38% (3 of 8) for Candida species, and 0% for other organisms. Mortality for proven and probable PFI was 38% and 11% respectively. PFI within the first post-transplant year was significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality at one year posttransplant (HR 4.0, 95% CI 2.3–6.9, P < 0.001), Figure 2. The association was also observed in a multivariable model adjusting for demographics, immunosuppressive regimen, complications (acute rejection, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease, CMV, and bronchiolitis obliterans) and year of transplantation (PFI HR 3.8, 95% CI 2.2–6.8, P <0.001).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

12-month survival in pediatric lung transplant recipients with and without PFI

Demographic and event risks for PFI by univariable analyses

The impact of demographic characteristics, immunosuppressive regimen, and posttransplant complications (acute rejection, CMV infection/disease) occurring prior to PFI was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. Several risk factors for PFI were identified: age over 15 years at transplant, CMV D+/R− status, and tacrolimus-based regimen (p < 0.05). Gender, ethnicity, cystic fibrosis, type of transplant received, era of transplant and induction therapy were not associated with the development of PFI (P>0.1). The following patterns of acute rejection were associated with an increased risk of PFI: two or more episodes of acute rejection including A1 and clinical diagnoses (Hazard ratio 1.82.0, 95% CI 1.03–3.8, P=0.04) or a single episode of A2 or higher rejection (HR 2.2, 1.2–3.8, P=0.006). Prior episode of CMV infection/disease was not associated with the development of PFI (HR 1.3, 0.7–2.6, P=0.4), Table 3 & Table 4.

TABLE 3.

Demographics of subjects with PFI compared to those without any fungal infections

With PFI (n = 58) Without any FI (n = 404) P-value*
Age Mean 13.7 years 11.4 years 0.002
Underlying diagnosis Cystic Fibrosis 59% 53% 0.50
PHTN from heart 9% 14%
Idiopathic PHTN 10% 7%
Bronchiolitis obliterans 4% 5%
Transplant type Double deceased donor 76% 70% 0.35**
Heart/lung 17% 24%
Bilateral living donor 2% 5%
Single (either) 5% 3%
CMV serostatus Donor + / Recipient + 19% 19% 0.36
Donor + / Recipient − 40% 28%
Donor − / Recipient + 10% 13%
Donor − / Recipient − 31% 40%
CMV donor status Donor + 59% 48% 0.12
Induction therapy Yes 44% 41% 0.70
Calcineurin therapy Cyclosporine 57% 77% <0.001
Tacrolimus 43% 22%

PHTN: Pulmonary hypertension

*

Chi-square test

**

Fisher’s exact test

TABLE 4.

Univariable hazard ratios for time to PFI

Risk factor Level Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-value
Donor and recipient CMV status CMV D−/R− REF 0.25
CMV D−/R+ 0.96 (0.38, 2.4) .
CMV D+/R+ 1.2 (0.58, 2.6) .
CMV D+/R− 1.8 (0.96, 3.3) .
Year of transplantation (quintiles) 1985–1992 REF 0.74
1993–1995 0.76 (0.30, 1.9)
1996–1998 0.72 (0.26, 2.0)
1999–2001 1.1 (0.52, 2.5)
2002–2005 1.1 (0.50, 2.6)
Cystic Fibrosis Etiology 1.3 (0.75, 2.1) 0.38
Age at transplant >= 15 years 2.2 (1.3, 3.7) 0.003
Pre-transplant culture positive 2.0 (0.95, 4.3) 0.067
CMV prior to PFI 1.3 (0.67, 2.6) 0.43
Any rejection prior to PFI 2.0 (1.03, 3.8) 0.041
Two rejections prior to PFI 2.0 (1.08, 3.6) 0.028
A2 rejection prior to PFI 2.2 (1.2, 3.8) 0.006
Two treated rejections prior to PFI 1.8 (0.99, 3.4) 0.054

Pretransplant colonization increased risk of PFI

Pretransplant colonization with yeast or mould increased the risk of PFI. Culture results from 272 subjects prior to transplantation were available (30 with PFI, 242 without fungal infection). The sensitivity and specificity of pretransplant cultures with respect to the development of posttransplant PFI in this subgroup were 67% and 52%, respectively. Evidence of pre-transplant colonization was associated with almost twice the risk of PFI, 7% to 15%, and pretransplant colonization was significantly associated with the posttransplant PFI although not necessarily from the same organism recovered from the pretransplant culture (OR 2.2, 0.99–4.92, logistic regression P=0.052).

Multivariable models show independence of risks

Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to model the risks for PFI within the first year after pediatric lung transplant. The risk factors discovered in univariable analysis including age 15 years or older at transplant, CMV D+/R−, tacrolimus-based regimen, and an episode of A2 rejection or greater prior to PFI remained significantly predictive. An additional model was evaluated using two or more episodes of any acute rejection, and results were similar to the first model (Table 5). No additional risk factors were significantly predictive in either model. Pretransplant colonization was not included in the model due to the limited number of subjects with pretransplant culture data, creating a sampling bias. In a subgroup multivariable analysis including only the subjects with pretransplant fungal culture data available, addition or exclusion of positive fungal culture did not alter the model (data not shown).

TABLE 5.

Multivariable models for time to Pulmonary Fungal Infection

Variable Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)
Model 1 Model 2
Age >= 15 years 2.0 (1.2, 3.4) p=0.01 2.0 (1.2, 3.5) p=0.008
CMV Donor +/Recipient − 1.9 (1.1, 3.3) p=0.014 2.0 (1.2, 3.3) p=0.013
Tacrolimus regimen 2.4 (1.4, 4.1) p=0.001 2.4 (1.4, 4.1) p=0.001
Prior A2 or greater rejection 2.1 (1.2, 3.6) p=0.013
Two or more prior episodes of any rejection 2.1 (1.1, 3.9) p=0.017

Discussion

Pulmonary fungal infection has been reported after lung transplantation in up to 15% of adult recipients. Risks for pulmonary fungal infection in adult lung transplant recipients include pretransplant colonization with Aspergillus species, acute rejection, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and single lung transplantation 8, 23, 24. Cytomegalovirus and steroid therapy have been reported as risk factors for fungal infection in some but not all studies 5, 11, 24, 25. Pulmonary Aspergillus infections have been associated with decreased survival 8, 23, 24 in adult transplant recipients, especially for older recipients and those with late infection. In addition, late infections with Aspergillus species have been reported 26. This study is the first to investigate the risk factors for PFI in pediatric lung transplant recipients within the first year after transplantation.

PFI occurred at rates similar to adults, 10.5% compared to a range of 3–16%. Compared to published adult studies, mortality is slightly lower in the pediatric population for Aspergillus infections (24%), although the 38% mortality for proven PFI approach that reported in the adult literature 49. The risks for PFI including pretransplant colonization and acute rejection mirror risks in adults. However, additional risk factors are identified in pediatric recipients. Adolescence, associated with a lower rate of survival in other solid organ transplant recipients 2731, is an independent risk factor for PFI in this study. The effect of adherence in this retrospective study is not assessed, but ascertaining that age over 15 years increases the risk of PFI allows for potential intervention, especially as 60% of pediatric lung recipients in the United States occur in children 11–17 years old. Devising metrics to measure adherence to immunosuppressive and antifungal medications will be crucial to evaluation of any intervention in this population.

Another risk factor identified in this study was the tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen. While tacrolimus was not associated with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in adult lung transplant recipients 24, tacrolimus increased the risk of PFI within the first posttransplant year in pediatric recipients. Although rarely used in patients less than 2 years of age in this cohort, tacrolimus use was evenly distributed across all other ages in this study, and a tacrolimus-based regimen remained predictive of PFI in multivariable models. Further, the immunosuppressive regimen was categorized at initial hospital discharge, and therefore a tacrolimus-based regimen does not represent higher immunosuppression secondary to repeated or severe rejection which could be a potential confounder. Tacrolimus used in conjunction with sirolimus is associated with increased risk of fungal infection in adult thoracic transplant recipients 32, 33, but tacrolimus alone has not previously been associated with fungal infections.

The contribution of dose and blood levels of tacrolimus to the association with PFI was not explored in this study since immunosuppressive protocols and target trough levels were not standardized across participating centers. While tacrolimus-based immunosuppression is associated with decreased calcineurin-related renal dysfunction, hypercholesterolemia and hypertension compared with cyclosporine-based regimens, an association between tacrolimus and PFI must be considered. Although tacrolimus has some in vitro anti-aspergillus properties, the in vivo immunosuppressive effects appear to outweigh the antifungal capabilities 26. It is plausible to consider that higher functional immunosuppression is being achieved with tacrolimus as compared to cyclosporine increasing the risk of PFI in recipients on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. As the IPLTC moves toward a more unified protocol with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, the identification of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression as a risk factor of PFI highlights the importance of immunosuppressive regimen in designing clinical trials to decrease infection-related morbidity and mortality.

CMV infection has been reported as a significant risk factor for invasive fungal infections in adult lung transplant recipients 5, 34, 35. In this study, only CMV-mismatch, not CMV infection, was associated with an increased risk of PFI. Diagnostic methods for CMV infection varied over the study period and may have contributed to this finding Subclinical CMV infection and its potential immunomodulatory effects cannot be excluded as factors. Similar to age, CMV status represents a non-modifiable risk factor for PFI in pediatric lung transplant recipients. For this reason, these parameters should be considered in patient care and future clinical trial design.

As with any retrospective study, there are limitations inherent in this study design. Pretransplant cultures were not routinely obtained at all participating sites or from all subjects. However, a subgroup analysis of subjects with pretransplant fungal culture available produced the same model with and without inclusion of the culture variable. No additional factors were identified or excluded in this subgroup analysis. Secondly, the use of data from multiple centers without unified protocols also presents a limitation. However, the data collection was performed by the principal investigator at all participating sites using predetermined definitions in an effort to decrease differences in data collection methods compared to each site collecting data independently. Antifungal prophylaxis was not standardized within or across participating centers and was not obtained during the data collection. While many centers in the IPLTC use targeted antifungal prophylaxis for subjects colonized before transplant, antifungal prophylaxis was not consistently used during the time in which subjects were enrolled in this cohort, and changed within individual centers over time. Further, pretransplant colonization remained a risk factor in the multivariable subgroup analysis. Agreement about the optimal antifungal prophylaxis regimen in the lung transplant community is lacking 36, 37, and a prospective trial offers both a standardized approach and a clearer comparison.

Another limitation is that only PFI that were identified on fungal culture or tissue histology were categorized. This may underestimate the number of PFI by excluding clinically diagnosed cases and likely bias our results toward the null hypothesis. Limiting the diagnosis to the established definitions provided does, however, allow for comparison of these pediatric-specific results with other previously published adult studies.

In conclusion, PFI occurs frequently in the first year after pediatric lung transplantation and is associated with increased 1-year mortality. Non-modifiable risk factors including CMV-mismatch, age over 15 years, pretransplant fungal colonization, and episodes of acute rejection were found in this retrospective study. The immunosuppressive regimen may be modified, but the diminished metabolic, cardiovascular and renal side effects, aside from an increased risk of PFI presented here, favor a tacrolimus-based immunosuppression regimen. Antifungal prophylaxis after adult lung transplantation remains variable; several antifungal regimens suggest prophylaxis decreases incidence of PFI 7, 3840. However, antifungal prophylaxis after adult lung transplantation remains variable given the lack of evidence on the optimal prevention regimen 36, 37. Future prevention of PFI in pediatric lung transplant recipients will require an innovative prospective study design to address issues related to limited sample size and adherence in this population.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This manuscript represents a collaborative effort among pediatric lung transplant programs. In addition to the authors listed, we wish to acknowledge the contributions of the following individuals: Craig Cole, Jaime Fox, Pauline Whitmore, Christian Benden, Kathy Iurlano, Carsten Mueller, and Allison Drabble.

Funding: Supported by Thrasher Research Fund National Institutes of Health/K23 RR022956 (LDI)

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Presented: American Society of Transplantation Annual Meeting, May 2007, San Francisco, CA

REFERENCES

  • 1.Kramer MR, Marshall SE, Starnes VA, Gamberg P, Amitai Z, Theodore J. Infectious complications in heart-lung transplant. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1993;153:2010–2016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Maurer JR, Tullis DE, Grossman RF, Vellend H, Winton TI, Patterson GA. Infectious complications following isolated lung transplant. Chest. 1992;101:1056–1059. doi: 10.1378/chest.101.4.1056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kanj SS, Tapson V, Davis DR, Madden J, Browning I. Infections in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis following Lung Transplantation. Chest. 1997;112(4):924–930. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.4.924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cahill BC, Hibbs JR, Savik K, et al. Aspergillus airway colonization and invasive disease in lung transplant. Chest. 1997;112:1160–1164. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.5.1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Husni RN, Gordon SM, Longworth DL, et al. Cytomegalovirus infection is a risk factor for invasive aspergillosis in lung transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26(3):753–755. doi: 10.1086/514599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mehrad B, Paciocco G, Martinez FJ, Ojo TC, Iannettoni MD, Lynch JP., 3rd Spectrum of Aspergillus infection in lung transplant recipients: case series and review of the literature. Chest. 2001;119(1):169–175. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.1.169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Minari A, Husni R, Avery RK, et al. The incidence of invasive aspergillosis among solid organ transplant recipients and implications for prophylaxis in lung transplants. Transpl Infect Dis. 2002;4(4):195–200. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3062.2002.t01-2-02002.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Singh N, Husain S. Aspergillus infections after lung transplatnation: clinical diferences in type of transplant and implications for management. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2003;22(3):258–266. doi: 10.1016/s1053-2498(02)00477-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Westney GE, Kesten S, deHoyos A, Cahapparro C, Winton T, Maurer JR. Aspergillus infectioun in single lung transplant and double lung transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1996;61:915–919. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199603270-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ruiz I, Gavalda J, Monforte V, et al. Donor-to-host transmission of bacterial and fungal infections in lung transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(1):178–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01145.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Helmi M, Love RB, Welter D, Cornwell RD, Meyer KC. Aspergillus infection in lung transplant recipients with cystic fibrosis: risk factors and outcomes comparison to other types of transplant recipients. Chest. 2003;123(3):800–808. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.3.800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Paradowski LJ. Saprophytic fungal infections and lung transplant revisited. Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 1997;16:524–531. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Monforte V, Roman A, Gavalda J, et al. Nebulized amphotericin B prophylaxis for Aspergillus infection in lung transplantation: study of risk factors. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001;20(12):1274–1281. doi: 10.1016/s1053-2498(01)00364-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Metras D, Viard L, Kreitmann B, et al. Lung infection in pediatric lung transplant: experience in 49 cases. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 1999;15:490–495. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00059-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kaditis AG, Phadke S, Dickman P, Webber S, Kurland G, Michaels MG. Mortality after pediatric lung transplantation: autopsies vs. clinical impression. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2004;37(5):413–418. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Das A, MacLaughlin EF, Ross LA, et al. Paecilomyces variotii in a pediatric patient with lung transplantation. Pediatr Transplant. 2000;4(4):328–332. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3046.2000.00133.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hunstad DA, Cohen AH, St Geme JW., 3rd Successful eradication of mucormycosis occurring in a pulmonary allograft. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1999;18(8):801–804. doi: 10.1016/s1053-2498(99)00033-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ascioglu S, Rex JH, de Pauw B, et al. Defining opportunistic invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplants: an international consensus. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(1):7–14. doi: 10.1086/323335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pappas PG, Andes D, Schuster M, et al. Invasive fungal infections in low-risk liver transplant recipients: a multi-center prospective observational study. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(2):386–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01176.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yousem SA, Berry G, Brunt E, et al. A working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart and lung rejection. Journal of Heart Transplantation. 1990;9:593–601. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yousem SA, et al. Revision of the 1990 working formulation of the classification of pulmonary allograft rejection: Lung rejection study group. Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 1996;15:1–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cooper JD, Billingham M, Egan T, et al. A working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature and for clinical staging of chronic dysfunction in lung allografts. International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993;12(5):713–716. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mattner F, Chaberny IF, Weissbrodt H, et al. Surveillance of invasive mold infections in lung transplant recipients: effect of antimycotic prophylaxis with itraconazole and voriconazole. Mycoses. 2005;48 Suppl 1:51–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2005.01112.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sole A, Morant P, Salavert M, Peman J, Morales P. Aspergillus infections in lung transplant recipients: risk factors and outcome. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11(5):359–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01128.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ruffini E, Baldi S, Rapellino M, et al. Fungal infections in lung transplantation. Incidence, risk factors and prognostic significance. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2001;18(2):181–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Singhal P, Usuda K, Mehta AC. Post-lung transplantation Aspergillus niger infection. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005;24(9):1446–1447. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2004.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Smith JM, Ho PL, McDonald RA. Renal transplant outcomes in adolescents: a report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study. Pediatr Transplant. 2002;6(6):493–499. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3046.2002.02042.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Simsir A, Greenebaum E, Nuovo G, Schulman LL. Late fatal adenovirus pneumonitis in a lung transplant recipient. Transplantation. 1998;65(4):592–594. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199802270-00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Boucek MM, Edwards LB, Keck BM, et al. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Sixth Official Pediatric Report--2003. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2003;22(6):636–652. doi: 10.1016/s1053-2498(03)00184-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sudan DL, Shaw BW, Jr, Langnas AN. Causes of late mortality in pediatric liver transplant recipients. Ann Surg. 1998;227(2):289–295. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199802000-00020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Watson AR. Non-compliance and transfer from paediatric to adult transplant unit. Pediatr Nephrol. 2000;14(6):469–472. doi: 10.1007/s004670050794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Singh N, Limaye AP, Forrest G, et al. Late-onset invasive aspergillosis in organ transplant recipients in the current era. Med Mycol. 2006;44(5):445–449. doi: 10.1080/13693780600684494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kobashigawa JA, Miller LW, Russell SD, et al. Tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus vs. cyclosporine with MMF in cardiac transplant patients: 1-year report. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(6):1377–1386. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01290.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Duncan SR, Paradis IL, Yousem SA, et al. Sequelae of cytomegalovirus pulmonary infections in lung allograft recipients. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;146(6):1419–1425. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/146.6.1419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Monteforte JS, Wood CA. Pneumonia caused by Nocardia nova and Aspergillus fumigatus after cardiac transplantation. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993;12(2):112–114. doi: 10.1007/BF01967585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Husain S, Zaldonis D, Kusne S, Kwak EJ, Paterson DL, McCurry KR. Variation in antifungal prophylaxis strategies in lung transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis. 2006;8(4):213–218. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2006.00156.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dummer JS, Lazariashvilli N, Barnes J, Ninan M, Milstone AP. A survey of anti-fungal management in lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2004;23(12):1376–1381. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2003.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Husain S, Paterson DL, Studer S, et al. Voriconazole Prophylaxis in Lung Transplant Recipients. Am J Transplant. 2006 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01548.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Garantziotis S, Howell DN, McAdams HP, Davis RD, Henshaw NG, Palmer SM. Influenza pneumonia in lung transplant recipients: clinical features and association with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Chest. 2001;119(4):1277–1280. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.4.1277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Drew RH, Dodds Ashley E, Benjamin DK, Jr, Duane Davis R, Palmer SM, Perfect JR. Comparative safety of amphotericin B lipid complex and amphotericin B deoxycholate as aerosolized antifungal prophylaxis in lung-transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2004;77(2):232–237. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000101516.08327.A9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES