Skip to main content
The Journal of Clinical Investigation logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
. 2008 Jul 10;118(8):2733–2746. doi: 10.1172/JCI32381

Ang II–stimulated migration of vascular smooth muscle cells is dependent on LR11 in mice

Meizi Jiang 1, Hideaki Bujo 1, Kenji Ohwaki 2, Hiroyuki Unoki 3, Hiroyuki Yamazaki 4, Tatsuro Kanaki 2, Manabu Shibasaki 2,4, Kazuhiko Azuma 5, Kenichi Harigaya 5, Wolfgang J Schneider 6, Yasushi Saito 2
PMCID: PMC2447934  PMID: 18618022

Abstract

Medial-to-intimal migration of SMCs is critical to atherosclerotic plaque formation and remodeling of injured arteries. Considerable amounts of the shed soluble form of the LDL receptor relative LR11 (sLR11) produced by intimal SMCs enhance SMC migration in vitro via upregulation of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) expression. Here, we show that circulating sLR11 is a novel marker of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and that targeted disruption of the LR11 gene greatly reduces intimal thickening of arteries through attenuation of Ang II–induced migration of SMCs. Serum concentrations of sLR11 were positively correlated with IMT in dyslipidemic subjects, and multivariable regression analysis suggested sLR11 levels as an index of IMT, independent of classical atherosclerosis risk factors. In Lr11–/– mice, femoral artery intimal thickness after cuff placement was decreased, and Ang II–stimulated migration and attachment of SMCs from these mice were largely abolished. In isolated murine SMCs, sLR11 caused membrane ruffle formation via activation of focal adhesion kinase/ERK/Rac1 accompanied by complex formation between uPAR and integrin αvβ3, a process accelerated by Ang II. Overproduction of sLR11 decreased the sensitivity of Ang II–induced activation pathways to inhibition by an Ang II type 1 receptor blocker in mice. Thus, we demonstrate a requirement for sLR11 in Ang II–induced SMC migration and propose what we believe is a novel role for sLR11 as a biomarker of carotid IMT.

Introduction

Migration of vascular SMCs from the media to the intima is a key step in the development of atherosclerosis (1, 2). Following migration, SMCs proliferate in the intima and secrete matrices and proteases to form atheromatous plaques under the influence of stimulatory cytokines. The system encompassing urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR) is thought to be important for the migration of SMCs. For migration, cell-associated proteolysis of ECM and/or receptor-mediated signaling leading to activation of ERK and Rac1 (3, 4) play crucial roles. However, in regard to migration of SMCs relevant to the development of atherosclerosis and remodeling of injured arteries, the mechanisms for and significance of uPA/uPAR activation have not been fully elucidated yet.

Functional studies using genetically altered animals or cells have revealed that certain receptors belonging to the family of LDL receptor relatives (LRs) are important regulators of cell migration via modulating cytokine signaling and/or protease activation (57). Interestingly, LR-mediated regulation of migration appears to be caused at least in part by modulation of the uPA/uPAR system (6, 7). LR11 (also called sorLA), an unusually complex and highly conserved LR discovered and molecularly characterized by us and others (810), mediates uPAR’s plasma membrane localization, as both the membrane-spanning form and the shed soluble form of the receptor (sLR11) bind to and colocalize with uPAR on the cell surface (11). LR11 is highly expressed in intimal SMCs at the intima-media border in the plaque area of experimental models of atherogenesis (11, 12). Furthermore, overexpression of LR11 in SMCs enhances their migration via elevated levels of uPAR (13).

In the process of atherosclerosis, the BB isoform of PDGF (PDGF-BB) is an important cytokine for migration of SMCs (1, 2). PDGF-BB performs its task through the stimulation of cell motility via accelerated cytoskeleton rearrangement and degradation of ECM components of intimal SMCs (1). Also, PDGF-BB enhances migration of intimal SMCs via activation of the LR11/uPAR-mediated intracellular pathway (14). Ang II is another potent chemoattractant for SMCs (1, 15, 16). Recent studies with Ang II type 1 receptor (AT1R) blockers (ARBs) (17) or knockdown experiments (18) have shown that intracellular signals involving activation of Rac1 are important for the Ang II–mediated hypertrophy of SMCs and neointimal formation in injured arteries.

Here, we have studied the (patho)physiological significance of the LR11-mediated migration system of intimal SMCs in the development of intimal thickening in vivo. We found that circulating sLR11 levels reflect the degree of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), an established atherosclerosis marker (19), independently of other risk factors of IMT in subjects with dyslipidemia. Subsequent studies using LR11-targeted mice revealed that sLR11 increases membrane ruffle formation through complex formation with uPAR and integrin αvβ3 and that the LR11/uPAR/integrin-mediated intracellular pathway is required for the Ang II–induced attachment and migration of intimal SMCs. Thus, we have identified a role for the shed form of LR11, an independent serum marker of carotid IMT, in a mechanism that involves Ang II–induced SMC migration.

Results

Circulating sLR11 is independently associated with carotid IMT.

Considerable amounts of sLR11 are produced by intimal SMCs in the process of intimal thickening after cuff injury of femoral arteries in mice and enhance migration of SMCs in vitro via upregulation of uPAR expression (11, 20). We first studied immunologically detectable serum sLR11 levels in association with degrees of carotid IMT, a marker of intimal thickness of carotid arteries that predicts coronary and/or cerebral atherosclerosis (19), in 402 dyslipidemic subjects (Supplemental Table 1; supplemental material available online with this article; doi: 10.1172/JCI32381DS1). Univariate analysis showed that sLR11 as well as age, sex, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, smoking, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL particle size, and levels of insulin were significantly correlated with IMT (Supplemental Table 2). Multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that sLR11 is associated with IMT independently of other classical risk factors of IMT (Table 1). Analysis of subject quartiles showed a gradual increase in adjusted odds ratios (ORs) depending on sLR11 levels; subjects in the highest quartile of sLR11 levels (sLR11 > 3.52 U/ml) had a significantly increased likelihood of having an IMT greater than 1.0 compared with those in the lowest quartile (sLR11 < 2.13 U/ml). Subsequent to the demonstration of a strong correlation of circulating sLR11 with carotid IMT, the univariate analysis of circulating sLR11 with the above-listed factors was performed separately in males and females (Supplemental Table 3). sLR11 levels in males and females, respectively, were significantly correlated with IMT degrees at similar r (correlation coefficient) values. Multivariate analysis showed that IMT is the only factor significantly correlated with sLR11. (Supplemental Table 4). Thus, circulating sLR11 levels are tightly associated with IMT of carotid arteries in dyslipidemic subjects.

Table 1 .

Multivariate assessment of the effect of sLR11 and atherosclerotic risk factors on IMT

graphic file with name JCI0832381.t1.jpg

Intimal thickness of injured arteries is drastically reduced in LR11-deficient mice.

A close association of serum sLR11, a regulator of SMC migration, and intimal thickness of carotid arteries suggested that LR11 is involved in the process of intimal thickening of injured arteries. We studied the effect of targeted inactivation of LR11 (Figure 1, A and B) on intimal thickening in response to cuff placement of femoral arteries in mice. In the knockout mice, immunodetectable LR11 was abolished in tissues including brain and kidney, which are dominant sites of LR11 expression in WT mice. In contrast, the expression levels of LDL-related protein 1 (LRP1), a ubiquitously expressed LR (5, 6), did not change (Figure 1C). When Lr11+/– mice were intercrossed, the ratios of the numbers of live births of the different genotypes were according to Mendelian laws. The appearance and development of homozygous Lr11–/– mice were indistinguishable from those of Lr11+/– or Lr11+/+ littermates. However, in Lr11–/– mice, the thickness of the arterial intima 4 weeks after cuff placement was drastically reduced compared with that in Lr11+/+ mice, and the average ratio of IMT (I/M ratio) in Lr11–/– mice was 32% of that in Lr11+/+ mice (Figure 1D). Immunohistochemical staining showed that the cells in the intima were predominantly SMA-positive SMCs in both Lr11–/– and Lr11+/+ mice; however, nonmuscle myosin heavy chain II–B protein (NMHCII-B), an embryonic myosin isoform (14, 21), was clearly decreased in the intimal SMCs of Lr11–/– mice (Figure 2A). Analysis of the mRNA levels of NMHCII-B in SMCs in injured arteries demonstrated that expression in Lr11–/– mice was similar in the intima and media. Levels of SM1, an isoform of mature myosin fibers, were significantly increased in the intima in Lr11–/– mice when compared with Lr11+/+ mice (Figure 2B). The substantial increase in SM1 expression together with the decrease of NMHCII-B expression in Lr11–/– mice compared with those in Lr11+/+ mice suggests that the isoform conversion in intimal SMCs was disturbed in Lr11–/– mice. Thus, targeted inactivation of LR11 caused attenuation of intimal thickening in response to arterial injury accompanied by an altered expression pattern of myosin fiber isoforms in intimal SMCs.

Figure 1. Intimal thickness of arteries after cuff placement in Lr11–/– mice.

Figure 1

(A) Targeted disruption strategy of the murine LR11 gene, consisting of 49 exons. The targeting vector (bold line) contains 3.3 kb (5′) and 4.4 kb (3′) of genomic DNA flanking the neomycin-resistance cassette (Neor). After homologous recombination, Neor replaced exon 1 (Ex1, gray box), which contained the initiation codon of the LR11 gene. The location of the probe used for Southern blot analysis is shown. RV, EcoRV; X, XbaI; H, HindIII; E, EcoRI. (B) Southern blot analysis of murine-tail DNA from heterozygous intercrosses digested with EcoRV using the probe (see Figure 1A) that detects 17-kb and 6.8-kb fragments in the WT and knockout allele, respectively. (C) Immunodetection of LR11 protein. Total protein (100 μg) extracted from brain and kidney were separated by electrophoresis, blotted on a membrane, and incubated with antibody against LR11 (~250 kDa) or LRP1(~85 kDa). The samples were loaded on the same gel but not on immediately neighboring lanes. (D) Upper panels show sections of femoral artery of Lr11+/+ or Lr11–/– mouse after cuff placement, subjected to elastica van Gieson staining. Arrowheads indicate the internal elastic layers. Scale bar: 50 μm. Lower panel shows I/M ratio of arteries presented as mean ± SD (n = 15). *P < 0.05.

Figure 2. Myosin isoform expression pattern in injured arteries after cuff placement in Lr11–/– mice.

Figure 2

(A) Sections of femoral arteries in Lr11+/+ or Lr11–/– mice after cuff placement, subjected to immunohistochemistry using antibodies against SMA or NMHCII-B. Arrowheads indicate the internal elastic layers. Scale bars: 50 μm. (B) mRNA levels of myosin isoforms NMHCII-B and SM1 in arteries after cuff placement in Lr11+/+ or Lr11–/– mice. Total RNA isolated from the thickened intima (I) or the media (M) of Lr11+/+ or Lr11–/– mice was reverse transcribed to cDNA and subjected to real-time PCR analysis using specific primers for NMHCII-B and SM1, respectively. The amounts of amplified products are expressed relative to the amounts of β-actin transcript. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 5). *P < 0.05.

Lr11–/– SMCs are characterized by grossly reduced Ang II–induced membrane ruffling.

We have previously shown that cultured SMCs prepared from the intima display increased LR11 expression and PDGF-induced migration compared with medial SMCs and that inhibition of LR11 function with neutralizing antibodies reduces the migratory activity of intimal SMCs (11). Hence, we investigated the migration activity of cultured SMCs isolated from the aorta of Lr11–/– mice. Migration, invasion, and as shown here, attachment but not proliferation by PDGF-BB in Lr11–/– SMCs were decreased compared with those in WT SMCs, in agreement with previous studies using cultured SMCs (refs. 1114, 20, and Supplemental Figure 1). We analyzed the effects of several other chemotactic cytokines (Ang II, VEGF, bFGF, and IL-6) on the migration activity of Lr11–/– SMCs (M. Jiang and H. Bujo, unpublished observations). Among them, only Ang II did not enhance the migration of Lr11–/– SMCs in both the presence and absence of PDGF-BB but did so in WT SMCs or Lr11–/– SMCs in the presence of conditioned medium from WT SMCs (Figure 3A). There were no significant differences in levels of Ang II–induced Stat1 phosphorylation activity between WT SMCs and Lr11–/– SMCs (Figure 3B). The absence of a migration response to Ang II of LR11-deficient SMCs prompted us to further analyze their motility properties, since Ang II is a potent stimulator of cytoskeleton reorganization through intracellular signaling (15, 17). Preincubation with Ang II of Lr11+/+ SMCs but not of Lr11–/– SMCs enhanced cell attachment in the presence and absence of PDGF-BB (Figure 3C). The defect in the Ang II–mediated induction of attachment activity was restored by sLR11 in Lr11–/– SMCs (Figure 3D); note that the Ang II–induced attachment activity of Lr11+/+ cells was reduced by neutralizing anti-LR11 antibodies to the levels observed in Lr11–/– SMCs. We therefore studied membrane ruffling, which is related to cytoskeletal reorganization leading to enhanced cell attachment (3, 4), in Lr11+/+ and Lr11–/– SMCs. Ang II appeared to increase the proportion of cells with ruffles, and this increase was attenuated by blocking uPAR with neutralizing antibody in Lr11+/+ cells (Figure 4, A–C, D, and M). In Lr11–/– SMCs, Ang II’s effect on ruffle formation was not significant; in addition, the proportion of cells with ruffles in the presence of PDGF-BB was lower (Figure 4, E–G, H, and M). Also, ruffling by Ang II incubation was not enhanced in Lr11–/– SMCs pretreated with sLR11 (Figure 4, I–M). Thus, as quantitated (Figure 4M), in the presence of PDGF, Ang II stimulates membrane ruffling of WT cells (Figure 4, B and C) and this stimulation is abolished in Lr11–/– SMCs (Figure 4, F and G), even in the presence of sLR11 (Figure 4, J and K). Surprisingly, sLR11 induces ruffle formation in Lr11–/– SMCs in the absence of both PDGF and Ang II (Figure 4, E and I), which is consistent with the sLR11-induced increase in attachment activity in Lr11–/– SMCs (see Figure 3D). The increased ruffling in the presence of sLR11 with PDGF and Ang II was almost abolished by blocking uPAR (Figure 4, K and L). Next, in order to study the significance of LR11 in the Ang II–mediated vascular pathology, we analyzed the effect of LR11 deficiency on intimal thickening of arteries after cuff placement in the murine Ang II infusion model. Administration of Ang II at 1 μg/kg/min for 28 days significantly increased the I/M ratio in Lr11+/+ mice: note that the medial thickness in Lr11–/– mice was not significantly different from that in Lr11+/+ mice (Figure 5A and Supplemental Figure 2). However, the Ang II infusion–induced increase was not observed in Lr11–/– mice. The increase by Ang II infusion in the level of NMHCII-B expression in intima versus media did not occur in Lr11–/– mice (Figure 5B; note that the level of LRP1 after Ang II infusion remained unchanged in both Lr11+/+ and Lr11–/– mice). Thus, Lr11–/– SMCs are characterized by a failure in Ang II–mediated ruffle formation and attachment, which in turn apparently leads to a decrease in Ang II– or PDGF-BB–mediated migration activity. Furthermore, Ang II infusion–induced intimal thickening in response to arterial injury is attenuated, accompanied by an altered expression pattern of myosin fiber isoforms in intimal SMCs (see Figure 2).

Figure 3. Ang II–induced migration and attachment of cultured SMCs derived from Lr11–/– mice.

Figure 3

(A) Effect of Ang II on the PDGF-BB–induced (10 ng/ml) migration activities of Lr11+/+ or Lr11–/– SMCs. SMCs were incubated with 1 μM Ang II for 24 hours in the presence or absence of conditioned medium of Lr11–/– SMCs before migration analyses. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6). (B) Effect of Ang II on Stat1 phosphorylation in Lr11+/+ or Lr11–/– SMCs. SMCs were incubated with 1 μM Ang II for 10 minutes before immunoblot analysis for (phospho-) Stat1 (~90 kDa). (C) Effects of Ang II on cell attachment of Lr11+/+ or Lr11–/– SMCs in the presence or absence of 10 ng/ml PDGF-BBs. SMCs were incubated with or without Ang II (1 μM) for 24 hours before attachment analyses. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6). (D) Effects of sLR11 on Ang II–induced attachment of Lr11+/+ or Lr11–/– SMCs. SMCs were incubated with or without Ang II (1 μM) for 24 hours in the presence or absence of anti-LR11 antibody (pm11, 1:5 dilution) or recombinant sLR11 (1 μg/ml) for 24 hours before attachment analyses. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6). *P < 0.05.

Figure 4. Ang II–induced membrane ruffle formation of cultured SMCs derived from Lr11–/– mice.

Figure 4

(AL) Ang II–induced membrane ruffling (arrowheads) in Lr11+/+ or Lr11–/– SMCs. The indicated SMCs were incubated with or without Ang II (1 μM) for 24 hours in the presence or absence of recombinant sLR11 (1 μg/ml) with or without anti-uPAR antibody for 24 hours. PDGF-BB (10 ng/ml) was then added to the culture medium for 10 minutes before immunofluorescence analyses. Cells were then stained using Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin. Scale bars: 10 μm. (M) The number of cells with membrane ruffles were counted among 500 cells in the field. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05. ND, not detected.

Figure 5. Intimal thickening after cuff placement in response to Ang II infusion in Lr11–/– mice.

Figure 5

(A) I/M ratios of femoral arteries in Lr11+/+ or Lr11–/– mice after cuff placement with saline or Ang II infusion (1 μg/kg/min for 28 days) are presented as mean ± SD (n = 15). *P < 0.05. (B) mRNA levels of NMHCII-B and LRP1 in injured arteries. Total RNA isolated from the intima or the media of Lr11+/+ or Lr11–/– mice was reverse transcribed into cDNA and subjected to real-time PCR analysis using specific primers for NMHCII-B and LRP1, respectively. The amounts of amplified products are expressed relative to the amounts of β-actin transcript, and the ratio of mRNA expression levels of intima and media are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05.

LR11 activates membrane ruffling through the uPAR/integrin/focal adhesion kinase/ERK/Rac1 pathway.

LR11 binds to and colocalizes with uPAR on the cell surface (11), and a fraction of cell surface–located LR11 is proteolytically shed to produce a soluble form, sLR11 (22). To gain further insight into sLR11’s activity, we analyzed its effect on uPAR-mediated intracellular signals for cytoskeletal reorganization. The proportion of cells with ruffle formation was increased in dose-dependent fashion by sLR11, and this increase was clearly reduced by pretreatment with neutralizing antibodies against LR11, uPAR, or integrin αvβ3; PD98059, a specific MEK inhibitor, had the same effect (Figure 6A). The formation of a complex between LR11 and integrin αvβ3 was shown by coimmunoprecipitation, as previously demonstrated for uPAR/LR11 (11). The complex formation was inhibited by the addition of known ligands of LR11, e.g., apoE and receptor-associated protein (RAP) (Figure 6B). LR11 attenuates internalization and catabolism of uPAR, which is accelerated by LRP1 (13). RAP, a common ligand of LR11 and LRP1, reduced the membrane expression of uPAR in Lr11+/+ SMCs but significantly increased the uPAR expression in Lr11–/– SMCs (Figure 6C). Thus, LR11 in association with LRP1 appears to form a complex with integrin αvβ3 via interaction with uPAR, which also binds integrin (4, 11). Accordingly, sLR11 induced the phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and ERK, which act downstream of uPAR/integrin signals (Figure 7, A and B), and subsequent activation of Rac1 was detected in the presence of sLR11 (Figure 7C). Moreover, the activation of the FAK/ERK/Rac1 cascade was inhibited by neutralizing anti-integrin αvβ3 antibody (Figure 7, A–C). Likewise, in Lr11–/– cells, Rac1 activation was increased by sLR11, and this increase was diminished by neutralizing anti-integrin αvβ3 antibody (Figure 7D). In these experiments, the presence of anti–glutathione-S-transferase (anti-GST) antibody did not show any significant effects (data not shown). Thus, sLR11 can activate the FAK/ERK/Rac1 pathway in SMCs through complex formation with uPAR and integrin αvβ3; transduction of the signal leads to cytoskeletal reorganization associated with membrane ruffling.

Figure 6. sLR11-mediated ruffle formation through complex formation with uPAR and integrin αvβ3.

Figure 6

(A) sLR11-induced membrane ruffle formation. Rabbit SMCs were incubated with sLR11 (1 μg/ml) for 24 hours in the presence or absence of antibody against LR11, uPAR, or integrin αvβ3 (MAB1976) or of PD98059. The number of cells with membrane ruffles were counted among 500 cells in the field. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 5). (B) Coimmunoprecipitation of sLR11 (~250 kDa) with integrin αvβ3 or uPAR. Membrane extracts of rabbit SMCs were incubated with or without sLR11 in the presence or absence of apoE (50 μg/ml) or RAP (10 μg/ml), immunoprecipitated with anti-integrin αvβ3 or anti-uPAR antibody, and subjected to immunoblot analysis using anti-LR11 antibody. (C) uPAR expression in Lr11–/– SMCs. Membrane extracts of Lr11+/+ or Lr11–/– SMCs were incubated with RAP and subjected to immunoblot analysis using anti-uPAR (~50 kDa) or anti-LRP1 (~85 kDa) antibody. Blot shown is representative of 3 independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05.

Figure 7. sLR11-mediated intracellular signals related to cytoskeleton reorganization.

Figure 7

(A) sLR11-induced FAK activation. Cell lysates of rabbit SMCs were incubated with or without sLR11 (1 μg/ml) in the presence or absence of antibody against LR11 or integrin αvβ3 (MAB1976), immunoprecipitated with anti-FAK antibody, and subjected to immunoblot analysis using anti-FAK (~130 kDa) or anti–phospho-FAK (~130 kDa) antibody. (B) sLR11–induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2. Cell lysates (10 μg protein) of rabbit SMCs were incubated with sLR11 (1 μg/ml) for the indicated times in the presence or absence of anti–integrin αvβ3 antibody (MAB1976) and subjected to immunoblot analysis using antibody against (phospho) p42/44 MAP kinase. Upper and lower signals represent ERK1 (~44 kDa) and ERK2 (~42 kDa), respectively (13). Blot shown is representative of 3 independent experiments. Data of p-ERK1/2 are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05. (C) Rac1 activation in Lr11–/– SMCs. Cell lysates (60 μg protein) of Lr11+/+ or Lr11–/– SMCs were incubated with sLR11 (1 μg/ml) in the presence or absence of antibody against integrin αvβ3 (RMV-7), immunoprecipitated with PAK-1 PBD Protein GST beads, and subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-Rac1 (~21 kDa) or anti–GTP-Rac1 (~21 kDa) antibody. (D) sLR11-induced Rac1 activation. Cell lysates (60 μg protein) of rabbit SMCs were incubated with sLR11 (1 μg/ml) for the indicated times in the presence or absence of anti–integrin αvβ3 antibody (MAB1976) and subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-Rac1 (Rac1 ~21 kDa and GST-Rac1 ~21 kDa) antibody with (top) or without (bottom) prior immunoprecipitation with PAK-1 PBD Protein GST beads.

Ang II induces migration of SMCs through activation of LR11-mediated cell attachment.

Together with the results shown in Figures 6 and 7, the greatly diminished Ang II–induced migration in LR11-deficient SMCs (see Figure 3) suggested that it is due to a defect in Ang II’s actions on the LR11/uPAR/integrin/FAK/ERK/Rac1 pathway. Ang II and PDGF-BB but not VEGF led to increased production of sLR11 in rabbit SMCs (Figure 8A). In fact, the levels of both sLR11 and membrane-bound LR11 but not LRP1 were increased by Ang II in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 8B). The Ang II–mediated increase in sLR11 levels was blocked by the ARBs, valsartan and candesartan, as well as by PD98059 (Figure 8C and Supplemental Figure 3). Ang II induced the membrane expression of uPAR in Lr11+/+ SMCs, which was abolished in Lr11–/– SMCs (Figure 9A). Thus, the specific increase of sLR11 levels caused by Ang II together with the reduction in Ang II–induced migration and attachment in Lr11–/– SMCs (see Figure 3) strongly suggested that Ang II is key to enhanced migration via activation of the LR11-mediated pathway and cytoskeletal reorganization. Accordingly, Ang II–induced Rac1 activation was inhibited by neutralizing antibody against LR11 or uPAR (Figure 9B). The abolished Ang II–induced Rac1 activation in Lr11–/– SMCs was recovered by sLR11, and the sLR11-mediated activity was not inhibited by candesartan (Figure 9C). The Ang II–induced increase in cell attachment was abolished by a neutralizing antibody against LR11, and importantly, valsartan had no effect on Ang II–induced enhanced attachment in the presence of sLR11 (Figure 10A). In addition, Ang II–induced migration activity was suppressed when SMCs were pretreated with uPAR-specific siRNA (Figure 10B). Finally, the inhibitory abilities of valsartan and candesartan on migration activity were reduced in sLR11-pretreated C-1 cells (16% and 17%, respectively), an established SMC line (11), or LR11-overexpressing R-1 cells (20% and 11%, respectively) compared with untreated C-1 cells (34% and 35%, respectively), although the absolute extent of inhibition among them were similar (Figure 10C). These results indicate that Ang II induces cell migration through activation of LR11/uPAR-mediated cell attachment involving the Rac1 pathway.

Figure 8. Ang II–induced sLR11 production in SMCs.

Figure 8

(A) Effects of chemotactic cytokines on the production of sLR11 in rabbit SMCs. Conditioned media collected for 12 hours in the absence (lane 1) or presence of Ang II (1 μM, lane 2), PDGF (10 ng/ml, lane 3), or VEGF (50 ng/ml, lane 4) were concentrated and subjected to immunoblot analysis using anti-LR11 antibody (~250 kDa). Blot shown is representative of 3 independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05. (B) Ang II–dependent increase of soluble or membrane-bound forms of LR11 in SMCs. Membrane extracts (20 μg protein) prepared from rabbit SMCs or conditioned medium collected for 12 hours after the addition of Ang II at the indicated concentrations were subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-LR11 (~250 kDa) or anti-LRP1 (~85 kDa) antibody. Blot shown is representative of 3 independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). (C) Effect of ARBs or an ERK inhibitor on the Ang II–dependent increase in sLR11 in rabbit SMCs. Conditioned medium collected for 12 hours in the presence or absence of Ang II with or without valsartan (valsar, 10 nM), candesartan (10 nM), or PD98059 (10 μM) were subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-LR11 (~250 kDa) antibody. Blot shown is representative of 3 independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).

Figure 9. Ang II–induced LR11/uPAR pathway in SMCs.

Figure 9

(A) uPAR expression in Lr11–/– SMCs. Membrane extracts of Lr11+/+ SMCs or Lr11–/– SMCs were incubated with or without Ang II (1 μM) in the presence or absence of sLR11 (1 μg/μl) and subjected to immunoblot analysis using anti-uPAR (~50 kDa) antibody. Blot shown is representative of 3 independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05. (B) Effect of blocking the LR11/uPAR pathway on the Ang II–dependent increase of Rac1 activation in rabbit SMCs. Cell lysates (60 μg protein) were incubated in the presence or absence of Ang II (1 μM) with or without valsartan (10 nM), anti-LR11 antibody, or anti-uPAR antibody, immunoprecipitated with PAK-1 PBD Protein GST beads, and subjected to immunoblot analysis using anti-Rac1 (~21 kDa) antibody. Blot shown is representative of 3 independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). (C) Effect of ARB on the Ang II–dependent increase of Rac1 activation in Lr11–/– SMCs. Cell lysate (60 μg protein) of Lr11+/+ or Lr11–/– SMCs was incubated in the presence or absence of Ang II (1 μM) with or without candesartan (10 nM) or sLR11 (1 μg/μl), immunoprecipitated with PAK-1 PBD Protein GST beads, and subjected to immunoblot analysis using anti-Rac1 (~21 kDa) antibody. Blot shown is representative of 3 independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).

Figure 10. Ang II–induced migration via the LR11/uPAR pathway in SMCs.

Figure 10

(A) Effect of blocking LR11 activation on the Ang II–induced increase of attachment of rabbit SMCs. The SMCs attached to plastic plates were counted after incubation in the presence or absence of Ang II (1 μM) with or without valsartan (10 nM), anti-LR11 antibody, or sLR11 (1 μg/μl). Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05. (B) Effect of uPAR silencing on the Ang II–induced increase in rabbit SMCs migration. The migrated SMCs treated with exogeneous siRNA specific for uPAR or control (Cont.) RNA were counted after incubation in the presence or absence of Ang II (1 μM) with or without candesartan (10 nM). Inset: Membrane extracts (10 μg protein) prepared from these cells were subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-uPAR (~50 kDa) or anti-LR11 antibody (~250 kDa). Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). (C) Effect of Ang II on the PDGF-induced migration of LR11-overexpressing SMCs. The number of migrated A7r5 cells transfected with LR11 cDNA (R-1), or control cells (C-1) in the presence or absence of PDGF-BB (PDGF, 10 ng/ml) were determined after incubation with or without sLR11 (1 μg/μl), Ang II (1 μM), or valsartan (10 nM). Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 10).

Candesartan does not inhibit intimal thickening after arterial injury in mice overproducing sLR11.

The production of sLR11 is elevated in SMCs in the course of intimal thickening after endothelial injury (20). In order to learn more about the effects of inhibition of Ang II–mediated LR11/uPAR/integrin signaling on intimal thickening, we analyzed the intimal thickness after cuff placement in LR11-overexpressing mice. Mice were implanted with R-1 cells, which are A7r5 cells stably overexpressing LR11, or with mock-transfected A7r5 cells (C-1) (13, 23). Mice implanted with R-1 cells showed a 5.2-fold increase in the serum concentration of immunodetectable sLR11 after implantation compared with those implanted with C-1 cells (4.2 ± 2.6 U versus 0.8 ± 0.1 U). Candesartan administration significantly reduced the intimal thickness (I/M ratio) 4 weeks after cuff placement in C-1 but not in R-1 mice (note that treatment of R-1 mice with neutralizing antibody against uPAR reduced the intimal thickness; Figure 11, A–J and U). Intimal versus medial expression of LR11 and NMHCII-B was significantly reduced by candesartan in C-1 mice (Figure 11, K, L, P, Q, and V). In contrast, the levels of LR11 and NMHCII-B expression in intima versus media were not significantly different in R-1 mice whether treated with candesartan or not (note that treatment of R-1 mice with neutralizing antibody against uPAR did not significantly reduce the ratio of intimal to medial expression of LR11; Figure 11, M–O, R–T, and V). Thus, the ARB candesartan, which inhibits Ang II–mediated LR11/uPAR/integrin cell migration and attachment signals, reduces intimal thickness after cuff placement in mice; this reduction is counteracted in mice that overproduce sLR11. These results, obtained using an intimal thickening model with sLR11 overproduction, show that Ang II–induced cell migration and attachment contribute to the migration of SMCs from the media to the intima after arterial injury.

Figure 11. Effect of the ARB candesartan on intimal thickness after arterial injury in sLR11-overproducing mice.

Figure 11

BL6 nude mice were implanted subcutaneously with A7r5 cells transfected with LR11 cDNA (R-1) or control cells (C-1). Sections of femoral arteries of cell-implanted mice after cuff placement with or without administration of candesartan or anti-uPAR neutralizing antibody were subjected to histological analysis using elastica van Gieson (EVG) staining (AE). Serial sections were immunohistochemically analyzed using antibody against SMA (FJ), LR11 (KO), or NMHCII-B (PT). Arrowheads indicate the internal elastic layers. Scale bars: 50 μm (AJ); 10 μm (KT). (U) I/M ratio of arteries is presented as mean ± SD (n = 5). *P < 0.05. (V) mRNA levels of LR11 and NMHCII-B in injured arteries. Total RNA isolated from thickened intima or media of mice using LCM was reverse transcribed and subjected to real-time PCR analysis using specific primers for NMHCII-B and LR11, respectively. The amounts of amplified products are expressed relative to the amounts of β-actin transcript, and the ratio of mRNA expression levels of intima and media are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).

Discussion

LRs play a key role in the catabolism of complexes between proteinases and their receptors (57). In SMCs, LRs are thought to function in the catabolism of membrane molecules that regulate intracellular signaling events important for the specific properties of these cells, particularly in regard to their motility and migration (2433). Members of the family, such as LRP1 (34), VLDL receptor (LR8) (25), and LRP1B (32, 35), endocytose uPAR and uPA/uPAR complexes into cells for subsequent degradation and/or recycling. We have discovered what we believe is a novel mechanism for uPAR localization to the plasma membrane that involves LR11 (11). Recycling and degradation of uPAR on the membrane is dependent on its internalization via LRP1 (34). The extracellular sLR11 binds to and colocalizes with uPAR on the cell surface; this de facto immobilization effectively stabilizes the receptor-protease complex by inhibiting its degradation through LRP1 (11). In cultured SMCs, LR11 is highly expressed, but LRP1 expression is rather stable during the rapidly proliferating phase (32). The balance between expression levels of LR11 and LRP1 may be important for the regulation of uPAR expression in the membrane (see Figure 6C). Enhanced uPAR-mediated cell migration appears to constitute an important factor in the process of atherosclerosis and arterial modeling (3, 4). LR11 is highly expressed in atherosclerotic plaques, particularly in the intimal SMCs at the border between the intima and the media in plaques of humans and apoE-knockout mice (11, 32). Considerable amounts of sLR11 are produced by intimal SMCs in the process of intimal thickening after cuff injury of femoral arteries in mice (20). In this study, an attempt to investigate the clinical significance of circulating sLR11 levels in atherosclerosis was made in relation to dyslipidemia, since LR11 is a relative of the LDL receptor, a key receptor for maintenance of lipid homeostasis (1, 57). We discovered that circulating sLR11 levels are positively correlated with the degree of carotid IMT, representative of arterial intimal and medial thickness and closely associated with the development of coronary and/or cerebral artery diseases (19), and that this correlation is independent of other established risk factors for IMT in subjects with dyslipidemia. Taking the results together, we propose that circulating sLR11 may be a marker reflecting the intimal and medial thickness of injured arteries. Clearly, further careful studies using subjects with different characteristics are needed for the evaluation of a (patho)physiological significance in arterial diseases. Given that sLR11 is released from other major sources, the basis for this inference remains uncertain. Considering that (a) the changes in IMT are presumably due to the evaluation of the complex of intimal thickness, medial thickness, and hypertrophy of SMCs, which can result from hypertension in the carotid arteries, and (b) LR11 is required for Ang II–induced SMC migration in culture systems and mouse models, the relation of the current results to the pathology of hypertension-induced vessel damage requires attention. sLR11 may well affect the remodeling of injured arteries through the phenotypic conversion of medial SMCs, since loss of sLR11 disturbs the myosin isoform conversion in addition to the actin rearrangement in SMCs (see Figure 2B, Figure 5B, and Supplemental Figure 1A). In this context, the pathophysiological alteration of Lr11–/– SMCs in the medial layer after Ang II infusion needs to be evaluated by a model suitable for vessel remodeling in addition to the current cuff placement model (see Figure 5A). In any case, the major sources and the plasma concentrations of sLR11 in various conditions need to be identified. In the process of atherosclerosis and vascular restenosis after coronary angioplasty, the migration of SMCs appears to play a key role in intimal thickening (1, 2). SMCs acquire or lose numerous cellular functions required for performing the above tasks in the intima, as represented by changes in myosin isoforms including NMHCII-B and SM1 (14, 21). One of these tasks is enhancing cellular mobility while interacting with components of the basement membrane and other extracellular matrix components. One of the players in matrix degradation is uPA bound to its specific receptor, uPAR, on the cell surface; its essential role in enhancing cell mobility has been intensively studied in cancer invasion and neural migration (3, 4). uPAR interacts with integrin αvβ3 (36) and subsequently activates signaling pathways such as the FAK/ERK/Rac1 cascade for cytoskeleton reorganization (3, 4). Therefore, uPAR activation contributes to the progression of vascular remodeling through enhanced migration of intimal SMCs. Based on these findings, we have now identified a regulator of uPAR–mediated activation of cytoskeletal reorganization in the process of Ang II–induced migration of SMCs (see Figure 12). Moreover, the disturbed myosin isoform conversion in Lr11–/– SMCs may indicate that the LR11/uPAR signal plays a role in the coordination of actin and myosin rearrangement. The significance of LR11-mediated cytoskeleton reorganization for the conversion from contractile to synthetic phenotype needs to be addressed in future studies.

Figure 12. Proposed molecular mechanism for LR11 requirement in the response of SMCs to Ang II.

Figure 12

Ang II and PDGF-BB are the key cytokines promoting migration of SMCs in plaque formation. LRP1 inhibits the PDGF-BB–mediated signals for migration and proliferation and/or the modulation of upstream Tsp-1/TGF-β–mediated signals (38) through interaction with the PDGF-β receptor. Ang II induces the Tsp-1/TGF-β signals (37) and LR11 gene transcription through activating AT1R. LR11 localized on the cell surface becomes the soluble form (as sLR11) by cleavage through TNF-α–converting enzyme (TCE) (22). Circulating sLR11 levels are positively correlated with carotid IMT. sLR11 binds to and interacts with uPAR, the expression of which is mainly regulated by LRP1, on the cell surface and/or on neighboring cells. This complex formation inhibits the internalization of uPAR via LRP1, resulting in enhanced uPAR cell-surface expression. The uPA/uPAR system increases cell mobility through both increased ECM degradation and intracellular integrin/FAK/ERK/Rac-1 signaling, which in turn promotes actin ruffling and myosin isoform switching. The SMCs expressing LR11 display increased migratory capacity in response to PDGF-BB and/or Ang II. Thus, LR11 in combination with its counteracting partner LRP1 regulates the migration of intimal SMCs in injured arteries and atherosclerotic plaques via modulation of the uPA/uPAR system. The proposed LR11-mediated migration of intimal SMCs may be modulated by other Ang II–induced molecules and cytokines, particularly endothelial cell–derived PAI-1 (48). ARBs inhibit (a) the migration of intimal SMCs through downregulation of LR11 and (b) their proliferation by blockade of signals mediated by Tsp-1/TGF-β and PDGF-BB.

Ang II, similar to PDGF-BB, plays an important role as a cytokine in the process of atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling (15, 16). The activation of its specific receptor, AT1R, triggers various intracellular signals toward proliferation and migration of SMCs. The Ang II–promoted activities are greatly diminished by specific AT1R antagonists or by inhibition of MAP signaling using synthetic inhibitors of MAP kinase (3, 4). Here, Ang II stimulated cell migration and attachment and LR11 expression through AT1R activation; the enhancement of attachment by Ang II was more obvious in the absence than in the presence of PDGF-BB (see Figure 3). Blocking LR11 and subsequent events abolished Ang II–induced migration and attachment of SMCs (see Figure 10). The effects of LR11 ablation on Ang II–induced migration and attachment strongly suggest that Ang II–mediated enhancement of attachment depends on sLR11-mediated cytoskeleton reorganization. sLR11-induced ruffle formation and attachment activity even in the absence of Ang II or PDGF-BB (see Figure 3D, Figure 4, I and M, and Figure 10C) suggest that LR11 overproduction generally induced by such cytokines is important for the increased attachment activity through enhanced ruffle formation in the process of cell migration. ARBs prevent vascular damages in a mouse model of Marfan syndrome through amelioration of the increased activation of TGF-β signaling pathways (37). Boucher et al. recently reported on a conditional LRP1-deficient mouse model in which activation of TGF-β signaling pathways in the vascular wall was maximally increased, which is similar to what occurs in Marfan syndrome (38). LR11 seems to play an essential role in the change in cell mobility in the signals from Ang II and also in part from PDGF-BB (Figure 12).

Neutralizing antibodies against LR11 have been shown to reduce the migratory activity of intimal SMCs and intimal thickness after cuff injury (11). Here, using LR11-deficient cells, we found that sLR11 induces the complex formation of uPAR and integrin αvβ3 in SMCs (Figure 6). This finding may well explain the previous observation that incubation with aprotinin, a plasmin inhibitor, effectively reduces invasion but has much less effect on migration in LR11-overexpressing cells (ref. 13 and Supplemental Figure 1). The current study shows that overproduction of sLR11 in the absence of the membrane-bound form triggers the activation of uPAR-mediated intracellular signals via the integrin/ERK/Rac1 pathway, leading to membrane ruffling (Figures 6 and 7). Elevated sLR11 levels resulted in an exaggerated response of intimal SMCs to vascular injury and to an attenuated sensitivity to ARB treatment in mice (Figure 11). In this context, we recently observed that exogenous recombinant sLR11 interacts with macrophage uPAR and accelerates foam cell formation (20). Thus, sLR11 derived from intimal SMCs is implicated in plaque formation through its effects on SMCs and macrophages. Although our limited analysis did not show a significant relationship between sLR11 and high-sensitve C-reactive protein (hsCRP) in plasma (M. Jiang and H. Bujo, unpublished observations), the involvement of inflammation in LR11 gene expression or shedding of sLR11 in various diseases accompanied with vascular damage needs to be evaluated in future studies.

It is of interest that in the central nervous system, LR11 directs trafficking of amyloid precursor protein into recycling pathways (39) and LR11 expression is reduced in sporadic Alzheimer disease (40). We have recently shown that inherited LR11/SORL1 variants are associated with late-onset Alzheimer disease (39). Furthermore, soluble circulating LRP1 has been shown to provide key endogenous peripheral “sink” activity for amyloid β-peptide in humans (41). The functions of LR11 in amyloid precursor protein and uPAR catabolism in association with LRP1 suggest multiple roles for LR11 in the degradation and/or transport of several cell-surface and cytoplasmic molecules. In any case, the vascular phenotype of LR11 deficiency, i.e., severely disturbed Ang II–mediated migration of SMCs through decreased uPAR catabolism, provides a system for studies on the regulation of vascular remodeling toward the development of novel therapeutic interventions.

Methods

Subjects.

The study subjects are participants in a cohort study carried out concurrently with health-check screening at Awa area in Chiba, Japan (42). From among the 22,228 participants screened initially, we selected individuals with dyslipidemia (LDL cholesterol [LDL-C] > 160 mg/dl, triglycerides > 200 mg/dl, or HDL-cholesterol [HDL-C] < 35 mg/dl). None of the selected participants had medical complications or was undergoing treatment for abnormal plasma lipids, glucose, or blood pressure levels. The selected participants visited a hospital for detailed examination of their clinical profiles, collection of fasting blood samples, and measurement of carotid IMT. None had diabetes mellitus or thyroid and endocrinological diseases. All gave written informed consent prior to the study, which was approved by the Human Investigation Review Committee of the Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine. Examination of IMT was carried out with an ultrasound scanner (SSD-1200CV; ALOKA) equipped with a linear 7.5-MHz transducer (32, 43). IMT was defined as the distance from the leading edge of the lumen-intima interface to the leading edge of the media-adventitia interface of the far wall. The measurement of IMT in the common carotid artery was made along a 10-mm section just proximal to the carotid bulb (32, 43), and the average IMT was calculated from the right and left IMTs of common carotid arteries. Venous blood was drawn after an overnight fast of 12–14 hours. Serum was separated from blood cells by centrifugation and used for the measurement of lipids and other biochemical markers (2). LDL-C was estimated with the equation of Friedewald (32). LDL particle size and malondialdehyde-LDL levels were determined using gradient gel electrophoresis and sandwich ELISA, respectively (32). sLR11 was immunologically measured as described in Immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation.

Generation of Lr11–/– mice.

A plasmid-targeting vector was constructed with 3.3 kb (5′) and 4.4 kb (3′) of genomic DNA flanking the neomycin resistance cassette (Neor) to target the first exon of murine LR11. After linearization, the plasmid was introduced into 129/Sv-derived embryonic stem cells by electroporation. Homologous recombinants were identified, and 2 independently targeted clones were injected into C57BL/6 blastocysts to generate chimeric mice. Male chimeras were crossbred with C57BL/6 females, and germline transmission was verified by Southern blot analysis. For Southern blot analysis, genomic DNA was prepared from the tail and digested with EcoRV. The fragments were separated by electrophoresis, transferred to a membrane, and hybridized with specific fragments corresponding to flanking regions of homologous recombination as probes for the identification of Lr11+/+, Lr11+/–, and Lr11–/– mice, as described previously (44). All animal studies were approved by the Special Committee on Animal Welfare, School of Medicine, at the Inohana Campus of Chiba University.

Vascular injury by cuff placement.

Cuff-placement surgery was carried out on 20-week-old male mice, as described (11). After isolating the right femoral artery from the surrounding tissues, a polyethylene tube (2-mm PE-90; BD) was opened longitudinally, loosely placed around the artery, and then closed with sutures. These arteries were removed from mice after 4 weeks; this was followed by serial perfusion with PBS(–) and with 10% neutral buffered formalin at 100 mmHg. The tissue was fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin overnight, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. The middle segment of the artery was cut into subserial 5-μm cross sections with an interval of 50 μm between them. The sections were stained with elastica van Gieson or used for subsequent histochemical analyses. The image analysis software WinROOF (Mitani Corp.) was used to measure the areas of the intima and the media, respectively.

Laser capture microdissection.

Frozen samples of cuffed artery were immediately embedded in OCT medium (Tissue-Tek; QIAGEN) and allowed to equilibrate to the cryostat temperature of –20°C. Each sample was sectioned into 10-μm specimens, placed on slides (Arturus; Molecular Devices), and directly fixed in fresh 95% ethanol. After complete dehydration, the slides were placed in solutions of 75% ethanol for 30 seconds, 95% ethanol for 30 seconds, 100% ethanol for 30 seconds, and xylene for 5 minutes, then allowed to dry. SMCs in intimal and medial layers were captured for subsequent RNA experiments using a PixCell II Laser Capture Microdissection System (Molecular Devices).

Ang II infusion.

The surgical procedures for connection to ALZET osmotic minipumps were performed together with those for cuff placement in Lr11+/+and Lr11–/– mice. The pumps delivered either saline or Ang II at a rate of 1 μg/kg per minute. The arteries were removed from mice after 4 weeks.

Antibodies, recombinant proteins, and ARBs.

Mouse monoclonal (5-4-30-19-2) and rabbit polyclonal (pm11) antibodies against LR11 were described previously (11). Polyclonal antibodies against uPAR (AF807), NMHCII-B (PRB-445P), integrin αV (RMV-7), GST (A-30), and (phospho-) p44/42 MAP kinase and (phospho-) Stat1 were from R&D Systems, Covance, BioLegend, BostonBiochem, and Cell Signaling Technology, respectively. Monoclonal antibodies against LRP1, SMA (1A4), FAK (MAb2A7), p-Y397 of FAK, and integrin αvβ3 (MAB1976) were from Research Diagnostics Inc., Dako, Upstate Biotechnology (Millipore), BioSource (Invitrogen), and Chemicon (Millipore), respectively. Recombinant PDGF-BB, angiotensin II, VEGF, and plasmin were from R&D Systems, Sigma-Aldrich, Wako, and American Diagnostica, respectively. apoE and 39-kDa RAP were from Cosmo Bio Co. Ltd. Recombinant sLR11 protein lacking the 104 C-terminal amino acids containing the transmembrane region (sLR11) was prepared as described (20). Purified sLR11 was used for experiments at a concentration of 1 μg/ml, estimated from its biological activity in stimulating the migration of rabbit SMCs. The ARBs valsartan (CGP48933) and candesartan (CV-11974) were obtained from Novartis and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., respectively.

Cells.

Primary cultures of mouse SMCs were prepared as described (45). In brief, the whole aortae prepared from 10-week-old mice were cut into pieces of approximately 1 mm2 after removal of adventitial connective tissue and luminal endothelial cells. The pieces were digested with 1 mg/ml collagenase (Nitta Gelatin Inc.) and 20 U/ml elastase (Elastin Products Co. Inc.) in DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 minutes at 37°C, and centrifuged at 2,000 g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The precipitate was resuspended in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS (GIBCO; Invitrogen) and 40 μg/ml gentamycin (Schering-Plough). After 2 to 10 passages, cells from the primary culture were used for experiments. Primary cultures of rabbit SMCs were prepared from the medial layers of aortae as described (13) and used at passages 3 and 4. The LR11-overexpressing A7r5 cells (a rat embryonic aortic SMC line), R-1, and the control line C-1 were established as described (13). Before migration, biochemical, and immunological assays, cells were preincubated with various agents under the conditions indicated in the figure legends at 37°C, and then aliquots of the cell suspension were used for the experiments.

RT-PCR.

Total RNA was purified from the microdissected or cultured cells using an RNeasy kit (QIAGEN) as described (11). The methods for RT-PCR have been described (46). The amplified products were visualized after gel electrophoresis. For quantification of transcript levels, real-time PCR was performed using SYBR Green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems). The sequences of the PCR primers were according to known cDNA sequences: LR11, 5′-AATGGTGTTTGGTTGAAACACACATCTTAG-3′ and 5′-TACGTGGTTTCAACTACCAGAAATGCGCTT-3′; LRP1, 5′-CGGAACTGTACCATTTCA-3′ and 5′-GGTGTTGACAACCCATTCG-3′; NMMHCII-B, 5′-TGGAGGATCCCGAGAGGTATCT-3′ and 5′-GGAATCCACACCAGCTTTTTAGC-3′; SM1, 5′-CTCAAGAGCAAACTCAGGAG-3′ and 5′-TCTGTGACTTGAGAACGAAT-3′; β-actin, 5′-AGAGGGAAATCGTGCGTGAC-3′ and 5′-CAATAGTGATGACCTGGCCGT-3′. mRNA amounts were normalized to levels of β-actin mRNA, which served as the internal standard.

Migration, invasion, attachment, and proliferation assays.

Cell migration and invasion were measured essentially as previously described (13), using a 96-well micro-Boyden chamber, its surface coated with type I collagen, and Transwell (Corning) 24-well plates coated with 100 μl collagen gel, respectively. The lower chamber contained 1% FBS-DMEM with or without 10 ng/ml PDGF-BB. After a 4-hour incubation at 37°C, the cells on the upper surfaces were washed, fixed, and stained by Diff-Quik (International Reagents Corp.). The number of cells that migrated to the lower (outer) surface of the filters (high-power field) was determined microscopically by counting. Cell adhesion was determined in a 96-well plate, the surface of which was coated with type I collagen, as described (20). After a 2-hour incubation at 37°C, nonadherent cells were removed by gently washing with PBS and adherent cells were determined by counting. Cell proliferation was measured based on the incorporation of BrdU during DNA synthesis of proliferating cells using a cell proliferation ELISA system (Amersham). In brief, after 48-hour incubation at 37°C without FBS, SMCs (8,000 cells/well) were labeled with BrdU (10 μmol/l) in the presence or absence of Ang II for 8 hours. DNA synthesis was assessed by measuring the amount of BrdU incorporation into the DNA, which was detected by the above immunoassay system.

Immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation.

Cultured cells were washed 3 times with PBS and harvested in PBS containing 0.5 mM PMSF and 2.5 μM leupeptin. The pellet after ultracentrifugation at 100,000 g for 1 hour was resuspended in solubilization buffer (200 mM Tris-maleate, pH 6.5, 2 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM PMSF, 2.5 μM leupeptin, and 1% Triton X-100) as previously described (11). Conditioned medium was concentrated 20-fold using Centricon-100 concentrators (Millipore) (5). 50 ml of serum was purified using a RAP-GST affinity column. For immunoblotting, equal amounts of membrane protein, protein extracted from pelleted beads, or concentrated medium were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE after heating to 95°C for 5 minutes as described (47) under reducing conditions and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Incubations were with antibody against LR11 (5-4-30-19-2, 1:500 dilution; or pm11, 1:200 dilution), LRP1 (1:500 dilution) (phospho-) p44/42 MAP kinase (1:1000 dilution) (phospho-) Stat1 (1:500 dilution), Rac1 (1:1000 dilution), integrin αvβ3 (MAB1976, 1:1000 dilution), or uPAR (1:500 dilution) followed by peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse, anti-rabbit, or anti-goat IgG. For immunoprecipitation, 100 μg of membrane protein was mixed with sLR11 (1 μg/μl) at 4°C for 3 hours in the presence or absence of apoE (50 μg) or RAP (10 μg), as indicated in Figure 6B. The LR11/uPAR/integrin/antibody complex was precipitated by protein A-Sepharose. The proteins were released into 25 μl SDS sample buffer by heating to 95°C for 5 minutes. For immunodetection, pm11 (1:200 dilution) was used, followed by peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG. Development was performed with the ECL detection reagents (Amersham). The signals were quantified by densitometric scanning using NIH Image software. The sLR11 level of each subject’s serum (50 μl) was determined in a blinded manner as an averaged value of 3 quantified signal intensities resulting from independent assays and expressed as a ratio to that of a standard serum. The immunological estimation indicated that the signal of 1 U (in 50 μl serum) corresponded to approximately 50 ng/ml of recombinant sLR11. For analysis of phosphorylated ERK, Rac1 pull-down, and FAK phosphorylation, cells were starved for 24 hours in 0.3% FBS-DMEM followed by the addition of sLR11 (1 μg/ml) for the indicated times in the presence or absence of anti-integrin antibody (MAB1976 or RMV-7, 1:200 dilution) as described (13). For Rac1 pull-down and FAK phosphorylation assays, cells were lysed directly in the plates with ice-cold magnesium-containing lysis buffer and RIPA buffer, respectively. GTP-Rac1 activity was measured with a PAK-1 PBD/Rac activation assay kit (Upstate Biotechnology). In brief, lysates were incubated at 4°C with 10 μg of PAK-1 PBD Protein GST beads for 60 minutes. The proteins were released into 25 μl SDS sample buffer by heating to 95°C for 5 minutes. For FAK phosphorylation measurement after immunoprecipitation with antibody against FAK (MAb2A7), lysates were subjected to electrophoresis in 7.5% SDS gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were probed with an antibody specific for FAK-pY397 (1:1000) and then reprobed with an anti-FAK antibody (MAb2A7, 1:500).

Transfection of SMCs with siRNA.

Oligonucleotides were synthesized for siRNA (Takara Bio Inc.). Annealed sense and antisense oligonucleotides (25 nM each), 5′-UGGCUUCCAAUGUUACAGCTT-3′ and 5′-GCUGUAACAUUGGAAGCCATT-3′ corresponding to the uPAR sequence, or 5′-GAUGCCAUCUGUAGUCACUTT-3′ and 5′-AGUGACUACAGAUGGCAUCTT-3′ for control were transfected into SMCs (1 × 106 cells/100 mm dish) and incubated for 2 days as described (14). Cells were then used for experiments.

Immunohistochemistry.

Serial paraffin-embedded sections (5 μm) were used for immunohistostaining as described (11). Deparaffinized sections were pretreated with 0.3% H2O2 to inactivate endogenous peroxidase. Slides were stained in the presence of 3% BSA with antibody against LR11 (pm11, 1:50 dilution), NMHCII-B (1:100 dilution), or SMA (1:1 dilution) at 23°C for 1 hour followed by HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes) at 1:200 dilution. The slides were counterstained with hematoxylin. Controls with nonimmune rabbit IgG were conducted in parallel with each immunoassay procedure.

Immunofluorescence.

Cells were grown to 70% confluence on LabTek chamber slides (Nunc). For assays of membrane ruffling, cells were preincubated with PDGF-BB (10 ng/ml), Ang II (1 μM), sLR11 (1 μg/ml), anti-LR11 antibody (pm11, 1:5 dilution), anti-uPAR antibody (10 μg/ml), anti-integrin αvβ3 antibody (10 μg/ml), or PD98059 (10 μM; Calbiochem) for the indicated times. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at 4°C for 15 minutes, as described (11). F-actin was labeled using Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin (1:40 dilution, A12379; Invitrogen) for measurement of ruffle formation. Slides were examined with a Zeiss LSM5 PASCAL confocal laser scanning microscope. The 488-nm line of the argon laser was used for excitation of Alexa Fluor 488. The number of cells with membrane ruffling were counted with 500 cells in the field.

sLR11-overproducing mouse model.

R-1 and C-1 cells were grown to near confluence, trypsinized, and suspended in DMEM with 10% FBS. After centrifugation, cell pellets were resuspended in PBS. Eight-week-old ICR nude mice were injected subcutaneously with either 1 × 107 R-1 cells or C-1 cells. The injection through 21-gauge needles into subcutaneous areas of nude mice was performed under anesthesia, as described (23). The surgical operations for cuff placement and connection to a supply osmotic minipump for candesartan (0.1 mg/kg/day) followed 4 weeks after cell implantations. Polyclonal antibodies against uPAR (1:500 dilution) or against GST (control, 1:200 dilution) in PBS were injected intraperitoneally, in each case 2–3 days after cuff treatment of mice injected with R-1 cells. Blood samples were collected for the immunodetection of sLR11. Six weeks after cell implantation, the femoral arteries were recovered for immunohistological analyses.

Statistics.

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 13.0 (SPSS Japan Inc.). Associations of IMT or sLR11 levels with risk factors were examined by Pearson correlation analysis for continuous variables and by unpaired t test for categorical variables between groups (sex and smoking) (see Supplemental Table 2). Subsequently, multiple linear regression analyses were used to calculate the ORs for the IMT for Table 1 (a) by controlling for age, blood pressure, and HDL-C, which are significantly correlated with IMT, with P < 0.001 by above analyses (model 1); and (b) by additionally controlling for all risk factors (age, sex, BMI, blood pressure, smoking, LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, LDL size, malondialdehyde-LDL, glucose, and insulin) used for the above analyses (model 2). Finally, the ORs were calculated for the IMT with raised baseline sLR11 (second, third, and fourth quartiles) compared with low baseline sLR11 (lowest quartile) by controlling for age. In the figures, the results are shown as mean ± SD for each index. 1-way ANOVA was used to compare between 2 groups, and Duncan’s multiple-range test was used for comparison of multiple groups. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data
JCI0832381sd.pdf (217.4KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

These studies were supported by grants from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (to Y. Saito and H. Bujo), the Austrian Science Foundation (FWF), and the Herzfelder’sche family endowment (to W.J. Schneider).

Footnotes

Nonstandard abbreviations used: ARB, AT1R blocker; AT1R, Ang II type 1 receptor; FAK, focal adhesion kinase; GST, glutathione-S-transferase; HDL-C, HDL cholesterol; I/M ratio; ratio of IMT; IMT, intima-media thickness; LDL-C, LDL cholesterol; LR, LDL receptor relatives; LRP1, LDL-related protein 1; NMHCII-B, nonmuscle myosin heavy chain II–B protein; OR, odds ratio; PDGF-BB, PDGF isoform with 2 B chains; RAP, receptor-associated protein; sLR11, shed soluble form of LR11; uPA, urokinase-type plasminogen activator; uPAR, uPA receptor.

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Citation for this article: J. Clin. Invest. 118:2733–2746 (2008). doi:10.1172/JCI32381

References

  • 1.Ross R. Atherosclerosis — an inflammatory disease. N. Engl. J. Med. . 1999;340:115–126. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901143400207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Newby A.C. Dual role of matrix metalloproteinases (matrixins) in intimal thickening and atherosclerotic plaque rupture. Physiol. Rev. 2005;85:1–31. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00048.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Blasi F., Carmeliet P. uPAR: a versatile signalling orchestrator. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002;3:932–943. doi: 10.1038/nrm977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Reuning U., Magdolen V., Hapke S., Schmitt M. Molecular and functional interdependence of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator system with integrins. Biol. Chem. 2003;384:1119–1131. doi: 10.1515/BC.2003.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Herz J., Hui D.Y. Lipoprotein receptors in the vascular wall. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2004;15:175–181. doi: 10.1097/00041433-200404000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gonias S.L., Wu L., Salicioni A.M. Low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein: regulation of the plasma membrane proteome. Thromb. Haemost. 2004;91:1056–1064. doi: 10.1160/TH04-01-0023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bujo H., Saito Y. Modulation of smooth muscle cell migration by members of the low-density lipoprotein receptor family. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2006;26:1246–1252. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000219692.78477.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yamazaki H., et al. Elements of neural adhesion molecules and a yeast vacuolar protein sorting receptor are present in a novel mammalian low density lipoprotein receptor family member. J. Biol. Chem. . 1996;271:24761–24768. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.40.24761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jacobsen L., et al. Molecular characterization of a novel human hybrid-type receptor that binds the α2-macroglobulin receptor associated protein (RAP). . J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:31379–31383. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.49.31379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Morwald S., et al. A novel mosaic protein containing LDL receptor elements is highly conserved in humans and chickens. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1997;17:996–1002. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.17.5.996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhu Y., et al. LR11, an LDL receptor gene family member, is a novel regulator of smooth muscle cell migration. Circ. Res. 2004;94:752–758. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000120862.79154.0F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kanaki T., et al. Expression of LR11, a mosaic LDL receptor family member, is markedly increased in atherosclerotic lesions. . Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1999;19:2687–2695. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.19.11.2687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhu Y., et al. Enhanced expression of the LDL receptor family member LR11 increases migration of smooth muscle cells in vitro. Circulation. 2002;105:1830–1836. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000014413.91312.EF. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jiang M., et al. Pitavastatin attenuates the PDGF-induced LR11/uPA receptor-mediated migration of smooth muscle cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. . 2006;348:1367–1377. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.07.204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Xi X.P., et al. Central role of the MAPK pathway in AngII-mediated DNA synthesis and migration in rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. . 1999;19:73–82. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.19.1.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nickenig G., Harrison D.G. The AT1-type angiotensin receptor in oxidative stress and atherogenesis: part I: oxidative stress and atherogenesis. . Circulation. . 2002;105:393–396. doi: 10.1161/hc0302.102618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zuo L., et al. Caveolin-1 is essential for activation of Rac1 and NAD(P)H oxidase after angiotensin II type 1 receptor stimulation in vascular smooth muscle cells: role in redox signaling and vascular hypertrophy. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2005;25:1824–1830. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000175295.09607.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Horiuchi M., et al. Fluvastatin enhances the inhibitory effects of a selective angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, valsartan, on vascular neointimal formation. Circulation. . 2003;107:106–112. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000043244.13596.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.O’Leary D.H., et al. Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999;340:14–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901073400103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ohwaki K., et al. A secreted soluble form of LR11, specifically expressed in intimal smooth muscle cells, accelerates formation of lipid-laden macrophages. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2007;27:1050–1056. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.106.137091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Manabe I., Nagai R. Regulation of smooth muscle phenotype. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2003;5:214–222. doi: 10.1007/s11883-003-0027-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hermey G., Sjogaard S.S., Petersen C.M., Nykjaer A., Gliemann J. Tumour necrosis factor alpha-converting enzyme mediates ectodomain shedding of Vps10p-domain receptor family members. Biochem. J. 2006;395:285–293. doi: 10.1042/BJ20051364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kitagawa Y., et al. 2004. .I mpaired glucose tolerance is accompanied by decreased insulin sensitivity in tissues of mice implanted with cells that overexpress resistin. Diabetologia. 471847–1853. 10.1007/s00125-004-1530-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Trommsdorff M., et al. Reeler/Disabled-like disruption of neuronal migration in knockout mice lacking the VLDL receptor and ApoE receptor 2. Cell. 1999;97:689–701. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80782-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Webb D.J., Nguyen D.H.D., Sankovic M., Gonias S.L. The very low density lipoprotein receptor regulates urokinase receptor catabolism and breast cancer cell motility in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:7412–7420. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.11.7412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Webb D.J., Nguyen D.H.D., Gonias S.L. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase functions in the urokinase receptor-dependent pathway by which neutralization of low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein promotes fibrosarcoma cell migration and matrigel invasion. J. Cell Sci. . 2000;113:123–134. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.1.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ma Z., et al. Regulation of Rac1 activation by the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein. J. Cell Biol. . 2002;159:1061–1070. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200207070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhu Y., Hui D.Y. Low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein mediates apolipoprotein E inhibition of smooth muscle cell migration. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:4141–4146. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109124200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Boucher P., Gotthardt M., Li W.P., Anderson R.G., Herz J. LRP: role in vascular wall integrity and protection from atherosclerosis. Science. 2003;300:329–332. doi: 10.1126/science.1082095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Swertfeger D.K., Bu G., Hui D.Y. Apolipoprotein E binding to low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-1 inhibits cell migration via activation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase A. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:36257–36263. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303171200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Orr A.W., Elzie C.A., Kucik D.F., Murphy-Ullrich J.E. Thrombospondin signaling through the calreticulin/LDL receptor-related protein co-complex stimulates random and directed cell migration. J. Cell. Sci. 2003;116:2917–2927. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tanaga K., et al. LRP1B attenuates the migration of smooth muscle cells by reducing membrane localization of urokinase and PDGF receptors. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2004;24:1422–1428. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000133607.80554.09. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Seki N., et al. LRP1B is a negative modulator of increased migration activity of intimal smooth muscle cells from rabbit aortic plaques. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005;331:964–970. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nykjaer A., et al. Recycling of the urokinase receptor upon internalization of the uPA:serpin complexes. EMBO J. 1997;16:2610–2620. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.10.2610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Liu C.X., et al. The putative tumor suppressor LRP1B, a novel member of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor family, exhibits both overlapping and distinct properties with the LDL receptor-related protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:28889–28896. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102727200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Degryse B., et al. Urokinase/urokinase receptor and vitronectin/alpha(v)beta(3) integrin induce chemotaxis and cytoskeleton reorganization through different signaling pathways. Oncogene. 2001;20:2032–2043. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cohn R.D., et al. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade attenuates TGF-beta-induced failure of muscle regeneration in multiple myopathic states. Nat. Med. 2007;13:204–210. doi: 10.1038/nm1536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Boucher P., et al. LRP1 functions as an atheroprotective integrator of TGFbeta and PDGF signals in the vascular wall: implications for Marfan syndrome. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rogaeva E., et al. The neuronal sortilin-related receptor SORL1 is genetically associated with Alzheimer disease. Nat. Genet. 2007;39:168–177. doi: 10.1038/ng1943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Scherzer C.R., et al. Loss of apolipoprotein E receptor LR11 in Alzheimer disease. Arch. Neurol. . 2004;61:1200–1205. doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.8.1200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sagare A., et al. Clearance of amyloid-beta by circulating lipoprotein receptors. Nat. Med. 2007;13:1029–1031. doi: 10.1038/nm1635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Fujita Y., et al. Association of nucleotide variations in the apolipoprotein B48 receptor gene (APOB48R) with hypercholesterolemia. J. Hum. Genet. 2005;50:203–209. doi: 10.1007/s10038-005-0240-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Taira K., et al. Positive family history for coronary heart disease and ‘midband lipoproteins’ are potential risk factors of carotid atherosclerosis in familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 2002;160:391–397. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9150(01)00577-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bujo H., et al. Chicken oocyte growth is mediated by an eight ligand binding repeat member of the LDL receptor family. EMBO J. 1994;13:5165–5175. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06847.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kobayashi K., et al. Targeted disruption of TGF-beta-Smad3 signaling leads to enhanced neointimal hyperplasia with diminished matrix deposition in response to vascular injury. Circ. Res. 2005;96:904–912. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000163980.55495.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hirata T., Unoki H., Bujo H., Ueno K., Saito Y. Activation of diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 gene results in increased tumor necrosis factor-alpha gene expression in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:5117–5121. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.08.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bujo H., et al. Mutant oocytic low density lipoprotein receptor gene family member causes atherosclerosis and female sterility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1995;92:9905–9909. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.21.9905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Redmond E.M., et al. Endothelial cells inhibit flow-induced smooth muscle cell migration: role of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. Circulation. 2001;103:597–603. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.4.597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental data
JCI0832381sd.pdf (217.4KB, pdf)

Articles from The Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES