Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Comparative and Functional Genomics logoLink to Comparative and Functional Genomics
. 2003 Jun;4(3):318–328. doi: 10.1002/cfg.292

ORF Organization and Gene Recognition in the Yeast Genome

Liaofu Luo 1,✉, Hong Li 1, Lirong Zhang 1
PMCID: PMC2448446  PMID: 18629282

Abstract

Some rules on gene recognition and ORF organization in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome are demonstrated by statistical analyses of sequence data. This study includes: (a) The random frame rule—that the six reading frames W1, W2, W3, C1, C2 and C3 in the double-stranded genome are randomly occupied by ORFs (related phenomena on ORF overlapping are also discussed). (b) The inhomogeneity rule—coding and non-coding ORFs differ in inhomogeneity of base composition in the three codon positions. By use of the inhomogeneity index (IHI), one can make a distinction between coding (IHI > 14) and non-coding (IHI ≤ 14) ORFs at 95% accuracy. We find that ‘spurious’ ORFs (with IHI ≤ 14) are distributed mainly in three classes of ORFs, namely, those with ‘similarity to unknown proteins’, those with ‘no similarity’, or ‘questionable ORFs’. The total number of spurious ORFs (which are unlikely to be regarded as coding ORFs) is estimated to be 470. (c) The evaluation of ORF length distribution shows that below 200 amino acids the occurrence of ATG initiator ORFs is close to random.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (166.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blandin G., Durrens P., Tekaia F., Aigle M., Bolotin-Fukuhara M., Bon E., Casarégola S., de Montigny J., Gaillardin C., Lépingle A. Genomic exploration of the hemiascomycetous yeasts: 4. The genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae revisited. FEBS Lett. 2000 Dec 22;487(1):31–36. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(00)02275-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burge C. B., Karlin S. Finding the genes in genomic DNA. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1998 Jun;8(3):346–354. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(98)80069-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burge C., Karlin S. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J Mol Biol. 1997 Apr 25;268(1):78–94. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burset M., Guigó R. Evaluation of gene structure prediction programs. Genomics. 1996 Jun 15;34(3):353–367. doi: 10.1006/geno.1996.0298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Claverie J. M. Computational methods for the identification of genes in vertebrate genomic sequences. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6(10):1735–1744. doi: 10.1093/hmg/6.10.1735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cliften P. F., Hillier L. W., Fulton L., Graves T., Miner T., Gish W. R., Waterston R. H., Johnston M. Surveying Saccharomyces genomes to identify functional elements by comparative DNA sequence analysis. Genome Res. 2001 Jul;11(7):1175–1186. doi: 10.1101/gr.182901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dujon B., Alexandraki D., André B., Ansorge W., Baladron V., Ballesta J. P., Banrevi A., Bolle P. A., Bolotin-Fukuhara M., Bossier P. Complete DNA sequence of yeast chromosome XI. Nature. 1994 Jun 2;369(6479):371–378. doi: 10.1038/369371a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dujon B. The yeast genome project: what did we learn? Trends Genet. 1996 Jul;12(7):263–270. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(96)10027-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fickett J. W. Recognition of protein coding regions in DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Sep 11;10(17):5303–5318. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.17.5303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fickett J. W., Tung C. S. Assessment of protein coding measures. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Dec 25;20(24):6441–6450. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.24.6441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fukuda Y., Washio T., Tomita M. Comparative study of overlapping genes in the genomes of Mycoplasma genitalium and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Apr 15;27(8):1847–1853. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.8.1847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gelfand M. S., Mironov A. A., Pevzner P. A. Gene recognition via spliced sequence alignment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 20;93(17):9061–9066. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.17.9061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Goffeau A., Barrell B. G., Bussey H., Davis R. W., Dujon B., Feldmann H., Galibert F., Hoheisel J. D., Jacq C., Johnston M. Life with 6000 genes. Science. 1996 Oct 25;274(5287):546, 563-7. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5287.546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Guigó R., Agarwal P., Abril J. F., Burset M., Fickett J. W. An assessment of gene prediction accuracy in large DNA sequences. Genome Res. 2000 Oct;10(10):1631–1642. doi: 10.1101/gr.122800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Krogh A., Mian I. S., Haussler D. A hidden Markov model that finds genes in E. coli DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Nov 11;22(22):4768–4778. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lander E. S., Linton L. M., Birren B., Nusbaum C., Zody M. C., Baldwin J., Devon K., Dewar K., Doyle M., FitzHugh W. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001 Feb 15;409(6822):860–921. doi: 10.1038/35057062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Luo L. F., Li H. The statistical correlation of nucleotides in protein-coding DNA sequences. Bull Math Biol. 1991;53(3):345–353. doi: 10.1007/BF02460722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mackiewicz P., Kowalczuk M., Gierlik A., Dudek M. R., Cebrat S. Origin and properties of non-coding ORFs in the yeast genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Sep 1;27(17):3503–3509. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.17.3503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mewes H. W., Albermann K., Bähr M., Frishman D., Gleissner A., Hani J., Heumann K., Kleine K., Maierl A., Oliver S. G. Overview of the yeast genome. Nature. 1997 May 29;387(6632 Suppl):7–65. doi: 10.1038/42755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Staden R. Measurements of the effects that coding for a protein has on a DNA sequence and their use for finding genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jan 11;12(1 Pt 2):551–567. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.1part2.551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stormo G. D. Gene-finding approaches for eukaryotes. Genome Res. 2000 Apr;10(4):394–397. doi: 10.1101/gr.10.4.394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Termier M., Kalogeropoulos A. Discrimination between fortuitous and biologically constrained open reading frames in DNA sequences of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1996 Mar 30;12(4):369–384. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0061(19960330)12:4<369::aid-yea922>3.0.co;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Velculescu V. E., Zhang L., Zhou W., Vogelstein J., Basrai M. A., Bassett D. E., Jr, Hieter P., Vogelstein B., Kinzler K. W. Characterization of the yeast transcriptome. Cell. 1997 Jan 24;88(2):243–251. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81845-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wood V., Rutherford K. M., Ivens A., Rajandream M. A., Barrell B. A re-annotation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Comp Funct Genomics. 2001;2(3):143–154. doi: 10.1002/cfg.86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang C. T., Wang J. Recognition of protein coding genes in the yeast genome at better than 95% accuracy based on the Z curve. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jul 15;28(14):2804–2814. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.14.2804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Comparative and Functional Genomics are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES