Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1991 Aug;35(8):1677–1678. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.8.1677

Effect of pH on the in vitro potency of clarithromycin against Mycobacterium avium complex.

C Truffot-Pernot 1, B Ji 1, J Grosset 1
PMCID: PMC245242  PMID: 1834015

Abstract

Employing 7H11 agar medium at pH 6.6, the MICs of clarithromycin for 50% (MIC50) and 90% (MIC90) of 19 strains of Mycobacterium avium complex were 8 and 16 micrograms/ml, respectively. However, the MICs were 2 to 3 log2 dilutions lower in the 7H11 medium adjusted to pH 7.4, and the MICs on 10% OADC (oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase)-enriched Mueller-Hinton agar at pH 7.3 were also 2 log2 dilutions lower than those measured on 7H11 agar at pH 6.6. Therefore, clarithromycin is more active at a physiologic than at an acidic pH.

Full text

PDF
1677

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barry A. L., Jones R. N., Thornsberry C. In vitro activities of azithromycin (CP 62,993), clarithromycin (A-56268; TE-031), erythromycin, roxithromycin, and clindamycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 May;32(5):752–754. doi: 10.1128/aac.32.5.752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barry A. L., Thornsberry C., Jones R. N. In vitro activity of a new macrolide, A-56268, compared with that of roxithromycin, erythromycin, and clindamycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Feb;31(2):343–345. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.2.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fernandes P. B., Bailer R., Swanson R., Hanson C. W., McDonald E., Ramer N., Hardy D., Shipkowitz N., Bower R. R., Gade E. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of A-56268 (TE-031), a new macrolide. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Dec;30(6):865–873. doi: 10.1128/aac.30.6.865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fernandes P. B., Hardy D. J., McDaniel D., Hanson C. W., Swanson R. N. In vitro and in vivo activities of clarithromycin against Mycobacterium avium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Sep;33(9):1531–1534. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.9.1531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hansen S. L., Swomley P., Drusano G. Effect of carbon dioxide and pH on susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis group to erythromycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Feb;19(2):335–336. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.2.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Khardori N., Rolston K., Rosenbaum B., Hayat S., Bodey G. P. Comparative in-vitro activity of twenty antimicrobial agents against clinical isolates of Mycobacterium avium complex. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989 Nov;24(5):667–673. doi: 10.1093/jac/24.5.667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lorian V., Sabath L. D. Effect of pH on the activity of erythromycin against 500 isolates of gram-negative bacilli. Appl Microbiol. 1970 Nov;20(5):754–756. doi: 10.1128/am.20.5.754-756.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Naik S., Ruck R. In vitro activities of several new macrolide antibiotics against Mycobacterium avium complex. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Sep;33(9):1614–1616. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.9.1614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES