Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1991 Sep;35(9):1799–1803. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.9.1799

In vitro studies of water activity and bacterial growth inhibition of sucrose-polyethylene glycol 400-hydrogen peroxide and xylose-polyethylene glycol 400-hydrogen peroxide pastes used to treat infected wounds.

U Ambrose 1, K Middleton 1, D Seal 1
PMCID: PMC245271  PMID: 1952851

Abstract

Water activity and bacterial growth inhibition have been studied in formulations comprising either sucrose or xylose along with polyethylene glycol 400 and hydrogen peroxide. The pastes are chemically stable for 6 months if stored at 2 to 8 degrees C and have been shown to lower water activity to levels below those essential for bacterial growth and to be bactericidal even when diluted up to 50% with serum. Of the organisms tested, Staphylococcus aureus proved the least susceptible to the bactericidal effects of these pastes, and candida and gram-negative organisms proved the most susceptible. Pastes without hydrogen peroxide were less rapidly bactericidal than pastes with hydrogen peroxide, while polyethylene glycol 400 itself was found to have considerable antimicrobial activity. It is suggested that sucrose paste may be of benefit as a treatment for infected and malodorous wounds.

Full text

PDF
1799

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Archer H. G., Barnett S., Irving S., Middleton K. R., Seal D. V. A controlled model of moist wound healing: comparison between semi-permeable film, antiseptics and sugar paste. J Exp Pathol (Oxford) 1990 Apr;71(2):155–170. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chirife J., Herszage L., Joseph A., Bozzini J. P., Leardini N., Kohn E. S. In vitro antibacterial activity of concentrated polyethylene glycol 400 solutions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Sep;24(3):409–412. doi: 10.1128/aac.24.3.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chirife J., Herszage L., Joseph A., Kohn E. S. In vitro study of bacterial growth inhibition in concentrated sugar solutions: microbiological basis for the use of sugar in treating infected wounds. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 May;23(5):766–773. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.5.766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chirife J., Scarmato G., Herszage L. Scientific basis for use of granulated sugar in treatment of infected wounds. Lancet. 1982 Mar 6;1(8271):560–561. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)92065-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Trouillet J. L., Chastre J., Fagon J. Y., Pierre J., Domart Y., Gibert C. Use of granulated sugar in treatment of open mediastinitis after cardiac surgery. Lancet. 1985 Jul 27;2(8448):180–184. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)91498-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES