Abstract
The recruitment of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) might have a beneficial effect on the clinical course of several diseases. Endothelial damage and detachment of endothelial cells are known to occur in infection, tissue ischemia, and sepsis. These detrimental effects in EPCs are unknown. Here we elucidated whether human EPCs internalize Bartonella henselae constituting a circulating niche of the pathogen. B. henselae invades EPCs as shown by gentamicin protection assays and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Dil-Ac-LDL/lectin double immunostaining and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of EPCs revealed EPC bioactivity after infection with B. henselae. Nitric oxide (NO) and its precursor l-arginine (l-arg) exert a plethora of beneficial effects on vascular function and modulation of immune response. Therefore, we tested also the hypothesis that l-arg (1–30 mM) would affect the infection of B. henselae or tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in EPCs. Our data provide evidence that l-arg counteracts detrimental effects induced by TNF or Bartonella infections via NO (confirmed by DETA-NO and L-NMMA experiments) and by modulation of p38 kinase phosphorylation. Microarray analysis indicated several genes involved in immune response were differentially expressed in Bartonella-infected EPCs, whereas these genes returned in steady state when cells were exposed to sustained doses of l-arg. This mechanism may have broad therapeutic applications in tissue ischemia, angiogenesis, immune response, and sepsis.
Keywords: immune response, sepsis
Bacterial toxins and cytokines initiate a series of pathogenic events altering endothelial function, capillary leakage, and endothelial swelling (1). Physiologically, endothelial cells (ECs) are attached to the extracellular matrix; however, under pathologic conditions, ECs can be detached from the vasculature appearing in the bloodstream (2). The production of antiangiogenic factors is another cause for the release of ECs into the circulation (3). ECs have a low proliferative potential; thus, adequate vascular repair requires additional support. Growing studies established that vascular repair and neoangiogenesis are mediated, at least in part, by bone marrow stem cells (BMCs) (4–6) and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) (7, 8). BMCs (9) would be important targets for some human pathogens such as Bartonella henselae, a Gram-negative, facultative intracellular bacteria that cause a variety of human diseases (10). Mechanisms underlying vasculoproliferations in B. henselae infections include inhibition of EC apoptosis (11), activation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and vascular endothelial growth factor (12), and release of calcium from intracellular stores (13). Overall, Bartonella may also promote vascular tumor formation (14).
The interaction of human pathogen bacteria with EPCs is unknown. Indirectly, we can gain information by the evidence that precursor hematopoietic cells were resistant to in vitro infection with Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enteritica, and Yersinia enterocolitica, but not when these cells were differentiated (15). Interestingly, the genus Bartonella can cause long-lasting intraerythrocytic bacteremia and employ hematotropism (16). Moreover, B. henselae is the cause of cat-scratch disease and the vasculoproliferative bacillary angiomatosis and bacillary peliosis in humans (17). It has been proposed an essential role for NO in T lymphocyte activation and signal transduction (18, 19). Indeed, NO acts as a second messenger, activating soluble guanyl cyclase and modulating mitochondrial events involved in apoptosis and biogenesis in lymphocytes. Mechanisms for beneficial effects of l-arginine (l-arg), the precursor of NO, in sepsis include enhanced protein metabolism, improved microcirculation, and antibacterial effects (20, 21). Here we describe that B. henselae infects human EPCs. Moreover, l-arg modulates the EPC response induced by TNF or Bartonella infections.
Results
Effect of l-Arginine on Human EPC Number and Viability.
Human EPCs cultured for 3 days resulted in an adherent population consisting of 23 ± 4% double-positive cells for 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine-labeled acetylated LDL (Dil-Ac-LDL) uptake (red) and lectin binding (green) (Fig. 1A), as assessed by phase contrast fluorescent microscopy (22). By using a specific counting (22), we establish that EPC number was significantly ameliorated in the presence of l-arg (3–30 mM) both under basal conditions and in the presence of TNF-α (Fig. 1A). Treatment of EPCs with TNF-α impairs EPC functional activity and number (22, 23). Accordingly, when EPCs were incubated with TNF-α, the cell number consistently decreased compared with control cells (Fig. 1B). The presence of l-arg during treatment with TNF-α prevented the TNF-α-induced reduction of cell number (P < 0.05 vs. TNF-α).
Fig. 1.
Effects of l-arg in presence of TNF-α or B. henselae on EPCs. (A and B) Dil-Ac-LDL uptake and lectin binding staining of EPCs by microscopy. (A) Photomicrographs of merged double-positive Dil-Ac-LDL/Lectin cells (Magnification: ×100): untreated EPCs (A1), l-arg (10mM)-treated EPCs (A2), TNF-α-treated EPCs (A3), l-arg + TNF-α-treated cells (A4). (B) The bar graphs show EPC number calculated as described (22). Results are mean ± SD of 13 different experiments in duplicate. *, P < 0.05 vs. untreated controls; §, P < 0.05 vs. untreated control and l-arg; °, P < 0.05 vs. TNF-α. (C and D) Dil-Ac-LDL uptake and lectin binding staining of EPCs infected with Bartonella at different MOI, as described in Results. In C an image for each B. henselae infection point pretreated with or without l-arg at the indicated concentration is shown at ×100 magnification. In D the bar graphs indicate the percentage of EPC number. Results are representative of five different experiments in duplicate. *, P < 0.05 vs. l-arg untreated.
EPCs (22) were then infected with B. henselae at different multiplicities of infection (MOI) in the presence or absence of l-arg. Interestingly, results indicated that EPC number and viability were ameliorated in the presence of l-arg at the MOI used for Bartonella infection (Fig. 1C). Indeed, infection of EPCs with Bartonella impaired EPC functional activity and reduced cell number, which consistently decreased compared with uninfected cells (P < 0.05 vs. untreated cells) (Fig. 1D). Pretreatment of EPCs with l-arg (10–30 mM) before infection significantly prevented the Bartonella-induced reduction of cell number (P < 0.05 vs. untreated cells). Infection with B. henselae was further investigated by fluorescence and confocal microscopy. Higher magnifications (×630) indicate morphological major differences when EPCs are infected with increasing doses of Bartonella [supporting information (SI) Fig. S1]. These changes appear at higher doses when EPCs are pretreated with l-arg before infection as shown with a MOI of 500 suggesting a protective action of l-arg on EPCs infected with B. henselae (Fig. 2). Particularly, cell aggregates begin to appear at a MOI of 200 until to develop a syncytium at a MOI of 500. At a 500–1,000 MOI we observed cytoplasmatic disruption and loss of cellular membrane integrity; at 1,000 MOI no cells showed Dil-AcLDL uptake (Fig. S1)
Fig. 2.
Bartonella and l-arginine. EPCs infected with Bartonella at a MOI of 500 in the presence or absence of l-arg. (A) Representative images by immunofluorescence. (B) Selected merge images were acquired by confocal microscopy. (Magnification: all, ×630.)
B. henselae Adheres to and Invades Human EPCs.
We investigated the interaction of EPCs with B. henselae by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Isolated EPCs were infected with B. henselae for up to 72 h and both cell morphology and bacteria internalization were evaluated on EPCs at 3 days after infection (Fig. 3 A–I). The ultrastructural examination revealed that adhesion of B. henselae to cells was accompanied by the formation of cytoplasmic protrusions of cell membranes, followed by internalization of bacteria, detectable in vacuoles (Fig. 3 H and I). Invasion of B. henselae into EPCs resulted in two different intracellular patterns: diffuse perinuclear bacteria localization, similar to a distribution pattern already described (24), and intracellular accumulation of bacteria forming the so-called “invasomes” (25). Moreover, dividing intracellular bacteria were also frequently observed. The examination of untreated EPCs revealed normal morphology. EPCs infected with B. henselae at a MOI of 500 showed mitochondria disruption and expansion of endoplasmatic reticulum. In contrast, EPCs pretreated with l-arg before infection with B. henselae, even at a MOI of 500, presented a reduced number of intracellular invasomes, intact cytoplasmatic mitochondria, and a modest expansion of smooth endoplasmatic reticulum compared with untreated cells. These data clearly show that B. henselae adheres to and invades human EPCs, also confirming the protective role of l-arg on EPCs infected with B. henselae. Furthermore, gentamicin protection assays quantifying the number of intracellular B. henselae revealed a dose-dependent increase (Fig. 3L).
Fig. 3.
The bacteria internalization was evaluated by TEM and gentamicin protection assay. Interaction of B. henselae with EPCs is shown. (A) Untreated EPCs. (Scale bar: 3 μm.) (B) EPCs treated with l-arg (10 mM). (Scale bar: 3 μm.) (C) EPCs after 1 h of infection with S. aureus. (Scale bar: 3 μm.) (D and F) Untreated human EPCs after 72 h of B. henselae infection with a MOI of 200 (D) and 500 (F). (Scale bars: 3 μm.) (E and G) l-arg-treated EPCs after 72 h of B. henselae infection with a MOI of 200 (E) and 500 (G). Adherence and invasion of B. henselae infection resulted in diffuse perinuclear accumulation of bacteria and large intracellular bacterial aggregates (invasomes). Black arrows indicate the formation of membrane ruffling and uptake of single bacteria by cellular protrusions (H), leading to internalization of B. henselae in cell vacuoles (I). (Scale bars 0.5 μm.) White arrows indicate the presence of mitochondria in F and G. In EPCs pretreated with l-arg, the mitochondria are intact (G). (L) Intracellular presence of B. henselae in EPCs determined by gentamicin protection assay at different MOI.
Flow Cytometry Analysis.
EPCs were incubated with Dil-Ac-LDL and FITC-labeled lectin from Ulex europaeus (see Materials and Methods). As indicated by representative four-quadrant FACS analysis of Dil-Ac-LDL/lectin double-positive EPCs with different treatments (Fig. 4A) and the corresponding bar graphs of EPC percent number (Fig. 4B), EPC number was significantly higher when cells were grown in the presence of l-arg. We considered the lymphocyte population for counting (see the inserted forward and sideward scatter plot image to the right of Fig. 4 A and B). We also investigated the effects of l-arg on Bartonella-infected EPCs at different MOI by FACS analysis. A representative forward and sideward scatter analysis for each indicated Bartonella MOI is shown (Fig. 4C). As shown in Fig. 4C, a novel cell population appeared in the blue area (named population 3), which essentially represents myelomonocytic cells CD13/CD15 positive (Fig. 4C Lower Left, similar to granulocytes). Bar graphs indicate the percentage of double-positive cell number (Fig. 4D) for different MOI. Considering the lymphocyte gate, EPC number was significantly reduced when infected with B. henselae at different MOI, with a protective action of l-arg (P < 0.05 vs. l-arg-untreated EPCs). Parallel experiments were carried out also in the presence of NO donor diethylamine-NO (DETA-NO) or NG-monomethyl-l-arginine (l-NMMA), an inhibitor of NO synthesis, which showed the involvement of NO in such mechanism.
Fig. 4.
Flow cytometry analysis. (A) Representative four-quadrant FACS analysis of Dil-Ac-LDL/lectin double-positive EPCs with different treatments: untreated EPCs (A1), l-arg (10 mM)-treated EPCs (A2), TNF-α-treated EPCs (A3), and l-arg + TNF-α-treated cells (A4). (B) Bar graphs showing EPCs percent number after treatments with l-arg (1–30 mM). The lymphocyte population was considered for counting as indicated by an arrow in the inserted forward and sideward scatter plot image on the right. (C and D) The effects of l-arg on Bartonella-infected EPCs by FACS analysis. Shown is FACS analysis of Dil-Ac-LDL/lectin double-positive EPCs, both uninfected and infected with B. henselae at different MOI, as described in Results. A representative forward and sideward scatter analysis for each indicated Bartonella MOI is shown (C). (C Lower Left) FACS analysis for CD13-PE/CD15-FITC antigens. (D) Bar graphs indicate the means and standard deviations of the percentage of double-positive cell number for the different MOI and in the presence of different treatments (l-arg (3–30 mM), l-arg 10 mM plus l-NMMA, DETA-NO). The lymphocyte population was considered for FACS counting. Results are representative of five different experiments in duplicate. *, P < 0.05 vs. l-arg untreated EPCs; °,P < 0.05 vs. both respective untreated or 10 mM l-arg EPCs.
p38 MAP Kinase Activation and NOx Release.
The effect of TNF-α and Bartonella on EPC number was investigated in relation to p38 MAP kinase activation (22, 23). In our experimental conditions, we show that increased p38 phosphorylation after treatment with TNF-α was counteracted by l-arg (P < 0.05 vs. untreated control cells) (Fig. S2A). Such treatment did not influence significantly p38 after exposure to Bartonella indicating the involvement of other signaling events (Fig. S2B). Finally, NOx (nitrate and nitrite) release increased significantly after exposure of EPCs to l-arg in comparison to untreated cells (4.2 ± 0.5 vs. 2.2 ± 0.3 μM, P < 0.01) whereas it decreased after exposure to Bartonella (MOI 200, 1.6 ± 0.3 μM, P < 0.05 vs. untreated cells). Consistently, the cotreatment of Bartonella-infected cells with l-arg restored partially NOx levels (MOI 200, 2.1 ± 0.3 μM, P < 0.05 vs. Bartonella alone).
Modulation of EPC Gene Expression by Bartonella and l-Arginine.
The cRNA generated from a pool of three different mRNA extractions (n = 3 in duplicate) for each condition (EPCs, both untreated and treated with l-arg, infected and uninfected) and arrays containing 14,500 well characterized human genes (22,215 total genes comprehensive of EST sequences) were used to measure the effects of Bartonella infection on EPCs, untreated or pretreated with l-arg. Only genes with a threshold of at least 50 arbitrary detection units and a signal log ratio (SLR) value ≥1 and ≤−1, corresponding to an absolute fold change (FC) value of 2 [FC = 2(SLR)] have been included in the lists. Major changes were observed for genes coding proteins with known biological functions, as listed in Table 1. The presence of several genes involved in immune response and cell death is noteworthy.
Table 1.
Modulation of EPC gene expression by Bartonella and l-arginine
| Gene title | RefSeq transcript ID | Gene ontology (biological process) | Chromosomal location | l-arginine vs. EPC | Bartonella vs. EPC | l-arginine plus Bartonella vs. EPC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-dehidrocoholesterol reductase (DHCR7) | NM_001360 | Blood vessel development | chr11q13.2 | 3,0 I | NDE | NDE |
| RecQ protein like 4 (RECQL4) | NM_004260 | DNA repair | chr8q24.3 | 2,0 I | NDE | NDE |
| Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor alfa (ARHGDIA) | NM_004309 | Antiapoptosis | chr17q25.3 | 1,1 I | NDE | NDE |
| Talin (TLN1) | NM_006289 | Cell motility | chr9p13 | 3,0 D | NDE | NDE |
| Programmed cell death 11 (PDCD11) | NM_014976 | RNA processing | ch19p13.12 | 1,7 D | NDE | NDE |
| Hepcidin antimicrobial peptide (HAMP) | NM_021175 | Response to pathogen | ch19p13.12 | NDE | 2,7 I | NDE |
| IL-1 receptor, type II (IL1R2) | NM_004633 | Inflammatory and immune response | chr2q11.2 | NDE | 2,5 I | NDE |
| Wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 5A (WNT5A) | NM_003392 | Cell–cell signaling, signal transduction | chr3p14.3 | NDE | 2,4 I | NDE |
| Solute carrier family 7 member 11 (SLCA11) | NM_014331 | Cationic amino acid transporter | chr4q28.3 | NDE | 2,4 I | NDE |
| Superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) | NM_00636 | Cellular defense response | chr6q2513 | NDE | 1,2 I | NDE |
| IL-1 receptor, type I (IL1R1) | NM_000877 | Inflammatory and immune response | chr2q12.1 | NDE | 1,2 I | NDE |
| Caspase 1, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase (IL-1β, convertase) (CASP1) | NM_001223 | Apoptosis | chr11q23 | NDE | 1,2 I | NDE |
| Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 20 (CCL20) | NM_004591 | Chemotaxis, defense response to bacteria | chr2q36.3 | NDE | 2,7 D | NDE |
| Plexin C1 (PLXNC1) | NM_005761 | Cell adhesion | chr12q22 | NDE | 2,5 D | NDE |
| Laminin β4 (LAMB4) | NM_007356 | Cell communication, focal adhesion | chr7q31.1 | NDE | 2,3 D | NDE |
| IL-1α (IL1A) | NM_000575 | Inflammatory and immune response | chr2q14 | NDE | 1,3 D | NDE |
| Vascular endothelial growth factor B (VEGFB) | NM_003377 | Regulation of progression through cell cycle | chr11q13 | NDE | 1,2 I | 1,4 D |
| Upf3 regulator of nonsense transcripts homolog A (UPF3A) | NM_023011 | mRNA catabolic process | chr13q34 | 1,1 D | 1,6 I | 1,2 D |
| Forkhead box P1 (FOXP1) | NM_00101250 | Transcription regulator activity | chr3p14.1 | 1,1 D | 1,2 I | 1,1 D |
| Abhydrolase domain containing 8 (ABHD8) | NM_024527 | Aromatic compound metabolism | chr19p13.11 | 1,1 D | 3,8 I | 2,6 D |
| Staphylococcal nuclease domain containing 1 (SND1) | NM_014390 | Regulation of transription | chr7q32.1 | 1,3 D | 1,1 I | 1,3 D |
| Kinesin family member 5c (KIF5C) | NM_004522 | Microtubule-based movement | chr2q23.1 | 1,4 D | 1,4 I | 1,1 D |
| Caspase recruitment domain family, member 11 (CARD11) | NM_032415 | Positive regulation of T and B cell proliferation | chr7p22 | 1,1 D | 1,4 I | 1,5 D |
| Thrombospondin, type I, domain containing 3 (THSD3) | NM_182509 | Immune response, involved in complement pathway | chr14q24.3 | 1,4 D | 2,4 I | 4,2 D |
| Serine/threonine kinase 4 (STK4) | NM_006282 | Cell morphogenesis | chr20q11.2 | 1,1 I | 1,4 D | 1,6 I |
| Topoisomerase (DNA) I, mitochondrial (TOP1MT) | NM_052963 | DNA topological change | chr8q24.3 | 1,1 I | 1,4 D | 1,1 I |
| IL-1β (IL1B) | NM_000576 | Inflammatory and immune response | chr2q14 | 1,2 D | 1,5 D | 1,0 D |
Results are expressed as both the signal log ratio and the direction of the change, i.e., an increase (I) or a decrease (D).
Discussion
We demonstrate that B. henselae can be effectively taken up into EPCs in vitro. Second, the treatment with l-arg can affect the response of EPCs to TNF-α and B. henselae via NO-dependent mechanisms. Intraerythrocytic presence of Bartonella has been demonstrated in vitro using anti-Bartonella antibodies (26). A potential primary niche in Bartonella infections could be represented by BMCs (9). Thus, mobilized EPCs could carry the pathogen to other organs and, more important, to endothelium of microcirculation. Thus, infected EPCs may reach endothelium where the vasculoproliferative disorders are initiated with the involvement of p38 kinase-dependent and -independent pathways. Until now, EPCs, which differentiate into angiogenic cells, have never been analyzed for their capacity to interact with human pathogens. Our in vitro data provide evidence that infection of EPCs with human pathogenic bacteria (e.g., B. henselae) results in the presence of bacteria in such cells.
Nutrients have traditionally been viewed as a means to provide basic calories to sustain homeostasis during sedentary style of life and physical exercise (27). However, critically ill, surgical, and trauma patients are in a constant dynamic state between systemic inflammatory response and compensatory antiinflammatory response (1–3). Results from ongoing research support the use of specific nutrients to modulate the immune and/or metabolic response (20, 21, 27). However, the postulate of using nutrients as therapeutic substances rather than just as “nutritional adjuvant support” would require a shift in the current belief. Among the most common nutrients found in currently available formulas are omega-3 fatty acids, antioxidants, nucleotides, glutamine, and l-arg. Multiple individual reports and at least five metaanalyses using combinations of immune-modulating nutrients have reported almost uniform beneficial results (20, 21, 27, 28). However, the wide use of l-arg in septic patients is difficult. Here, we support the adjuvant use of l-arg against the dissemination of infected EPCs in the bloodstream. This adverse event may compromise the tissue regeneration and neoangiogenesis afforded by EPCs. Notably, our microarray analysis revealed that several genes involved in immune response were differentially expressed in Bartonella-infected EPCs, whereas these genes showed expression levels comparable to uninfected control cells when the EPCs were pretreated with l-arg. Recently, it was shown that the production of NO by Helicobacter pylori-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells was dependent on the l-arg concentration, and the ED50 for l-arg was 220 μM, which is above reported plasma l-arg levels (29). The inducible form of NO synthase protein increased in an l-arg-dependent manner, which resulted in the killing of H. pylori. The average baseline plasma concentration of l-arg in healthy subjects is 60-100 μM (30, 31). This value increases until 300 μM after a single oral administration of a 10-g dose with bioavailbility of ∼20% and until 6.6 mM after intravenous administration of a 30-g dose (30, 31). In peripheral arterial disease patients, plasma l-arg concentration increased to a value of about 4.0 mM after 30-g dose infusion (32–34). Similar doses (about 15g) also have been administered to patients with chronic renal failure in a randomized controlled study (35). The administration of l-arg in sepsis is still debated. This condition is characterized by a reduction in plasma and tissue arginine levels compared with healthy individuals (20, 36). Thus, l-arg has been supplied in these patients by various forms, such as immunonutrition containing arginine with a range dose between 4.5 g and 18.7 g to intravenous administration of 30g (36, 37). However, a recent study performed on a small number of animals with septic shock (the well characterized canine model of Escherichia coli peritonitis) reported that parenteral l-arg, at dose above standard dietary practices, was markedly harmful (38). Despite the fact that our in vitro data is not a biodynamic model of l-arg bioavailability, the dose used in the present study is not much higher than doses reached in humans (30–37). Thus, l-arg and NO may exert multiple beneficial effects affecting tissue ischemia and its regeneration, immune response, sepsis, and angiogenesis.
Materials and Methods
EPC Isolation and Cultivation.
Experiments with human EPCs were performed in agreement with the local ethics committee, and informed consent was provided according to the Declaration of Helsinki. EPCs were isolated from total peripheral blood mononuclear cells as previously described (22).
Cell Treatments and NOx Release.
EPCs were incubated with l-arg (1–30 mM), TNF-α (22), NO donor diethylamine-NO (DETA-NO), or the NO inhibitor NG-monomethyl-l-arginine (l-NMMA), and infection was induced by B. henselae strain ATCC 49882 (LGC Promochem) or Staphylococcus aureus (SI Materials and Methods).
Dil-Ac-LDL/Lectin Staining and Cell Number Calculation.
Cells were dual-stained with Dil-Ac-LDL and lectin from U. europaeus and counted as previously described (22) (SI Materials and Methods).
Flow Cytometry Analysis.
Dual-stained cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (22) (SI Materials and Methods).
Western Blot Analysis.
EPC extracts (20–50 μg per lane) were loaded onto SDS polyacrylamide gels, blotted onto membranes, and analyzed as described (22) (SI Materials and Methods).
Transmission Electron Microscopy.
Ultrathin sections (80 nm) were stained with 2% uranyl acetate (Electron Microscopy Sciences) for 10 min at room temperature and 2.66% lead citrate (Electron Microscopy Sciences) for 8 min at room temperature. Grids were examined by using a Philips EM 208 S transmission electron microscope (Philips) operating at 80 kV at magnifications between ×2,500 and ×60,000 (SI Materials and Methods).
RNA Extraction and Microarray Analysis.
Total RNAs were extracted from cultured EPCs, treated and untreated, using TRIzol solution (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. cRNA was used for hybridization onto the Affymetrix Human Genome U133 2.0 probe array cartridge (SI Materials and Methods).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments.
This work was supported by grants from the Progetto di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale Ministero Italiano Universitaà e Ricerca 2006 [Code 0622153_002 “Meccanismi fisiopatologici di danno vascolare/trombotico ed angiogenesi” (to C.N.) and Code 2006068944_001 “Basi genetiche e molecolari della patogenicità batterica” (to P.S.)], Regional Funds from Centro di Competenza Regionale for Transplantation (to B.F.), Ricerca di Ateneo 2006 of the II University of Naples (to C.N. and B.F.), and the Fondation Jerome Lejeune (C.N.).
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement: Louis J. Ignarro helped develop and has a financial interest in a commercially available dietary supplement that contains some of the amino acids studied in this article.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0803602105/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Mantovani A, Bussolino F, Introna M. Cytokine regulation of endothelial cell function: From molecular level to the bedside. Immunol Today. 1997;18:231–240. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5699(97)81662-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Boos CJ, Goon PK, Lip GY. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2613–2616. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mancuso P, et al. Circulating endothelial cells as a novel marker of angiogenesis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2003;522:83–97. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0169-5_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Carmeliet P, et al. Angiogenesis in life, disease and medicine. Nature. 2005;438:932–936. doi: 10.1038/nature04478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Napoli C, et al. Beneficial effects of concurrent autologous bone marrow cell therapy and metabolic intervention in ischemia-induced angiogenesis in the mouse hindlimb. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:17202–17206. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508534102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Napoli C, Maione C, Schiano C, Fiorito C, Ignarro LJ. Oxidation-specific mechanisms and cardiovascular repair induced by autologous bone marrow cell infusion. Trends Mol Med. 2007;13:278–286. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2007.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Urbich C, Dimmeler S. Endothelial progenitor cells: Characterization and role in vascular biology. Circ Res. 2004;95:343–353. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000137877.89448.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Napoli C, Balestrieri A, Ignarro LJ. Therapeutic approaches in vascular repair induced by adult bone marrow cells and circulating progenitor endothelial cells. Curr Pharm Des. 2007;13:3245–3251. doi: 10.2174/138161207782341303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mändle T, et al. Infection of human CD34+ progenitor cells with Bartonella henselae results in intraerythrocytic presence of B. henselae. Blood. 2005;106:1215–1222. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-12-4670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Greub G, Raoult D. Bartonella: New explanations for old diseases. J Med Microbiol. 2002;51:915–923. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-51-11-915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kirby JE, Nekorchuk DM. Bartonella-associated endothelial proliferation depends on inhibition of apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:4656–4666. doi: 10.1073/pnas.072292699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kempf VA, et al. Activation of hypoxia-inducible factor- 1 in bacillary angiomatosis: Evidence for a role of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 in bacterial infections. Circulation. 2005;111:1054–1062. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000155608.07691.B7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.McCord AM, Cuevas J, Anderson BE. Bartonella-induced endothelial cell proliferation is mediated by release of calcium from intracellular stores. DNA Cell Biol. 2007;26:657–663. doi: 10.1089/dna.2007.0592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dehio C. Bartonella-host-cell interactions and vascular tumour formation. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3:621–631. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kolb-Maurer A, Wilhelm M, Weissinger F, Brocker EB, Goebel W. Interaction of human hematopoietic stem cells with bacterial pathogens. Blood. 2002;100:3703–3709. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schulein R, et al. Invasion and persistent intracellular colonization of erythrocytes: A unique parasitic strategy of the emerging pathogen Bartonella. J Exp Med. 2001;193:1077–1086. doi: 10.1084/jem.193.9.1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Anderson BE, Neuman MA. Bartonella spp. as emerging human pathogens. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:203–219. doi: 10.1128/cmr.10.2.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nagy G, Clark JM, Buzás EI, Gorman CL, Cope AP. Nitric oxide, chronic inflammation and autoimmunity. Immunol Lett. 2007;111:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2007.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Napoli C, et al. Nitric oxide and atherosclerosis: An update. Nitric Oxide. 2006;15:265–279. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2006.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Luiking YC, Deutz NE. Exogenous arginine in sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(9) Suppl:S557–S563. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000279191.44730.A2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Napoli C, Ignarro LJ. Nitric oxide-releasing drugs. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2003;43:97–123. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.43.100901.140226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Casamassimi A, et al. Comparison between total endothelial progenitor cell isolation versus enriched CD133+ culture. J Biochem. 2007;141:503–511. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvm060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Seeger FH, et al. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase downregulates endothelial progenitor cells. Circulation. 2005;111:1184–1191. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000157156.85397.A1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zbinden R, Höchli M, Nadal D. Intracellular location of Bartonella henselae cocultivated with Vero cells and used for an indirect fluorescent-antibody test. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1995;2:693–695. doi: 10.1128/cdli.2.6.693-695.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dehio C, Meyer M, Berger J, Schwarz H, Lanz C. Interaction of Bartonella henselae with endothelial cells results in bacterial aggregation on the cell surface and the subsequent engulfment and internalisation of the bacterial aggregate by a unique structure, the invasome. J Cell Sci. 1997;110:2141–2154. doi: 10.1242/jcs.110.18.2141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Foucault C, Rolain JM, Raoult D, Brouqui P. Detection of Bartonella quintana by direct immunofluorescence examination of blood smears of a patient with acute trench fever. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:4904–4906. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4904-4906.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ignarro LJ, Balestrieri ML, Napoli C. Nutrition, physical activity, and cardiovascular disease: An update. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;73:326–340. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kudsk KA. Immunonutrition in surgery and critical care. Annu Rev Nutr. 2006;26:463–479. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.26.061505.111230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chaturvedi R, et al. L-arginine availability regulates inducible nitric oxide synthase-dependent host defense against Helicobacter pylori. Infect Immun. 2007;75:4305–4315. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00578-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tangphao O, Grossmann M, Chalon S, Hoffman B-B, Blaschke T-F. Pharamacokinetics of intravenous and oral l-arginine in normal volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999;47:261–266. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00883.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Böger R-H, Bode-Böger S-M. The clinical pharmacology of l-arginine. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2001;41:79–99. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.41.1.79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schellong S-M, et al. Dose-related effect of intravenous l-arginine on muscular blood flow of the calf in patients with peripheral vascular disease: A H2150 positron emission tomography study. Clin Sci (London) 1997;93:159–165. doi: 10.1042/cs0930159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Napoli C, Sica V, Pignalosa O, de Nigris F. New trends in anti-atherosclerotic agents. Curr Med Chem. 2005;12:1755–1772. doi: 10.2174/0929867054367257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bode-Böger S-M, et al. l-arginine induces nitric oxide-dependent vasodilation in patients with critical limb ischemia: A randomized, controlled study. Circulation. 1996;93:85–90. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.93.1.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.De Nicola L, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of arginine supplementation in chronic renal failure. Kidney Int. 1999;56:674–684. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00582.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhou M, Martindale R-G. Arginine in the critical care setting. J Nutr. 2007;137(6) Suppl 2:1687S–1692S. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.6.1687S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Heyland D-K, et al. Should immunonutrition become routine in critically ill patients? A systematic review of the evidence. J Am Med Assoc. 2001;286:944–953. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.8.944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kalil A-C, et al. Preclinical trial of l-arginine monotherapy alone or with N-acetylcysteine in septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:2719–2728. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000242757.26245.03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




