Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1992 Oct;36(10):2118–2124. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.10.2118

Analysis of macromolecular biosynthesis to define the quinolone-induced postantibiotic effect in Escherichia coli.

L Guan 1, R M Blumenthal 1, J C Burnham 1
PMCID: PMC245465  PMID: 1280055

Abstract

Quinolones inhibit DNA gyrase, and the major effects of this inhibition are on replication and transcription of DNA. The postantibiotic effect (PAE) refers to continued inhibition of cell division, in terms of the viable count, following transient exposure to an antibiotic. Previous work has shown that quinolone-treated cells have not fully recovered by the time the classically defined PAE has ended. We describe the PAE of the quinolones CI-960, enoxacin, and ciprofloxacin on macromolecular biosynthesis in the clinical isolate Escherichia coli J96 in an attempt to relate the PAE to the time that it actually takes for the cells to recover fully. DNA synthesis was inhibited immediately upon exposure to these quinolones at 0.5x or 0.75x the MIC. This inhibition continued for several hours following quinolone removal. The effects of these quinolones on RNA and protein synthesis varied; enoxacin treatment at 0.5x the MIC resulted in an increase of over 60% in both RNA and protein synthesis per unit of cell mass, while ciprofloxacin and CI-960 at that level had no significant effects on either RNA or protein synthesis. The effects of enoxacin and ciprofloxacin on bacterial protein profiles were also distinguishable, and these changes corresponded to their PAE on DNA synthesis. Throughout the study, all measures of the physiological status of the cells returned to normal by the time DNA synthesis per unit of cell mass did so. These results suggest that DNA synthesis per unit of cell mass provides an accurate measure of the time required for quinolone-treated cells to recover fully.

Full text

PDF
2118

Images in this article

2122Image
on p.2122

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Benbrook D. M., Miller R. V. Effects of norfloxacin on DNA metabolism in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Jan;29(1):1–6. doi: 10.1128/aac.29.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bundtzen R. W., Gerber A. U., Cohn D. L., Craig W. A. Postantibiotic suppression of bacterial growth. Rev Infect Dis. 1981 Jan-Feb;3(1):28–37. doi: 10.1093/clinids/3.1.28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Courtright J. B., Turowski D. A., Sonstein S. A. Alteration of bacterial DNA structure, gene expression, and plasmid encoded antibiotic resistance following exposure to enoxacin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988 Feb;21 (Suppl B):1–18. doi: 10.1093/jac/21.suppl_b.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Crumplin G. C., Smith J. T. Nalidixic acid: an antibacterial paradox. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Sep;8(3):251–261. doi: 10.1128/aac.8.3.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Diver J. M., Piddock L. J., Wise R. The accumulation of five quinolone antibacterial agents by Escherichia coli. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Mar;25(3):319–333. doi: 10.1093/jac/25.3.319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Diver J. M., Wise R. Morphological and biochemical changes in Escherichia coli after exposure to ciprofloxacin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986 Nov;18 (Suppl 500):31–41. doi: 10.1093/jac/18.supplement_d.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Engle E. C., Manes S. H., Drlica K. Differential effects of antibiotics inhibiting gyrase. J Bacteriol. 1982 Jan;149(1):92–98. doi: 10.1128/jb.149.1.92-98.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fuursted K. Post-antibiotic effect of ciprofloxacin on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Jun;6(3):271–274. doi: 10.1007/BF02017611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Georgopapadakou N. H., Bertasso A. Effects of quinolones on nucleoid segregation in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Dec;35(12):2645–2648. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.12.2645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gudas L. J., Pardee A. B. DNA synthesis inhibition and the induction of protein X in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1976 Mar 15;101(4):459–477. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90240-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kreuzer K. N., Cozzarelli N. R. Escherichia coli mutants thermosensitive for deoxyribonucleic acid gyrase subunit A: effects on deoxyribonucleic acid replication, transcription, and bacteriophage growth. J Bacteriol. 1979 Nov;140(2):424–435. doi: 10.1128/jb.140.2.424-435.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Krueger J. H., Walker G. C. groEL and dnaK genes of Escherichia coli are induced by UV irradiation and nalidixic acid in an htpR+-dependent fashion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Mar;81(5):1499–1503. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.5.1499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lewin C. S., Amyes S. G., Smith J. T. Bactericidal activity of enoxacin and lomefloxacin against Escherichia coli KL16. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Aug;8(8):731–733. doi: 10.1007/BF01963763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McDonald P. J., Craig W. A., Kunin C. M. Persistent effect of antibiotics on Staphylococcus aureus after exposure for limited periods of time. J Infect Dis. 1977 Feb;135(2):217–223. doi: 10.1093/infdis/135.2.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Minguez F., Ramos C., Barrientos S., Loscos A., Prieto J. Postantibiotic effect of ciprofloxacin compared with that of five other quinolones. Chemotherapy. 1991;37(6):420–425. doi: 10.1159/000238889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Neu H. C., Kumada T., Chin N. X., Mandell W. The post-antimicrobial suppressive effect of quinolone agents. Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1987;13(2):63–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Normark S., Lark D., Hull R., Norgren M., Båga M., O'Hanley P., Schoolnik G., Falkow S. Genetics of digalactoside-binding adhesin from a uropathogenic Escherichia coli strain. Infect Immun. 1983 Sep;41(3):942–949. doi: 10.1128/iai.41.3.942-949.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Phillips I., Culebras E., Moreno F., Baquero F. Induction of the SOS response by new 4-quinolones. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1987 Nov;20(5):631–638. doi: 10.1093/jac/20.5.631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Studier F. W. Analysis of bacteriophage T7 early RNAs and proteins on slab gels. J Mol Biol. 1973 Sep 15;79(2):237–248. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90003-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Vogelman B., Gudmundsson S., Turnidge J., Leggett J., Craig W. A. In vivo postantibiotic effect in a thigh infection in neutropenic mice. J Infect Dis. 1988 Feb;157(2):287–298. doi: 10.1093/infdis/157.2.287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES