Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
editorial
. 2006 Nov;60(11):910–911. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.049379

Adults at 12? Trends in puberty and their public health consequences

M A Bellis 1, J Downing 1, J R Ashton 1
PMCID: PMC2465479  PMID: 17053275

Short abstract

Adults at 12?


Over the past 150 years, the age of puberty onset has fallen substantially across many developed countries. Although trends are apparent in both sexes,1 the evidence in females (where biological markers are clearer) suggests that, for instance, in northern Europe the age at menarche (first menstruation) fell during the 1800s, then further reduced by up to 3 years over the last century (fig 1). Factors contributing to this fall include a combination of public health successes and changes in social structures. Thus, successes such as improved childhood nutrition and health status through reduction in childhood infections have been major factors accelerating the onset of puberty.7

graphic file with name ch49379.f1.jpg

Figure 1 Secular trends in menarcheal age.11,12,13,14,15

Socially, however, stress is also a puberty accelerator, with familial disruption, including father absenteeism, being one of the most effective stressors, and levels of divorce as well as single‐parent families have rapidly escalated in many countries (eg, England, 2005).8,9 The sum effect of these changes has been relatively recent reductions in the age of puberty onset.7 However, these have not been matched by efforts to socially develop young people at an equally accelerated rate, leaving an increasing gap between physical puberty and social puberty (the age at which people are mentally, educationally and legally equipped to function as adults in modern societies). Here, we propose that this disparity may underpin many of the major public health challenges associated with young people today.

Puberty is a physical preparation for adulthood that, along with bodily changes, promotes interest in sexual activity,10 increases aggression in adolescents,11 encourages curiosity and can escalate risk‐taking behaviours as people compete for social status and attempt to conform to perceived peer norms.12 Increasingly, however, as social puberty lags behind physical puberty, the results can be ill‐informed health‐damaging behaviour. Thus, early sexual activity is associated with unprotected sex and, consequently, sexually transmitted infections and teenage pregnancies.13 Moreover, adolescent stresses resulting from mismatches in physical and social development may also promote substance use (including alcohol, tobacco and drug use) as ways of both self‐medicating and trying to conform to peer pressures. Further, a lack of knowledge of how to adapt to changes in physical, mental and social status may lead to self‐harm, violence and bullying.14 Attributing all recent changes in sexual health, substance use and violence to earlier puberty (on a population basis) is oversimplistic, but disregarding the role of earlier physical maturation in these major health trends is equally inappropriate.

Dissociation of physical and social puberty is also likely to affect certain communities disproportionately (eg, the most deprived). For example, early menarche has been linked with a combination of poor prenatal nutrition and excess nutrition in childhood.7 Although studied mainly in immigrant populations, such combinations are also more likely to occur endemically in deprived areas. Equally, other factors capable of accelerating puberty, such as single‐parent families, are also associated with deprived populations (eg, in the UK).9 Surprisingly, the contribution that such inequalities make to current variations in the onset of puberty, and how they then affect patterns of sexual health, substance use and violence, is largely unstudied.

The continued reduction in the age of onset of puberty should not be treated as a biological anomaly. It is likely that some 20 000 years ago, humans had already evolved to experience menarche at around 12 years and at present many countries are moving back to this position.7,15 However, for young people, although physical development has reverted to this earlier age, understanding their role in society is becoming substantially more complicated. Further, political, educational and even parental attitudes can often ignore earlier puberty, preferring to leave important lessons about sex, risk‐taking and social behaviour until later in life. In the meantime, the earlier physical development of children has not been ignored by commercial sectors. Magazines, television and radio are increasingly using sexual imagery for marketing and storylines aimed at younger people10 while versions of adult make‐up and fashion lines are now specifically developed for the pubescent. Sales of computer games that include fighting and risk‐taking rely on people developing interests in these behaviours early in life. Such marketing is more likely to reinforce the confusion caused by separated physical and social puberty rather than providing the information necessary to deal with it.

In many countries, it is unlikely that population trends capable of affecting puberty have stabilised. Lone parent and divorce rates are still increasing. Further, in developed countries, changes in children's diet mean that their body fat levels (a trigger for puberty) are rapidly increasing and, elsewhere, general improvements in child nutrition and child health are yet to plateau. In all cases, public health measures can affect the age at which children enter physical puberty. Where this considerably precedes social puberty, resultant pressures on children will contribute to public health problems through naive approaches to sex, risk‐taking and aggression. Instead of tackling the consequences of such naive behaviour, a better understanding of puberty at the population level may offer new opportunities to address risk factors. In the long term, public health strategies may attempt to retain the benefits of improved childhood nutrition and reduced infection without necessarily increasing the gap between physical and social puberty. In the short term, however, responding to earlier puberty means moving away from societal attitudes that equate protecting children with regarding them as firmly ensconced in childhood long after their physical journey into adulthood has begun. Such pretence, however well intentioned, simply denies them the vital information they require to complete this transition without damaging their health.

Footnotes

Competing interests: None declared.

References

  • 1.Herman‐Giddens M E. Recent data on pubertal milestones in United States children: the secular trend towards earlier development. Int J Androl 200629241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anderson S E, Must A. Interpreting the continued decline in the average age at menarche: results from two nationally representative surveys of U.S. girls studied 10 years apart. J Pediatr 2005753–760. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Anderson S E, Dallal G E, Must A. Relative weight and race influence average age at menarche: results from two nationally representative surveys of U.S. girls studied 25 years apart. Pediatrics 2003111844–850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bodzsar E B, Susanne C. eds. Secular growth changes in Europe. Budapest, Hungary: Eotovos University Press, 1998
  • 5.Tanner J M. Trend towards earlier menarche in London, Oslo, Copenhagen, the Netherlands and Hungary. Nature 197324395–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Whincup P H, Gilg J A, Taylor S J C.et al Age of menarche in contemporary British teenagers: survey of girls born between 1982 and 1986. BMJ 20013221095–1096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gluckman P D, Hanson M A. Evolution, development and timing of puberty. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2006177–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Parent A, Teilmann G, Juul A.et al The timing of normal puberty and age limits of sexual precocity: variations around the world, secular trends, and changes after migration. Endocr Rev 200325668–693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Office of National Statistics, England, 2005. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/ (accessed 11 2006)
  • 10.Brown J D, Tucker Halpern C, Ladin L'Engle K. Mass Media as a sexual peer for early maturing girls. J Adolesc Health 200536420–427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Finkelstein J W, Von Eye A, Preece M A. The relationship between aggressive behaviour and puberty in normal adolescents: a longitudinal study. J Adolesc Health 199415319–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kinsman S B, Romer D, Furstenberg F F.et al Early sexual initiation: the role of the peer norms. Pediatrics 19981021185–1192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wellings K, Nanchahal K, Macdowall W.et al Sexual behaviour in Britain: early heterosexual experience. Lancet 20013581843–1850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Krug E G, Dahlberg L L, Mercy J A.et al eds. World Report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2002
  • 15.De Muinck Keizer‐Schrama, Mul D. Trend in pubertal development in Europe. Eur Soc Hum Reprod Embryol 20017287–291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES