Abstract
The majority of familial Alzheimer disease mutations are linked to the recently cloned presenilin (PS) genes, which encode two highly homologous proteins (PS-1 and PS-2). It was shown that the full-length PS-2 protein is phosphorylated constitutively within its N-terminal domain by casein kinases, whereas the PS-1 protein is not. Full-length PS proteins undergo endoproteolytic cleavage within their hydrophilic loop domain resulting in the formation of ≈20-kDa C-terminal fragments (CTF) and ≈30-kDa N-terminal fragments [Thinakaran, G., et al. (1996) Neuron 17, 181–190]. Here we describe the surprising finding that the CTF of PS-1 is phosphorylated by protein kinase C (PKC). Stimulation of PKC causes a 4- to 5-fold increase of the phosphorylation of the ≈20-kDa CTF of PS-1 resulting in reduced mobility in SDS gels. PKC-stimulated phosphorylation occurs predominantly on serine residues and can be induced either by direct stimulation of PKC with phorbol-12,13-dibutyrate or by activation of the m1 acetylcholine receptor-signaling pathway with the muscarinic agonist carbachol. However, phosphorylation of full-length PS-1 and PS-2 is not altered upon PKC stimulation. In addition, a mutant form of PS-1 lacking exon 10, which does not undergo endoproteolytic cleavage [Thinakaran, G., et al. (1996) Neuron 17, 181–190] is not phosphorylated by PKC, although it still contains all PKC phosphorylation sites conserved between different species. These results show that PKC phosphorylates the PS-1 CTF. Therefore, endoproteolytic cleavage of full-length PS-1 results in the generation of an in vivo substrate for PKC. The selective phosphorylation of the PS-1 CTF indicates that the physiological and/or pathological properties of the CTF are regulated by PKC activity.
Keywords: protein phosphorylation/muscarinic receptors/phorbol ester/signal transduction
Alzheimer disease (AD) is by far the most common form of dementia worldwide, currently affecting approximately 17 million people. Pathologically, AD is characterized by the invariant accumulation of senile plaques predominantly composed of the amyloid-β peptide (Aβ; ref. 1). Aβ is a proteolytic breakdown product of the β-amyloid precursor protein (βAPP; ref. 2). In most cases the disease occurs sporadically in an age-dependent manner; however, in approximately 10% of the cases, AD can be inherited as an autosomal dominant trait [familial Alzheimer disease (FAD)]. FAD mutations have been linked so far to three different genes (for review see refs. 3 and 4). In addition, a polymorphism in the allele encoding apolipoprotein E was found to be a major risk factor (for review see ref. 5). Mutations within the βAPP gene account for only a very small minority of FAD cases. The majority of FAD cases were linked to mutations within a gene located on chromosome 14 (6–8). This gene was cloned recently and called presenilin (PS)-1 (9). Shortly after, a second gene involved in chromosome 1-linked FAD (10) was identified and named PS-2 (11, 12). Both genes encode highly homologous proteins with multiple trans-membrane domains (refs. 9, 11, and 12; for review see refs. 13 and 14). So far more than 30 FAD-causing mutations were shown to occur within PS-1, whereas only 2 mutations were found within PS-2 (13, 14). Recent work analyzing the C termini of Aβ secreted from primary fibroblasts, or detected within plasma from family members with FAD-linked PS-1 as well as PS-2 mutations, clearly showed that these mutations cause an increased production of Aβ42/43 (15). Similar results were also obtained by overexpressing a variety of mutant PS cDNAs in tissue culture cells and transgenic mice (16–19). Moreover, in vivo these mutations clearly cause the enhanced formation of Aβ42/43-containing amyloid plaques (20, 21). Sequence homologies to the Caenorhabditis elegans genes spe-4 and sel-12 suggest that PS genes might be involved in vesicular trafficking or notch signaling (22, 23). Indeed, recent studies (24, 25) showed that human PS-1 can reconstitute the sel-12 mutant phenotype, strongly suggesting that PS proteins are involved directly or indirectly in notch signaling.
Cellular expression of the PS genes showed that both PS proteins are predominantly located within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (26–29). Interestingly, PS-2 but not PS-1 was shown to be constitutively phosphorylated. PS-2 phosphorylation was mapped to three serine residues within an acidic sequence of the N-terminal domain, which is missing in PS-1 (26). Recently, it was shown that PS proteins undergo endoproteolytic processing (30, 31). The cleavage occurs within the large loop between trans-membrane domain 6 (TM6) and TM7 (of an eight-trans-membrane domain model; ref. 32), which results in the production of ≈30-kDa N-terminal and ≈20-kDa C-terminal fragments (CTFs) (refs. 30 and 31; see also Fig. 1). Radio sequencing of the C-terminal fragment indicated the production of heterogeneous fragments beginning at amino acids 291–299 (D. J. Selkoe and D. B. Teplow, personal communication). Moreover, it appears that in vivo PS proteins predominantly occur as proteolytic breakdown products, whereas very little if any full-length PS can be detected within the tissues and cell lines analyzed (30). Here, we report the surprising finding that the CTF of PS-1 is selectively phosphorylated in vivo by PKC, whereas no PKC-dependent phosphorylation of full-length PS was observed. Our results suggest that endoproteolytic cleavage of PS-1 results in the generation of a PKC substrate. Because phosphorylation of the CTF is modulated by activation/inhibition of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, the physiological and/or pathological properties of the CTF might be regulated by PKC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Antibodies.
Polyclonal antibodies 3027 and 2953 were raised to the loop domain (amino acids 263–407) and the N terminus (amino acids 2–81) of PS-1, respectively. The respective coding regions were amplified by PCR using the primers 5′-CCGAATTCTGTCCGAAAGGTCCA-3′ and 5′-CCGGATCCCTAGGTTGTGTTCCAGTC-3′ for the PS-1 loop domain (3027), and 5′-CCGGATCCACAGAGTTACCTGCACC-3′ and 5′-TGCGGTCGACATGCTTGGCGCCATATT-3′ for the PS-1 N terminus (2953). The resulting fragments were cloned into the EcoRI/BamHI (3027) restriction site and the BamHI/SalI (2953) restriction site, respectively, of pMAL-c2 (New England Biolabs). The fusion proteins were expressed in E. coli DH5α, purified on amylose resin (New England Biolabs) according to the supplier’s instructions, and inoculated into rabbits. Antibody PS-1Loop is described by Thinakaran et al. (30). The polyclonal anti-peptide antibodies BOS4627 raised to PS-1457–467 and BOS4624 raised to PS-1343–357 were described previously (26). The epitopes of the antibodies used in this study are shown in Fig. 1A.
Cell Culture.
All cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. The kidney 293 cell lines stably expressing PS-1 wild type and PS-1 Δexon 10 were described previously (17). Transient transfections were carried out using DOTAP (Boehringer Mannheim). All cDNA constructs used are encoding the VRSQ motif.
Metabolic Labeling and Immunoprecipitation.
Metabolic labeling and immunoprecipitations were carried out as described by Haass et al. (33), except that the immunoprecipitates were heated to 68°C before they were separated on 8% or 10% SDS polyacrylamid gels containing 4 M urea.
In Vivo Phosphorylation.
A confluent cell monolayer was incubated for 45 min in phosphate-free media (Sigma). The media were aspirated and the respective fresh media were added, together with 13–36 MBq [32P]orthophosphate, and cells were incubated for 2–4 h at 37°C. The conditioned media were then aspirated, and cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and immediately lysed on ice with lysis buffer containing 1% Nonidet P-40 for 10 min. Cell lysates were centrifuged 10 min at 14,000 × g, and supernatants were immunoprecipitated with specific anti-PS-antibodies for 2–3 h. Radiolabeled proteins were separated by SDS/PAGE as described above and visualized by autoradiography. Quantification was done by phospohorimaging (Molecular Dynamics) using the imagequant program as described by Hung et al. (34).
Stimulation and Inhibition of Protein Kinase C.
To activate protein kinase C during in vivo labeling with [32P]orthophosphate, phosphorylation was carried out in the presence of 1 μM phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate (PDBu; Sigma). To inhibit protein kinase C activity, the specific inhibitor GF109203X (Biomol, Plymouth Meeting, PA; final concentration, 0.1 μM) was added to the media during periods of labeling. To activate or inhibit muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, U373 cells stably transfected with the m1-type muscarinic receptor cDNA were treated with 1 mM carbachol (Sigma) or 10 μM atropine (Sigma), respectively.
Dephosphorylation by Alkaline Phosphatase.
Immunoprecipitates of PS-1 CTFs were incubated for 1 h at 37°C in the absence or presence of alkaline phosphatase (calf intestine; Boehringer, Mannheim) according to the supplier manual.
Phosphoamino Acid Analysis.
32P-labeled CTFs of PS-1 were isolated by immunoprecipitation, separated by SDS/PAGE, electrotransferred onto PVDF membrane, and localized by autoradiography. Bands were cut out and two-dimensional phosphoamino acid analyses were carried out according to Boyle et al. (35). Briefly, PS fragments were hydrolyzed by incubation in 6 M HCl for 90 min at 110°C. Supernatants were dried in a SpeedVac concentrator (Savant), and the resulting pellets were dissolved in pH 1.9 buffer (7.8% acetic acid/2.5% formic acid) and spotted onto cellulose–TLC plates together with unlabeled phosphoamino acids (P-Ser, P-Thr, P-Tyr; 1 μg each). High voltage electrophoresis was carried out for 20 min (pH 1.9 buffer) at 1.5 kV and for 16 min (pH 3.5 buffer; 5% acetic acid/0.5% pyridine) at 1.3 kV, respectively. Radioactive phosphoamino acids were identified by autoradiography and comparison with ninhydrin-stained standards.
RESULTS
Recently, it was shown that PS proteins undergo proteolytic processing resulting in the generation of ≈20-kDa C-terminal and ≈30-kDa N-terminal fragments (refs. 30 and 31; see Fig. 1A). Because the large hydrophilic loop of PS-1 contains seven potential PKC phosphorylation sites (ref. 9; see also Fig. 5), we examined whether the CTF generated by proteolytic cleavage serves as a PKC substrate. Untransfected COS-7 cells were labeled with [35S]methionine and then incubated in the presence or absence of PDBu, a direct stimulator of PKC (36). Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with antibody 3027 raised to the hydrophilic loop of PS-1 (Fig. 1A). This antibody specifically detects PS-1 with no cross-reactivity to PS-2 (data not shown). Under control conditions, antibody 3027 immunoprecipitates a polypeptide of ≈20 kDa (Fig. 1B). In PDBu-treated cells, a major ≈23-kDa polypeptide is detected, which is absent in unstimulated cells, while the ≈20-kDa band is weaker compared with control cells. When cells were labeled with [32P]orthophosphate in the absence of PDBu, two weakly phosphorylated polypeptides of ≈22 kDa and ≈23 kDa were detected (Fig. 1B). PKC stimulation with PDBu results in the detection of a major 32P-labeled polypeptide with an apparent molecular mass of ≈23 kDa and a weaker band of ≈24 kDa. The ≈20-kDa polypeptide detected in [35S]methionine-labeled cells is not phosphorylated. The weaker 32P-labeled band of ≈24 kDa presumably represents a distinct phosphorylated form of the PS-1 CTF, because the amount of this form increased when cells were treated with PDBu in the presence of the phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid (data not shown). To prove that the observed polypeptides indeed represent the CTF of PS-1, we performed an epitope mapping using several independent antibodies (Fig. 1A). Antibody PS-1loop (30) also detected the same polypeptides specifically (Fig. 1C). This antibody was recently used to identify the CTF of PS-1 for the first time (30). Another polyclonal antibody raised to the peptide PS-1457–467 (BOS4627; Fig. 1A), which specifically detects PS-1 as well as PS-2 (26) identified both the 20-kDa and the 23-kDa peptides (Fig. 1C). None of these polypeptides was immunoprecipitated with the corresponding preimmunsera or with antibody 2953 (Fig. 1A) raised against the N-terminal domain of PS-1 proteins (data not shown). These data therefore prove that the observed polypeptide represent the C-terminal cleavage product of the PS full-length protein. Moreover, because the antibodies PS-1loop (30) and 3027 are specific for PS-1 and do not cross-react with PS-2, these data show that the observed polypeptides represent endogenous PS-1 CTFs. PDBu-stimulated phosphorylation of the CTF is not cell-specific because it was observed in all cell lines analyzed so far, including human kidney 293 cells (Fig. 3), human primary fibroblasts (data not shown), and human U373 cells (Fig. 5). It should be noted that PDBu treatment had no effect on phosphorylation of the PS-1 N-terminal fragment (data not shown).
To further prove that the observed molecular mass shift of PS-1 CTF is due to covalent phosphate incorporation (and not to alternative proteolytic cleavage), immunoprecipitates from PDBu-treated COS-7 cells were incubated in the presence or absence of alkaline phosphatase. Phosphatase treatment resulted in a shift of the 23-kDa form of the PS-1 CTF back to 20 kDa, while incubation in the absence of phosphatase had no effect on its mobility (Fig. 2A). These results therefore indicate that the ≈20-kDa CTF undergoes PDBu-stimulated phosphorylation causing a molecular mass shift of about 3–4 kDa. Such a phenomenon is frequently observed for other hyperphosphorylated proteins such as the tau protein (37).
To assess the involvement of PKC in the phosphorylation of the ≈20-kDa CTF, the effect of the PKC-specific inhibitor GF109203X on 32P incorporation was tested. COS-7 cells were labeled with [32P]orthophosphate in the presence or absence of PDBu or GF109203X, and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with antibody 3027. Inhibition of PKC by GF109203X indeed strongly suppressed phosphorylation of the CTF in the presence of PDBu (Fig. 2B), thus clearly showing that PKC catalyses the phosphorylation of the PS-1 CTF. Quantification of the stimulatory effect of PDBu on CTF phosphorylation revealed an approximately 4- to 5-fold increase (Fig. 2C). To prove which amino acids of the CTF were phosphorylated by PKC, we performed a phosphoamino acid analysis of the phosphorylated CTF after stimulation with PDBu. As shown in Fig. 2D, the PS-1 CTF is phosphorylated predominantly on serine residues. This is consistent with the notion that five out of seven potential PKC phosphorylation sites are serines and two are threonines (ref. 11; see Fig. 5).
Previously we have shown that full-length PS-2 is phosphorylated in vivo within its N-terminal domain, whereas full-length PS-1 is phosphorylated very weakly, if at all (26). PS-2 phosphorylation was mapped to serine residues within an acidic sequence of the N-terminal domain containing potential phosphorylation sites for both casein kinase 1 and 2 (26). However, here we report that PKC phosphorylates the CTF of PS-1 in vivo. Because we (26) and others (30) do not detect endogenous full-length PS proteins, kidney 293 cells stably transfected with the PS-1 cDNA (19) were incubated with [32P]orthophosphate in the presence or absence of PDBu. In parallel, cells were radiolabeled with [35S]methionine. Cell lysates were prepared and full-length PS proteins and the CTFs were immunoprecipitated with antibody BOS4627. As shown by [32S]methionine labeling, PS-1 was expressed as full-length protein of 42–45 kDa (Fig. 3A). In agreement with our previous report (26), we found very little if any phosphorylation of full-length PS-1 under nonstimulated conditions, which was not increased after PKC stimulation with PDBu (Fig. 3A). In contrast, we detected a strong increase of the phosphorylation of the PS-1 CTF in these cells (Fig. 3A). Similar results were obtained using COS-7 cells transiently transfected with the human PS-1 cDNA (data not shown).
However, these experiments could not exclude the possibility that PKC phosphorylates full-length PS proteins, thereby inducing a very rapid proteolytic processing. In this case it might be impossible to detect PKC-phosphorylated full-length PS precursors. Therefore, we analyzed the phosphorylation of a naturally occurring PS-1 mutation lacking exon 10 (PS-1 Δexon 10; ref. 38). This mutant splice variant of PS-1 lacks amino acids 290–319 containing the proteolytic cleavage site and was shown not to undergo endoproteolytic cleavage (30). However, PS-1 Δexon 10 was not phosphorylated under both conditions, in the absence and presence of PDBu (Fig. 3B), although five out of the seven potential PKC recognition sites were still present (Fig. 5). As a control, labeling with [35S]methionine revealed that expression of PS-1 Δexon 10, like that of wild-type PS-1, was not altered upon PDBu treatment (Fig. 3 A and B). Therefore, these data indicate that the observed phosphorylated CTF results predominantly from a direct modification by PKC and not from cleavage of the phosphorylated full-length precursor. Notably, in kidney 293 cells stably transfected with the PS-1 Δexon 10 cDNA, we did not detect endogenous PS-1 CTFs, indicating that overexpression of PS-1 Δexon 10 inhibits proteolytic processing of endogenous PS-1.
In vivo, PKC can be activated by signaling pathways involving muscarinic acetylcholine cell surface receptors (39, 40). We therefore tested whether phosphorylation of the CTF can be induced via receptor activation by the muscarinic agonist carbachol. U373 cells stably expressing the m1 receptor were labeled with [35S]methionine or with [32P]orthophosphate in the absence or presence of 1 mM carbachol. Incubation with carbachol resulted in a strong increase in the phosphorylation of the CTF, which was comparable to that observed by direct activation of PKC with PDBu (Fig. 4 Lower). Again, phosphorylation results in a shift in the apparent molecular mass of the 20-kDa CTF to 23 kDa (Fig. 4 Upper). When carbachol and the muscarinic antagonist atropine were added to cells simultaneously, phosphorylation of the CTF was inhibited, as shown by reduced phosphate incorporation and lack of the molecular mass shift. The presence of the PKC-specific inhibitor GF109203X during incubation with carbachol also reduced the carbachol-stimulated phosphorylation of the CTF. These data therefore indicate that phosphorylation of the CTF of PS-1 can be induced by stimulating a signaling cascade involving PKC via an m1-type acetylcholine receptor with muscarinic agonists, suggesting that the physiological or pathological function(s) of the CTF can be biologically regulated.
DISCUSSION
In this study we showed that the C-terminal fragment of PS-1 is specifically phosphorylated by PKC. The identity of the C-terminal cleavage product was proven by epitope mapping using a variety of independent antibodies, including one (PS-1Loop) that was recently used to identify the CTF of PS-1 (30).
The involvement of PKC in the phosphorylation of the CTF was proven by direct activation with PDBu and selective inhibition by a specific PKC inhibitor. Moreover, the CTF was also phosphorylated upon PKC stimulation via m1 receptor-mediated signaling pathways. These results therefore strongly suggest that the CTF of PS-1 serves as an in vivo substrate of PKC.
Interestingly, we did not observe PKC-dependent phosphorylation of full-length PS-1 protein. Recently, we reported that full-length PS-2 protein is phosphorylated in vivo within its N-terminal domain, most likely by casein kinases, whereas PS-1 undergoes very little if any phosphorylation (26). Here we demonstrated that endoproteolytic cleavage products and full-length PS proteins are modified differently by PKC. Both full-length PS-1 as well as PS-2 were shown not to be phosphorylated by PKC, because neither stimulation nor inhibition of PKC altered their phosphorylation state. To rule out the possibility that full-length PS proteins are phosphorylated and immediately cleaved, in which case phosphorylated full-length proteins might not be detectable, we tested the phosphorylation of the FAD-associated splicing variant of PS-1 missing exon 10 (38), which was shown not to undergo endoproteolytic cleavage (30). It is important to note that this deleted form of PS-1 still contains five out of seven potential PKC phosphorylation sites within the hydrophilic loop domain (Fig. 5), therefore making it possible to test PKC-dependent phosphorylation of full-length PS-1. Moreover, potential PKC phosphorylation sites within exon 10 are not very well conserved between different species, whereas the PKC sites between amino acids 320 and 397 are highly conserved (Fig. 5), suggesting that these sites are biologically relevant. In addition, we (25) and others (24) have shown recently that human PS-1 Δexon 10 can functionally replace mutant sel-12 in C. elegans. This shows that PS-1 Δexon 10 is biologically active and can behave like wild-type PS-1, making it therefore an appropriate tool to study its phosphorylation. As observed for wild-type full-length PS proteins, the exon 10-deleted form of PS-1 also is not phosphorylated by PKC. In addition, we did not observe a decrease in the amount of full-length wild-type PS-1 or an increase in the amount of the PS-1 CTF upon PDBu stimulation (Fig. 3), therefore indicating that PKC activation has no effect on proteolytic processing of PS-1. These results strongly suggest that PKC-dependent phosphorylation occurs selectively on the PS-1 CTF after its generation by proteolytic cleavage of the full-length precursor. One explanation for this phenomenon might be that PKC phosphorylation sites are not accessible in the three-dimensional conformation of the full-length protein when the large hydrophilic loop is flanked by TM6 and TM7. Endoproteolytic cleavage of PS-1, which is known to occur shortly after the putative TM6 (ref. 30; D. J. Selkoe and D. B. Teplow, personal communication), might therefore result in a conformational change of the loop domain and facilitated access of the kinase to its recognition sites.
In our study we clearly proved that the CTF of PS-1 is phosphorylated by PKC. Due to the lack of C-terminal PS-2-specific antibodies we were unable to prove phosphorylation of the CTF of PS-2. However, because the CTF of PS-1 contains seven potential PKC recognition sites (9), whereas the putative CTF of PS-2 contains none (Fig. 5), one might speculate that the CTF of PS-2 is not phosphorylated by PKC. Therefore, the biological function of the CTFs of PS-1 and PS-2 might be regulated differently.
Although it is unclear which isoform of PKC phosphorylates the PS-1 CTF, it was reported that the PKC α-isoform translocates from the cytosol to ER membranes upon stimulation with phorbolesters (41, 42). This is the subcellular compartment in which PS proteins are predominantly localized (26, 27–29). In addition, the presented data also strongly suggest that the hydrophilic loop is exposed to the cytoplasmic face of the ER. Taken together with our previous data (26), we would postulate that the N terminus as well as the hydrophilic loop of PS proteins are cytoplasmic (see Fig. 1A). This is in agreement with data published recently by Doan et al. (32).
Although the biological function of the CTF is unknown, it should be noted that activation of PKC stimulates α-secretory processing of βAPP (43, 44), thus increasing the amount of secreted APPS-α and decreasing the formation of Aβ peptide (34, 45). In this study, we demonstrate that phosphorylation the CTF of PS-1 parallels the secretion of APPS. Because the protein substrate(s) of PKC mediating the α-secretory pathway are unknown so far, it will be of great interest if the selective phosphorylation of the PS-1 CTF is involved in the regulation of βAPP processing.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Drs. S. Sisodia and G. Thinakaran for antibody PS-1Loop, Drs. J. Perez-Tur and J. Hardy for the PS-1 Δexon 10 cDNA, and Dr. Lars Lannfelt for primary human fibroblasts. This work was supported by Boehringer Ingelheim (C.H.) and grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 317) to C.H., from the National Institutes of Health to D.J.S. (AG 06173, AG 12749), and from the Alzheimer Association of Ontario, The Medical Research Council of Canada, and the Canadian Genetic Disease Network to P.S.H.
ABBREVIATIONS
- Aβ
amyloid β-peptide
- AD
Alzheimer disease
- βAPP
β-amyloid precursor protein
- CTF
C-terminal fragment
- ER
endoplasmic reticulum
- FAD
familial Alzheimer disease
- PDBu
phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate
- PKC
protein kinase C
- PS
presenilin
- TM
trans-membrane domain
Note Added in Proof
While this manuscript was under review, we learned that similar data were obtained by Gandy and coworkers (47).
References
- 1.Selkoe D J. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1994;17:489–517. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.17.030194.002421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Haass C, Selkoe D J. Cell. 1993;75:1039–1042. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90312-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schellenberg G. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:8552–8559. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.19.8552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Selkoe D J. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:18295–18298. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.31.18295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Strittmatter W J, Roses A D. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:4725–4727. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.11.4725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schellenberg G D, Bird T D, Wijsman E M, Orr H T, Anderson L, Nemens E, White J A, Bonnycastle L, Weber J L, Alonso E, Potter H, Heston L L, Martin G M. Science. 1992;3:1–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1411576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.St. George-Hyslop P, Haines J, Rogaev E, Mortilla M, Vaula G, et al. Nat Genet. 1992;2:330–334. doi: 10.1038/ng1292-330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.van Broeckhoven C, Backhoven H, Cruts M, de Winter G, Bruyland M, et al. Nat Genet. 1992;2:335–339. doi: 10.1038/ng1292-335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sherrington R, Rogaev E I, Liang Y, Rogaeva E A, Levesque G, et al. Nature (London) 1995;375:754–760. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Levy-Lahad E, Wijsman E M, Nemens E, Anderson L, Goddard K A B, Weber J L, Bird T D, Schellenberg G D. Science. 1995;269:970–973. doi: 10.1126/science.7638621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Levy-Lahad E, Wasco W, Poorkaj P, Romano D M, Oshima J, Pettingell W H, Yu C, Jondro P D, Schmidt S D, Wang K, Crowley A C, Fu Y-H, Guenette S Y, Galas D, Nemens E, Wijsman E M, Bird T D, Schellenberg G D, Tanzi R E. Science. 1995;269:973–977. doi: 10.1126/science.7638622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rogaev E I, Sherrington R, Rogaeva E A, Levesque G, Ikeda M, Liang Y, Chi H, Lin C, Holamn K, Tsuda T, Mar L, Sorbi S, Nacmias B, Piacentini S, Amaducci L, Chumakkov I, Cohen D, Lannfelt L, Fraser P E, Rommens J M, St. George-Hyslop P H. Nature (London) 1995;376:775–778. doi: 10.1038/376775a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tanzi R E, Kovacs D M, Kim T-W, Moir R, Guenette S Y, Wasco W. Neurobiol Dis. 1996;3:159–168. doi: 10.1006/nbdi.1996.0016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Haass C. Curr Opin Neurol. 1996;9:254–259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Scheuner D, Eckman C, Jensen M, Song X, Citron M, et al. Nat Med. 1996;2:864–870. doi: 10.1038/nm0896-864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Borchelt D, Thinakaran G, Eckman C, Lee M, Davenport F, et al. Neuron. 1996;17:1005–1013. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80230-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Citron M, Westaway D, Xia W, Carlson G, Diehl T S, et al. Nat Med. 1997;3:67–72. doi: 10.1038/nm0197-67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tomita T, Maruyama K, Saido T C, Kume H, Shinozaki K, Tokuhiro S, Capell A, Walter J, Grünberg J, Haass C, Iwatsubo T, Obata K. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:2025–2030. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.5.2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Duff K, Eckman C, Zehr C, Yu X, Prada C M, Perez-tur J, Hutton M, Buee L, Harigaya Y, Yager D, Morgan D, Gordon M N, Holcomb L, Refolo L, Zenk B, Hardy J, Younkin S. Nature (London) 1996;383:710–713. doi: 10.1038/383710a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lemere C A, Lopera F, Koski K S, Lendon C L, Ossa J, Saido T C, Yamaguchi H, Ruiz A, Martinez A, Madrigal L, Hincabie L, Arango J C, Anthony D C, Koo E H, Goate A M, Selkoe D J, Arango J C V. Nat Med. 1996;2:1146–1150. doi: 10.1038/nm1096-1146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mann D M A, Iwatsubo T, Caairns N J, Lantos P L, Nochlin D, Sumi S M, Bird T D, Poorkaj P, Hardy J, Hutton M, Prihar G, Crook R, Rossor M N, Haltia M. Ann Neurol. 1996;40:149–156. doi: 10.1002/ana.410400205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.L’Hernault S W, Arduengo P M. J Cell Biol. 1992;119:55–68. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Levitan D, Greenwald I. Nature (London) 1995;377:351–354. doi: 10.1038/377351a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Levitan D, Doyle T G, Brousseau D, Lee M K, Thinakaran G, Slunt H H, Sisodia S S, Greenwald I. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:14940–14944. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Baumeister, R., Leimer, U., Zweckbronner, I., Jakubek, C., Grünberg, J. & Haass, C. (1997) Genes Funct., in press. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 26.Walter J, Capell A, Grünberg J, Pesold B, Schindzielorz A, Prior R, Podlisny M B, Fraser P, St. George-Hyslop P, Selkoe D J, Haass C. Mol Med. 1996;2:673–691. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kovacs D M, Fausett H J, Page K J, Kim T W, Moir R D, Merriam D E, Hollister R D, Hallmark O G, Mancini R, Felsenstein K M, Hyman B T, Tanzi R E, Wasco W. Nat Med. 1996;2:224–229. doi: 10.1038/nm0296-224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cook D G, Sung J C, Golde T E, Felsenstein K M, Wojczyk B S, Tanzi R E, Trojanowski J Q, Lee V M-Y, Doms R W. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:9223–9228. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.17.9223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.DeStrooper B, Beullens M, Contreras B, Levesque L, Craessaerts K, Cordell B, Moechars D, Bollen M, Fraser P, St. George-Hyslop, van Leuven F. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:3590–3598. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.6.3590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Thinakaran G, Borchelt D R, Lee M K, Slunt H H, Spitzer L, Kim G, Ratovitsky T, Davenport F, Nordstedt C, Seeger M, Hardy J, Levey A I, Gandy S E, Jenkins N A, Copeland N G, Pric D L, Sisodia S S. Neuron. 1996;17:181–190. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80291-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mercken M, Takahashi H, Honda T, Sato K, Murayama M, Nakazato Y, Noguchi K, Imahori K, Takashima A. FEBS Lett. 1996;389:297–303. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00608-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Doan, A., Thinakaran, G., Borchelt, D. R., Slunt, H. H., Ratovitsky, T., Podlisny, M., Selkoe, D. J., Seeger, M., Gandy, S. E., Price, D. L. & Sisodia, S. S. Neuron 17, 1023–1030. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 33.Haass C, Hung A Y, Selkoe D J. J Neurosci. 1991;11:3783–3793. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-12-03783.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hung A Y, Haass C, Nitsch R M, Qiu W Q, Citron M, Wurtman R J, Growdon J H, Selkoe D J. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:22959–22962. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Boyle W J, van der Geer P, Hunter T. Methods Enzymol. 1991;201:110–149. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)01013-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Buxbaum J D, Gandy S E, Cicchetti P, Ehrlich M E, Czernik A J, Fracasso P R, Ramabhadran T V, Unterbeck A J, Greengard P. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:6003–6006. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.15.6003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Goedert M, Cohen E S, Jakes R, Cohen P. FEBS Lett. 1992;312:95–99. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(92)81418-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Perez-Tur J, Froehlich S, Prihar G, Crook R, Baker M, et al. NeuroReport. 1995;7:297–301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nishizuka Y. Nature (London) 1988;334:661–665. doi: 10.1038/334661a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Nishizuka Y. Science. 1992;258:607–614. doi: 10.1126/science.1411571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Goodnight J, Mischak H, Kolch W, Mushinski J F. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:991–1001. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.17.9991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dekker L V, Parker P J. Trends Biol Sci. 1994;19:73–77. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90038-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Caporaso G L, Gandy S E, Buxbaum J D, Ramabhadran T V, Greengard P. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:3055–3059. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.7.3055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nitsch R M, Slack B E, Wurtman R J, Growdon J H. Science. 1992;258:304–307. doi: 10.1126/science.1411529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Buxbaum J D, Koo E H, Greengard P. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:9195–9198. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.19.9195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pearson R B, Kemp B E. Methods Enzymol. 1991;200:62–84. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)00127-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Seeger M, Nordstedt C, Petanceska S, Kovacs D M, Gouras G K, Hahne S, Fraser P, Levesque L, Czernikm A J, S, George-Hyslop P, Sisodia S S, Thinakaran G, Tanzi R E, Greengard P, Gandy S. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:5090–5094. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]