Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1974 Jun;118(3):911–918. doi: 10.1128/jb.118.3.911-918.1974

Characteristics and Relationships of Mercury-Resistant Mutants and Methionine Auxotrophs of Yeast1

Arjun Singh a, Fred Sherman a
PMCID: PMC246839  PMID: 4364332

Abstract

Approximately one-half of the mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that are selected as resistant to methyl mercury are also found to require methionine. Eighty-four percent of these met mutations occur at the met15 locus, and the remaining 16% occur at the met2 locus. Surprisingly, the methionine-requiring mutants are recovered at a much higher frequency on methionineless media than on media supplemented with methionine. Growth patterns of the met mutants on media having a continuous concentration gradient of methionine and mercury compounds indicate that, at a critical concentration of the mercury compounds, the methionine requirement of certain met mutants is partially or completely alleviated. This was found for met2, met15, and to a lesser extent for met6, but not for any other methionine mutants. This loss of methionine requirement is produced with methyl mercury, phenyl mercury, and mercuric chloride although met2 and met15 strains can be shown to be resistant only to methyl mercury. Other methionine auxotrophs are not resistant to any of the three mercury compounds. The met2 and met15 mutants, but not the other methionine auxotrophs, develop a sheen of an unidentified product when grown on media with mercuric chloride but not with methyl mercury or phenyl mercury. It is suggested that met2 and met15 mutants produce a simple diffusible substance, which detoxifies methyl mercury, which reacts with mercuric chloride to produce a sheen, and which is the cause of the methionine requirement.

Full text

PDF
911

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARTLETT G. W. Gain and loss of resistance in the fungus Penicillium roqueforti Thom. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1959 Jan 27;150(938):120–130. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1959.0011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Komura I., Izaki K. Mechanism of mercuric chloride resistance in microorganisms. I. Vaporization of a mercury compound from mercuric chloride by multiple drug resistant strains of Escherichia coli. J Biochem. 1971 Dec;70(6):885–893. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a129718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Landner L. Biochemical model for the biological methylation of mercury suggested from methylation studies in vivo with Neurospora crassa. Nature. 1971 Apr 16;230(5294):452–454. doi: 10.1038/230452a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Loutit J. S. Investigation of the mating system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain I. VI. Mercury resistance associated with the sex factor (FP). Genet Res. 1970 Oct 2;16(2):179–184. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300002408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McLaughlin C. S., Hartwell L. H. A mutant of yeast with a defective methionyl-tRNA synthetase. Genetics. 1969 Mar;61(3):557–566. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.3.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Miller M. A., Harmon S. A. Genetic association of determinants controlling resistance to mercuric chloride, production of penicillinase and synthesis of methionine in Staphylococcus aureus. Nature. 1967 Jul 29;215(5100):531–532. doi: 10.1038/215531a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nelson J. D., Blair W., Brinckman F. E., Colwell R. R., Iverson W. P. Biodegradation of phenylmercuric acetate by mercury-resistant bacteria. Appl Microbiol. 1973 Sep;26(3):321–326. doi: 10.1128/am.26.3.321-326.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Novick R. P. Penicillinase plasmids of Staphylococcus aureus. Fed Proc. 1967 Jan-Feb;26(1):29–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Novick R. P., Roth C. Plasmid-linked resistance to inorganic salts in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 1968 Apr;95(4):1335–1342. doi: 10.1128/jb.95.4.1335-1342.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Robichon-Szulmajster H., Cherest H. Regulation of homoserine O-transacetylase, first step in methionine biosyntheis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1967 Jul 21;28(2):256–262. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(67)90438-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. STUTZENBERGER F. J., BENNETT E. O. SENSITIVITY OF MIXED POPULATIONS OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS AND ESCHERICHIA COLI TO MERCURIALS. Appl Microbiol. 1965 Jul;13:570–574. doi: 10.1128/am.13.4.570-574.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Singh A., Sherman F. Association of methionine requirement with methyl mercury resistant mutants of yeast. Nature. 1974 Jan 25;247(5438):227–229. doi: 10.1038/247227a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Smith D. H. R factors mediate resistance to mercury, nickel, and cobalt. Science. 1967 May 26;156(3778):1114–1116. doi: 10.1126/science.156.3778.1114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Summers A. O., Lewis E. Volatilization of mercuric chloride by mercury-resistant plasmid-bearing strains of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 1973 Feb;113(2):1070–1072. doi: 10.1128/jb.113.2.1070-1072.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Summers A. O., Silver S. Mercury resistance in a plasmid-bearing strain of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1972 Dec;112(3):1228–1236. doi: 10.1128/jb.112.3.1228-1236.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES