Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1972 Mar;109(3):1101–1105. doi: 10.1128/jb.109.3.1101-1105.1972

Inhibition and Activation of Bacterial Luciferase Synthesis

Anatol Eberhard a,1
PMCID: PMC247330  PMID: 5011244

Abstract

Luciferase synthesis is repressed when bioluminescent bacteria are inoculated into fresh medium but is induced after the cells have grown in the medium for some time. In minimal medium, an activator which leads to induction of the enzyme is released into the medium by the bacteria. Complete medium contains a dialyzable and quite stable inhibitor which leads to repression of luciferase. The bacteria remove the inhibitor from the medium and also produce activator, thus allowing synthesis of the enzyme. Two unidentified nonluminescent strains of bacteria were unable to remove the inhibitor. Two different bioluminescent strains, Photobacterium fischeri and P. fischeri strain MAV, produce specific activators that are ineffective with cells of the other strain. The two activators are different with respect to heat stability, but both are small molecules. The activators can be assayed on the basis of their ability to counteract the inhibitor. Identification of the inhibitor and the activators may allow the bioluminescent system to be linked to other metabolic processes of the cells.

Full text

PDF
1101

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Coffey J. J. Inducible synthesis of bacterial luciferase: specificity and kinetics of induction. J Bacteriol. 1967 Nov;94(5):1638–1647. doi: 10.1128/jb.94.5.1638-1647.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hastings J. W., Weber K., Friedland J., Eberhard A., Mitchell G. W., Gunsalus A. Structurally distinct bacterial luciferases. Biochemistry. 1969 Dec;8(12):4681–4689. doi: 10.1021/bi00840a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kempner E. S., Hanson F. E. Aspects of light production by Photobacterium fischeri. J Bacteriol. 1968 Mar;95(3):975–979. doi: 10.1128/jb.95.3.975-979.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mitchell G. W., Hastings J. W. A stable, inexpensive, solid-state photomultiplier photometer. Anal Biochem. 1971 Jan;39(1):243–250. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(71)90481-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nealson K. H., Markovitz A. Mutant analysis and enzyme subunit complementation in bacterial bioluminescence in Photobacterium fischeri. J Bacteriol. 1970 Oct;104(1):300–312. doi: 10.1128/jb.104.1.300-312.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nealson K. H., Platt T., Hastings J. W. Cellular control of the synthesis and activity of the bacterial luminescent system. J Bacteriol. 1970 Oct;104(1):313–322. doi: 10.1128/jb.104.1.313-322.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES