Abstract
We describe a novel, typically prokaryotic, sensor kinase in chloroplasts of green plants. The gene for this chloroplast sensor kinase (CSK) is found in cyanobacteria, prokaryotes from which chloroplasts evolved. The CSK gene has moved, during evolution, from the ancestral chloroplast to the nuclear genomes of eukaryotic algae and green plants. The CSK protein is now synthesised in the cytosol of photosynthetic eukaryotes and imported into their chloroplasts as a protein precursor. In the model higher plant Arabidopsis thaliana, CSK is autophosphorylated and required for control of transcription of chloroplast genes by the redox state of an electron carrier connecting photosystems I and II. CSK therefore provides a redox regulatory mechanism that couples photosynthesis to gene expression. This mechanism is inherited directly from the cyanobacterial ancestor of chloroplasts, is intrinsic to chloroplasts, and is targeted to chloroplast genes.
Keywords: cell evolution, chloroplast genome, redox, transcription, two-component system
Photosynthesis is the conversion of radiant energy into chemical potential energy by land plants, algae, and certain species of bacteria. These organisms thereby harness sunlight to drive the biogeochemical cycles of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen, fuelling and sustaining life on Earth. In eukaryotes, photosynthesis occurs in chloroplasts, cytoplasmic organelles that evolved from a free-living cyanobacterium. The ancient symbiosis that co-opted prokaryotic cyanobacteria as photosynthetic compartments of eukaryotic cells involved the uptake and maintenance of both the photosynthetic and genetic systems of the cyanobacterial endosymbiont. Today, the chloroplasts of photosynthetic eukaryotes carry out oxygenic photosynthesis that is indistinguishable, except in fine detail, from photosynthesis in cyanobacteria. In contrast, the chloroplast genome has been hugely decreased in size, because almost all cyanobacterial genes still retained by eukaryotes have relocated to the cell nucleus (1). Therefore the vast majority of chloroplast proteins are now imported as products of nuclear genes that encode chloroplast-targeted precursors made on cytosolic ribosomes (2).
The few functional genes now left in chloroplasts always include genes for core proteins of the photochemical reaction centers that perform the primary, light-driven redox chemistry of photosynthetic electron transfer (3). Expression of these chloroplast genes is regulated by photosynthetic electron transport (4). Here we demonstrate that the basis of regulation is a typically bacterial, two-component signaling system, inherited from the cyanobacterial ancestor of the chloroplast.
Two-component signal transduction is ubiquitous in prokaryotes (5), including cyanobacteria (6). Its components are a sensor kinase, phosphorylated on histidine when a specific environmental change occurs; and a response regulator that contains an aspartate residue to which the phosphate group is transferred, activating an appropriate response (5). The nuclear genome of the model higher plant Arabidopsis thaliana contains 54 genes for two-component proteins (7). However, known two-component elements in chloroplasts are limited to a few examples in certain nongreen algal groups, where there are just one or two two-component genes of uncertain function in the chloroplast genome itself (8).
Results and Discussion
Chloroplast Sensor Kinase (CSK) in Arabidopsis thaliana.
We inspected the complete nuclear genome sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana for a sensor kinase that might be synthesised in the cytosol as a precursor for import into chloroplasts. Fig. 1 shows the deduced amino acid sequence of a predicted CSK, the At1g67840 gene product of Arabidopsis thaliana, aligned with sequences of three bacterial histidine sensor kinases and of homologous proteins from whole genomes or expressed sequence tags (EST) of other plant and algal species. Fig. 1A shows the conserved histidine residue that is the site of autophosphorylation by phosphoryl group transfer from ATP. This histidine phosphorylation site is retained in CSKs of the red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae and of the diatoms Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Thalassiosira pseudonana (Fig. 1A). In contrast, Arabidopsis thaliana CSK and other plant CSKs contain an homologous “H-box” motif in which the histidine phosphorylation site has been replaced by glutamic acid (Fig. 1A). In further contrast, the histidine phosphorylation site has been replaced by a tyrosine residue in the CSK of the eukaryotic alga Ostreococcus (9) (Fig. 1A). Similar replacement of the histidine residue of the original phosphorylation site has been observed in plant phytochromes (10) and ethylene receptors (11), which are serine/threonine kinases with histidine kinase ancestries. Fig. 1B shows the sequence motifs N, G1, F, G2, and G3 of the ATP-binding domain. It is seen that all of these motifs are common to the bacterial proteins ArcB (12), RegB (13), and EnvZ (14), and to the CSK proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana, Populus trichocarpa, Oryza sativa, Thalassiosira pseudonana, and Cyanidioschyzon merolae (Fig. 1B).
Subcellular Localization of CSK.
The entire coding sequence of CSK (giving 611 aa) was fused in-frame with the gene for green fluorescent protein. Tobacco leaf epidermal cells were transformed with this full-length CSK-GFP gene construct. After 48 h, fluorescence microscopy revealed that the transiently expressed GFP was entirely colocated with chlorophyll fluorescence, showing that the CSK precursor is targeted and imported into chloroplasts (Fig. 2). A second CSK-GFP construct carrying only the first 139 aa residues of pre-CSK was also expressed in transformed tobacco epidermal cells became imported completely into chloroplasts (results not shown). To investigate further the location of CSK, a chloroplast import assay with the [35S]methionine-labeled CSK precursor was executed in vitro. The radiolabeled CSK protein is seen to be imported into the major chloroplast soluble phase, the chloroplast stroma (Fig. 3A, lane S). Interestingly, the CSK transit peptide is not cleaved off, because the imported CSK has the same molecular mass as the initial translation product. Cleavage of the transit peptide after import is seen for the majority of chloroplast proteins, therefore a “low energy” binding assay (15) was carried out to ensure that CSK is a genuine chloroplast stromal protein. Under these low energy conditions—low temperature, without added ATP, and in darkness—chloroplasts bind protein precursors ready for import (15). This precursor binding is indeed seen in the case of CSK (Fig. 3B), where the precursor protein associates with chloroplasts (lane C), but remains sensitive to added protease. The function of the uncleaved transit peptide of CSK after import into the chloroplast (Figs. 2 and 3A) is unclear, but in the Chlamydomonas nuclear-encoded chlorophyll a/b binding protein, CP29, the uncleaved transit peptide is a site of regulatory phosphorylation and acetylation (16).
CSK Links Photosynthetic Electron Transport with Chloroplast Transcription.
Sensor kinases sense specific environmental cues and trigger appropriate responses via their cognate response regulator proteins. The latter are often DNA-binding transcription factors (5). We examined the transcriptional response of the chloroplast psaA gene to changes in light quality, and then compared the transcriptional response in wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana with that in two separate CSK T-DNA insertion lines from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center [supporting information (SI) Fig. S1]. It has been demonstrated in different plant species that transcription of the psaA gene, which encodes the photosystem I reaction center apoprotein A, responds robustly and in a functionally intelligible way to changes in the redox state of the electron carrier plastoquinone (4, 17, 18). Fig. 4 A and B shows the complex kinetics of psaA transcript accumulation in wild-type Arabidopsis plants. Here, Fig. 4 A and B also shows clear changes in these kinetics in the two Arabidopsis CSK-null mutants after shifts in the spectral quality of incident light that change the redox state of plastoquinone (18). The transcriptional response of CSK-mutant plants differs from that of wild-type plants. When light one (favoring photosystem I) is replaced by light two (favoring photosystem II), transcripts of the chloroplast psaA gene for the photosystem I reaction center protein PS I-A accumulate up to 11-fold in 26 h for the wild type (Fig. 4A). However, CSK-mutant plants show only a 5-fold increase in psaA gene transcription under the same conditions (Fig. 4A). The reverse light switch, from light two to light one, produces a 2.5-fold decrease in psaA expression in the wild type, as the reaction center of photosystem I is repressed (Fig. 4B). In contrast, psaA transcript quantity does not decrease under the same conditions in CSK mutants (Fig. 4B). Instead, the sign of the response is reversed, and psaA transcript quantity increases for 8 h, eventually falling between 26 and 32 h (Fig. 4B).
Normal psaA transcriptional control is part of an acclimatory response in chloroplasts called photosystem stoichiometry adjustment. The function of photosystem stoichiometry adjustment is to compensate for any deficiency in energy conversion at either photosystem I or photosystem II by increasing the quantity of the photosystem that will otherwise become rate-limiting to overall photosynthesis. The chlorophyll a/b ratio is a measure of the stoichiometry of photosystem I to photosystem II (19). Table 1 shows the lack of a functional photosystem stoichiometry adjustment as an inability of the CSK mutants to control Chl a/b ratio in response to changes between light one and light two.
Table 1.
Chl a/b ratio | Grown in white light | Grown under Light 2 | Grown under Light 1 |
---|---|---|---|
Wild type | 2.27 ± 0.13 | 3.05 ± 0.03 | 1.55 ± 0.09 |
CSK mutant | 2.32 ± 0.08 | 2.54 ± 0.05 | 2.10 ± 0.12 |
Data are shown as means ± SE from three independent measurements
CSK Is Autophosphorylated.
Autophosphorylation of sensor kinases is the initial step in the detection and transduction of signals by two-component signaling pathways. We therefore tested whether CSK becomes autophosphorylated by incubating the overexpressed CSK protein, which includes the catalytic domain of CSK fused with the GST tag, in the presence of [γ-32P]ATP, the reducing agent DTT, and the divalent cations Mg2+, Mn2+, or Ca2+. It is known that bacterial sensor kinases have specific requirements for certain divalent cations for autophosphorylation and signal perception. The CSK protein becomes autophosphorylated in the presence of Mn2+ and to a lesser degree in the presence of Ca2+, but no autophosphorylation was detected in the presence of Mg2+ (Fig. 4C). DTT stimulates autophosphorylation but is not an absolute requirement (Fig. 4C). Manganese-specific autophosphorylation is known to be characteristic of some plant ethylene sensors that are derived from histidine sensor kinases (11, 20). Fig. 4D shows little or no labeling of the GST protein alone by [γ-32P]ATP under any of these conditions. To further confirm that the labeling of CSK results from phosphorylation of an amino acid side chain by 32P, the labeled proteins were incubated with calf intestine alkaline phosphatase, which hydrolyzes orthophosphoric acid monoester groups (21). Alkaline phosphatase treatment completely removed 32P-labeling of CSK (Fig. 4E).
To investigate the identity of the phosphorylated amino acid(s) in autophosphorylated CSK, the autophosphorylated protein was incubated in acid or alkali. It is known that phosphohistidine is labile in acid but stable in alkaline solution, that phosphoserine and phosphothreonine are acid-stable and alkali-labile, and that phosphotyrosine is stable in both acid and alkali. The stability of the CSK phosphoryl group to both acid and alkali treatments (Fig. 4F) suggests tyrosine phosphorylation. Because a glutamate residue replaces the histidine autophosphorylation site in plant CSKs (Fig. 1B), conserved tyrosine residues lying outside the H- box could be the site(s) of phosphorylation of plant CSK. In CSK of the chlorophycean alga Ostreococcus, a tyrosine residue replaces histidine (Fig. 1B). Such a tyrosine replacement in the DivL sensor kinase of Caulobacter crescentus results in tyrosine autokinase activity of DivL (22).
Cyanobacterial Ancestry of CSK.
Phylogenetic analysis of predicted CSK amino acid sequences from a red alga and a green alga and from two diatoms and five green plants shows that all CSKs share common ancestors with cyanobacterial histidine sensor kinases. In cyanobacteria, Hik2 is a conspicuous example of a CSK homologue (Fig. 5). Hik2 is a cognate sensor of the Rre1 response regulator (6). The gene for Rre1 (cyanobacterial nomenclature) is retained by red algal plastids as ycf29. CSK is therefore related to the two-component systems retained from cyanobacteria by red algal plastids. For example, in the single-celled ancient red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae, CSK is a nuclear-encoded sensor kinase, and the only sensor kinase in the whole genome (23). The plastid of C. merolae encodes two response regulators, ycf29 and ycf27, both of which are transcription factors with a helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif (24). The cognate response regulator partner of CSK in higher plant chloroplasts remains to be identified.
Distribution and Function of CSK Suggest Deep Evolutionary Significance.
The CSK gene homologue Hik2 is retained as one of only four histidine sensor kinases in the minimal cyanobacterial genome of Prochlorococcus marinus SS120 (25). CSK is also retained in the minimal eukaryotic nuclear genomes of Ostreococcus (9) and Cyanidioschyzon (23). Furthermore, CSK has persisted through a secondary symbiotic event in the ancestor of diatoms such as Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Thalassiosira pseudonana where the chloroplast is derived from a eukaryotic, red algal symbiont, itself a product of a primary endosymbiosis involving a cyanobacterium. In green plants, CSK bears the unmistakable hallmarks of a cyanobacterial sensor kinase (Figs. 1 and 4 C–F) that is now targeted to chloroplasts (Figs. 2 and 3), being encoded by a gene that has moved, in evolution, from the chloroplast to the cell nucleus. The sequence (Fig. 1 and Figs. S2 and S3), functional (Fig. 4) and phylogenetic (Fig. 5) properties of CSK strongly suggest that CSK is the sensor in a two-component redox regulatory system that provides the mechanism that couples photosynthesis to chloroplast genome function. This coupling may also provide information controlling expression of nuclear genes for components of photosynthesis and gene expression in chloroplasts (17, 26).
Oxygenic photosynthesis takes place in chloroplasts and cyanobacteria, and requires two separate photochemical reaction centers that are connected electrically in series. Together with their distinct light-harvesting antennae, these reaction centers comprise photosystems I and II of the photosynthetic electron transport chain. CSK is clearly required for the photosynthetic, redox control of reaction center gene transcription (Fig. 4) that corrects imbalance in electron transport between the two photosystems by initiating new synthesis of proteins, according to the redox signal received from the connecting electron carrier, plastoquinone (4, 19).
Conclusion
Our results show that redox regulatory coupling is intrinsic to chloroplasts and has been inherited, and maintained, from the chloroplast's cyanobacterial ancestor. This coupling implies a general function for cytoplasmic genetic systems in eukaryotes. The persistence, in chloroplasts, of a bacterial two-component redox regulatory system is an explicit prediction of the CORR hypothesis for the function of chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes (3, 27). The CORR hypothesis (CO-location for Redox Regulation) states that genes have been retained in bioenergetic organelles to provide direct and unconditional regulation of their expression by the redox state of their gene products, the core proteins of energy transduction in photosynthesis and respiration. The properties and phylogenetic distribution of CSK are consistent with the application of CORR to chloroplasts, and in agreement with its predictions (3). Thus genes for photosynthetic reaction centers are retained in chloroplasts to be regulated by photosynthetic electron transport, whereas genes for the redox signaling components themselves belong to the major class of former cyanobacterial genes, and have moved to the cell nucleus.
Our findings support the hypothesis (3, 27) that local redox control of gene expression by energy transduction requires the presence of chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes as extranuclear genetic elements responsible for non-Mendelian inheritance of characters associated with photosynthesis and respiration.
Materials and Methods
Plant Growth Conditions.
Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings were grown from seeds on soil at 24°C and a photon flux density of 100 μE m−2·s−1 with an 8-hour light and 16-h dark photoperiod unless otherwise specified. For the Light switch time-course experiment, wild type (Col-0) and CSK knockout mutant Arabidopsis lines were grown in white light (100 μE m−2·s−1; 16-hour day) for 12 days and then transferred to light one or light two cabinets and allowed to acclimate for 4 days. At the end of the 4th day, light one was replaced by light two and vice versa. Leaves from 2 to 3 plants were collected for RNA extraction before the light switch and at various time points extending to 32 h after it. Chlorophyll a/b ratios were determined from plants that were 2–4 weeks old and grown under two days of light one, light two, or white light.
Lights One and Two.
Light one was provided by two red fluorescent strip lamps (Osram L 18W/60 Red from Osram GmbH, Hellabrunner Strasse 1, 81536 Munich, Germany), each wrapped in red filter (Lee 027 medium red from Lee Filters, Andover, Hants, U.K.). Light two was provided by two white fluorescent strip lamps (Osram L 18W/827 Lumillux) each wrapped in orange filter (Lee 105 Orange). The photon flux density at the highest leaves in light two was 12 μE m−2·s−1 and in light one was 6 μE m−2·s−1. Light one and light two were present for a 16-hour day (8-h dark period). The spectra of lights one and two show extended red and near infrared components in light one (results not shown). Their selective actions on photosystems I and II, respectively, were confirmed by modulated chlorophyll fluorescence and state transition measurements in the growth cabinet (results not shown).
Genotyping of the SALK T-DNA Insertion Lines.
Two T-DNA lines (SALK_027360 and SALK_018074) harboring insertions in the gene (At1g67840) encoding the CSK protein were obtained from ABRC. Genomic DNA was isolated from these lines and genotyped for homozygous insertion lines by using genomic and T-DNA cassette primers. A reverse transcriptase PCR confirmed that expression from the locus At1g67840 was completely absent (see Fig. S1 and SI Text for details).
CSK-GFP Construct and Chloroplast Protein Import in Vivo.
Two gene fusions between Arabidopsis CSK and the gene encoding the jellyfish green fluorescent protein (GFP) were constructed to investigate the subcellular targeting of CSK-GFP fusion proteins. The construct pCSK1-GFP was generated by amplifying a CSK cDNA fragment comprising 54 bp of the 5′UTR and the first 139 codons using Phusion DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) and the oligonucleotide primers PK-F (5′-CTAggatccGAGAGTTTCAGTCTCAGCCACAAAGTAA-3′; lowercase sequence represents a BamH I cleavage site) and PK-R1 (5′-GTATaggcctCGAGAGTACTGCGTTTGGATCAACGAT-3′; lowercase sequence represents a StuI cleavage site). The amplified cDNA was digested with BamH I and StuI and cloned in-frame with the GFP orf in the expression vector as described (28). The construct pCSK2-GFP contains a cDNA fragment possessing the same 5′ end but with the entire CSK ORF (without its stop codon) fused in-frame with GFP. This cDNA fragment was amplified by using the primer pair PK-F and PK-R2 (5′GTATaggcctTGCTTCATTGGCTTCAGATACTGCTG).
Transcriptional control of the CSK-GFP gene fusions was provided by the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter, and transcription termination and polyadenylation signals were provided by the nopaline synthase (nos) terminator (28). Leaves of Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco) were bombarded with tungsten particles (0.7 μm) coated with pCSK1-GFP or pCSK2-GFP by using a Bio-Rad PDS-1000/He particle delivery system, as described (29). After 24–48 h, leaf samples of 2 × 2 mm were mounted in water on a glass slide and viewed by scanning laser microscopy (TCS-NT, DMRXA light microscope stand, Leica Microsystems Wetzlar GmbH, Germany). Images of GFP and chlorophyll fluorescence, by using an excitation wavelength of 488 nm, were collected through TRITC and FITC filters, respectively.
Chloroplast Import of Radiolabeled CSK Precursor.
Pea seedlings (Pisum sativum, var. Kelvedon Wonder) were grown and then harvested at 9 days old. Chloroplasts were isolated from the leaf tips as described (30). A full-length CSK cDNA clone was obtained from Genoscope (Paris) and the CSK precursor was synthesised by the method described in ref. 31 by using SP6 RNA-polymerase for cDNA transcription followed by translation in a wheat germ cell-free system in the presence of [35S]methionine. Chloroplast import assays were conducted as before (32). Subsequent chloroplast fractionation and protease treatments are done as described before (33). Controls for chloroplast fractionation were based on published work (15). An identical import reaction was conducted omitting additional ATP, with the chloroplasts on ice, in the dark. These conditions promote envelope binding but inhibit import.
RNA Isolation and Quantitative Real Time PCR.
Total RNA was isolated from the leaves of 15–17-day-old Arabidopsis plants with Qiagen RNeasy Plant mini kit. RNA was treated with RNase-free DNase (Qiagen) to eliminate possible DNA contamination. Real time quantitative RT PCR was performed with Quantitech SYBR green kit from Qiagen, in a Chromo4 cycler (Bio-Rad). A ≈150-bp-long sequence was amplified from the psaA and the reference gene, Actin8 transcripts. For amplifying the psaA transcript, forward and reverse primers used were 5′ GGCACAAGCATCTCAGGTAA 3′ and 5′ AGCCCAAACAATGGATTCAA 3′ respectively and for Actin8, 5′ TTCCAGCAGATGTGGATCTCTA 3′ and 5′ AGAAAGAAATGTGATCCCGTCA 3′. The forward primer for the Actin8 transcript was designed as flanking an intron-exon boundary, thus eliminating the chances of amplifying any contaminated DNA sequences. The optimum annealing temperature for the each primer pair was found out by a gradient PCR. The authenticities of the amplificates were confirmed by sequencing the PCR products. Amplification efficiency for each primer pair was calculated by a 16-fold serial dilution of the template and the R2 value for each primer pair was found to be ≥0.99. A nontemplate control reaction was done for each primer pair to check whether template contamination or primer dimers contribute to the fluorescence signals observed. A small fluorescence signal at very late cycle numbers was seen in nontemplate control reactions for some primer pairs. This signal is likely to have arisen from primer dimers. A non-RT (non-reverse transcriptase) control reaction was also included to check for amplification from any contaminated DNA and it was found that, like nontemplate controls, a small fluorescence signal appeared at very late cycle numbers. For measuring the transcription kinetics of light switch samples, RNA was pooled from 2 to 3 plants and 3 technical replicates were used for each reaction. Expression values were normalized to total RNA. The quantitative real-time PCR technique used here employs relative quantification based on comparative CT method.
Chlorophyll Estimation.
Chlorophyll content was estimated by methods established by Porra et al. as described in ref. 19.
Autophosphorylation Assay.
A partial cDNA clone (U13211) encoding 450 residues from the carboxy-terminus of CSK, which includes the catalytic domain was obtained from ABRC. The cDNA was cloned into pGEX4T2 (Amersham) vector system and expressed as a GST fusion protein. The over-expressed CSK-GST fusion protein was purified by affinity chromatography (glutathione sepharose). For autophosphorylation assay, ≈10 μg of CSK-GST protein was taken in a 25-μl reaction volume containing 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 10% glycerol, 0.5 mM ATP, 8μCi [γ-32P]ATP (3,000 Ci/mmol), with or without 2 mM DTT and 10 mM MgCl2 or MnCl2, or CaCl2. The reactions were incubated at 22°C for 60 min and terminated by adding sample buffer. The phosphorylated proteins were subjected to SDS-12% PAGE and blotted onto PVDF membrane (Hybond-P, Amersham). The incorporated phosphate was visualized by autoradiography. The identity of the autophosphorylated CSK-GST fusion protein was confirmed by a monoclonal antibody directed against the GST tag (Novagen) of the fusion protein (results not shown). Standard Western blot analysis procedures were followed for the immunodetection of the GST tag. Amido black staining of the same membrane was also performed to verify the protein loading. For dephosphorylation of the phosphorylated CSK protein, autophosphorylation of CSK protein was performed as above and 1 μl of calf intestine alkaline phosphatase (New England Biolabs) was added to the autophosphorylated CSK and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Acid/alkali stability of the incorporated phosphate was determined by incubating the membrane in 1 M HCl or 3 M NaOH for 2 h at room temperature. The acid/alkali treated membrane was then rinsed with water and subjected to autoradiography.
Sequence Analysis.
Sequence similarity searches were performed with blastp and tblastn programs. Subcellular localization prediction was carried out with the programs TargetP, ChloroP, WoLF PSORT, PCLR and Predotar. Domains and motifs were identified by using the SMART database. Sequence alignment was generated with ClustalW and the alignment was edited with Jalview.
Phylogenetic Reconstruction.
Multiple alignment of the amino acid sequence corresponding to the catalytic domain of CSK and its homologues (as delineated by SMART database) was generated across a representative selection of photosynthetic eukaryotes and cyanobacteria. Sequences were retrieved from both JGI and GENBANK databases. The multiple alignment was generated by using CLUSTAL X and adjusted manually by using MacClade 4.06. The CSK tree was reconstructed from 91 characters. Bayesian phylogeny was generated by using Mr. Bayes 3.1 (34) from 2,000,000 generations divided between two parallel runs of 1,000,000 each with sampling every 1,000 generations. Although the likelihoods for both trees rapidly reached a plateau, 100 burn-in trees were nevertheless removed from both runs when computing the Bayesian topology. The substitution model was inferred by using a mixed model of amino acid substitution and rate across sites variation was modeled on a discrete gamma distribution approximated by using 4 gamma categories and 1 category of invariable sites. Bootstraps were generated by using PHYML 2.4.5 (35) using the WAG substitution model and rate-across-sites variation modeled on an approximate gamma distribution also using four gamma categories and one category of invariable sites.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments.
We thank Thomas Pfannschmidt and Carol A. Allen for discussions. S.P. thanks Queen Mary, University of London for a postgraduate research studentship; J.F.A. thanks The Royal Society of London for a Royal Society-Wolfson Research Merit Award; and M.B.R. is supported by a Wellcome Trust research grant to M.v.d.G.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0803928105/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Martin W, et al. Evolutionary analysis of Arabidopsis, cyanobacterial, and chloroplast genomes reveals plastid phylogeny and thousands of cyanobacterial genes in the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:12246–12251. doi: 10.1073/pnas.182432999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ellis RJ. The nuclear domination of chloroplast development. Sci Prog Oxf. 1984;69:129–142. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Allen JF. The function of genomes in bioenergetic organelles. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci. 2003;358:19–37. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pfannschmidt T, Nilsson A, Allen JF. Photosynthetic control of chloroplast gene expression. Nature. 1999;397:625–628. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stock AM, Robinson VL, Goudreau PN. Two-component signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem. 2000;69:183–215. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ashby MK, Houmard J. Cyanobacterial two-component proteins: structure, diversity, distribution, and evolution. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006;70:472–509. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00046-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hwang I, Chen HC, Sheen J. Two-component signal transduction pathways in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2002;129:500–515. doi: 10.1104/pp.005504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Duplessis MR, et al. Chloroplast His-to-Asp signal transduction: a potential mechanism for plastid gene regulation in Heterosigma akashiwo (Raphidophyceae) BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Derelle E, et al. Genome analysis of the smallest free-living eukaryote Ostreococcus tauri unveils many unique features. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:11647–11652. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604795103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yeh KC, Lagarias JC. Eukaryotic phytochromes: Light-regulated serine/threonine protein kinases with histidine kinase ancestry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:13976–13981. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Moussatche P, Klee HJ. Autophosphorylation activity of the Arabidopsis ethylene receptor multigene family. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:48734–48741. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403100200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Iuchi S, Lin ECC. Mutational analysis of signal transduction by ArcB, a membrane sensor protein responsible for anaerobic repression of operons involved in the central aerobic pathways in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:3972–3980. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.12.3972-3980.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bauer C, Elsen S, Swem LR, Swem DL, Masuda S. Redox and light regulation of gene expression in photosynthetic prokaryotes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci. 2003;358:147–153. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1189. discussion 153–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mizuno T, Wurtzel ET, Inouye M. Osmoregulation of gene expression. II. DNA sequence of the envZ gene of the ompB operon of Escherichia coli and characterization of its gene product. J Biol Chem. 1982;257:13692–13698. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Friedman AL, Keegstra K. Chloroplast protein import: Quantitative analysis of precursor binding. Plant Physiol. 1989;89:993–999. doi: 10.1104/pp.89.3.993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Turkina MV, Villarejo A, Vener AV. The transit peptide of CP29 thylakoid protein in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is not removed but undergoes acetylation and phosphorylation. FEBS Lett. 2004;564:104–108. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(04)00323-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fey V, et al. Retrograde plastid redox signals in the expression of nuclear genes for chloroplast proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:5318–5328. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406358200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Puthiyaveetil S, Allen JF. Transients in chloroplast gene transcription. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;368:871–874. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.01.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pfannschmidt T, Nilsson A, Tullberg A, Link G, Allen JF. Direct transcriptional control of the chloroplast genes psbA and psaAB adjusts photosynthesis to light energy distribution in plants. IUBMB Life. 1999;48:271–276. doi: 10.1080/713803507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhang ZG, et al. Evidence for serine/threonine and histidine kinase activity in the tobacco ethylene receptor protein NTHK2. Plant Physiol. 2004;136:2971–2981. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.034686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Coleman JE. Structure and mechanism of alkaline phosphatase. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1992;21:441–483. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.21.060192.002301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wu J, Ohta N, Zhao JL, Newton A. A novel bacterial tyrosine kinase essential for cell division and differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:13068–13073. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.23.13068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Matsuzaki M, et al. Genome sequence of the ultrasmall unicellular red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae 10D. Nature. 2004;428:653–657. doi: 10.1038/nature02398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Martinez-Hackert E, Stock AM. Structural relationships in the OmpR family of winged-helix transcription factors. J Mol Biol. 1997;269:301–312. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dufresne A, et al. Genome sequence of the cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus marinus SS120, a nearly minimal oxyphototrophic genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:10020–10025. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1733211100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Koussevitzky S, et al. Signals from chloroplasts converge to regulate nuclear gene expression. Science. 2007;316:715–719. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Allen JF. Control of gene-expression by redox potential and the requirement for chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes. J Theor Biol. 1993;165:609–631. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1993.1210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Helliwell CA, et al. A plastid envelope location of Arabidopsis ent-kaurene oxidase links the plastid and endoplasmic reticulum steps of the gibberellin biosynthesis pathway. Plant J. 2001;28:201–208. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01150.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hibberd JM, Linley PJ, Khan MS, Gray JC. Transient expression of green fluorescent protein in various plastid types following microprojectile bombardment. Plant J. 1998;16:627–632. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Brock IW, et al. Precursors of one integral and five lumenal thylakoid proteins are imported by isolated pea and barley thylakoids: Optimisation of in vitro assays. Plant Mol Biol. 1993;23:717–725. doi: 10.1007/BF00021527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.James HE, et al. Transport of proteins into chloroplasts. Import and maturation of precursors to the 33-Kda, 23-Kda, and 16-Kda proteins of the photosynthetic oxygen-evolving complex. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:19573–19576. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mould RM, Robinson C. A proton gradient is required for the transport of two lumenal oxygen-evolving proteins across the thylakoid membrane. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:12189–12193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Di Cola A, Robinson C. Large-scale translocation reversal within the thylakoid Tat system in vivo. J Cell Biol. 2005;171:281–289. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200502067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:1572–1574. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Guindon S, Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003;52:696–704. doi: 10.1080/10635150390235520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chenna R, et al. Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3497–3500. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.