Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jul 18.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Radiol. 2008 Jun;15(6):728–739. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.10.010

Posture-Dependent Human 3He Lung Imaging in an Open Access MRI System: Initial Results

L L Tsai 1,2,3, R W Mair 1, C-H Li 1,4, M S Rosen 1,4, S Patz 3,5, R L Walsworth 1,4
PMCID: PMC2474800  NIHMSID: NIHMS52867  PMID: 18486009

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives

The human lung and its functions are extremely sensitive to orientation and posture, and debate continues as to the role of gravity and the surrounding anatomy in determining lung function and heterogeneity of perfusion and ventilation. However, study of these effects is difficult. The conventional high-field magnets used for most hyperpolarized 3He MRI of the human lung, and most other common radiological imaging modalities including PET and CT, restrict subjects to lying horizontally, minimizing most gravitational effects.

Materials and Methods

In this paper, we briefly review the motivation for posture-dependent studies of human lung function, and present initial imaging results of human lungs in the supine and vertical body orientations using inhaled hyperpolarized 3He gas and an open-access MRI instrument. The open geometry of this MRI system features a “walk-in” capability that permits subjects to be imaged in vertical and horizontal positions, and potentially allows for complete rotation of the orientation of the imaging subject in a two-dimensional plane.

Results

Initial results include two-dimensional lung images acquired with ~ 4 × 8 mm in-plane resolution and three-dimensional images with ~ 2 cm slice thickness.

Conclusion

Effects of posture variation are observed, including posture-related effects of the diaphragm and distension of the lungs while vertical.

Keywords: orientation, posture-dependent, lung imaging, open-access MRI, hyperpolarized 3He

INTRODUCTION

The effects of body orientation and posture changes on the regional distribution of pulmonary perfusion and ventilation have been a source of renewed interest in recent years [14], principally due to significant questions relating to the care and survival of patients with obstructive or restrictive lung diseases such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [3]. Perfusion heterogeneity has classically been attributed to effects of gravity on pleural pressure and alveolar expansion, resulting in regional variations in lung function [5,6]. Position-dependent changes in ventilation dynamics also play an important role in a wide variety of common clinical problems [79]. Few methods exist that allow detailed studies of regional lung function under varying gravitational conditions — or subject orientations. Thus, pulmonary physiology could benefit greatly from the development of minimally-invasive methods to quantify regional lung function in subjects at variable orientations.

MRI has only recently been recognized as a useful tool for pulmonary imaging. Chest radiography [10] offers rapid, low-cost, high-resolution projection images with multiple subject orientations, but yields no quantitative information on gas exchange. Scintigraphy [11] offers tomographic and quantitative information but uses relatively high and costly doses of nuclear tracers and suffers from poor resolution. CT provides superior anatomic detail with limited functional data [1214]. Positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/CT are used to directly measure pulmonary ventilation and perfusion and have provided the best regional quantitative detail thus far [4,15], but subjects are restricted to prone or supine orientations.

In recent years, MRI of inhaled, hyperpolarized 3He gas [16,17] has emerged as a powerful method for studying lung structure and function [18,19]. This technique is used with conventional clinical MRI instruments to make quantitative maps of human ventilation [18,19], obtain regional acinar structural information via measurements of the 3He Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) [20,21], and to monitor the regional alveolar gas-space O2 concentration (pAO2) via the 3He spin-relaxation rate [22,23]. These techniques have applications to basic pulmonary physiology [24] as well as lung diseases such as asthma [25, 26], emphysema [20,27,28], lung cancer [27], and cystic fibrosis [29].

However, the large superconducting magnets used in conventional clinical MRI systems also restrict human subjects to lying in a horizontal orientation. Some initial studies with hyperpolarized 3He have shown that posture changes, even while horizontal, affect the lung structure modestly in a way that can nonetheless be clearly probed by 3He MRI [25,30,31]. However only minimal subject reorientation is possible inside conventional MRI scanners. An open-access MRI system that allows for different body orientations and postures has been used for studies of the lumbar spine under various loading conditions, but is even heavier and more costly than a traditional clinical MRI scanner [3234]. Also, the size, weight and technical restrictions of traditional clinical MRI systems demand patients be brought to the scanner. For many critical-care patients the requirement of being moved from the Intensive Care Unit is dangerous, time consuming, and expensive. Thus, the potential medical benefits of hyperpolarized 3He MRI are not realized for many of the most needy patients. An open-access, light-weight and less-cumbersome MRI system, therefore, could have significant potential for monitoring critically ill lung patients.

To enable posture-dependent lung imaging, we developed an open-access MRI system based on a simple electromagnet that operates at a field strength approximately 200 times lower than a traditional clinical MRI scanner. To perform MRI at such a field strength, we exploit the practicality of hyperpolarized 3He MRI at magnetic fields < 10 mT [3538]. 3He hyperpolarized to 30–60% can be created by one of two laser-based optical pumping processes [14,15] prior to the MRI procedure, and then high-resolution gas space imaging can be performed without the need of a large applied magnetic field. Such high spin polarization gives 3He gas a magnetization density similar to that of water in ~ 10 T fields, despite the drastically lower spin density of the gas. Thus the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of hyperpolarized noble gas MRI in animal or human lungs is only weakly dependent on the applied magnetic field [36], and very-low-field MRI becomes practical [36,37]. In addition, once the effects of reduced magnetic susceptibility-induced background gradients and the resultant much longer 3He T2* time at very-low fields are accounted for, it can be shown that the optimum field strength for hyperpolarized 3He may be around 0.1 T, not 1.5 or 3.0 T [39]. In addition, operation at ~ 10 mT should provide image SNR within a factor of 2–4 of that obtained in clinical scanners [39]. We had previously developed a prototype open-access, very-low-field MRI system [37,38]. Other groups have recognized the benefits of low-field MRI for human studies with hyperpolarized gases [4044], however, these studies generally have employed horizontal bore MRI magnets which restrict the subject to a single orientation [4042,44]. One study employed a vertically-oriented electromagnet that allowed the subject to stand vertically, but not be imaged horizontally [43].

In this paper, we present initial results on posture-dependent 3He human lung imaging obtained with our second-generation open-access MRI system. With this system, the subject is unrestricted by the magnet and gradient coils in two dimensions. The system allows for complete re-orientation of the subject into any inclined, recumbent or inverted posture in a two-dimensional plane. Initial two- and three-dimensional human lung images are presented from subjects in two orientations - lying horizontally (supine) and sitting vertically.

BACKGROUND

Development of an open-access MRI scanner for posture-dependent human lung imaging is motivated by: (i) current interest in the effects of body orientation and posture changes on the regional distribution of pulmonary perfusion and ventilation; and (ii) the lack of existing open-access imaging technology that does not employ ionizing radiation but does allow visualization and functional mapping of the lung in different orientations.

Regional heterogeneity of pulmonary ventilation and pulmonary perfusion is well-known to be influenced by gravity [4,45], but is also affected by the lung parenchyma and surrounding organs and stroma, leading to controversy over which effect is more physiologically relevant [5,6]. Pulmonary functional residual capacity (FRC) and gas elimination has been shown to be gravity-dependent [46], suggesting differences in local airway resistance. This has important clinical implications in mechanical ventilation, for example, where patients who are ventilated in a prone position tend to have improved gas exchange compared to those lying supine [1,2]. Non-horizontal orientations, such as Trendelenburg posturing, result in an increased total respiratory elastance and resistance, mainly due to decreasing lung volumes [7]. The reverse-Trendelenburg posture is commonly used in abdominal laproscopic surgeries, where insufflation of the abdominal cavity is well known to have global cardiopulmonary effects due to increased intraperitoneal pressure [47].

Of particular interest is the change in gas exchange dynamics when a subject is moved from a supine to an upright position. This change in orientation displaces abdominal contents inferiorly, lowering the diaphragm and distending the lungs. Ribcage motion during the breathing cycle is also increased as a result of the altered load as well as changes in respiratory muscle tone [48]. Total FRC and conductance is known to significantly decrease in normal individuals undergoing such a postural change [49,50], but regional dynamics have not been measured. Although this has a small net effect on the overall respiratory mechanics of normal individuals, it can have a profound impact in disease. For example, in obese patients the total lung capacity (TLC) and FRC are markedly decreased in either posture, while baseline airway resistance is increased and maximized in the supine state [8]. Although it is generally understood that global lung mechanics are altered due to the increased load from surrounding abdominal contents and subcutaneous fat in such individuals, this provides an inadequate explanation for the observed changes in pulmonary function [9]. Of similar interest is the effect of pregnancy on pulmonary dynamics, which involves not only mass effect and mechanical changes to the cardiopulmonary circuit, but also fundamental changes to neuro-respiratory drive of the mother [51]. Management of such issues becomes increasingly relevant in modern medicine as the prevalence of obesity and asthma increases within the pregnant population and advances in fertility treatments allow for pregnancy at increasingly advanced maternal ages.

Regional measurements reflecting local gas dynamics and airway conductance are necessary to locate areas where the most significant physiological changes are occurring within the lung. To date, all pulmonary function tests performed on upright individuals have been via spirometry, with global resistance/conductance measurements limited to forced oscillation techniques performed at the mouth only. pAO2, ADC, and ventilation-perfusion ratio (V/Q) maps of the lung, obtained either through MRI [22,23,52] or PET [5355] imaging, are capable of reliably resolving regional dynamics and anatomical features, but all studies have been performed on supine or prone individuals only.

The open-access magnet design of our MRI system allows for 3He lung imaging of subjects in either recumbent or upright postures. The ability to image both postures within the same system offers two major advantages: (i) comparative studies between the supine and upright state can be performed on the same instrument, eliminating a potentially major source of systematic error; and (ii) supine imaging with the system can be compared to the numerous supine studies already performed with PET or MRI, serving as a calibration and verification tool for the measurement techniques employed for both supine and upright lung imaging. Any gravity-dependent effects on regional lung ventilation and gas exchange seen in studies of prone and supine subjects would be further enhanced in the upright orientation, as the total vertical distance occupied by the lungs would be increased by at least 10 cm. 3He Ventilation images and pAO2 and ADC maps of the upright lung will provide previously unobtainable data pertaining to normal human lung physiology in a common, natural posture. For example, qualitative ventilation maps or quantitative measurements of 3He gas clearance over multiple breath cycles, in upright versus supine postures, will highlight regions of significant change in residual volume and resistance. These variations are likely to correlate with subject body mass index (BMI), even within normal ranges, due to mechanical and physiological changes mentioned previously. Quantification of these changes would be a significant step towards future studies involving obese patients. The open-access design of our imager is also well-suited to image individuals with extreme morbid obesity, whose size often excludes them from imaging via conventional PET or MRI systems.

Another important application of the open-access lung imager will be 3He MRI of asthmatic subjects. To date, 3He MRI with traditional clinical scanners have shown profound ventilation defects in supine subjects, even at an asymptomatic state [25]. These defects are both transient and mobile throughout the periphery of the lung. Although asthma is classically viewed as a disease of the major central airways where hypersensitive smooth muscles lead to obstructions in airflow, there is increasing evidence that peripheral lung involvement is also important [5660]. Supine imaging with PET has shown that ventilation defects are composed of clusters of constricted terminal bronchioles; this supports a lung branching model which possesses an intrinsic sensitivity to minor instabilities, leading to major regional patches of airway collapse [61]. Importantly, such ventilation defects have usually been observed in gravity-dependent regions of the lung, so imaging in the upright posture may reveal a more exaggerated or altered distribution pattern. 3He ventilation, pAO2, and ADC studies on upright healthy, non-asthmatic subjects will also provide useful information, as similar, smaller-scale ventilation defects have been seen even in healthy lungs [55]. Results from these studies, as well as future studies with asthmatics, will be useful not only to further understand the mechanics of airway constriction in diseases such as asthma, but also to help understand how and why inhaled therapeutics, usually administered with the patient in an upright posture, can be effective for some patients but not for others, and how co-existing conditions such as obesity can complicate management.

The quality-of-life amongst the ever-growing geriatric population is often reduced by dyspnea, which generally results from age-related changes in pulmonary function. Anatomical and physiological changes in older lungs include smaller airway size, increased peripheral airway resistance leading to air trapping, and increasing pulmonary compliance, characteristics that can be emphysema-like [62]. Some of these alterations can be present by the age of forty, even among healthy individuals. Although TLC remains fairly constant with age, inspiratory and expiratory residual volumes increase while tidal volume decreases, exacerbating regional air trapping in the periphery [63,64]. 3He ADC, pAO2, and ventilation imaging of healthy adults with an open-access MRI system is expected to reveal age-dependent regional changes in airway dimensions and ventilation defects from peripheral bronchiole airway closure and may show an association between some of those changes and subject age. Equally important is the study of how and to what extent these changes are influenced by postural variations — an investigation that would be possible with an open-access MRI system. Such data would help elucidate, for example, how some healthy elderly patients who do not have classical sleep apnea can experience respiratory discomfort while lying supine but significantly alleviate their symptoms in a slight reverse-Trendelenburg orientation. This study may also be influential in the ICU setting, where mechanical ventilation in geriatric patients is often associated with poorer outcomes [65]. Potential studies involving geriatric patients would be further aided by an open-access MR system operating at very-low magnetic field, which would allow easier access than a traditional clinical scanner for disabled patients, as well as those with metallic or electronic implants who would be excluded from traditional clinical MRI systems.

Finally, idiopathic pulmonary hypertension (IPH) is a public health problem of increasing interest [66]. This disease is typically discovered around the fourth decade, after complaints of dyspnea at rest or with minor activity. However, V/Q mismatches can manifest themselves symptomatically under heavy exercise stress, e.g., in high-performance athletes, up to two decades earlier. In the case of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTPH) [67], subjects suffer multiple microscopic, radiographically-invisible pulmonary embolisms that can eventually lead to clinical symptoms of pulmonary hypertension. The initial clinical picture can mimic early IPH, where symptoms become apparent only with major exercise. Suspicion of CTPH requires a stress exercise test where patients are monitored invasively with pulmonary arterial catheters and real-time blood gas analysis [68]. An open-access MRI system, which would permit patients to undergo an exercise challenge while inside the MRI scanner, and then be monitored in a non-invasive manner, including local measurements of O2 distribution and consumption, would be a significant improvement in the study of the progression of this disease.

EXPERIMENTAL

Imager Design

A detailed description of the design and operation of our open-access human MRI system, refined from the prototype imager [37,38], will be presented elsewhere [69]. Here, a brief overview of the design, and how it permits variable-posture lung imaging, is provided.

The imager operates at an applied static magnetic field, B0, of 6.5 mT (65 G). The B0 field is created by a four-coil, bi-planar magnet design [70] with pairs of coils measuring 2 and 0.55 meters in diameter. One large and small coil are mounted together on a 2.2 m-diameter aluminum flange. There are two of these flange and coil sets, which are wound and arranged in a mirroring fashion, and are mounted vertically on a customized stand made of extruded aluminum beams, maintaining a separation of ~ 90 cm between coil sets (see Figure 1a). All four coils are connected in series to a single DC power supply that supplies 42.2 A of current to reach the desired B0 of 6.5 mT. This field allows 3He MRI at a frequency of 210 kHz. With manual shimming and DC offsets on the gradient coils, the magnetic field exhibits a total variation of less than ~ 5 µT (350 ppm) across the volume of a human chest, which allows 3He NMR signals from such volumes with spectral FWHM line-widths of ~ 30 Hz.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Photographs of the open-access human MRI system. a) The open-access imaging area, which allows reorientation of a subject. The gap between the two coils is 90 cm, with over 2 m of open space in the other two dimensions. The photograph shows the pair of main B0 coils on their aluminum support flanges, with the gradient coils located parallel to each B0 coil on additional supports bolted to the flanges. b) The entire imager on its customized aluminum framework, located inside an RF-shielded room. Access to the imaging region from outside the room is straightforward.

Planar gradient coils were built to provide the pulsed magnetic field gradients, thus eliminating another restrictive cylindrical geometry found in clinical MRI scanners. The coils were designed to allow the acquisition of 256 × 256 3He images across a 40 cm field of view (FOV) with an imaging bandwidth of 10 kHz, while minimizing concomitant field effects [71]. We wound the coils using insulated magnet wire on non-conducting, free-standing frames to facilitate heat dissipation, and minimize eddy current formation in the B0 coil/flange structure. The z coils consist of two sets of three circular loops, with each set mounted on the magnet flange, parallel to the B0 coils. The x and y gradients consist of free-standing rectangular grids mounted on each magnet flange (see Figure 1a), maintaining the ~ 90 cm spacing for subject access. The gradient coils are powered by Techron 8607 gradient amplifiers, operating at up to 140 A. At maximum current, the three gradients each provide ~ 0.07 G/cm gradient strength with a 500 µs rise-time.

RF-frequency and gradient control is accomplished using a Tecmag Apollo commercial MRI research console [Tecmag Inc, Houston, TX]. This system is designed to operate at frequencies as low as 100 kHz without further hardware modification, unlike traditional MRI scanners. RF pulses from the Apollo are fed to an NMR Plus 5LF300S amplifier [Communications Power Corp. Inc., Hauppage, NY] which provides up to 300 W of RF power. We employed a single RF coil for B1 transmission and detection, in conjunction with a Transcoupler II probe interface-T/R switch [Tecmag] optimized for 200 kHz operation. The RF coil is a large solenoid designed to accommodate the subject’s shoulders and arms, and completely cover the thoracic region. The coil is ~ 50 cm in diameter and length, and is tuned to 210 kHz using an external capacitative resonance box that is remote from the coil. At maximum power, the 90° hard pulse has a duration of ~ 300 µs. Being a solenoid, the coil has very high B1 homogeneity [69], and can be rotated along with the subject in the imaging plane, while remaining perpendicular to the direction of B0. The coil has a quality factor Q ~ 30, implying operating bandwidths of ~ 10 kHz at the 3He Larmor frequency of 210 kHz. This low coil Q removes the effect of the coil response function being convolved with the image dataset, as we had seen previously with coils of higher Q and lower Larmor frequencies [38]. At a Larmor frequency of 210 kHz, the human body does not effect the coil Q and has minimal loading effects, allowing the RF coil power and flip angles to be calibrated ahead of time and remain reproducible from subject to subject, unlike the case for operation at > 10 MHz frequencies in traditional clinical MRI scanners.

To improve SNR, the B0, gradient and B1 coils were housed inside an RF shielded room [Lindgren RF Enclosures Inc., Glendale Heights, IL] (See Figure 1b). The room attenuates environmental RF interference in the range 10 kHz to 10 MHz by up to 100 dB. Power lines for the B0 magnet, preamplifier and RF coil connections all pass through commercial filters that shield out noise above 10 kHz [Lindgren Inc.]. The gradient lines pass into the shielded room via three sets of custom high-current passive line filters that produce ~ 25 dB attenuation at 100 kHz [Schaffner Inc., Luterbach, Switzerland].

MRI Techniques

We employed standard two-and three-dimensional fast gradient-recalled echo (FLASH) sequences for image acquisition. To efficiently use the non-renewable magnetization from hyperpolarized 3He, low-flip angle excitation pulses were used throughout [72]. 2D projection images were acquired without slice selection, using an excitation flip angle of ~ 5°, data-set size of 128 × 64 points, 50 × 50 cm field of view (FOV) in ~ 5 seconds. 3D images were acquired by repeating the 2D experiment with 6 different third-dimension phase encoding gradients alternating in a centric manner [7375]. These experiments yielded a 3D dataset of size 128 × 64 × 6 across a FOV of 50 × 50 × 12 cm, using an excitation flip angle of ~ 4°, acquired in ~ 30 seconds. All imaging acquisitions used the following parameters: bandwidth = 4.0 kHz, 2.2 ms sinc-shaped RF pulse, TE/TR ~ 29/86 ms, NEX = 1. The datasets were zero-filled to 128 × 128 (2D) or 128 × 128 × 8 (3D) points before fast-Fourier-transformation.

Polarized 3He Production and Delivery

Hyperpolarized 3He gas is produced via the spin-exchange optical pumping technique using vaporized Rb as an intermediate [14]. Our modular 3He polarization apparatus includes gas storage, transport, and delivery stages [37]; recent modifications are described here. The polarization cells are ~ 80 cm3 in volume, and made of Pyrex glass. A magnetic field of ~ 2.3 mT is generated by a 5-coil arrangement mounted on the polarizer, thereby providing a quantization axis for optical pumping. The 2.3 mT field also allows in-situ polarization monitoring via NMR detection at a Larmor frequency of 74 kHz using a benchtop Aurora spectrometer [Magritek, Wellington, New Zealand]. The polarizer is located adjacent to, but outside, the RF shielded room. For each experiment, we filled a polarization cell with ~ 5 – 6 bar of 3He and 0.1 bar of N2, heated the cell to ~ 170°C, and applied ~ 30 W of circularly polarized light at 794.7 nm, provided by a line-narrowed diode laser apparatus that has an intense spectral output at 794.7 ± 0.1 nm [Spectra Physics Inc., Tuscon, AZ].

After spin-exchange optical pumping for ~ 8 – 10 hours, the 3He nuclear spin polarization reaches ~ 20 – 40 %. We then expand the polarized gas from the optical pumping cell into a previously evacuated glass and Teflon compressor for storage and delivery. The polarized 3He is then delivered via Teflon tubing through a feedthrough in the RF shielded room to a delivery manifold adjacent to the subject. This manifold consists of a Tedlar bag, vacuum and inert gas ports, and a Teflon tube through which the gas is inhaled. The valves on the manifold are controlled pneumatically.

Human Imaging Protocol

Figure 2 shows subjects in the open-access imager, in both horizontal and vertical orientations. After a relaxed expiration, the subjects inhale, through the Teflon tubing, ~ 500 cm3 of hyperpolarized 3He gas, usually followed by a small breath of air to wash the helium out of the large airways and distribute it throughout the lung. The MR imaging sequence begins immediately after inhalation, and proceeds while the subject maintains a breath-hold for ~ 30 – 40 seconds. We monitor the subject’s heart rate, blood pressure and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) throughout. Subjects were restricted to healthy adults between 18 and 60 years of age, with BMI < 30, a resting SpO2 > 95%, and no history of pulmonary or cardiological disease. All human experiments are performed according to a protocol approved by the Partners Human Research Committee at Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Massachusetts General Hospital, under an inter-institutional IRB agreement with the Harvard University Committee for the Use of Human Subjects. An FDA IND was not required for this study.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Subjects in the open-access human MRI system. a) Subject on the support table, ready for imaging in the supine position. The B1 coil is slid into position with the aid of positional guides on the table, below the subject support bed. b) Subject sitting on a wooden chair, ready for vertical orientation imaging. The B1 coil is raised and lowered with a wooden support mechanism that allows easy positioning of the subject and ensures the coil returns to the correct position, independent of the subject.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

As can be seen in the photographs in Figure 2, the imager easily accommodates subjects in the supine and vertical orientations without being significantly encumbered or having their posture influenced by the RF coil. Figure 3 shows example two-dimensional human 3He MRI lung images, acquired without slice selection in the open-access human MRI system, operating at a field strength of 6.5 mT. Both images have a coronal orientation, with the lungs viewed in an anterioposterior direction, i.e., the subject’s right lung is on the left side of the images. The images exhibit both an absence of artifacts and high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). SNR varies from ~ 25 – 80 (Figure 3a) and ~ 50 – 140 (Figure 3b). The images were obtained without using a variable flip angle for reproducible transverse magnetization from each successive RF pulse[72], as the excitation flip angle was sufficiently low to ensure minimal variation in magnetization over the first ~ 50 phase-encoding rows, and hence produce an artifact-free image. The in-plane resolution in both images is ~ 4 × 8 mm.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Two-dimensional projection 3He MR images of human lungs, obtained using the open-access human MRI system, with subjects positioned as shown in Figure 2. a) Image obtained while the subject was lying horizontally, in a supine orientation. b) Image acquired while the subject was sitting vertically. Both images visualize the lungs as if looking at the subject from the front — i.e., the subject’s right lung lobe is on the left of the image. Imaging parameters: B0 = 6.5 mT, Larmor frequency = 210 kHz, FOV = 50 cm, NEX = 1, flip angle = 5°, TE/TR = 28.5/85.8 ms. Data size = 128 × 64, zero-filled to 128 × 128, total scan time ~ 4 s.

The horizontal image (Figure 3a) shows the two lungs with the usual concave shape at the bottom as the diaphragm pushes against the lungs. As this image did not employ slice selection, the boundary is not sharp, but rather shows that the diaphragm impacts the front portion of the lower lung, while the lungs extend down below the diaphragm at the back. A region of lower intensity in the middle region of the left lung is consistent with the location of the heart and major aorta. The gas distribution is uniform throughout the two lungs, as expected for a healthy subject with low body mass in this orientation. The vertical image (Figure 3b) shows modest distension of the lungs in this same subject. Also, in the vertical orientation, the effect of the diaphragm on the lower portion of the lung is clearly absent. The helium gas distribution remains highly uniform, and a small trace of gas can be observed in the trachea and major bronchi.

The main application of the open-access imager is posture-dependent functional lung studies, e.g.; pAO2 mapping, which relies on accurately measuring MRI signal attenuation as a function of time. In such measurements, the use of narrow slice-selective imaging methods can lead to reduced accuracy in quantitative data as out-of-slice magnetization can diffuse into the image slice during pulse-sequence and inter-image delays and so result in an apparent signal attenuation that is lower than would be expected due to the measurement alone [7375]. This can result in underestimations of pAO2 by as much as factor of four [75]. We note that early pAO2 mapping was also performed using projection images, partly for this reason [22,52], while recent studies incorporating slice selection have used only one or a few slices [23,76], followed by binning of multiple pixels together for analysis. In addition to avoiding thin-slice selection methods for pAO2 mapping, multi-slice experiments become more difficult to implement at the much lower RF frequencies used in the open-access imager than at the higher frequencies used in traditional clinical scanners. Generally, slices away from the magnet iso-center are achieved by varying the frequency of the slice-selective RF pulse by an amount proportional to the distance of the center of the slice from the magnet center. This frequency offset is usually in the range of ~ 1 – 10 kHz. At a Larmor frequency of 210 kHz, and with a coil Q of ~ 30, the coil response has a frequency width of ~ 10 kHz. Therefore, frequency offsets of anything more than a couple of kHz would significantly attenuate the RF pulse received by the sample, and any slice selection away from the magnet iso-center would result in variable RF calibrations.

For the reasons above, we have not implemented slice-selection in 2D imaging methods, and have instead used third-dimension phase encoding to spatially resolve the lung in the third dimension. Figure 4 and Figure 5 show example three-dimensional lung image datasets acquired with the open-access imager. Figure 4 was acquired while the subject was horizontal, in the supine position, while Figure 5 was acquired with a different subject sitting vertically. Both figures show multiple image planes of ~ 2 cm thickness, displaying the images in the anterio-posterior view, and from anterior to posterior in the image montage (# 1 – 8).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Three-dimensional 3He MR image series of human lungs, obtained using the open-access human MRI system, with subject lying horizontally in a supine orientation. All planes visualize the lungs as if looking at the subject from the front – i.e., the subject’s right lung lobe is on the left of the image. Image planes represent slices ~ 1.5 cm thick, and progress from anterior (# 1) to posterior (# 8) through that dataset. Imaging parameters: B0 = 6.5 mT, Larmor frequency = 210 kHz, FOV = 50 × 50 × 12 cm, NEX = 1, flip angle = 4°, TE/TR = 28.5/85.8 ms. Data size = 128 × 64 × 6, zero-filled to 128 × 128 × 8, total scan time ~ 30 s.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Three-dimensional 3He MR image series of human lungs, obtained using the open-access human MRI system, with subject positioned vertically. Additional room air was not inhaled following 3He inhalation, resulting in non-uniform 3He distribution throughout the lung, and intense signal in the trachea and oral cavity. MR signal below the diaphragm in each image, beside the plane number, is most likely due to gas above the trachea and outside the top of the image field-of-view that was folded in to the bottom portion of the image. Image orientation, layout and acquisition parameters are the same as for Figure 4.

The 2D image planes of Figure 4 define the edges of the lungs, and show an even distribution of 3He throughout the periphery. The regions exhibiting the greatest anterio-posterior thickness correspond to the regions of greatest intensity levels from the 2D projection image. Anterior planes # 2 – 4 show the cardiac cavity, and also illustrate the characteristic concave curvature from the diaphragm, which is absent from the posterior planes # 6 – 8. The central planes also show a faint 3He signal in the left bronchus, but not in the right one. We attribute this to residual 3He remaining in the large airways even after the subject had taken a chaser breath of room air. This is consistent with anatomy; the left bronchus has a slightly sharper branching angle, and thus gas flow through the region is lower in comparison to the right bronchus. Despite the use of the third-dimension phase encoding, the image SNR in each plane remains high, generally around ~ 40 – 60 for planes # 3 – 6, and ~ 15 – 30 for the peripheral planes.

For the 3D image of Figure 5, the subject did not take an additional breath of room following their inhalation of the supplied helium. As a result, the 2D image planes show intense signal from 3He gas in the oral cavity and upper airways, while the gas is not uniformly distributed in the lungs. A number of thin dark lines branch out from a central location in the left lung (shown on the right), where the pulmonary outflow originates. These lines could, therefore, be larger blood vessels that are visualized more easily when in the vertical position, or they could result from motion artifacts due to the effects of cardiac motion on the lung tissue during a breath-hold. There is also the possibility of 3D truncation artifacts given the use of a 12 cm field of view in the third dimension, despite the fact our subjects inhaled only 500 cm3 of helium gas and were therefore well below maximum lung capacity when imaged. As the images were acquired with centric phase encoding in the third dimension, we do not believe k-space filtering from magnetization loss was significant. We note these are preliminary results from this novel imager, and such features in the images will be investigated thoroughly in the future.

We emphasize two significant benefits of performing pulmonary MRI at low B0 and Larmor frequency. Firstly, we operate well below the frequency range in which “sample noise” dominates human MRI [36,38]. Thus, we found that placing the RF coil over the subject resulted in minimal coil loading effects in comparison to an empty coil. The coil Q was not affected in any way by the presence of the subjects, while the coil resonance moved a very small and reproducible amount [69]. In addition to making sample noise insignificant, this effect eliminates tuning/matching errors and variation in RF pulse calibrations from subject to subject. Secondly, we can use an open, bi-planar electromagnet to create a horizontal B0, and thereby allow a solenoid RF coil to be used, which can then be rotated with the subject through various postures (See Figure 2). In addition to being the most sensitive RF detectors, solenoidal coils have the most homogeneous B1 field among common RF coil designs [77]. Therefore, a significant confounding step in pulmonary functional imaging methods such as pAO2 mapping: i.e., the need to calibrate the effect of RF flip angle effects on a pixel-by-pixel basis for every trial with every subject [22,23,52], may not be necessary in our open-access imager. Instead, it will be possible to calibrate the RF coil pulse power in advance using appropriate phantoms [69], and apply this known value to later image post-processing procedures.

Finally, we note that the images presented here were acquired with a readout gradient of ~ 0.5 mT/m (0.05 G/cm), which is an order of magnitude lower than values used in traditional clinical MRI scanners. At large B0, gradients of ~ 10 mT/m are employed to enable rapid echo acquisition (~ 5 – 10 ms per row), and, specifically for pulmonary imaging, to ensure that the pulsed gradient fields dominate the susceptibility-induced background gradient fields in the human lung, which scale with B0. When operating at much lower B0, the need for large readout gradients to dominate background gradients is no longer relevant. Additionally, use of low gradient strengths ensure that the maximum gradient across the sample, and hence gradient deviation from linearity, remains low in comparison to B0, minimizing concomitant field effects [71]. However, when using such low-strength encoding gradients, correspondingly longer echo acquisition and repetition times must be used in order to achieve image resolution comparable to that obtained with traditional clinical MRI scanners, which reduces image temporal resolution. A straight-forward step to increase gradient strength, and so improve image temporal resolution, is to operate the gradient current amplifiers in series to double the maximum current available to the gradient coils. The design of the coils is not limited to a given current, and will support significantly higher currents than those used in the system’s present configuration. Modification to the design of the gradient coils could also double the gradient strength. Such steps could improve temporal resolution by a factor of 4, while still ensuring the overall field gradient is low enough to avoid image distortion due to concomitant field effects [71].

CONCLUSION

We have demonstrated human lung imaging in both the horizontal and vertical body orientations using inhaled hyperpolarized 3He gas and an open-access MRI instrument operating at an applied magnetic field of 6.5 mT (65 G). Two- and three-dimensional coronal lung images in the anterio-posterior view were obtained during 3He breath-holds. 2D images were obtained without slice selection, while 3D images yielded six image planes with a thickness of ~ 2 cm. In plane image resolution was ~ 4 × 8 mm. Peak SNR is high, being ~ 100 for the 2D projection images, and above 30 for the planes of the 3D datasets. The images show differences in lung shape and size as a function of subject posture, which indicates that the open-access imager will enable posture-dependent pulmonary functional imaging and thereby serve as a valuable tool for the study of critical pulmonary diseases and questions relating to posture-dependent and gravitational effects on pulmonary function. In addition, the open-access imager, operating such a low applied field, could provide lung imaging for subjects with implants, prostheses, claustrophobia or acute illnesses who have been denied access to MRI in its traditional form.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Support is acknowledged from NASA grant NAG9-1489, NSF grant CTS-0310006, NIH grant R21 EB006475-01A1, and Harvard University. We thank Dr. Mirko Hrovat, Dr. Jim Maddox, Ms. Rachel Burke, Ms. Ana Batrachenko, Ms. Rachel Scheidegger and Mr. Dan Chonde for technical assistance with imager, and Dr. Michael Barlow for assistance with the novel laser source. We are indebted to Kenneth Tsai, MD, who acted as observing physician for human imaging trials, and George Topulos, MD, who devised the human protocols.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Mure M, Domino KB, Lindahl SGE, Hlastala MP, Altemeier WA, Glenny RW. Regional ventilation-perfusion distribution is more uniform in the prone position. J. Appl. Physiol. 2000;88:1076–1083. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.3.1076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mure M, Lindahl SGE. Prone position improves gas exchange--but how? Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2001;45:150–159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gattinoni L, Tognoni G, Pesenti A, Taccone P, Mascheroni D, Labarta V, Malacrida R, Di Giulio P, Fumagalli R, Pelosi P, Brazzi L, Latini R. Effect of prone positioning on the survival of patients with acute respiratory failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001;345:568–573. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Musch G, Layfield JD, Harris RS, Melo MF, Winkler T, Callahan RJ, Fischman AJ, Venegas JG. Topographical distribution of pulmonary perfusion and ventilation, assessed by PET in supine and prone humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 2002;93:1841–1851. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00223.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Glenny RW, Lamm WJ, Albert RK, Robertson HT. Gravity is a minor determinant of pulmonary blood flow distribution. J. Appl. Physiol. 1991;71:620–629. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1991.71.2.620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.West JB, Hlastala MP. Importance of gravity in determining the distribution of pulmonary blood flow. J. Appl. Physiol. 2002;93:1888–1891. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00459.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fahy BG, Barnas GM, Nagle SE, Flowers JL, Njoku MJ, Agarwal M. Effects of Trendelenburg and reverse Trendelenburg postures on lung and chest wall mechanics. J. Clin. Anesth. 1996;8:236–244. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(96)00017-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yap JC, Watson RA, Gilbey S, Pride NB. Effects of posture on respiratory mechanics in obesity. J. Appl. Physiol. 1995;79:1199–1205. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1995.79.4.1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Watson RA, Pride NB. Postural changes in lung volumes and respiratory resistance in subjects with obesity. J. Appl. Physiol. 2005;98:512–517. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00430.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Potchen EJ, Cooper TG, Sierra AE, Aben GR, Potchen MJ, Potter MG, Siebert JE. Measuring Performance in Chest Radiography. Radiology. 2000;217:456–459. doi: 10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv14456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Taplin GV, Poe ND. A dual lung-scanning technique for evaluation of pulmonary function. Radiology. 1965;85:365–368. doi: 10.1148/85.2.365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mayo JR, Webb WR, Gould R, Stein MG, Bass I, Gamsu G, Goldberg HI. High-Resolution CT of the Lungs - An Optimal Approach. Radiology. 1987;163:507–510. doi: 10.1148/radiology.163.2.3562834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jones AT, Hansell DM, Evans TW. Pulmonary perfusion in supine and prone positions: an electron-beam computed tomography study. J. Appl. Physiol. 2001;90:1342–1348. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.4.1342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Saba OI, Chon D, Beck K, McLennan G, Sieren J, Reinhardt J, Hoffman EA. Static Versus Prospective Gated Non-breath Hold Volumetric MDCT Imaging of the Lungs. Acad. Radiol. 2005;12:1371–1384. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Layfield D, Venegas JG. Enhanced Parameter Estimation From Noisy PET Data: Part I—Methodology. Acad. Radiol. 2005;12:1440–1447. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Walker TG, Happer W. Spin-exchange optical pumping of noble-gas nuclei. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1997;69:629–642. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nacher PJ, Leduc M. Optical pumping in 3He with a laser. J. Physique. 1985;46:2057–2073. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Leawoods JC, Yablonskiy DA, Saam B, Gierada DS, Conradi MS. Hyperpolarized 3He Gas Production and MR Imaging of the Lung. Concepts Magn. Reson. 2001;13:277–293. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Moller HE, Chen XJ, Saam B, Hagspiel KD, Johnson GA, Altes TA, de Lange EE, Kauczor H-U. MRI of the lungs using hyperpolarized noble gases. Magn. Reson. Med. 2002;47:1029–1051. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Salerno M, de Lange EE, Altes TA, Truwit JD, Brookeman JR, Mugler JP., III Emphysema: Hyperpolarized Helium 3 Diffusion MR Imaging of the Lungs Compared with Spirometric Indexes - Initial Experience. Radiology. 2002;222:252–260. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2221001834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Saam BT, Yablonskiy DA, Kodibagkar VD, Leawoods JC, Gierada DS, Cooper JD, Lefrak SS, Conradi MS. MR Imaging of Diffusion of 3He Gas in Healthy and Diseased Lungs. Magn. Reson. Med. 2000;44:174–179. doi: 10.1002/1522-2594(200008)44:2<174::aid-mrm2>3.0.co;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Deninger AJ, Eberle B, Ebert M, Grossmann T, Hanisch G, Heil W, Kauczor H-U, Markstaller K, Otten E, Schreiber W, Surkau R, Weiler N. He-3-MRI-based measurements of intrapulmonary p(O2) and its time course during apnea in healthy volunteers: first results, reproducibility, and technical limitations. NMR in Biomed. 2000;13:194–201. doi: 10.1002/1099-1492(200006)13:4<194::aid-nbm643>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rizi RR, Baumgardner JE, Ishii M, Spector ZZ, Edvinsson JM, Jalali A, Yu J, Itkin M, Lipson DA, Gefter W. Determination of Regional VA/Q by Hyperpolarized 3He MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004;52:65–72. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mills GH, Wild JM, Eberle B, Van Beek EJ. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the lung. BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2003;91:16–30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Altes TA, Powers PL, Knight-Scott J, Rakes G, Platts-Mills TAE, de Lange EE, Alford BA, Mugler JP, Brookeman JR. Hyperpolarized 3He MR lung ventilation imaging in asthmatics: preliminary findings. J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 2001;13:378–384. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Samee S, Altes TA, Powers P, de Lange EE, Knight-Scott J, Rakes G, Mugler JP, Ciambotti JM, Alford BA, Brookeman JR, Platts-Mills TAE. Imaging the lungs in asthmatic patients by using hyperpolarized helium-3 magnetic resonance: Assessment of response to methacholine and exercise challenge. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2003;111:1205–1211. doi: 10.1067/mai.2003.1544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kauczor H-U, Ebert M, Kreitner KF, Nilgens H, Surkau R, Heil W, Hofmann D, Otten EW, Thelen M. Imaging of the lungs using 3He MRI: preliminary clinical experience in 18 patients with and without lung disease. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 1997;7:538–543. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880070314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.de Lange EE, Mugler JP, III, Brookeman JR, Knight-Scott J, Truwit JD, Teates CD, Daniel TM, Bogorad PL, Cates GD. Lung air spaces: MR imaging evaluation with hyperpolarized 3He gas. Radiology. 1999;210:851–857. doi: 10.1148/radiology.210.3.r99fe08851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Donnelly LF, MacFall JR, McAdams HP, Majure JM, Smith J, Frush DP, Bogorad P, Charles HC, Ravin CE. Cystic fibrosis: combined hyperpolarized 3He enhanced and conventional proton MR imaging in the lung-preliminary observations. Radiology. 1999;212:885–889. doi: 10.1148/radiology.212.3.r99se20885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Guenther D, Eberle B, Hast J, Lill J, Markstaller K, Puderbach M, Schreiber WG, Hanisch G, Heussel CP, Surkau R, Grossmann T, Weiler N, Thelen M, Kauczor H-U. 3He MRI in healthy volunteers: preliminary correlation with smoking history and lung volumes. NMR Biomed. 2000;13:182–189. doi: 10.1002/1099-1492(200006)13:4<182::aid-nbm642>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fichele S, Woodhouse N, Swift AJ, Said Z, Paley MNJ, Kasuboski L, Mills GH, van Beek EJR, Wild JM. MRI of Helium-3 Gas in Healthy Lungs: Posture Related Variations of Alveolar Size. J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 2004;20:331–335. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jinkins JR, Dworkin JS, Green AC, Greenhalgh JF, Gianni M, Gelbien M, Wolf RB, Damadian J, Damadian RV. Upright, Weight-Bearing, Dynamic-Kinetic MRI of the Spine pMRI/kMRI. Rivista di Neuroradiologia. 2002;15:333–356. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jinkins JR, Dworkin JS, Green AC, Greenhalgh JF, Gianni M, Gelbien M, Wolf RB, Damadian J, Damadian RV. Upright, Weight-Bearing, Dynamic-Kinetic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Spine Review of the First Clinical Results. Rivista di Neuroradiologia. 2003;16:55–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jinkins JR, Dworkin JS, Damadian RV. Upright, weight-bearing, dynamic-kinetic MRI of the spine: initial results. Eur. Radiol. 2005;15:1815–1825. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2666-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tseng C-H, Wong GP, Pomeroy VR, Mair RW, Hinton DP, Hoffmann D, Stoner RE, Hersman FW, Cory DG, Walsworth RL. Low-Field MRI of Laser Polarized Noble Gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998;81:3785–3788. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wong GP, Tseng CH, Pomeroy VR, Mair RW, Hinton DP, Hoffmann D, Stoner RE, Hersman FW, Cory DG, Walsworth RL. A system for low field imaging of laser-polarized noble gas. J. Magn. Reson. 1999;141:217–227. doi: 10.1006/jmre.1999.1904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mair RW, Hrovat MI, Patz S, Rosen MS, Ruset IC, Topulos GP, Tsai LL, Butler JP, Hersman FW, Walsworth RL. 3He lung imaging in an open access, very-low-field human magnetic resonance imaging system. Magn. Reson. Med. 2005;53:745–749. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ruset IC, Tsai LL, Mair RW, Patz S, Hrovat MI, Rosen MS, Muradian I, Ng J, Topulos GP, Butler JP, Walsworth RL, Hersman FW. A system for open-access He-3 human lung imaging at very low field. Concepts Magn. Reson. B - Magn. Reson. Eng. 2006;29B:210–221. doi: 10.1002/cmr.b.20075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Parra-Robles J, Cross AR, Santyr GE. Theoretical signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution dependence on the magnetic field strength for hyperpolarized noble gas magnetic resonance imaging of human lungs. Med. Phys. 2005;32:221–229. doi: 10.1118/1.1833593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Durand E, Guillot G, Darrasse L, Tastevin G, Nacher P-J, Vignaud A, Vattolo D, Bittoun J. CPMG measurements and ultrafast imaging in human lungs with hyperpolarized helium-3 at low field (0.1 T) Magn. Reson. Med. 2002;47:75–81. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Owers-Bradley JR, Fichele S, Bennattayalah A, McGloin CJS, Bowtell RW, Morgan PS, Moody AR. MR tagging of human lungs using hyperpolarized He-3 gas. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2003;17:142–146. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Venkatesh AK, Zhang AX, Mansour J, Kubatina L, Oh C-H, Blasche G, Unlu MS, Balamore D, Jolesz FA, Goldberg BB, Albert MS. MRI of the lung gas-space at very low-field using hyperpolarized noble gases. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2003;21:773–776. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(03)00178-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bidinosti CP, Choukeife J, Nacher P-J, Tastevin G. In vivo NMR of hyperpolarized 3He in the human lung at very low magnetic fields. J. Magn. Reson. 2003;162:122–132. doi: 10.1016/s1090-7807(02)00198-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bidinosti CP, Choukeife J, Tastevin G, Vignaud A, Nacher P-J. MRI of the lung using hyperpolarized 3He at very low magnetic field (3 mT) Magma. 2004;16:255–258. doi: 10.1007/s10334-004-0035-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.West JB, Dollery CT, Naimark A. Distribution of blood flow in isolated lung; relation to vascular and alveolar pressures. J. Appl. Physiol. 1964;19:713–724. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1964.19.4.713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Frerichs I, Dudykevych T, Hinz J, Bodenstein M, Hahn G, Hellige G. Gravity effects on regional lung ventilation determined by functional EIT during parabolic flights. J. Appl. Physiol. 2001;91:39–50. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.1.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Williams MD, Murr PC. Laparoscopic insufflation of the abdomen depresses cardiopulmonary function. Surgical Endoscopy. 1993;7:12–16. doi: 10.1007/BF00591229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Druz WS, Sharp JT. Activity of respiratory muscles in upright and recumbent humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 1981;51:1552–1561. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1981.51.6.1552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Behrakis PK, Baydur A, Jaeger MJ, Milic-Emili J. Lung mechanics in sitting and horizontal body positions. Chest. 1983;83:643–646. doi: 10.1378/chest.83.4.643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Barnas GM, Green MD, Mackenzie CF, Flethcer SJ, Campbell DN, Runcie C, Broderick GE. Effect of posture on lung and regional chest wall mechanics. Anesthesiology. 1993;78:251–259. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199302000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kolarzyk E, Szot WM, Lyszczarz J. Lung function and breathing regulation parameters during pregnancy. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2005;272:53–58. doi: 10.1007/s00404-004-0691-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fischer MC, Kadlecek S, Yu J, Ishii M, Emami K, Vahdat V, Lipson DA, Rizi RR. Measurements of Regional Alveolar Oxygen Pressure Using Hyperpolarized 3He MRI. Acad. Radiol. 2005;12:1430–1439. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Vidal Melo MF, Layfield D, Harris RS, O'Neill K, Musch G, Richter T, Winkler T, Fischman AJ, Venegas JG. Quantification of regional ventilation-perfusion ratios with PET. J. Nucl. Med. 2003;44:1982–1991. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Rhodes CG, Valind SO, Brudin LH, Wollmer PE, Jones T, Hughes JM. Quantification of regional V/Q ratios in humans by use of PET. I. Theory. J. Appl. Physiol. 1989;66:1896–1904. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1989.66.4.1896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Rhodes CG, Valind SO, Brudin LH, Wollmer PE, Jones T, Buckingham PD, Hughes JM. Quantification of regional V/Q ratios in humans by use of PET. II. Procedure and normal values. J. Appl. Physiol. 1989;66:1905–1913. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1989.66.4.1905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tulic MK, Christodoulopoulos P, Hamid Q. Small airway inflammation in asthma. Respir. Res. 2001;2:333–339. doi: 10.1186/rr83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hamid QA. Peripheral inflammation is more important than central inflammation. Respir. Med. 1997;91 Suppl A:11–12. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(97)90098-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hamid Q, Song YL, Kotsimbos TC, Minshall E, Bai TR, Hegele RG, Hogg JC. Inflammation of small airways in asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1997;100:44–51. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(97)70193-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Poutler LW. Central inflammation is more important than peripheral inflammation. Respir. Med. 1997;91 Suppl A:9–10. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(97)90097-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Shaw RJ, Djukanovic R, Tashkin DP, Millar AB, Du Bois RM, Corris PA. The role of small airways in lung disease. Respir. Med. 2002;96:67–80. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2001.1216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Venegas JG, Winkler T, Musch G, Vidal Melo MF, Layfield D, Tgavalekos N, Fischman AJ, Callahan RJ, Bellani G, Harris RS. Self-organized patchiness in asthma as a prelude to catastrophic shifts. Nature. 2005;434:777–782. doi: 10.1038/nature03490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Chan ED, Welsh CH. Geriatric respiratory medicine. Chest. 1998;114:1704–1733. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.6.1704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Johnson BD, Reddan WG, Pegelow DF, Seow KC, Dempsey JA. Flow limitation and regulation of functional residual capacity during exercise in a physically active aging population. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1991;143:960–967. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/143.5_Pt_1.960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hazzard WR. Principles of geriatric medicine and gerontology. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2003. pp. p xxvi–1648. [12] p. of plates. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Benhamou D, Muir JF, Melen B. Mechanical ventilation in elderly patients. Monaldi. Arch. Chest Dis. 1998;53:547–551. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Barst RJ, McGoon M, Torbicki A, Sitbon O, Krowka MJ, Olschewski H, Gaine S. Diagnosis and differential assessment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2004;43:40S. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.02.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Fedullo PF, Auger WR, Kerr KM, Rubin LJ. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001;345:1465–1472. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra010902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Fedullo PF, Auger WR, Moser KM, et al. Hemodynamic response to exercise in patients with chronic, major vessel thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1990;141:A890. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.81.6.1735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Tsai LL, Mair RW, Rosen MS, Patz S, Walsworth RL. An Open-Access, Very-Low-Field MRI System for Posture-Dependent 3He Human Lung Imaging. J. Magn. Reson. 2007 doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2008.05.016. submitted. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Gottardi G, Mesirca P, Agostini C, Remondini D, Bersani F. A four coil exposure system (tetracoil) producing a highly uniform magnetic field. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003;24:125–133. doi: 10.1002/bem.10074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yablonskiy DA, Sukstanskii AL, Ackerman JJH. Image artifacts in very low magnetic field MRI: The role of concomitant gradients. J. Magn. Reson. 2005;174:279–286. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2005.02.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zhao L, Mulkern R, Tseng C-H, Williamson D, Patz S, Kraft R, Walsworth RL, Jolesz FA, Albert MS. Gradient echo imaging considerations for hyperpolarized 129Xe MR. J. Magn. Reson. B. 1996;113:179–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kim YR, Rebro KJ, Schmainda KM. Water Exchange and Inflow Affect the Accuracy of T1-GRE Blood Volume Measurements: Implications for the Evaluation of Tumor Angiogenesis. Magn. Reson. Med. 2002;47:1110–1120. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wild JM, Woodhouse N, Paley MNJ, Fichele S, Said Z, Kasuboski L, van Beek EJR. Comparison Between 2D and 3D Gradient-Echo Sequences for MRI of Human Lung Ventilation With Hyperpolarized 3He. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004;52:673–678. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Wild JM, Fichele S, Woodhouse N, Paley MNJ, Kasuboski L, van Beek EJR. 3D Volume-Localized pO2 Measurement in the Human Lung with 3He MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2005;53:1055–1064. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kadlecek SJ, Emami K, Fischer MC, Ishii M, Yu J, Woodburn JM, NikKhah M, Vahdat V, Lipson DA, Baumgardner JE, Rizi RR. Imaging physiological parameters with hyperpolarized gas MRI. Prog. Nucl. Magn.Reson. Spectrosc. 2005;47:187–212. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Callaghan PT. Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy. Oxford [UK], New York: Oxford University Press; 1991. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES