Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1970 Sep;103(3):692–696. doi: 10.1128/jb.103.3.692-696.1970

Reversion to the Streptococcal State of Enterococcal Protoplasts, Spheroplasts, and L-Forms

James R King a,1, Harry Gooder a
PMCID: PMC248145  PMID: 4919988

Abstract

A method is described for predetermining whether lysozyme-damaged enterococci grow as either the parent strain or as L-forms. Organisms treated with lysozyme grew as L-forms on media solidified with low concentrations of agar, or the damaged cells grew as streptococci on media solidified with high concentrations of gelatin. After induction, some of the L-forms reverted to the parent strain, but most did not during three routine subcultures. Continued spontaneous reversion occurred through approximately 30 subcultures after induction. However, subsequent progeny did not revert, even when subjected to conditions such as the gelatin medium which strongly favors growth in the streptococcal phase.

Full text

PDF
692

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALTENBERN R. A. Reversion of L forms and spheroplasts of Proteus mirabilis. J Bacteriol. 1963 Feb;85:269–272. doi: 10.1128/jb.85.2.269-272.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CRAWFORD Y. E., FRANK P. F., SULLIVAN B. Isolation and reversion of L forms of beta-hemolytic streptococci. J Infect Dis. 1958 Jan-Feb;102(1):44–52. doi: 10.1093/infdis/102.1.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DIENES L., WEINBERGER H. J. The L forms of bacteria. Bacteriol Rev. 1951 Dec;15(4):245–288. doi: 10.1128/br.15.4.245-288.1951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FREIMER E. H., KRAUSE R. M., McCARTY M. Studies of L forms and protoplasts of group A streptococci. I. Isolation, growth, and bacteriologic characteristics. J Exp Med. 1959 Dec 1;110:853–874. doi: 10.1084/jem.110.6.853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hoyer B. H., King J. R. Deoxyribonucleic acid sequence losses in a stable streptococcal L form. J Bacteriol. 1969 Mar;97(3):1516–1517. doi: 10.1128/jb.97.3.1516-1517.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. King J. R., Gooder H. Induction of enterococcal L-forms by the action of lysozyme. J Bacteriol. 1970 Sep;103(3):686–691. doi: 10.1128/jb.103.3.686-691.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. LANDMAN O. E., HALLE S. ENZYMICALLY AND PHYSICALLY INDUCED INHERITANCE CHANGES IN BACILLUS SUBTILIS. J Mol Biol. 1963 Dec;7:721–738. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(63)80119-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Landman O. E., Ryter A., Fréhel C. Gelatin-induced reversion of protoplasts of Bacillus subtilis to the bacillary form: electron-microscopic and physical study. J Bacteriol. 1968 Dec;96(6):2154–2170. doi: 10.1128/jb.96.6.2154-2170.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Miller I. L., Wiebe W., Landman O. E. Gelatin-induced reversion of protoplasts of Bacillus subtilis to the bacillary form: photomicrographic study. J Bacteriol. 1968 Dec;96(6):2171–2174. doi: 10.1128/jb.96.6.2171-2174.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES