Abstract
The RAS small GTPases orchestrate multiple cellular processes. Studies on knock-out mice showed the essential and sufficient role of K-RAS, but not N-RAS and H-RAS in embryonic development. However, many physiological functions of K-RAS in vivo remain unclear. Using wild-type and fli1:GFP transgenic zebrafish, we showed that K-ras-knockdown resulted in specific hematopoietic and angiogenic defects, including the impaired expression of erythroid-specific gene gata1 and ße3-hemoglobin, reduced blood circulation and disorganized blood vessels. Expression of either K-rasC40 that links to phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) activation, or Akt2 that acts downstream of PI3K, could rescue both hematopoietic and angiogenic defects in the K-ras knockdown. Consistently, the functional rescue by k-ras mRNA was significantly suppressed by wortmannin, a PI3K-specific inhibitor. Our results provide direct evidence that PI3K-Akt plays a crucial role in mediating K-ras signaling during hematopoiesis and angiogenesis in vivo, thus offering new targets and alternative vertebrate model for studying these processes and their related diseases.
Introduction
RAS mutations are found in at least 20% of all human malignancies with K-RAS being the most frequently activated oncogene of all RAS proteins [1], [2]. Most of our understanding on the function and regulation of RAS stem from the over-expression of their constitutive active or dominant negative mutants or the other RAS signaling components. While useful, such approaches potentially lead to non-physiological effects [3]. Knock-out studies in mouse established that K-RAS is essential and sufficient for normal development while H-RAS and N-RAS are dispensable [4]–[7]. However, such studies could not conclusively identify the exact roles of RAS during normal tissue/organ development. Nonetheless, use of K-ras −/− fetal liver cells had shown that K-RAS signals to PI3K to regulate differentiation and proliferation of erythroid progenitor cells [8], [9]. Other evidence also point to a close functional association between wild type and oncogenic RAS, whereby wild type RAS could antagonize the function of oncogenic RAS [10]. All these call for a need to further address the physiological roles of RAS signaling at both the cellular and organismic levels.
The zebrafish Danio rerio is fast emerging as an excellent model for studying gene functions and signaling processes during development. Here we aim to define the physiological roles of wild-type K-ras in zebrafish through its specific gene knockdown, coupled with functional rescues by its pathway-specific mutant, their downstream effectors, and also the interference of rescue by pharmacological inhibitors.
Results
Zebrafish K-ras knockdown resulted in defective hematopoiesis and angiogenesis
First, zebrafish k-ras cDNA (GenBank DQ486868) was isolated by reverse transcription-PCR. The encoded protein (Figure 1A) is highly homologous to human K-RAS2B and mouse K-RAS2, signified by a poly-lysine tract at its C-terminus (Figure 1A–1C). It is distinct from two other zebrafish Ras, N-ras [11] and BC048875 (Figure 1B and 1C), especially at their 5′UTR (supporting information Figure S1) that allows subsequent use of specific morpholino to knockdown K-ras. Zebrafish k-ras transcripts were detected from one-cell stage and continued to be detected throughout the whole embryos (Figure 1D). In adult, k-ras expression was detectable in most tissues (supporting information Figure S2).
To identify the functional role of K-ras in vivo, translation of endogenous K-ras was suppressed by targeting k-ras mRNA with its specific antisense morpholino, k-ras-MO1 or k-ras-MO2 (Figure 1A). Optimal dose for microinjection was obtained that could result in specific defects but without gross lethality and global defects (materials and methods, Figure 2– Figure 4, and supporting information Table S1, Movie S1, S2, S3, S4, S5 and S6). From 24 hpf (hours-post fertilization) onwards, compared to control embryos, injected embryos showed reduced circulation of blood cells in the presence of a beating heart, albeit with lower beating rate (Figure 2A, Figure 2B, supporting information Figure S3 and Movie S1, S2, S3, S4, S5 and S6). Negligible or fewer circulating blood cells were seen inside the heart and blood vessels. This phenotype was observed in 76% of k-ras-MO1 injected embryos (75.8%±9.8, n>500, from 15 independent experiments). Moreover, accumulated red blood cells were often found at sites away from circulation (Figure 2C). As a negative control, one four-base mismatch morpholino k-ras-MO1-mis did not cause any of the above phenotypes as in k-ras-MO1 injected embryos (supporting information Figure S4). The specificity of K-ras knockdown was further confirmed by using a second morpholino, k-ras-MO2 that resulted in similar extents of defects in hematopoiesis (supporting information Table S1). Furthermore, the specificity and the efficiency of K-ras knockdown was confirmed by the reduced level of K-ras, rather than N-ras and H-ras, protein expression in K-ras MO injected embryos (supporting information Figure S5), and by the reduced level of the expression of a red fluorescent protein reporter fused downstream of k-ras 5′UTR in k-ras-MO injected embryos (supporting information Figure S6). Importantly, when k-ras mRNA was co-injected with k-ras-MO, such hematopoietic defects could be rescued effectively (Figure 5A and Figure 5B, supporting information Table S2), further supporting the specificity of K-ras knockdown. On the other hand, k-ras mRNA failed to rescue the gastrulation defects induced by the knock down of RhoA [12] (supporting information Figure S7), another small GTPase protein, demonstrating the specificity of the k-ras mRNA and the K-ras knock down.
To further validate the hematopoietic defects, expression of erythroid-specific genes was examined. In-situ hybridization revealed the defects or partial loss of the expression of gata1 (Figure 3), one well studied erythroid specific gene in early stage embryo. In addition, some ectopic gata1 expression domains were observed as well in some embryos. Disrupted gata1 expression was found in 58% (n = 42 in total n = 72) knock down embryos. In agreement with this, when we used ße3-hemoglobin, a gene normally expressed in differentiating erythrocytes within ICM (intermediate cell mass) from 15-somite stage, to evaluate the erythroid development, abnormal ße3-hemoglobin expression was noted in 43% (n = 13 in total n = 30) of the K-ras knock down embryos, including either the reduced expression of ße3-hemoglobin or some ectopic expression of ße3-hemoglobin (Figure 3). It hence indicates that the disruption of the expression pattern was not due to the failure of developing erythrocytes to express gata1 or ße3-hemoglobin, but was due to the loss of developing erythrocytes in ICM and the misdistribution of the erythrocytes in some ectopic locations.
Consistently, lack of erythrocytes was further confirmed by o-Dianisidine staining, in agreement with the microscopic analysis for live embryos (Figure 2A and Figure 2B, supporting information Movie S1, S2, S3, S4, S5 and S6). Hemoglobinization appeared normal since all the existing red blood cells, including the circulating ones which were inside the blood vessels and those away from the circulation, showed the positive o-Dianisidine staining.
Since hematopoietic stem cells and angioblasts originate from bipotential precursors and thus the blood and blood vessel formation are closely connected in early stage [13], we set out to examine if the vascular-angiogenesis was also affected by K-ras knockdown. A vascular-specific transgenic line fli1:GFP, which allows immediate and direct in-situ monitoring of blood vessel formation [14] was used. k-ras-MO was injected into fli1:GFP embryos at 1–4 cell stage. GFP expression was not altered significantly until 22–24 hpf (Figure 4A). The major vessels, such as dorsal aorta, caudal artery, posterior cardinal vein and caudal vein, appeared normal, indicating normal vasculogenesis. But at later stages, angiogenesis started to be disrupted. By 48 hpf, defective vasculature was clearly visible. The regular normal trunk vessels (Figure 4B–i) were replaced by disorganized vascular channels (Figure 4B–ii to 4B–vi, Figure 4C). Particularly, sub-intestinal vein (SIV) was examined at 3 dpf (days-post fertilization), since the well-organized SIV at 72 hpf was regarded as one of the criteria to evaluate both angiogenic and anti-angiogenic effects [15] (Figure 4D). There, disorganized SIV, bearing obviously reduced size/numbers of vessel branches and/or ectopic blood vessels, accounted for 76% of k-ras-MO1 injected embryos (76.0%±10.2, n = 131, from 5 independent experiments) compared to only 17% basal defect level of wild type. Moreover, the same angiogenic defects could also be induced by k-ras-MO2 (Figure 4B–iii), demonstrating that the angiogenic defects are specifically resulted from K-ras knockdown. Furthermore, when k-ras mRNA was co-injected with k-ras-MO, numbers of embryo with disrupted SIV were reduced significantly (Figure 5).
To further demonstrate the essential role of normal Ras signaling, k-rasN17, one dominant negative mutant of K-ras, was expressed in zebrafish embryos. Consistently, it caused similar hematopoietic and angiogenic defects (Figure 3A–v, 3A–vi, 3B–ii, Figure 4B–iv and supporting information Table S1), strongly supporting that the defective hematopoiesis and angiogenesis result from the disruption of Ras signaling.
PI3K-Akt is important in mediating K-ras signaling for both hematopoiesis and angiogenesis
Disruption of K-ras signaling caused defective hematopoiesis and angiogenesis during zebrafish embryonic development. Subsequently, to determine the involvements of the downstream effectors of Ras in these two processes, we analyzed the two major downstream pathways, PI3 Kinase pathway and MAP Kinase pathway respectively.
Firstly, zebrafish embryos were treated with PI3K inhibitor wortmannin. Wortmannin (1 µM) was able to cause defective blood and blood vessel formation, mimicking the defects in K-ras morphants (supporting information Figure S7, Table S3). This finding implies that signaling nodes at PI3K-Akt is important for zebrafish hematopoiesis and angiogenesis, and might be involved in mediating the downstream signals of K-ras. To prove it, we examined the ability of this inhibitor at sub-optimal levels to interfere with the functional rescue by k-ras mRNA for K-ras knockdown. Indeed, lower concentration of wortmannin (250 nM), which itself had no effect, could significantly nullify the rescue ability of k-ras mRNA (Figure 5A). This highlights the importance of PI3K for mediating K-ras signaling during hematopoiesis. To substantiate this further, we checked the ability of functional rescue of K-ras mutant, k-rasC40, which is known to preferably activate PI3K; and Akt2, which acts downstream of PI3K [16], [17]. Consistently, k-rasC40 could significantly reduce the hematopoietic and angiogenic defects caused by K-ras knockdown (Figure 5B and 5D), and Akt2 also could reduce the extents of both hematopoietic and angiogenic defects in K-ras knockdown embryos (Figure 5C and 5E.). Taking together, all these results demonstrate that the normal signaling from K-ras to PI3K-Akt is essential for maintaining the normal processes during hematopoiesis and angiogenesis.
As a comparison, we are also analyzing another major downstream pathway of Ras, Mek-Erk1/2, which acts downstream of Raf [18]. The Mek inhibitor U0126 could not effectively block the k-ras mRNA rescue for K-ras knockdown at lower doses, although by itself at a higher dose (10 µM) it was able to induce the similar defects shown in K-ras morphants (data not shown and supporting information Figure S8, Table S3). Moreover, the analysis of the rescue ability of either Mek, or K-ras mutant K-rasS35, which specifically targets the effector Raf [16], [17], indicates a complexity of the involvement of Raf/Mek/Erk in regulating hematopoiesis and angiogenesis. For an example, in the rescue for hematopoietic defects, the rescue ability of K-rasS35 and Mek1 do not always follow the same trends (supporting information Figure S9), suggesting the possibility of other downstream target(s), rather than the Mek, being involved in mediating the Ras-Raf signaling. Furthermore, when constitutive active MEK1 (S218D/S222D) was introduced to the rescue, such mutant already led to global defects in the embryonic development (data not shown). On the other hand, when U0126 was used at its sub-optimal levels it did not significantly block the Akt2 rescue after the K-ras knock-down (data not shown), implying that the basal Mek/Erk activity may not be necessary for the Akt2 function in regulating these two processes. More Mek-specific knockdowns are now being developed in order to better understand the exact involvements of Mek/Erk either in isolation or in concert with Akt2.
To further elucidate the specificity versus redundancy in mediating Ras signaling in hematopoiesis and angiogenesis, zebrafish N-ras was introduced to rescue K-ras knockdown. The N-ras was shown to confer comparable functional rescue only for hematopoiesis but not for angiogenesis (Figure 6), thus, suggesting a unique function of K-ras which is not shared by N-ras. This is in agreement with the notion that distinct signal outputs from different RAS isoforms are necessary for diverse biological responses [19]. In essence, applying targeted gene knockdown for individual Ras isoforms in zebrafish will help clarify their distinct mechanisms, establish their relative contributions to normal physiological functions, and further analyze their potential downstream pathways. Such information will serve as the basis for developing the targeted therapeutics without disruption for other normal RAS signaling. Thus, zebrafish presents a significant model for faithfully reflecting the in vivo status of Ras signaling, bypassing the limitation by their over-expression that might re-route them to ectopic compartments.
Discussion
Previous studies have revealed the roles of RAS in hematopoietic cell growth and differentiation, but the underlying signaling network in vivo is unclear. K-ras knockout mouse resulted in anemia and normal RAS signaling was required for erythroid differentiation, while K-RAS is the major regulator for AKT activation in vitro [4], [6], [8], [9]. Moreover, oncogenic RAS were known to associate with blood cancer and other blood disorders [20]–[22]. One hematopoietic transcription factor c/EBPß has been linked to RAS, which could be turned into an activator by RAS/MAPK signaling [23]. Erythropoietin (EPO) and Epo-receptor are also found to be able to activate RAS/RAF/MAPK and PI3K pathways [24]. Studies on human erythroid progenitors showed importance of PI3K for RAS, MEK and ERK activation, which were stimulated by EPO through a RAF-independent way [25]. All these suggest the extensive involvements of RAS signaling in hematopoiesis and highlight the importance and the complexity of PI3K-AKT and/or RAF/MEK/ERK in connecting to and mediating RAS signaling.
Our current studies first establish the in vivo function of PI3K-Akt as a mediator of K-ras signaling that regulates zebrafish hematopoiesis. This is consistent with the findings from in vitro studies in K-ras −/− fetal liver cells [9]. Alternatively, this may imply a potential cross-talk between PI3K and MAP kinase pathways, such as the studies in hematopoietic progenitor which demonstrated that MAP kinase pathway through RAS is PI3K-dependent and that PI3K drives RAF/MEK/ERK activation through RAF by a yet uncharacterized mechanism [26]. Likewise, it is possible that Mek/Erk may be under the control of other effectors, including PI3K, to exert its functional role. More evidence is however required to address this issue more conclusively.
RAS signaling has also been reported to link to angiogenesis, especially the tumor-angiogenesis. Oncogenic RAS through RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K-AKT have been implicated in controlling VEGF expression [27]. Here, our results provide strong evidence that PI3K-Akt is an important common downstream regulator of K-ras signaling during both hematopoiesis and angiogenesis, lending further support on the interconnectivity of hematopoiesis and angiogenesis. Our results therefore supports the potential value of developing zebrafish as an ideal model for dissecting these two important biological processes mediated by K-ras signaling. In summary, our findings have established the important roles of K-ras signaling in zebrafish hematopoiesis and angiogenesis, with PI3K/Akt being an important mediator for these two processes. Within the complexity of Ras and GTPase signaling, it remains an important issue to determine whether other Ras effector pathways such as the Raf, Ral and others might be engaged separately or in concert with the PI3K/Akt. This and further comparative analyses for the involvement of other Ras isoforms and small GTPases, should help us better understand the signaling bases of the diseases in vivo, and to further develop the zebrafish as an alternative model for therapeutic screens.
Materials and Methods
Fish maintenance
Wild type and transgenic zebrafish were maintained by standard methods [28]. The transgenic line fli1-GFP was kind gift from Dr Ge Ruowen and was previously described [14]. All experiments on zebrafish were carried out at the National University of Singapore, in accordance with the National Advisory Committee for Laboratory Animal Research (NACLAR) Guidelines and in facilities licensed by the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority of Singapore.
Morpholinos
Antisense morpholino oligos (Gene-Tools) were designed to target the translational start (ATG) of k-ras as k-ras-MO1 and to target the upstream sequence of ATG in 5′UTR as k-ras-MO2 (Figure 1A).
Microinjections
Morpholinos, mRNAs or plasmid constructs (supporting information for details) were injected into yolk of 1- to 4-cell stage zebrafish embryos. Doses for injection were titrated with lower toxicity and higher affectivity. Concentrations for injection are 600 µM for k-ras-MO1 and k-ras-MO1-mis, 1 mM for k-ras-MO2, 250 µM for RhoA-MO, 2.5 ng/µl of mRNA for k-ras, n-ras, k-rasC40 and k-rasS35, 18 ng/µl of mRNA for akt2, 40 ng/µl for Mek1 and 50 ng/µl for k-rasN17 respectively. Injection volume is around 2.3 nl.
O-Dianisidine staining and alkaline phosphatase staining
Staining of hemoglobin by o-Dianisidine was carried out as described [29]. Sub-intestinal vein (SIV) development was evaluated by alkaline phosphatase staining as described [15].
Inhibitor treatments
Wortmannin (Sigma) and U0126 (Promega) were dissolved in DMSO as stock and then diluted in egg water before use. Zebrafish embryos, wild type or injected ones, were treated with inhibitors from 3–4 hpf at the concentration indicated, controlled by DMSO treated wild type embryos, or by DMSO treated injected embryos. Embryos were maintained as standard method.
Criteria for evaluating the status of zebrafish blood and blood vessel formation
For blood formation, we examined the circulation of live embryos at 30 hpf and 2 dpf, and then inspected the hemoglobin by o-Dianisidine staining at 2 dpf. Embryos bearing obvious reduction in circulation and o-Dianisidine staining in comparison to their wild type counterparts were regarded as abnormal. For blood vessel formation, we focused on checking SIV (sub-intestinal vein, indicated by arrows in Figure 4D) development by alkaline phosphatase staining at 3 dpf [15]. Embryos with disorganized SIV baskets, which lost the intact and bear obviously reduced numbers/size of vessel branches and/or had ectopic blood vessels, were regarded as abnormal.
Data analysis
All data are presented as mean±SD (standard deviation). Statistic analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA. Differences were considered significant at p<0.01, P<0.05 or P<0.10 as indicated.
More methods were shown in Supporting Information Text S1 .
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr Ge Ruowen and Dr Muhammad Farooq for maintaining and providing the fli1-GFP transgenic zebrafish, Dr Chew Li Li for providing rat Mek1 plasmid construct and Dr Wen Zilong for providing the ße3-hemoglobin probe.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: This work was supported by a grant from the Biomedical Research Council of Singapore.
References
- 1.Malumbres M, Barbacid M. RAS oncogenes: the first 30 years. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:459–465. doi: 10.1038/nrc1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kranenburg O. The KRAS oncogene: past, present, and future. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1756:81–82. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2005.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Campbell SL, Khosravi-Far R, Rossman KL, Clark GJ, Der CJ. Increasing complexity of Ras signaling. Oncogene. 1998;17:1395–1413. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Koera K, Nakamura K, Nakao K, Miyoshi J, Toyoshima K, et al. K-Ras is essential for the development of the mouse embryo. Oncogene. 1997;15:1151–1159. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Umanoff H, Edelmann W, Pellicer A, Kucherlapati R. The murine N-ras Gene is not essential for growth and development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:1709–1713. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.5.1709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Johnson L, Greenbaum D, Cichowski K, Mercer K, Murphy E, et al. K-ras is an essential gene in the mouse with partial functional overlap with N-ras. Genes Dev. 1997;11:2468–2481. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.19.2468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Esteban LM, Vicario-Abejon C, Fernandez-Salguero P, Fernandez-Medarde A, Swaminathan N, et al. Targeted genomic disruption of H-ras and N-ras, individually or in combination, reveals the dispensability of both loci for mouse growth and development. Mol. Cell. . Biol. 2001;21:1444–1452. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.5.1444-1452.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Khalaf WF, White H, Wenning MJ, Orazi A, Kapur R, et al. K-Ras is essential for normal fetal liver erythropoiesis. Blood. 2005;105:3538–3541. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-05-2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang J, Lodish, HF Identification of K-ras as the major regulator for cytokine-dependent Akt activation in erythroid progenitors in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:14605–14610. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507446102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Singh A, Sowjanya AP, Ramakrishna G. The wild-type Ras: road ahead. FASEB J. 2005;19:161–169. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-2584hyp. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cheng R, Bradford S, Barnes D, Williams D, Hendricks J, et al. Cloning, sequencing, and embryonic expression of an N-ras protooncogene isolated from an enriched zebrafish (Danio rerio) cDNA library. Mol. Mar. Biol. . Biotechnol. 1997;6:40–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhu S, Liu L, Korzh V, Gong Z, Low BC. RhoA acts downstream of Wnt5 and Wnt11 to regulate convergence and extension movements by involving effectors Rho Kinase and Diaphanous: Use of zebrafish as an in vivo model for GTPase signaling. Cellular Signaling. 2006;18:359–372. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2005.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Choi K, Kennedy M, Kazarov A, Papadimitriou JC, Keller G. A common precursor for hematopoietic and endothelial cells. Development. 1998;125:725–732. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.4.725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lawson ND, Weinstein BM. in vivo imaging of embryonic vascular development using transgenic zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2002;248:307–318. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2002.0711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Serbedzija GN, Flynn E, Willett CE. Zebrafish angiogenesis: a new model for drug screening. Angiogenesis. 1999;3:353–359. doi: 10.1023/a:1026598300052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Joneson T, White MA, Wigler MH, Bar-Sagi D. Stimulation of membrane ruffling and MAP kinase activation by distinct effectors of RAS. Science. 1996;271:810–812. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5250.810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Marsha JM, Lise R, Gregory VP, Sarah C, Michael AW, Judy LM. Differential Effects of Protein Kinase A on Ras Effector Pathways. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:3718–3726. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.7.3718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Han M, Golden A, Han Y, Sternberg PW. C. elegans lin-45 raf gene participates in let-60 ras-stimulated vulval differentiation. Nature. 1993;363:133–140. doi: 10.1038/363133a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Prior IA, Hancock JF. Compartmentalization of Ras proteins. J Cell Sci. 2001;114:1603–1608. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114.9.1603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lubbert M, Mirro J, Jr, Kitchingman G, McCormick F, Mertelsmann R, et al. Prevalence of N-ras mutations in children with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia. Oncogene. 1992;7:263–268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Parker J, Mufti GJ. Ras and myelodysplasia: lessons from the last decade. Semin Hematol. 1996;33:206–224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Braun BS, Tuveson DA, Kong N, Le DT, Kogan SC, et al. Somatic activation of oncogenic Kras in hematopoietic cells initiates a rapidly fatal myeloproliferative disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:597–602. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307203101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mo X, Kowenz-Leutz E, Xu H, Leutz A. Ras induces mediator complex exchange on c/EBPbeta. Molecular Cell. 2004;13:241–250. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00521-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Richmond TD, Chohan M, Barber DL. Turning cells red: signal transduction mediated by erythropoietin. Trends Cell Biol. 2005;15:146–155. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schmidt EK, Fichelson S, Feller SM. PI3 kinase is important for Ras, MEK and Erk activation of Epo-stimulated human erythroid progenitors. BMC Biol. 2004;18:2:7. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-2-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wandzioch E, Edling CE, Palmer RH, Carlsson L, Hallberg B. Activation of the MAP kinase pathway by c-Kit is PI-3 kinase dependent in hematopoietic progenitor/stem cell lines. Blood. 2004;104:51–57. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-07-2554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kranenburg O, Gebbink MF, Voest EE. Stimulation of angiogenesis by Ras proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1654:23–37. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2003.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Westerfield M. Eugene, OR, USA: University of Oregon Press; 2000. The Zebrafish Book. A guide for the laboratory use of zebrafish (Danio rerio). 4th edn. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Detrich HW, 3rd, Kieran MW, Chan FY, Barone LM, Yee K, et al. Intraembryonic hematopoietic cell migration during vertebrate development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:10713–10717. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.23.10713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.