Abstract
The argument put forward in this paper is that successful implementation of research into practice is a function of the interplay of three core elements--the level and nature of the evidence, the context or environment into which the research is to be placed, and the method or way in which the process is facilitated. It also proposes that because current research is inconclusive as to which of these elements is most important in successful implementation they all should have equal standing. This is contrary to the often implicit assumptions currently being generated within the clinical effectiveness agenda where the level and rigour of the evidence seems to be the most important factor for consideration. The paper offers a conceptual framework that considers this imbalance, showing how it might work in clarifying some of the theoretical positions and as a checklist for staff to assess what they need to do to successfully implement research into practice.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (135.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Berwick D. M. Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 5;320(1):53–56. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198901053200110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bryce F. P., Neville R. G., Crombie I. K., Clark R. A., McKenzie P. Controlled trial of an audit facilitator in diagnosis and treatment of childhood asthma in general practice. BMJ. 1995 Apr 1;310(6983):838–842. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6983.838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burrows D. E. Facilitation: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 1997 Feb;25(2):396–404. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025396.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cullum N. Identification and analysis of randomised controlled trials in nursing: a preliminary study. Qual Health Care. 1997 Mar;6(1):2–6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.6.1.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ellis J., Mulligan I., Rowe J., Sackett D. L. Inpatient general medicine is evidence based. A-Team, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine. Lancet. 1995 Aug 12;346(8972):407–410. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haines A., Jones R. Implementing findings of research. BMJ. 1994 Jun 4;308(6942):1488–1492. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6942.1488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harvey G., Kitson A. Achieving improvement through quality: an evaluation of key factors in the implementation process. J Adv Nurs. 1996 Jul;24(1):185–195. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.15825.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hearnshaw H. M., Baker R. H., Robertson N. Multidisciplinary audit in primary healthcare teams: facilitation by audit support staff. Qual Health Care. 1994 Sep;3(3):164–168. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.3.164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kitson A., Ahmed L. B., Harvey G., Seers K., Thompson D. R. From research to practice: one organizational model for promoting research-based practice. J Adv Nurs. 1996 Mar;23(3):430–440. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb00003.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sackett D. L., Rosenberg W. M., Gray J. A., Haynes R. B., Richardson W. S. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):71–72. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]