Skip to main content
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 1998 Sep;7(3):163–167. doi: 10.1136/qshc.7.3.163

Searching for information on outcomes: do you need to be comprehensive?

A J Brettle, A F Long, M J Grant, J Greenhalgh
PMCID: PMC2483607  PMID: 10185143

Abstract

The concepts of evidence-based practice and clinical effectiveness are reliant on up to date, accurate, high quality, and relevant information. Although this information can be obtained from a range of sources, computerised databases such as MEDLINE offer a fast, effective means of bringing up to date information to clinicians, as well as health service and information professionals. Common problems when searching for information from databases include missing important relevant papers or retrieving too much information. Effective search strategies are therefore necessary to retrieve a manageable amount of relevant information. This paper presents a range of strategies which can be used to locate information on MEDLINE efficiently and effectively.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (102.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berzon R. A., Simeon G. P., Simpson R. L., Jr, Donnelly M. A., Tilson H. H. Quality of life bibliography and indexes: 1993 update. Qual Life Res. 1995 Feb;4(1):53–74. doi: 10.1007/BF00434384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dickersin K., Scherer R., Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994 Nov 12;309(6964):1286–1291. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Harrison J. Designing a search strategy to identify and retrieve articles on evidence-based health care using MEDLINE. Health Libr Rev. 1997 Mar;14(1):33–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Haynes R. B., Wilczynski N., McKibbon K. A., Walker C. J., Sinclair J. C. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994 Nov-Dec;1(6):447–458. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95153434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Long A. F., Fairfield G. Confusion of levels in monitoring outcomes and/or process. Lancet. 1996 Jun 8;347(9015):1572–1572. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91072-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McKibbon K. A., Walker-Dilks C. J. The quality and impact of MEDLINE searches performed by end users. Health Libr Rev. 1995 Sep;12(3):191–200. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2532.1995.1230191.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care : QHC are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES