Skip to main content
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 1998 Dec;7(4):200–208. doi: 10.1136/qshc.7.4.200

Introducing a quality improvement programme to primary healthcare teams

H Hearnshaw, S Reddish, D Carlyle, R Baker, N Robertson
PMCID: PMC2483622  PMID: 10339022

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a programme in which quality improvement was facilitated, based on principles of total quality management, in primary healthcare teams, and to determine its feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness, and the duration of its effect. METHOD: Primary healthcare teams in Leicestershire (n = 147) were invited to take part in the facilitated programme. The programme comprised seven team meetings, led by a researcher, plus up to two facilitated meetings of quality improvement subgroups, appointed by each team to consider specific quality issues. OUTCOME MEASURES: To assess the effect and feasibility of the programme on improving the quality of care provided, the individual quality improvement projects undertaken by the teams were documented and opportunities for improvement were noted at each session by the facilitator. The programme's acceptability was assessed with questionnaires issued in the final session to each participant. To assess the long term impact on teams, interviews with team members were conducted 3 years after the programme ended. RESULTS: 10 of the 27 teams that initially expressed interest in the programme agreed to take part, and six started the programme. Of these, five completed their quality improvement projects and used several different quality tools, and three completed all seven sessions of the programme. The programme was assessed as appropriate and acceptable by the participants. Three years later, the changes made during the programme were still in place in three of the six teams. Four teams had decided to undertake the local quality monitoring programme, resourced and supported by the Health Authority. CONCLUSIONS: The facilitated programme was feasible, acceptable, and effective for a few primary healthcare teams. The outcomes of the programme can be sustained. Research is needed on the characteristics of teams likely to be successful in the introduction and maintenance of quality improvement programmes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (127.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker R., Thompson J. Innovation in general practice: is the gap between training and non-training practices getting wider? Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Jun;45(395):297–300. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berwick D. M. Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 5;320(1):53–56. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198901053200110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berwick D. M., Enthoven A., Bunker J. P. Quality management in the NHS: the doctor's role--I. BMJ. 1992 Jan 25;304(6821):235–239. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6821.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hearnshaw H. M., Baker R. H., Robertson N. Multidisciplinary audit in primary healthcare teams: facilitation by audit support staff. Qual Health Care. 1994 Sep;3(3):164–168. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.3.164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jarman B. Identification of underprivileged areas. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 May 28;286(6379):1705–1709. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6379.1705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kaluzny A. D., McLaughlin C. P., Simpson K. Applying total quality management concepts to public health organizations. Public Health Rep. 1992 May-Jun;107(3):257–264. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lawrence M., Packwood T. Adapting total quality management for general practice: evaluation of a programme. Qual Health Care. 1996 Sep;5(3):151–158. doi: 10.1136/qshc.5.3.151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McCowan C., Neville R. G., Crombie I. K., Clark R. A., Warner F. C. The facilitator effect: results from a four-year follow-up of children with asthma. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Mar;47(416):156–160. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pollitt C. Business approaches to quality improvement: why they are hard for the NHS to swallow. Qual Health Care. 1996 Jun;5(2):104–110. doi: 10.1136/qshc.5.2.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care : QHC are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES