Skip to main content
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 1999 Mar;8(1):16–21. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.1.16

Left in limbo: patients' views on care across the primary/secondary interface

C Preston, F Cheater, R Baker, H Hearnshaw
PMCID: PMC2483626  PMID: 10557664

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To discover the views of patients about their experiences across the interface between primary and secondary health care, including referral from general practitioners, outpatient and inpatient care, discharge, and aftercare. DESIGN: A qualitative study involving individual and focus group interviews of patients and interviews of carers. SUBJECTS: 33 patients who had attended at least one outpatient appointment or had been an inpatient between two and four months previously, and eight carers of patients with chronic conditions. SETTING: Three acute hospitals and one community health service in Leicestershire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Common themes in the views of patients and carers towards their experiences of care. RESULTS: Five themes emerged. The first four were: "getting in" (access to appropriate care), "fitting in" (orientation of care to the patient's requirements), "knowing what's going on" (provision of information), and "continuity" (continuity of staff and coordination and communication among professionals). The fifth theme was "limbo" (difficulty in making progress through the system), which was influenced by failures in care in relation to the other four themes. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of progress is central to patients' views of care. It involves both progress through the healthcare system and progress towards recovery or adjustment to an altered health state. Patients' views on how well they progress through the healthcare system may be an appropriate indicator for monitoring health service performance.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (96.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aharony L., Strasser S. Patient satisfaction: what we know about and what we still need to explore. Med Care Rev. 1993 Spring;50(1):49–79. doi: 10.1177/002570879305000104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Avis M., Bond M., Arthur A. Satisfying solutions? A review of some unresolved issues in the measurement of patient satisfaction. J Adv Nurs. 1995 Aug;22(2):316–322. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22020316.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker R. Pragmatic model of patient satisfaction in general practice: progress towards a theory. Qual Health Care. 1997 Dec;6(4):201–204. doi: 10.1136/qshc.6.4.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bruster S., Jarman B., Bosanquet N., Weston D., Erens R., Delbanco T. L. National survey of hospital patients. BMJ. 1994 Dec 10;309(6968):1542–1546. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6968.1542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cleary P. D., Edgman-Levitan S. Health care quality. Incorporating consumer perspectives. JAMA. 1997 Nov 19;278(19):1608–1612. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Delbanco T. L. Enriching the doctor-patient relationship by inviting the patient's perspective. Ann Intern Med. 1992 Mar 1;116(5):414–418. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-116-5-414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hall J. A., Dornan M. C. What patients like about their medical care and how often they are asked: a meta-analysis of the satisfaction literature. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(9):935–939. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90284-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Scott A., Smith R. D. Keeping the customer satisfied: issues in the interpretation and use of patient satisfaction surveys. Int J Qual Health Care. 1994 Dec;6(4):353–359. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/6.4.353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ware J. E., Jr, Davies-Avery A., Stewart A. L. The measurement and meaning of patient satisfaction. Health Med Care Serv Rev. 1978 Jan-Feb;1(1):1, 3-15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wensing M., Grol R., Smits A. Quality judgements by patients on general practice care: a literature analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Jan;38(1):45–53. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90298-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care : QHC are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES