Skip to main content
PMC home page
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 1999 Jun;8(2):92–98. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.2.92

Can small group education and peer review improve care for patients with asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

I J Smeele, R P Grol, C P van Schayck, W J van den Bosch, H J van den Hoogen, J W Muris
PMCID: PMC2483639  PMID: 10557684

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness of an intensive small group education and peer review programme aimed at implementing national guidelines on asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on care provision by general practitioners (GPs) and on patient outcomes. DESIGN: A randomised experimental study with pre-measurement and post- measurement (after one year) in an experimental group and a control group in Dutch general practice. SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTION: Two groups of GPs were formed and randomised. The education and peer review group (17 GPs with 210 patients) had an intervention consisting of an interactive group education and peer review programme (four sessions each lasting two hours). The control group consisted of 17 GPs with 223 patients (no intervention). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Knowledge, skills, opinion about asthma and COPD care, presence of equipment in practice; actual performance about peakflow measurement, non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment; asthma symptoms (Dutch Medical Research Council), smoking habits, exacerbation ratio, and disease specific quality of life (QOL-RIQ). Data were collected by a written questionnaire for GPs, by self recording of consultations by GPs, and by a written self administered questionnaire for adult patients with asthma/COPD. RESULTS: Data from 34 GP questionnaires, 433 patient questionnaires, and recordings from 934 consultations/visits and 350 repeat prescriptions were available. Compared with the control group there were only significant changes for self estimated skills (+16%, 95% confidence interval 4% to 26%) and presence of peakflow meters in practice (+18%, p < 0.05). No significant changes were found for provided care and patient outcomes compared with the control group. In the subgroup of more severe patients, the group of older patients, and in the group of patients not using anti-inflammatory medication at baseline, no significant changes compared with the control group were seen in patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: Except for two aspects, intensive small group education and peer review in asthma and COPD care do not seem to be effective in changing relevant aspects of the provided care by GPs in accordance with guidelines, nor in changing patients' health status.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (145.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dalhuijsen J., Zwaard A. M., Grol R. P., Mokkink H. M. Het handelen van huisartsen volgens de standaard Otitis media acuta van het Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1993 Oct 16;137(42):2139–2144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Davis D. A., Thomson M. A., Oxman A. D., Haynes R. B. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995 Sep 6;274(9):700–705. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.9.700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davis D. A., Thomson M. A., Oxman A. D., Haynes R. B. Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1992 Sep 2;268(9):1111–1117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Donner A., Birkett N., Buck C. Randomization by cluster. Sample size requirements and analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1981 Dec;114(6):906–914. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Donner A., Donald A. Analysis of data arising from a stratified design with the cluster as unit of randomization. Stat Med. 1987 Jan-Feb;6(1):43–52. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grimshaw J. M., Russell I. T. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993 Nov 27;342(8883):1317–1322. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grimshaw J., Freemantle N., Wallace S., Russell I., Hurwitz B., Watt I., Long A., Sheldon T. Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines. Qual Health Care. 1995 Mar;4(1):55–64. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grol R. Quality improvement by peer review in primary care: a practical guide. Qual Health Care. 1994 Sep;3(3):147–152. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.3.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Juniper E. F., Guyatt G. H., Willan A., Griffith L. E. Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Jan;47(1):81–87. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90036-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kerstjens H. A., Brand P. L., Hughes M. D., Robinson N. J., Postma D. S., Sluiter H. J., Bleecker E. R., Dekhuijzen P. N., de Jong P. M., Mengelers H. J. A comparison of bronchodilator therapy with or without inhaled corticosteroid therapy for obstructive airways disease. Dutch Chronic Non-Specific Lung Disease Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1992 Nov 12;327(20):1413–1419. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199211123272003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Maillé A. R., Koning C. J., Zwinderman A. H., Willems L. N., Dijkman J. H., Kaptein A. A. The development of the 'Quality-of-life for Respiratory Illness Questionnaire (QOL-RIQ)': a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with mild to moderate chronic non-specific lung disease. Respir Med. 1997 May;91(5):297–309. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(97)90034-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Perneger T. V. What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ. 1998 Apr 18;316(7139):1236–1238. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schectman J. M., Elinsky E. G., Pawlson L. G. Self-reported versus actual test ordering behavior among primary care clinicians. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992 Feb;18(2):60–62. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30508-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sluiter H. J., Koëter G. H., de Monchy J. G., Postma D. S., de Vries K., Orie N. G. The Dutch hypothesis (chronic non-specific lung disease) revisited. Eur Respir J. 1991 Apr;4(4):479–489. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stein L. S. The effectiveness of continuing medical education: eight research reports. J Med Educ. 1981 Feb;56(2):103–110. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198102000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang V. L., Terry P., Flynn B. S., Williamson J. W., Green L. W., Faden R. Evaluations of continuing medical education for chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. J Med Educ. 1979 Oct;54(10):803–811. doi: 10.1097/00001888-197910000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wensing M., Grol R. Single and combined strategies for implementing changes in primary care: a literature review. Int J Qual Health Care. 1994 Jun;6(2):115–132. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/6.2.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. White P. T., Pharoah C. A., Anderson H. R., Freeling P. Randomized controlled trial of small group education on the outcome of chronic asthma in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 May;39(322):182–186. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. White P., Atherton A., Hewett G., Howells K. Using information from asthma patients: a trial of information feedback in primary care. BMJ. 1995 Oct 21;311(7012):1065–1069. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7012.1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. van der Lende R., Orie N. G. The MRC-ECCS questionnaire on respiratory symptoms (use in epidemiology). Scand J Respir Dis. 1972;53(4):218–226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care : QHC are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES