Skip to main content
PMC home page
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 1999 Dec;8(4):228–233. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.4.228

Measurement of patient perceptions of pain and disability in relation to total hip replacement: the place of the Oxford hip score in mixed methods

R McMurray, J Heaton, P Sloper, S Nettleton
PMCID: PMC2483663  PMID: 10847884

Abstract

Objectives - To describe the practical difficulties experienced by patients when completing the Oxford hip score, and to highlight the need to reconsider aspects of its structure and conceptual base. Design - Qualitative study incorporating the Oxford hip score in semi-structured interviews with patients before and four months after their operation. Setting - Two hospitals in the North of England. Subjects - Osteoarthritic patients undergoing primary elective total hip replacement. Results - Use of the Oxford hip score provided quantitative data on disability in the sample, particularly about pain and immobility. It also facilitated the collection of qualitative data, serving as a useful starting point for interviews and as a prompt for indepth discussion. Concerns about the clarity, coverage, and content validity of the score were identified, however, raising questions about the measure's conceptual base. Conclusion - The Oxford hip score was found to be a useful precursor to the semi- structured interviews. However, deficiencies in instruction and lack of clarity in purpose have implications for its ongoing development and future application, both in this type of study and other, more general, contexts.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (84.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amadio P. C. Outcomes measurements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Nov;75(11):1583–1584. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199311000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brooker D. J., Dinshaw C. J. Staff and patient feedback in mental health services for older people. Qual Health Care. 1998 Jun;7(2):70–76. doi: 10.1136/qshc.7.2.70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cleary P. D., Reilly D. T., Greenfield S., Mulley A. G., Wexler L., Frankel F., McNeil B. J. Using patient reports to assess health-related quality of life after total hip replacement. Qual Life Res. 1993 Feb;2(1):3–11. doi: 10.1007/BF00642884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Carr A., Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Mar;78(2):185–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Murray D., Carr A. Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery. Qual Health Care. 1996 Jun;5(2):81–88. doi: 10.1136/qshc.5.2.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Donovan J. L., Frankel S. J., Eyles J. D. Assessing the need for health status measures. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Apr;47(2):158–162. doi: 10.1136/jech.47.2.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fitzpatrick R., Fletcher A., Gore S., Jones D., Spiegelhalter D., Cox D. Quality of life measures in health care. I: Applications and issues in assessment. BMJ. 1992 Oct 31;305(6861):1074–1077. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6861.1074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jette A. M. How measurement techniques influence estimates of disability in older populations. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Apr;38(7):937–942. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90426-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Johanson N. A., Charlson M. E., Szatrowski T. P., Ranawat C. S. A self-administered hip-rating questionnaire for the assessment of outcome after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Apr;74(4):587–597. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Levine D. W., Simmons B. P., Koris M. J., Daltroy L. H., Hohl G. G., Fossel A. H., Katz J. N. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Nov;75(11):1585–1592. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199311000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Segovia J., Bartlett R. F., Edwards A. C. An empirical analysis of the dimensions of health status measures. Soc Sci Med. 1989;29(6):761–768. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90156-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Summers A., McKeown K. Local voices: evolving a realistic strategy on public consultation. Public Health. 1996 May;110(3):145–150. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(96)80067-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wright J. G., Rudicel S., Feinstein A. R. Ask patients what they want. Evaluation of individual complaints before total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994 Mar;76(2):229–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care : QHC are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES