Skip to main content
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 1999 Dec;8(4):213–218. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.4.213

Perceptions of good medical practice in the NHS: a survey of senior health professionals

A Hutchinson, M Williams, K Meadows, R S Barbour, R Jones
PMCID: PMC2483666  PMID: 10847882

Abstract

Objectives - To categorise senior health professionals' experience with poor medical practice in hospitals and in general practice, to describe perceptions which senior NHS staff have of good medical practice, and to describe how problems of poor medical practice are currently managed. Design - A postal questionnaire survey. The questionnaire sought perceptions of good medical practice, asked participants to characterise deviations from good practice, and to describe experience with managing poor performance at the time of the introduction of the General Medical Council (GMC) performance procedures. Setting - A range of NHS settings in the UK: hospital trusts, health authorities/boards, local medical committees, community health councils. Subjects - Senior health professionals involved in the management of medical professional performance. Main measures - Perceptions of what constitutes good medical practice. Results - Most respondents considered that persistent problems related to clinical practice (diagnosis, management, and outcome and prescribing) would require local management and, possibly, referral to the GMC performance procedures. Informal mechanisms, including informal discussion, education, training, and work shifting, were the most usual means of handling a doctor whose performance was poor. Many took a less serious view of deficiencies in performance on manner and attitude and communication, although consultation skills rather than technical skills comprised the greatest number of complaints about doctors. Conclusions - Senior NHS professionals seem reluctant to consider persistently poor consultation skills in the same critical light as they do persistently poor technical practice. These attitudes may need to change with the implementation of clinical governance and updated guidance from the GMC on what constitutes good medical practice.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (84.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dyer C. Study identifies why child heart operations go wrong. BMJ. 1999 Sep 25;319(7213):803–803. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7213.803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Irvine D. The performance of doctors. II: Maintaining good practice, protecting patients from poor performance. BMJ. 1997 May 31;314(7094):1613–1615. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7094.1613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Klein R. Competence, professional self regulation, and the public interest. BMJ. 1998 Jun 6;316(7146):1740–1742. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7146.1740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Smith R. All changed, changed utterly. British medicine will be transformed by the Bristol case. BMJ. 1998 Jun 27;316(7149):1917–1918. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7149.1917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care : QHC are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES