Abstract
To solve complex quality problems teams need to follow a systematic sequence of inquiry and action. In this article a practical description of a team quality improvement sequence (TQIS) is given based on the experience of the more successful teams in the Norwegian total quality management experiment. There are nine phases in the sequence and teams have the flexibility to choose the best quality methods for completing each phase. The strengths of the framework are in ensuring that personnel time is used cost effectively and that changes are made which result in measurable improvement. One limitation is that the framework has not been as widely tested as FOCUS-PDCA (find, organise, clarify, understand, select - plan, do, check, act) and other frameworks to which the TQIS framework is compared. It is proposed that if team projects are to be the main vehicle for quality improvement, then their work must be made more cost effective. The article aims to stimulate research into the conditions necessary for different quality teams to be successful in health care, and draws on the research to propose a "risk of team failure index" to improve the management of such teams.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (95.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Batalden P. B., Stoltz P. K. A framework for the continual improvement of health care: building and applying professional and improvement knowledge to test changes in daily work. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1993 Oct;19(10):424–452. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30025-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bero L. A., Grilli R., Grimshaw J. M., Harvey E., Oxman A. D., Thomson M. A. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. BMJ. 1998 Aug 15;317(7156):465–468. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7156.465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis D. A., Thomson M. A., Oxman A. D., Haynes R. B. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995 Sep 6;274(9):700–705. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.9.700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Firth-Cozens J. Celebrating teamwork. Qual Health Care. 1998 Dec;7 (Suppl):S3–S7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freemantle N., Grilli R., Grimshaw J., Oxman A. Implementing findings of medical research: the Cochrane Collaboration on Effective Professional Practice. Qual Health Care. 1995 Mar;4(1):45–47. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grimshaw J. M., Russell I. T. Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines II: Ensuring guidelines change medical practice. Qual Health Care. 1994 Mar;3(1):45–52. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnston M. E., Langton K. B., Haynes R. B., Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jan 15;120(2):135–142. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-2-199401150-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nelson E. C., Batalden P. B., Plume S. K., Mohr J. J. Improving health care, Part 2: A clinical improvement worksheet and users' manual. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1996 Aug;22(8):531–548. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30254-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wensing M., Grol R. Single and combined strategies for implementing changes in primary care: a literature review. Int J Qual Health Care. 1994 Jun;6(2):115–132. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/6.2.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]