Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 1999 Dec;8(4):234–238. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.4.234

Is the emergency readmission rate a valid outcome indicator?

G C Leng, D Walsh, F Fowkes, C P Swainson
PMCID: PMC2483668  PMID: 10847885

Abstract

Objectives - The principal aim was to determine whether the emergency readmission rate varies between medical specialties, and to identify whether differences in emergency readmission rates between hospital trusts can be reduced by standardising for specialty. Possible factors influencing emergency readmission were also investigated, including frequency of previous admission and cause of readmission. Design - Emergency readmission rates were obtained from the Scottish Morbidity Record scheme (SMR1) using record linkage, standardised for age and sex. Rates throughout Scotland were analysed by specialty, and rates for general medicine compared among teaching hospital trusts. Cause of emergency readmission was determined from hospital records in a random sample (177 patients). Setting - Medical specialties throughout Scotland. Subjects - All patients readmitted as an emergency within 28 days of discharge (October 1990 to September 1994). Results - Emergency readmissions varied markedly between medical specialties, with highest rates in nephrology (24.2%, 95% CI 23.5 to 24.8) and haematology (20.4%, 95% CI 19.9 to 20.9), and the lowest in homeopathy (2.2%, 95% CI 1.6 to 2.7) and metabolic diseases (3.5%, 95% CI 2.4 to 4.5). The largest number of emergency readmissions was in general medicine, accounting for 63% of the total. Restricting emergency readmission rates to general medicine significantly altered previous rates. In the year preceding the emergency readmission, 59% of all patients had been admitted to hospital at least once, and most emergency readmissions (73.3%) resulted from a chronic underlying condition. Conclusions - Significant variations in emergency readmission rates occurred between medical specialties, suggesting that differences between hospital trusts are influenced by differences in specialties and thus case mix. The majority of emergency readmissions occurred in patients with an underlying chronic condition, and many had a history of multiple previous hospital admissions. The emergency readmission rate is therefore unlikely to be a valid outcome indicator reflecting quality of care until routine data are available for standardisation by case mix.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (82.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clarke A. Are readmissions avoidable? BMJ. 1990 Nov 17;301(6761):1136–1138. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6761.1136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Goldacre M. J., Simmons H., Henderson J., Gill L. E. Trends in episode based and person based rates of admission to hospital in the Oxford record linkage study area. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Feb 20;296(6621):583–585. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6621.583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Graham H., Livesley B. Can readmissions to a geriatric medical unit be prevented? Lancet. 1983 Feb 19;1(8321):404–406. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91513-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Henderson J., Goldacre M. J., Graveney M. J., Simmons H. M. Use of medical record linkage to study readmission rates. BMJ. 1989 Sep 16;299(6701):709–713. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6701.709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jones J. Readmission rates. The price of early discharge. Health Serv J. 1986 Jun 19;96(5004):825–825. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kendrick S., Clarke J. The Scottish Record Linkage System. Health Bull (Edinb) 1993 Mar;51(2):72–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kendrick S. The pattern of increase in emergency hospital admissions in Scotland. Health Bull (Edinb) 1996 Mar;54(2):169–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Milne R., Clarke A. Can readmission rates be used as an outcome indicator? BMJ. 1990 Nov 17;301(6761):1139–1140. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6761.1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Popplewell P. Y., Chalmers J. P., Burns R. J., Miller C. D., Rayner P. Y. A review of early medical readmissions at the Flinders Medical Centre. Aust Clin Rev. 1984 Mar;(11):3–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Saltz C. C., McVey L. J., Becker P. M., Feussner J. R., Cohen H. J. Impact of a geriatric consultation team on discharge placement and repeat hospitalization. Gerontologist. 1988 Jun;28(3):344–350. doi: 10.1093/geront/28.3.344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shaw C. D. Clinical outcome indicators. Health Trends. 1989 May;21(2):37–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tierney A. J., Worth A. Review: readmission of elderly patients to hospital. Age Ageing. 1995 Mar;24(2):163–166. doi: 10.1093/ageing/24.2.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Victor C. R., Vetter N. J. The early readmission of the elderly to hospital. Age Ageing. 1985 Jan;14(1):37–42. doi: 10.1093/ageing/14.1.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Williams D. R. Outcome indicators for diabetes services--what do we have and what do we need? Community Med. 1989 Feb;11(1):57–64. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Williams E. I., Fitton F. Factors affecting early unplanned readmission of elderly patients to hospital. BMJ. 1988 Sep 24;297(6651):784–787. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6651.784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care : QHC are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES