Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association logoLink to The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association
. 1995 Sep;39(3):147–153.

Chiropractic rehabilitation of spinal pain patients: principles, practices and outcome data

Howard T Vernon, Joseph Piccininni, Deborah Kopansky-Giles, Carol Hagino, Shirley Fuligni
PMCID: PMC2485064

Abstract

Objective:

To review basic principles and practices of chiropractic rehabilitation for spine pain patients and to present data on outcomes of an active care program.

Design:

Pre-post statistical comparisons of patient outcomes in a 6-week program of active care.

Setting:

Rehabilitation clinic.

Participants:

A convenience sample of seventy-three work-injured spine-pain patients from January 1993 to September 1994 who completed a 6-week intervention program. Forty eight (48) males with an average age of 41 years, and 25 females with an average age of 39 years were included.

Outcome measures:

VAS for pain severity; Oswestry and Neck Disability Indices; self-ratings for improvement; an outcomes satisfaction index.

Results:

The average duration of complaint was 48 days. Mean pre-post changes in pain scores (6.7 to 3.4) and disability scores (27.3 to 17.1) were highly significant (p < .0001). Eight-one percent (81%) of subjects were discharged as fit to return to at least modified work. The average level of self-rated improvement was 68%. The average level of satisfaction with outcome was 39/50. The highest correlations were found between disability status, self-rated improvement and outcomes satisfaction (.57-.81)

Conclusion:

An active care program has been shown to produce high levels of clinical improvement and patient satisfaction in a sample of moderate-to-severely disabled spine-pain patients. While this study has limitations, investigations such as this are essential to improve the quality of care provided to work-injured spine-pain patients.

Keywords: chiropractic, manipulation, rehabilitation

Full text

PDF
147

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cherkin D. C., MacCornack F. A., Berg A. O. Managing low back pain--a comparison of the beliefs and behaviors of family physicians and chiropractors. West J Med. 1988 Oct;149(4):475–480. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cherkin D. C., MacCornack F. A. Patient evaluations of low back pain care from family physicians and chiropractors. West J Med. 1989 Mar;150(3):351–355. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Deyo R. A., Diehl A. K., Rosenthal M. How many days of bed rest for acute low back pain? A randomized clinical trial. N Engl J Med. 1986 Oct 23;315(17):1064–1070. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198610233151705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fairbank J. C., Couper J., Davies J. B., O'Brien J. P. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980 Aug;66(8):271–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gill C., Sanford J., Binkley J., Stratford P., Finch E. Low back pain: program description and outcome in a case series. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994 Jul;20(1):11–16. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1994.20.1.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hacquebord H. Health care from the perspective of a patient: theories for improvement. Qual Manag Health Care. 1994 Winter;2(2):68–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kane R. L., Olsen D., Leymaster C., Woolley F. R., Fisher F. D. Manipulating the patient. A comparison of the effectiveness of physician and chiropractor care. Lancet. 1974 Jun 29;1(7870):1333–1336. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90695-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Linton S. J., Bradley L. A., Jensen I., Spangfort E., Sundell L. The secondary prevention of low back pain: a controlled study with follow-up. Pain. 1989 Feb;36(2):197–207. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90024-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mayer T. G., Gatchel R. J., Mayer H., Kishino N. D., Keeley J., Mooney V. A prospective two-year study of functional restoration in industrial low back injury. An objective assessment procedure. JAMA. 1987 Oct 2;258(13):1763–1767. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mitchell R. I., Carmen G. M. Results of a multicenter trial using an intensive active exercise program for the treatment of acute soft tissue and back injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1990 Jun;15(6):514–521. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199006000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Scott J., Huskisson E. C. Graphic representation of pain. Pain. 1976 Jun;2(2):175–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Vernon H., Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991 Sep;14(7):409–415. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Von Korff M., Deyo R. A., Cherkin D., Barlow W. Back pain in primary care. Outcomes at 1 year. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993 Jun 1;18(7):855–862. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199306000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Waddell G. 1987 Volvo award in clinical sciences. A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987 Sep;12(7):632–644. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198709000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Waddell G., Newton M., Henderson I., Somerville D., Main C. J. A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain. 1993 Feb;52(2):157–168. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90127-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wiesel S. W., Boden S. D., Feffer H. L. A quality-based protocol for management of musculoskeletal injuries. A ten-year prospective outcome study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Apr;(301):164–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association are provided here courtesy of The Canadian Chiropractic Association

RESOURCES