Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 1990 Nov;64(11):5617–5625. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.11.5617-5625.1990

Moloney murine leukemia virus integration protein produced in yeast binds specifically to viral att sites.

S Basu 1, H E Varmus 1
PMCID: PMC248616  PMID: 2214028

Abstract

The integration protein (IN) of Moloney murine leukemia virus (MuLV), purified after being produced in yeast cells, has been analyzed for its ability to bind its putative viral substrates, the att sites. An electrophoretic mobility shift assay revealed that the Moloney MuLV IN protein binds synthetic oligonucleotides containing att sequences, with specificity towards its cognate (MuLV) sequences. The terminal 13 base pairs, which are identical at both ends of viral DNA, are sufficient for binding if present at the ends of oligonucleotide duplexes in the same orientation as in linear viral DNA. However, only weak binding was observed when the same sequences were positioned within a substrate in a manner simulating att junctions in circular viral DNA with two long terminal repeats. Binding to att sites in oligonucleotides simulating linear viral DNA was dependent on the presence of the highly conserved CA residues preceding the site for 3' processing (an IN-dependent reaction that removes two nucleotides from the 3' ends of linear viral DNA); mutation of CA to TG abolished binding, and a CA to TA change reduced affinity by at least 20-fold. Removal of either the terminal two base pairs from both ends of the oligonucleotide duplex or the terminal two nucleotides from the 3' ends of each strand did not affect binding. The removal of three 3' terminal nucleotides, however, abolished binding, suggesting an essential role for the A residue immediately upstream of the 3' processing site in the binding reaction. These results help define the sequence requirements for att site recognition by IN, explain the conservation of the subterminal CA dinucleotide, and provide a simple assay for sequence-specific IN activity.

Full text

PDF
5617

Images in this article

5618Image
on p.5618
5620Image
on p.5620
5620Image
on p.5620
5621Image
on p.5621
5622Image
on p.5622
5623Image
on p.5623

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brown P. O., Bowerman B., Varmus H. E., Bishop J. M. Correct integration of retroviral DNA in vitro. Cell. 1987 May 8;49(3):347–356. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90287-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown P. O., Bowerman B., Varmus H. E., Bishop J. M. Retroviral integration: structure of the initial covalent product and its precursor, and a role for the viral IN protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Apr;86(8):2525–2529. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.8.2525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cobrinik D., Katz R., Terry R., Skalka A. M., Leis J. Avian sarcoma and leukosis virus pol-endonuclease recognition of the tandem long terminal repeat junction: minimum site required for cleavage is also required for viral growth. J Virol. 1987 Jun;61(6):1999–2008. doi: 10.1128/jvi.61.6.1999-2008.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Colicelli J., Goff S. P. Mutants and pseudorevertants of Moloney murine leukemia virus with alterations at the integration site. Cell. 1985 Sep;42(2):573–580. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90114-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Colicelli J., Goff S. P. Sequence and spacing requirements of a retrovirus integration site. J Mol Biol. 1988 Jan 5;199(1):47–59. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90378-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Craigie R., Mizuuchi K. Mechanism of transposition of bacteriophage Mu: structure of a transposition intermediate. Cell. 1985 Jul;41(3):867–876. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80067-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Craigie R., Mizuuchi M., Mizuuchi K. Site-specific recognition of the bacteriophage Mu ends by the Mu A protein. Cell. 1984 Dec;39(2 Pt 1):387–394. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90017-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Donehower L. A., Varmus H. E. A mutant murine leukemia virus with a single missense codon in pol is defective in a function affecting integration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Oct;81(20):6461–6465. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.20.6461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Duyk G., Longiaru M., Cobrinik D., Kowal R., deHaseth P., Skalka A. M., Leis J. Circles with two tandem long terminal repeats are specifically cleaved by pol gene-associated endonuclease from avian sarcoma and leukosis viruses: nucleotide sequences required for site-specific cleavage. J Virol. 1985 Nov;56(2):589–599. doi: 10.1128/jvi.56.2.589-599.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eichinger D. J., Boeke J. D. The DNA intermediate in yeast Ty1 element transposition copurifies with virus-like particles: cell-free Ty1 transposition. Cell. 1988 Sep 23;54(7):955–966. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90110-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fried M., Crothers D. M. Equilibria and kinetics of lac repressor-operator interactions by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Dec 11;9(23):6505–6525. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.23.6505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fujiwara T., Craigie R. Integration of mini-retroviral DNA: a cell-free reaction for biochemical analysis of retroviral integration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 May;86(9):3065–3069. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.9.3065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fujiwara T., Mizuuchi K. Retroviral DNA integration: structure of an integration intermediate. Cell. 1988 Aug 12;54(4):497–504. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90071-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Grandgenett D. P., Mumm S. R. Unraveling retrovirus integration. Cell. 1990 Jan 12;60(1):3–4. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90707-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Grandgenett D. P., Vora A. C., Schiff R. D. A 32,000-dalton nucleic acid-binding protein from avian retravirus cores possesses DNA endonuclease activity. Virology. 1978 Aug;89(1):119–132. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(78)90046-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Johnson M. S., McClure M. A., Feng D. F., Gray J., Doolittle R. F. Computer analysis of retroviral pol genes: assignment of enzymatic functions to specific sequences and homologies with nonviral enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Oct;83(20):7648–7652. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.20.7648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jones E. W. Proteinase mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1977 Jan;85(1):23–33. doi: 10.1093/genetics/85.1.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Katzman M., Katz R. A., Skalka A. M., Leis J. The avian retroviral integration protein cleaves the terminal sequences of linear viral DNA at the in vivo sites of integration. J Virol. 1989 Dec;63(12):5319–5327. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.12.5319-5327.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kopchick J. J., Harless J., Geisser B. S., Killam R., Hewitt R. R., Arlinghaus R. B. Endodeoxyribonuclease activity associated with Rauscher murine leukemia virus. J Virol. 1981 Jan;37(1):274–283. doi: 10.1128/jvi.37.1.274-283.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Krogstad P. A., Champoux J. J. Sequence-specific binding of DNA by the Moloney murine leukemia virus integrase protein. J Virol. 1990 Jun;64(6):2796–2801. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.6.2796-2801.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lobel L. I., Murphy J. E., Goff S. P. The palindromic LTR-LTR junction of Moloney murine leukemia virus is not an efficient substrate for proviral integration. J Virol. 1989 Jun;63(6):2629–2637. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.6.2629-2637.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Luk K. C., Gilmore T. D., Panganiban A. T. The spleen necrosis virus int gene product expressed in Escherichia coli has DNA binding activity and mediates att and U5-specific DNA multimer formation in vitro. Virology. 1987 Mar;157(1):127–136. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(87)90321-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Misra T. K., Grandgenett D. P., Parsons J. T. Avian retrovirus pp32 DNA-binding protein. I. Recognition of specific sequences on retrovirus DNA terminal repeats. J Virol. 1982 Oct;44(1):330–343. doi: 10.1128/jvi.44.1.330-343.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Panet A., Baltimore D. Characterization of endonuclease activities in Moloney murine leukemia virus and its replication-defective mutants. J Virol. 1987 May;61(5):1756–1760. doi: 10.1128/jvi.61.5.1756-1760.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Panganiban A. T., Temin H. M. Circles with two tandem LTRs are precursors to integrated retrovirus DNA. Cell. 1984 Mar;36(3):673–679. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90347-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Panganiban A. T., Temin H. M. The retrovirus pol gene encodes a product required for DNA integration: identification of a retrovirus int locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Dec;81(24):7885–7889. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.24.7885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Panganiban A. T., Temin H. M. The terminal nucleotides of retrovirus DNA are required for integration but not virus production. Nature. 1983 Nov 10;306(5939):155–160. doi: 10.1038/306155a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Porath J., Carlsson J., Olsson I., Belfrage G. Metal chelate affinity chromatography, a new approach to protein fractionation. Nature. 1975 Dec 18;258(5536):598–599. doi: 10.1038/258598a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Quinn T. P., Grandgenett D. P. Genetic evidence that the avian retrovirus DNA endonuclease domain of pol is necessary for viral integration. J Virol. 1988 Jul;62(7):2307–2312. doi: 10.1128/jvi.62.7.2307-2312.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Roth M. J., Schwartzberg P. L., Goff S. P. Structure of the termini of DNA intermediates in the integration of retroviral DNA: dependence on IN function and terminal DNA sequence. Cell. 1989 Jul 14;58(1):47–54. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90401-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Roth M. J., Tanese N., Goff S. P. Gene product of Moloney murine leukemia virus required for proviral integration is a DNA-binding protein. J Mol Biol. 1988 Sep 5;203(1):131–139. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90097-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schaber M. D., DeChiara T. M., Kramer R. A. Yeast vectors for production of interferon. Methods Enzymol. 1986;119:416–423. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(86)19061-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Schwartzberg P., Colicelli J., Goff S. P. Construction and analysis of deletion mutations in the pol gene of Moloney murine leukemia virus: a new viral function required for productive infection. Cell. 1984 Jul;37(3):1043–1052. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90439-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Shinnick T. M., Lerner R. A., Sutcliffe J. G. Nucleotide sequence of Moloney murine leukaemia virus. Nature. 1981 Oct 15;293(5833):543–548. doi: 10.1038/293543a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Terry R., Soltis D. A., Katzman M., Cobrinik D., Leis J., Skalka A. M. Properties of avian sarcoma-leukosis virus pp32-related pol-endonucleases produced in Escherichia coli. J Virol. 1988 Jul;62(7):2358–2365. doi: 10.1128/jvi.62.7.2358-2365.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES