Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 1990 Feb;64(2):784–793. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.2.784-793.1990

Proviral insertions within the int-2 gene can generate multiple anomalous transcripts but leave the protein-coding domain intact.

C Dickson 1, R Smith 1, S Brookes 1, G Peters 1
PMCID: PMC249173  PMID: 2153243

Abstract

We examined the effects of mouse mammary tumor virus integration on the multiple RNA transcripts expressed from the int-2 proto-oncogene in virally induced breast tumors. Proviral insertion either upstream or downstream of the gene could simultaneously activate transcription from three dissimilar int-2 promoters. In some tumors, the activating provirus lies within the transcription unit and disrupts the structures of the various RNAs. Insertions in the 5' region of the gene had complex effects depending on the orientation and position of the provirus relative to the three promoters and intron-exon boundaries. RNase protection experiments identified transcripts initiated in the viral long terminal repeat, at normal and cryptic sites in the int-2 sequences, and from cryptic promoters in an inverted provirus. AT the 3' end, insertions occurred within the untranslated trailer and provided alternative termination signals that substituted for one or both of the normal the poly(A) addition sites. However, in no instance, of the 20 tumors analyzed in detail, did a provirus perturb the presumed open reading frame of the gene. These data strongly implicate the normal product of the int-2 gene, which is related to the fibroblast growth factor family, as a contributory factor in virally induced mammary tumors.

Full text

PDF
784

Images in this article

785Image
on p.785
787Image
on p.787
788Image
on p.788
791Image
on p.791

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cullen B. R., Lomedico P. T., Ju G. Transcriptional interference in avian retroviruses--implications for the promoter insertion model of leukaemogenesis. Nature. 1984 Jan 19;307(5948):241–245. doi: 10.1038/307241a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dickson C., Peters G. Potential oncogene product related to growth factors. 1987 Apr 30-May 6Nature. 326(6116):833–833. doi: 10.1038/326833a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dickson C., Smith R., Brookes S., Peters G. Tumorigenesis by mouse mammary tumor virus: proviral activation of a cellular gene in the common integration region int-2. Cell. 1984 Jun;37(2):529–536. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90383-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dixon M., Deed R., Acland P., Moore R., Whyte A., Peters G., Dickson C. Detection and characterization of the fibroblast growth factor-related oncoprotein INT-2. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Nov;9(11):4896–4902. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.11.4896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dudov K. P., Perry R. P. Properties of a mouse ribosomal protein promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Nov;83(22):8545–8549. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.22.8545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Emerman M., Temin H. M. Genes with promoters in retrovirus vectors can be independently suppressed by an epigenetic mechanism. Cell. 1984 Dec;39(3 Pt 2):449–467. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jakobovits A., Shackleford G. M., Varmus H. E., Martin G. R. Two proto-oncogenes implicated in mammary carcinogenesis, int-1 and int-2, are independently regulated during mouse development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Oct;83(20):7806–7810. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.20.7806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Linial M., Groudine M. Transcription of three c-myc exons is enhanced in chicken bursal lymphoma cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jan;82(1):53–57. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.1.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mansour S. L., Martin G. R. Four classes of mRNA are expressed from the mouse int-2 gene, a member of the FGF gene family. EMBO J. 1988 Jul;7(7):2035–2041. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03043.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Moore R., Casey G., Brookes S., Dixon M., Peters G., Dickson C. Sequence, topography and protein coding potential of mouse int-2: a putative oncogene activated by mouse mammary tumour virus. EMBO J. 1986 May;5(5):919–924. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04304.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nottenburg C., Varmus H. E. Features of the chicken c-myc gene that influence the structure of c-myc RNA in normal cells and bursal lymphomas. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Aug;6(8):2800–2806. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.8.2800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nusse R., van Ooyen A., Cox D., Fung Y. K., Varmus H. Mode of proviral activation of a putative mammary oncogene (int-1) on mouse chromosome 15. Nature. 1984 Jan 12;307(5947):131–136. doi: 10.1038/307131a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Paterno G. D., Gillespie L. L., Dixon M. S., Slack J. M., Heath J. K. Mesoderm-inducing properties of INT-2 and kFGF: two oncogene-encoded growth factors related to FGF. Development. 1989 May;106(1):79–83. doi: 10.1242/dev.106.1.79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Peters G., Brookes S., Placzek M., Schuermann M., Michalides R., Dickson C. A putative int domain for mouse mammary tumor virus on mouse chromosome 7 is a 5' extension of int-2. J Virol. 1989 Mar;63(3):1448–1450. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.3.1448-1450.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Peters G., Brookes S., Smith R., Dickson C. Tumorigenesis by mouse mammary tumor virus: evidence for a common region for provirus integration in mammary tumors. Cell. 1983 Jun;33(2):369–377. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90418-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Peters G., Lee A. E., Dickson C. Concerted activation of two potential proto-oncogenes in carcinomas induced by mouse mammary tumour virus. Nature. 1986 Apr 17;320(6063):628–631. doi: 10.1038/320628a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Robinson H. L., Gagnon G. C. Patterns of proviral insertion and deletion in avian leukosis virus-induced lymphomas. J Virol. 1986 Jan;57(1):28–36. doi: 10.1128/jvi.57.1.28-36.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Selten G., Cuypers H. T., Berns A. Proviral activation of the putative oncogene Pim-1 in MuLV induced T-cell lymphomas. EMBO J. 1985 Jul;4(7):1793–1798. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb03852.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Selten G., Cuypers H. T., Zijlstra M., Melief C., Berns A. Involvement of c-myc in MuLV-induced T cell lymphomas in mice: frequency and mechanisms of activation. EMBO J. 1984 Dec 20;3(13):3215–3222. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02281.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shih C. K., Linial M., Goodenow M. M., Hayward W. S. Nucleotide sequence 5' of the chicken c-myc coding region: localization of a noncoding exon that is absent from myc transcripts in most avian leukosis virus-induced lymphomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Aug;81(15):4697–4701. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.15.4697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Smith R., Peters G., Dickson C. Multiple RNAs expressed from the int-2 gene in mouse embryonal carcinoma cell lines encode a protein with homology to fibroblast growth factors. EMBO J. 1988 Apr;7(4):1013–1022. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02908.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wilkinson D. G., Bhatt S., McMahon A. P. Expression pattern of the FGF-related proto-oncogene int-2 suggests multiple roles in fetal development. Development. 1989 Jan;105(1):131–136. doi: 10.1242/dev.105.1.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wilkinson D. G., Peters G., Dickson C., McMahon A. P. Expression of the FGF-related proto-oncogene int-2 during gastrulation and neurulation in the mouse. EMBO J. 1988 Mar;7(3):691–695. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02864.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. van Ooyen A., Nusse R. Structure and nucleotide sequence of the putative mammary oncogene int-1; proviral insertions leave the protein-encoding domain intact. Cell. 1984 Nov;39(1):233–240. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90209-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES