Skip to main content
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 1984 May;66(3):192–194.

The efficacy of agents employed to prevent anastomotic recurrence in colorectal carcinoma.

H C Umpleby, R C Williamson
PMCID: PMC2492522  PMID: 6232888

Abstract

Forty-eight of 72 surgeons canvassed in the South West of England (67%) routinely use an intraluminal cytotoxic agent to prevent suture-line recurrence following partial resection of the large bowel for cancer. The most popular agents are chlorhexidine-cetrimide preparations (n = 14), mercuric perchloride (12), povidone-iodine (7) and water (12); noxythiolin, sodium hypochlorite and silver nitrate are used occasionally. The mean duration of treatment is 2 minutes. When assayed for cytotoxity against tumour cells freshly prepared from human colorectal carcinomas (n = 10), both chlorhexidine-cetrimide and povidone-iodine were rapidly lethal at a wide range of concentrations (5-100%). Mercuric perchloride (0.2%) was similarly effective, but up to 20% of tumour cells remained viable after exposure to noxythiolin and nearly 30% with water alone. Chlorhexidine-cetrimide and povidone-iodine are the agents of choice to kill malignant cells exfoliated into the colorectal lumen.

Full text

PDF
192

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Desai S., Jamieson C. W. Intraperitoneal noxytiolin as an experimental chemotherapeutic agent. Br J Surg. 1973 May;60(5):350–351. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800600506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gibson G. R., Stephens F. O. Experimental use of cetrimide in the prevention of wound implantation with cancer cells. Lancet. 1966 Sep 24;2(7465):678–680. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(66)92834-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gricouroff G. Pathogenesis of recurrences on the suture line following surgical resection for carcinoma of the colon. Cancer. 1967 May;20(5):673–676. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(1967)20:5<673::aid-cncr2820200517>3.0.co;2-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jamieson C. W. Inhibition of the growth of tumour cells in culture by noxytiolin. Br J Surg. 1972 Feb;59(2):108–109. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800590210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KEYNES W. M. Implantation from the bowel lumen in cancer of the large intestine. Ann Surg. 1961 Mar;153:357–364. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196103000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. KILLINGBACK M., WILSON E., HUGHES E. S. ANAL METASTASES FROM CARCINOMA OF THE RECTUM AND COLON. Aust N Z J Surg. 1965 Feb;34:178–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1965.tb04353.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MORGAN C. N. Trends in the treatment of tumours of the rectum, rectosigmoid and left colon. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1955 Dec;1(2):112–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rosenberg I. L., Russell C. W., Giles G. R. Cell viability studies on the exfoliated colonic cancer cell. Br J Surg. 1978 Mar;65(3):188–190. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800650314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rosenberg I. L. The aetiology of colonic suture-line recurrence. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1979 Jul;61(4):251–257. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES