Skip to main content
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
letter
. 2008 May 15;66(2):320–322. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03193.x

Rituximab off-label use for immune diseases: assessing adverse events in a single-centre drug-utilization survey

Laurent Sailler 1, Camille Attane 1, Fleur Michenot 1, Jean-Marie Canonge 1, Lionel Rostaing 2, Elizabeth Arlet-Suau 3, Philippe Arlet 3, François Launay 4, Jean-Louis Montastruc 1, Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre 1
PMCID: PMC2492921  PMID: 18485050

Rituximab is an anti-CD20 autoantibody approved for rheumatoid arthritis. It induces deep and prolonged depletion of CD20-bearing lymphocytes. Rituximab is increasingly used off-label for autoimmune diseases (AIDs) in immunocompromised patients (ICP), whereas its safety is not well documented in this setting. We assessed off-label rituximab use in AIDs through a drug-utilization survey in Toulouse University Hospital (2834 beds) from January 2004 to December 2005.

Patients who had received at least one rituximab infusion for AIDs were identified from the pharmacy department database. We used the World Health Organization definition for serious adverse events (SAEs) [1]. Patients taking >20 mg day−1 prednisone and/or an immunosuppressive drug at the time of first rituximab infusion were considered immunocompromised. All patients were followed 1 year after the first rituximab infusion.

Thirty-seven patients (18 women), mean age 51.7 years (95% confidence interval ±17.6) were included in the study. Median disease duration was 87 months (range 1–396). Diagnostic groups were: autoimmune cytopenia (n = 19), autoimmune coagulation disorder (n = 5), cryoglobulinaemia (n = 7), Wegener's granulomatosis (n = 3), pemphigus (n = 2) and lupus erythematosus (n = 1). The mean daily corticosteroid dosage at the time of rituximab first infusion was 35.2 mg day−1 (median 30; range 0–60). There was 30 ICPs (81.1 ± 12.6%); 75.7% (±13.8) of the patients received a complete cycle of four 375 mg kg−1 day−1 infusions. Eight then had maintenance therapy.

We estimated that the complete remission rate after rituximab was 20/37 (54 ± 16.1%) according to criteria used in major international publications. One patient had a partial response. Rituximab was the main contributor to complete remission in 14 patients (37.8 ± 15.6) who had no intensification of other therapies. Among 20 complete responders, three were treated again because of relapse between 12 and 13 months after the first infusion.

SAEs occurred in 14/37 patients (37.8 ± 15.6%) (Table 1), including death in six with uncontrolled disease. Seven (18.9 ± 12.6%) had serious infections, of whom two had pneumocystosis. Six of these seven patients were immunocompromised and another had undergone splenectomy 3 months earlier. The estimated incidence rate of infectious SAEs was 20.7 (±14.5) per 100 patient-years in ICPs.

Table 1.

Serious adverse events (SAE) among 37 patients treated by Rituximab for AIDs

Age Gender Disease Drugs at the time of AE Co-morbidity Adverse event Time of AE B cell % Evolution Response to RTX
51 F MPG-cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis Prednisone 60 mg HCV infection Cutaneous necrosis over a catheter port M2 0 Resolved Yes
 Interferon-ribavirin
47 M MPG-cryoglobulinaemia-HCV Ciclosporin 100 mg Renal engraftment Staphylococcal cellulitis M12 3 Resolved Yes
 MMF 2 g  CMV reactivation
 Prednisone 5 mg
56 F MPG-VHC Prednisone 5 mg Renal engraftment Staphylococcus aureus M5 1 Resolved No
 MMF 1000 mg Pseudomonas aeruginosa
 Tacrolimus 3 mg pneumopathy
 Disseminated HSV2
40 M TTP Prednisone 60 mg Urinary catheter Escherichia coli septicaemia M2 0 Resolved No
52 M WG Prednisone 60 mg Renal dialysis Haemorrhagic collapse M1 0 Resolved Yes
 CPM 100 mg day−1
53 M WG Prednisone 60 mg Renal dialysis Pneumocystosis M2 0 Resolved Resolved Resolved Resolved Yes
 Digestive and lung haemorrhage  Severe lymphopenia neutropenia anemia Resolved
Resolved
Resolved
57 F AIHA Prednisone 15 mg Pleuro-pneumopathy M10 ND Resolved No
85 H ITP Prednisone 60 mg Waldenström's gammaglobulinaemia Bacterial pneumopathy M2 ND Resolved Yes
70 F Pure red cell aplasia Prednisone 30 mg Chronic malnutrition Shock and epidermolysis M1 ND Died No
73 F AIHA Prednisone 1 mg kg−1 day−1 Uncontrolled haemolysis M5 ND Died No
 IV CPM
72 M AIHA Methylprednisolone 60–120 mg day−1 Undiagnosed AIL-like T-lymphoma Septic choc M2 0 Died No
 Pneumocystosis
 Uncontrolled haemolysis
50 M Wegener's I.v. methylprednisolone, i.v. CPM Uncontrolled cerebral vasculitis D3 ND Died NE
80 M Acquired anti-Willebrand IV-Ig (inefficacy) End-stage renal disease Undefined M3 ND Died No
77 F ITP Prednisone 2 mg kg−1 Splenectomy Cerebral bleeding D7 ND Died No
 IV-Ig

One Wegener's patient had SAE in 2004 and in 2005 after re-treatment. AE, adverse event; AIHA, autoimmune haemolytic anemia; CPM, cyclophosphamide; D, day; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HSV, herpes simplex virus; ITP, immune thrombocytopenic purpura; IV-Ig, intravenous immunoglobulins; M, month; MMF, mycophenolate mophetil; MPG, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; ND, not done; NE, not evaluable; RTX, rituximab; TTP, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura; WG, Wegener's granulomatosis.

To our knowledge, this is the first report of a systematic hospital-based safety survey of rituximab off-label utilization for AIDs. Incidence of SAE, especially infectious, was much higher than in another study including adult patients with various AIDs [2]. In this retrospective study, 1/3 of patients had rheumatoid arthritis, some had a short follow-up, and patients were included on a voluntary basis by their attending physician. We cannot exactly determine the contribution of rituximab to infectious SAEs, as SAEs occur in about 13.5 per 100 years in patients receiving chronic immunosuppressive therapy for various AIDs [3]. Given a large confidence interval, this may not be very different from the 20.7 (±14.5) per 100 years infection rate we have found. However, hypogammaglobulinaemia occurring in some patients [4], loss of IgM-only producing memory B cells that are crucial for defence against bacteria [5], alteration of antigen-presenting cell function due to B-cell depletion [6] and the possibility of delayed neutropenia [7] may worsen susceptibility to infection in previously immunocompromised patients exposed to rituximab.

In conclusion, in this study SAEs were frequent among patients treated off-label by rituximab for AIDs. The infection rate was perhaps abnormally high. Benefit-to-risk ratio of rituximab off-label use for immune diseases in real life should be further systematically assessed.

Acknowledgments

The Laboratoire de Pharmacoépidémiologie, to which L.S. belongs, has received in 2006 a €1000 grant from Roche, who manufactures rituximab, as a support for clinical research in the field of autoimmunity.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2000;356:1255–59. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02799-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gottenberg JE, Guillevin L, Lambotte O, Combe B, Allanore Y, Cantagrel A, Larroche C, Soubrier M, Bouillet L, Dougados M, Fain O, Farge D, Kyndt X, Lortholary O, Masson C, Moura B, Remy P, Thomas T, Wendling D, Anaya JM, Sibilia J, Mariette X, Club Rheumatismes et Inflammation (CRI) Tolerance and short term efficacy of rituximab in 43 patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:913–20. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.029694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gluck T, Kiefmann B, Grohmann M, Falk W, Straub RH, Scholmerich J. Immune status and risk for infection in patients receiving chronic immunosuppressive therapy. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:1473–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Keystone E, Fleischmann R, Emery P, Furst DE, van Vollenhoven R, Bathon J, Dougados M, Baldassare A, Ferraccioli G, Chubick A, Udell J, Cravets MW, Agarwal S, Cooper S, Magrini F. Safety and efficacy of additional courses of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: an open-label extension analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:3896–908. doi: 10.1002/art.23059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kruetzmann S, Rosado MM, Weber H, Germing U, Tournilhac O, Peter HH, Berner R, Peters A, Boehm T, Plebani A, Quinti I, Carsetti R. Human immunoglobulin M memory B cells controlling Streptococcus pneumoniae infections are generated in the spleen. J Exp Med. 2003;197:939–45. doi: 10.1084/jem.20022020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lund FE, Hollifield M, Schuer K, Lines JL, Randall TD, Garvy BA. B cells are required for generation of protective effector and memory CD4 cells in response to pneumocystis lung infection. J Immunol. 2006;176:6147–54. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.10.6147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cattaneo C, Spedini P, Casari S, Re A, Tucci A, Borlenghi E, Ungari M, Ruggeri G, Rossi G. Delayed-onset peripheral blood cytopenia after rituximab: frequency and risk factor assessment in a consecutive series of 77 treatments. Leuk Lymphoma. 2006;47:1013–7. doi: 10.1080/10428190500473113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES