Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Molecular Vision logoLink to Molecular Vision
. 2008 Aug 4;14:1388–1394.

Early noninvasive prenatal detection of a fetal CRB1 mutation causing Leber congenital amaurosis

Ana Bustamante-Aragones 1,✉, Elena Vallespin 1, Marta Rodriguez de Alba 1, Maria Jose Trujillo-Tiebas 1, Cristina Gonzalez-Gonzalez 1, Dan Diego-Alvarez 1, Rosa Riveiro-Alvarez 1, Isabel Lorda-Sanchez 1, Carmen Ayuso 1, Carmen Ramos 1
PMCID: PMC2493031  PMID: 18682814

Abstract

Purpose

Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) is one of the most severe inherited retinal dystrophies with the earliest age of onset. Mutations in the Crumbs homologue 1 (CRB1; OMIM 600105) gene explain 10%–24% of cases with LCA depending on the population. The aim of the present work was to study a fetal mutation associated to LCA in maternal plasma by a new methodology in the noninvasive prenatal diagnosis field: the denaturing High Performance Liquid Chromatography (dHPLC).

Methods

This study presents the case of a compound heterozygous fetus for two mutations in CRB1 (1q3.1-q32.2). dHPLC and automated DNA sequencing were used to detect the paternally inherited fetal mutation in a maternal plasma sample collected at the 12th week of gestation. To test the detection limit of dHPLC, we made serial dilutions of paternal DNA in control DNA.

Results

We were able to detect the presence of the paternally inherited fetal CRB1 mutation in maternal plasma by dHPLC. Moreover, by comparing chromatograms of serial dilutions to the plasma sample, we could ascertain that the percentage of fetal DNA in maternal plasma was at least 2%. However, the detection of the fetal mutation was not possible by automated DNA sequencing.

Conclusions

dHPLC seems to be sensitive enough to detect small amounts of fetal DNA in maternal plasma samples. It could be a useful tool for the noninvasive prenatal detection of paternally inherited point mutations associated with retinopathies.

Introduction

Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA; OMIM 204000) is a severe form of inherited retinal dystrophy with the earliest onset [1-6]. LCA is generally inherited in an autosomal recessive manner although some autosomal dominant families have been described [7-9]. Nonsyndromic LCA has so far been associated with mutations in 12 genes (RetNet).

Mutations in Crumbs homologue 1 (CRB1; OMIM 600105) have been associated with several visual disorders including retinitis pigmentosa (RP) with [10,11] or without [11,12] preserved para-arteriolar retinal pigment epithelium, paravenous pigmented chorioretinal atrophy [13], and LCA [14,15]. Of these disorders, LCA is the most severe form of inherited retinal dystrophy and is characterized by severe visual impairment from birth or very early in infancy and a decreased or absent electroretinogram (ERG) response [16]. Mutations in CRB1 explain 10%–24% of cases with LCA depending on the population [4-9,17-21].

The first evidence of the existence of fetal material in maternal tissue was discovered in 1893. Fetal cells were found in the lungs of pregnant women who died of eclampsia [22]. But it was in the 1980s when this discovery was taken into consideration, opening the possibility to develop a noninvasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) to avoid the risk that obstetric invasive techniques entail. Fetal sex assessment and the study of the most common aneuploidies were the first diagnoses carried out from the analysis of fetal cells in maternal blood [23,24]. In 1997, Lo et al. [25] discovered the existence of circulating cell free fetal DNA (ccffDNA) in maternal blood. This discovery was based on the detection of Y-chromosome specific sequences in the maternal circulation of pregnant women bearing a male fetus. Once the presence of this fetal DNA in maternal plasma was widely demonstrated [26-28], some studies focused on the quantification of this fetal material [29-31].These studies reported that the ccffDNA represented around 3%–6% of the total DNA present in the maternal plasma [29]. In addition, it was observed that the amount of ccffDNA increases throughout gestation [31] and disappears immediately after delivery [32].

An important limitation of these kinds of studies is that, because of the presence of maternal DNA in the plasma samples, they are bound solely to the detection of paternally inherited fetal sequences. Therefore, the ccffDNA present in maternal plasma has been mainly used for fetal gender assessment [26-28], determination of fetal rhesus status in Rh-negative pregnant women [33-35], and detection of paternally inherited disorders [36-41].

Because of the low percentage of ccffDNA present in maternal plasma, all studies require the use of sensitive technologies. Real-time PCR (RT-PCR) has been the most widely used technique for this aim because its high sensitivity enables the detection of small amounts of target DNA sequences [28,42-44]. However, other approaches, such as restriction analysis [37] or quantitative fluorescent PCR (QF-PCR) [45,46], have been also used. In addition to these techniques, our group described in a previous report the use of automated DNA sequencing for the detection of a paternally inherited fetal mutation associated with an X-linked RP [41].

Here, we present the first evidence of the application of denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (dHPLC) for the detection of an LCA-associated fetal mutation in maternal plasma. dHPLC is a technique currently used in diagnostic laboratories for the detection of point mutations or small deletions/insertions. However, to the best of our knowledge, this technology has not been applied in the NIPD field yet. The aim of this work is to report the use of this technique for the detection of a paternally inherited fetal mutation associated to LCA in maternal plasma in the first trimester of gestation.

Methods

Patients

In the present study, the patient was an in utero fetus. The parents of the fetus came to our clinic to undergo a chorion biopsy for prenatal diagnosis. The parents were heterozygous for two different mutations in CRB1: the father carried the p.Cys896ter mutation in exon 8 and the mother the p.Cys948Tyr mutation in exon 9 (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Genealogy of the family. Parents were carriers of a different mutation in CRB1 (paternal mutation in red color). Haplotypes for four markers flanking the gene are showed (color bars). The first child (VI1) was affected with LCA. The probandus of the present study (VI:2) was carrier of both parental mutations.

Sample collection

Maternal blood (9 ml) was collected in EDTA tubes at the 12th week of gestation before the chorion biopsy was performed. This collection was done under informed consent and according to the Helsinki declaration. The sample was centrifuged at 1,600x g for 10 min. Plasma was collected in 1 ml fractions and centrifuged at 16,000x g for 10 min to eliminate all maternal cells present in the plasma sample. Supernatant was collected in new tubes and stored at –20 °C.

In the present study, chorion villi sample was used as fetal control, paternal DNA served as positive control for the p.Cys896ter mutation and maternal DNA was used as wild-type control for the p.Cys896ter mutation.

DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from 2 ml of maternal plasma with the QIAmp DNA Blood MiniKit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the protocol recommended by the manufacturer with one modification: the eluate was reloaded into the column and centrifuged again. The parental DNAs were already available from previous studies. DNA extraction from the chorion villi sample was performed using the Tissue Extraction Kit in the BioRobot EZ1 (Qiagen) following the recommended protocol.

Polymerase chain reaction amplification

CRB1 is composed of 12 exons. The mutation carried by the father was in exon 8 (p.Cys896ter). A 276 bp fragment of exon 8 was amplified by PCR. Amplification was performed using 25 μl of DNA extracted from the plasma sample as a template. For controls (paternal DNA, maternal DNA, and chorion biopsy DNA), 2 ng of DNA were used as PCR control templates. The final volume of the reaction was 50 μl containing: 5 pmol of CRB1ex8 forward, 5′-CAA CAT TTT TCT ATT TAG TTG CC-3′ (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA); 5 pmol of CRB1ex8 reverse, 5′-CTC AAA TGT CGC AAC TTA ACT G-3′ (Applied Biosystems); 1X PCR buffer with 2.5 nM MgCl2 (Roche, Indianapolis, IN); 200 μM each deoxynucleotide; and 1U of FastStart Taq DNA Polymerase (Roche). Amplification was performed in a GeneAmp PCR System 2700 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems). After an initial incubation of 95 °C for 10 min, the reaction was cycled for 30 s at 95 °C, 20 s at 60 °C, and 50 s at 74 °C for 40 cycles, followed by a final extension of 5 min at 74 °C. PCR products were analyzed by two different methods: dHPLC and automated sequencing.

Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography

In this technique, the PCR products are denatured and subsequently subjected to a slow renaturalization. During renaturalization, complementary sequences perfectly reanneal, creating homoduplex forms. However, the presence of a different nucleotide in a specific position in one of the strands of DNA will generate mismatched double-stranded DNA fragments called heteroduplexes. dHPLC can reveal the presence of differences in the sequences based on the detection of the heteroduplex forms.

Denaturing of the PCR products was performed at 95 °C for 5 min, and posterior renaturing was done at room temperature for over 1 h. dHPLC analysis was performed using a WAVETM DNA fragment Analysis System (Transgenomic Inc., Omaha, NE). Subsequently, 5 μl of renatured products were loaded on a C18 reversed-phase column (DNASepTM column; Transgenomic Inc.) and analyzed with an acetonitrile gradient formed by mixing buffers A and B (WAVE OptimizedTM; Transgenomic Inc.). The optimal partial denaturing temperature used was 59.9 °C, which was calculated by the WAVE Maker program (Ver. 4.1; Transgenomic Inc.).

In order to know the detection limit of the dHPLC for the p.Cys896ter mutation, a battery of serial dilutions of paternal DNA (carrier control) in maternal DNA (wild-type DNA) was made. These dilutions were made with different ratios of paternal DNA/maternal DNA (% of paternal DNA): 50/50 (50%), 25/75 (25%), 15/85 (15%), 10/90 (10%), 5/95 (5%), 4/96 (4%), 3/97 (3%), 2/98 (2%), and 1/99 (1%).

Automated sequencing

PCR products were purified by QIAGEN Purification Kit columns (Qiagen). The plasma sample was eluted in 30 µl of elution buffer and the controls in 50 µl. Based on the manufacturer’s recommendations, the sequencing reaction was performed in a final volume of 20 μl containing 5 μl of purified PCR product for the controls and 10 μl for the plasma sample, 10 pmol of CRB1ex8 forward or reverse primer, and dRhodamine terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit (Applied Bioscience). The product was electrophoresed in an ABI Prism 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Bioscience) and analyzed with the Sequencing Analysis 5.1.1 software package (Applied Bioscience).

Results

Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography analysis

dHPLC analysis of the control DNA for the mutation in exon 8 (maternal DNA) and the heterozygous mutant control (paternal DNA) revealed two different and distinguishable chromatograms. The control DNA chromatogram showed a unique peak generated by the homoduplex forms. However, the heterozygous mutant control presented a different pattern comprised three peaks: one peak corresponding to the homoduplexes, and two smaller additional peaks corresponding to the heteroduplex forms (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Chromatograms of the control DNAs obtained by dHPLC. After PCR amplification of exon 8 of CRB1 (where the p.Cys896ter mutation is located), the PCR products were analyzed by dHPLC. A: Electropherogram showed by the paternal DNA (carrier for the p.Cys896ter mutation). 1: Double-peak generated by the heteroduplexes forms associated to the presence of the p.Cys896ter mutation in the sample. 2: Peak generated by the homoduplexes. The presence of both homo and heteroduplexes peaks indicates a heterozygous genotype for the p.Cys896ter mutation. B: Electropherogram showed by the maternal DNA (wild-type for the p.Cys896ter mutation). 2: Peak generated by the homoduplexes. The only presence of homoduplexes peak represents a wild-type genotype.

Chromatograms from the serial dilutions showed how the two peaks corresponding to the heteroduplex forms diminished as the amount of paternal DNA in the mix decreased. In mixes with low concentrations of paternal DNA, these two peaks became a “slight peak” which was visible until the 2/98 (2%) dilution. When the mutation was in a percentage lower than 2% it was not detectable because the chromatogram was similar to the one showed by the maternal DNA. (Figure 3)

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Chromatograms showed by the analysis of the serial dilutions by the dHPLC. The percentage data indicate the amount of the carrier DNA present in the dilution. The double-peak corresponding to the heteroduplexes decreases in size as the percentage of mutant DNA in the sample gets lower. From the 5% to the 2% dilution, the double-peak becomes a slight peak (pointed by the arrows in the figure). Below the 2%, the heteroduplexes could not be distinguished. These chromatograms revealed that the mutation was detectable up to the 2% dilution.

Analysis of the plasma sample showed a chromatogram in which the ‘slight peak’, previously observed in the 5% and 2% dilution controls and associated to the mutation, was present (Figure 4). The presence of this slight peak in the maternal plasma sample chromatogram represented the presence of the paternally inherited fetal mutation.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Analysis of the maternal plasma sample by dHPLC. A: Chromatograms from the maternal plasma sample (black graph) and the wild-type control DNA chromatogram (pink graph). They are shown overlapped in order to be compared. The arrow points the peak shape in the graph associated to the presence of the p.Cys896ter mutation in the maternal plasma sample and not present in the wild-type chromatogram; B: Enlarge image from the region of interest revealing the carrier condition of the fetus for the p.Cys896ter mutation.

The analysis of the chorion biopsy revealed that the fetus had inherited the paternal mutation.

Sequencing analysis

The detection of the paternal mutation (p.Cys896ter) was determined by the presence of an adenine (instead of a thymine) at the mutation site (c.2688 T>A). We were not able to detect the paternal mutation in the plasma sample by automated sequencing. However, the mutation was observed in the analysis of the chorion villi sample.

Discussion

Different techniques have been applied to detect fetal DNA in maternal plasma. The tools most commonly used are RT–PCR, QF-PCR, and restriction analysis. However, the adoption of new emerging techniques, usually more sensitive, may increase the possible diagnoses to be offered by the noninvasive prenatal diagnosis.

In the present study, the parents of the fetus were heterozygous for a different mutation in different exons of CRB1.

The aim of this work was to introduce the dHPLC technology for the detection of a paternally inherited fetal mutation associated to LCA in maternal plasma in the first trimester of gestation. Exclusion of the paternal mutation in the maternal plasma would indicate that the fetus was, at worst, a carrier of the maternal mutation. Therefore, conventional invasive procedures could be avoided.

Used as a screening tool, the dHPLC technique searches for unknown mutations in large scale studies or known mutations in new patients with a previously diagnosed relative. Some advantages of this tool are its easy handling, its ability to rapidly process samples, and its low cost. Moreover, it has shown excellent results in clinical practice [47].

Considering the low percentage of ccffDNA in the maternal plasma previously reported [29] and in order to know the detection limit of the dHPLC for the p.Cys896ter mutation, serial dilutions of paternal DNA (carrier for the mutation) were made. In addition, the comparison of the migration patterns between the serial dilutions and the plasma sample was the strategy followed to determine the genotype of the fetus for the paternal mutation.

Analysis of the chromatograms from the dilutions helped to establish the detection limit of the technique for the p.Cys896ter mutation as 2% of carrier DNA present in the sample. This high level of detection made us look at this technique as a promising tool for the detection of fetal DNA in maternal blood. This hypothesis was confirmed when we were able to detect the mutation by analyzing the maternal plasma sample.

The correspondence of the migration patterns of the serial dilutions (5% and 2% dilutions) with the one showed by the plasma sample let us ascertain the carrier condition of the fetus for the paternal mutation. Besides, this assay design also allowed us to speculate that the amount of fetal DNA represented around 2% to 5% of the total DNA present in the plasma sample analyzed.

In a previous paper, we reported the detection, by automated sequencing, of a fetal mutation associated to a X-linked Retinitis Pigmentosa in maternal plasma collected at the 19th week of gestation [41]. However, a sample collected from the same pregnancy at the 10th week was also analyzed but the mutation was not detected [41]. In the present study, the paternally inherited fetal mutation has been detected in the maternal plasma (at the 12th week) by the dHPLC method but not by automated sequencing. Therefore both studies, in which automated sequencing has been used, are concordant about the inefficiency of the technique for detection of ccffDNA in maternal plasma samples in the first trimester of gestation. This fact would be in accordance with previous reports about the scarcity of ccffDNA in the first trimester of gestation [30,31].

This work opens up the possibility to incorporate the dHPLC technique for the study of paternally inherited fetal mutations in maternal plasma. It has shown to be sensitive enough to detect ccffDNA in the first trimester of gestation. However the automated sequencing technique has not been efficient for the detection of ccffDNA at this early stage of gestation. The creation of serial dilutions containing low percentages of paternal DNA has shown to be an essential strategy for the analysis of paternally inherited fetal mutations in maternal plasma by dHPLC. Considering that the detection limit of the technique could be variable for the analysis of different mutations, further studies are required to evaluate the accuracy of the method for other mutational changes.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Ministry of Health PI040218, CIBERER CB06/07/0036 and EVI-GENORET LSHG-CT-2005–512036. Ana Bustamante and Elena Vallespin are supported by Fundacion Conchita Rabago de Jimenez Diaz. Thanks to Diego Cantalapiedra and Hamish Binns for their collaboration with the idiom.

References

  • 1.Leber T. Über Retinitis Pigmentosa und angeborene Amaurose. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Ophthalmol. 1869;15:1–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Perrault I, Rozet JM, Calvas P, Gerber S, Camuzat A, Dollfus H, Châtelin S, Souied E, Ghazi I, Leowski C, Bonnemaison M, Le Paslier D, Frézal J, Dufier JL, Pittler S, Munnich A, Kaplan J. Retinal-specific guanylate cyclase gene mutations in Leber's congenital amaurosis. Nat Genet. 1996;14:461–4. doi: 10.1038/ng1296-461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cremers FP, Van der Hurk J, den Hollander A. Molecular genetic of Leber congenital amaurosis. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:1169–76. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.10.1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fazzi E, Signorini SG, Scelsa B, Bova SM, Lanzi G. Leber's congenital amaurosis: an update. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2003;7:13–22. doi: 10.1016/s1090-3798(02)00135-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Allikmets R. Leber congenital amaurosis: a genetic paradigm. Ophthalmic Genet. 2004;25:67–79. doi: 10.1080/13816810490514261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hanein S, Perrault I, Gerber S, Tanguy G, Barbet F, Ducroq D, Calvas P, Dollfus H, Hamel C, Lopponen T, Munier F, Santos L, Shalev S, Zafeiriou D, Dufier JL, Munnich A, Rozet JM, Kaplan J. Leber Congenital Amaurosis: Comprehensive Survey of the Genetic Heterogeneity, Refinfement of the Clinical Definition, and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations as a Strategy for Molecular Diagnosis. Hum Mutat. 2004;23:306–17. doi: 10.1002/humu.20010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Heckenlively RJ. Retinitis Pigmentosa 1988. Lippincott, Philadelphia. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sohocki MM, Sullivan LS, Mintz-Hittner HA, Birch D, Heckenlively JR, Freund CL, McInnes RR, Daiger SP. A range of clinical phenotypes associated with mutations in CRX, a photoreceptor transcription-factor gene. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63:1307–15. doi: 10.1086/302101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tzekov RT, Liu Y, Sohocki MM, Zack DJ, Daiger SP, Heckenlively JR, Birch DG. Autosomal dominant retinal degeneration and bone loss in patients with a 12-bp deletion in the CRX gene. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1319–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.den Hollander AI, ten Brink JB, de Kok YJ, van Soest S, van den Born LI, van Driel MA, van de Pol DJ, Payne AM, Bhattacharya SS, Kellner U, Hoyng CB, Westerveld A, Brunner HG, Bleeker-Wagemakers EM, Deutman AF, Heckenlively JR, Cremers FP, Bergen AA. Mutations in a human homologue of Drosophila crumbs cause retinitis pigmentosa (RP12). Nat Genet. 1999;23:217–21. doi: 10.1038/13848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bernal S, Calaf M, Garcia-Hoyos M, Garcia-Sandoval B, Rosell J, Adan A, Ayuso C, Baiget M. Study of the involvement of the RGR, CRPB1, and CRB1 genes in the pathogenesis of autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. J Med Genet. 2003;40:e89. doi: 10.1136/jmg.40.7.e89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lotery AJ, Malik A, Shami SA, Sindhi M, Chohan B, Maqbool C, Moore PA, Denton MJ, Stone EM. CRB1 mutations may result in retinitis pigmentosa without para-arteriolar RPE preservation. Ophthalmic Genet. 2001;22:163–9. doi: 10.1076/opge.22.3.163.2222. b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McKay GJ, Clarke S, Davis JA, Simpson DA, Silvestri G. Pigmented paravenous chorioretinal atrophy is associated with a mutation within the crumbs homolog 1 (CRB1) gene. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:322–8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.den Hollander AI, Heckenlively JR, van den Born LI, de Kok YJ, van der Velde-Visser SD, Kellner U, Jurklies B, van Schooneveld MJ, Blankenagel A, Rohrschneider K, Wissinger B, Cruysberg JR, Deutman AF, Brunner HG, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Hoyng CB, Cremers FP. Leber congenital amaurosis and retinitis pigmentosa with Coats-like exudative vasculopathy are associated with mutations in the crumbs homologue 1 (CRB1) gene. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69:198–203. doi: 10.1086/321263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lotery AJ, Jacobson SG, Fishman GA, Weleber RG, Fulton AB, Namperumalsamy P, Héon E, Levin AV, Grover S, Rosenow JR, Kopp KK, Sheffield VC, Stone EM. Mutations in the CRB1 gene cause Leber congenital amaurosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:415–20. doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.3.415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.De Laey JJ. Leber's congenital amaurosis. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 1991;241:41–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zernant J, Külm M, Dharmaraj S, den Hollander AI, Perrault I, Preising MN, Lorenz B, Kaplan J, Cremers FP, Maumenee I, Koenekoop RK, Allikmets R. Genotyping microarray (disease chip) for Leber congenital amaurosis: detection of modifier alleles. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:3052–9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hanein S, Perrault I, Gerber S, Tanguy G, Barbet F, Ducroq D, Calvas P, Dollfus H, Hamel C, Lopponen T, Munier F, Santos L, Shalev S, Zafeiriou D, Dufier JL, Munnich A, Rozet JM, Kaplan J. Leber congenital amaurosis: comprehensive survey of the genetic heterogeneity, refinement of the clinical definition, and genotype–phenotype correlations as a strategy for molecular diagnosis. Hum Mutat. 2004;23:306–17. doi: 10.1002/humu.20010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Galvin JA, Fishman GA, Stone EM, Koenekoop RK. Evaluation of genotype–phenotype associations in leber congenital amaurosis. Retina. 2005;25:919–29. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200510000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yzer S, Leroy BP, De Baere E, de Ravel TJ, Zonneveld MN, Voesenek K, Kellner U, Ciriano JP, de Faber JT, Rohrschneider K, Roepman R, den Hollander AI, Cruysberg JR, Meire F, Casteels I, van Moll-Ramirez NG, Allikmets R, van den Born LI, Cremers FP. Microarray-based mutation detection and phenotypic characterization of patients with Leber congenital amaurosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1167–76. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vallespin E, Cantalapiedra D, Riveiro-Alvarez R, Wilke R, Aguirre-Lamban J, Avila-Fernandez A, Lopez-Martinez MA, Gimenez A, Trujillo-Tiebas MJ, Ramos C, Ayuso C. Mutation screening of 299 Spanish families with retinal dystrophies by Leber congenital amaurosis genotyping microarray. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:5653–61. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schmörl G. Pahologisch-anatomische untersuchungen ueber Publerekampsie. Vogel 1893; Leipzig. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rodríguez De Alba M, Palomino P, Jurado A, Sanz R, Ibañez MA, Fernández-Moya JM, Ayuso C, Díaz-Recasens J, Lahoz C, Ramos C. Prenatal diagnosis on fetal cells obtained from maternal peripheral blood: report of 66 cases. Prenat Diagn. 1999;19:934–40. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199910)19:10<934::aid-pd675>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rodríguez de Alba M, Palomino P, González-González C, Lorda-Sanchez I, Ibañez MA, Sanz R, Fernández-Moya JM, Ayuso C, Díaz-Recasens J, Ramos C. Prenatal diagnosis on fetal cells from maternal blood: practical comparative evaluation of the first and second trimesters. Prenat Diagn. 2001;21:165–70. doi: 10.1002/1097-0223(200103)21:3<165::aid-pd29>3.0.co;2-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lo YM, Corbetta N, Chamberlain PF, Rai V, Sargent IL, Redman CW, Wainscoat JS. Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet. 1997;350:485–7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02174-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pertl B, Sekizawa A, Samura O, Orescovic I, Rahaim PT, Bianchi DW. Detection of male and female fetal DNA in maternal plasma by multiplex fluorescent polymerase chain reaction amplification of short tandem repeats. Hum Genet. 2000;106:45–9. doi: 10.1007/s004390051008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Guibert J, Benachi A, Grebille AG, Ernault P, Zorn JR, Costa JM. Kinetics of SRY gene appearance in maternal serum: detection by real time PCR in early pregnancy after assisted reproductive technique. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1733–6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bustamante-Aragones A, Rodriguez de Alba M, Gonzalez-Gonzalez C, Trujillo-Tiebas MJ, Diego-Alvarez D, Vallespin E, Plaza J, Ayuso C, Ramos C. Foetal sex determination in maternal blood from the seventh week of gestation and its role in diagnosing haemophilia in the foetuses of female carriers. Haemophilia. 2008;14:593–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2008.01670.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lo YM, Tein MS, Lau TK, Haines CJ, Leung TN, Poon PM, Wainscoat JS, Johnson PJ, Chang AM, Hjelm NM. Quantitative analysis of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum: implications for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:768–75. doi: 10.1086/301800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Birch L, English CA, O'Donoghue K, Barigye O, Fisk NM, Keer JT.Accurate and robust quantification of circulating fetal and total DNA in maternal plasma from 5 to 41 weeks of gestation. Clin Chem 200551312–20.Epub 2004 Dec 17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Galbiati S, Smid M, Gambini D, Ferrari A, Restagno G, Viora E, Campogrande M, Bastonero S, Pagliano M, Calza S, Ferrari M, Cremonesi L. Fetal DNA detection in maternal plasma throughout gestation. Hum Genet. 2005;117:243–8. doi: 10.1007/s00439-005-1330-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lo YM, Zhang J, Leung TN, Lau TK, Chang AM, Hjelm NM. Rapid clearance of fetal DNA from maternal plasma. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;64:218–24. doi: 10.1086/302205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Harper TC, Finning KM, Martin P, Moise KJ., Jr Use of maternal plasma for noninvasive determination of fetal RhD status. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1730–2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gautier E, Benachi A, Giovangrandi Y, Ernault P, Olivi M, Gaillon T, Costa JM. Fetal RhD genotyping by maternal serum analysis: a two-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:666–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Moise KJ. Fetal RhD typing with free DNA in maternal plasma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:663–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Saito H, Sekizawa A, Morimoto T, Suzuki M, Yanaihara T. Prenatal DNA diagnosis of a single-gene disorder from maternal plasma. Lancet. 2000;356:1170. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02767-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.González-González MC, García-Hoyos M, Trujillo MJ, Rodríguez de Alba M, Lorda-Sánchez I, Díaz-Recasens J, Gallardo E, Ayuso C, Ramos C. Prenatal detection of a cystic fibrosis mutation in fetal DNA from maternal plasma. Prenat Diagn. 2002;22:946–8. doi: 10.1002/pd.439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li Y, Holzgreve W, Page-Christiaens GC, Gille JJ, Hahn S. Improved prenatal detection of a fetal point mutation for achondroplasia by the use of size-fractionated circulatory DNA in maternal plasma--case report. Prenat Diagn. 2004;24:896–8. doi: 10.1002/pd.1030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nasis O, Thompson S, Hong T, Sherwood M, Radcliffe S, Jackson L, Otevrel T.Improvement in sensitivity of allele-specific PCR facilitates reliable noninvasive prenatal detection of cystic fibrosis. Clin Chem 200450694–701.Epub 2004 Feb 5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Li Y, Di Naro E, Vitucci A, Zimmermann B, Holzgreve W, Hahn S. Detection of paternally inherited fetal point mutations for beta-thalassemia using size-fractionated cell-free DNA in maternal plasma. JAMA. 2005;293:843–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.7.843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bustamante-Aragones A, Garcia-Hoyos M, Rodriguez DE, Alba M, Gonzalez-Gonzalez C, Lorda-Sanchez I, Diego-Alvarez D, Trujillo-Tiebas MJ, Ayuso C, Ramos C. Detection of a paternally inherited fetal mutation in maternal plasma by the use of automated sequencing. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1075:108–11. doi: 10.1196/annals.1368.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Honda H, Miharu N, Ohashi Y, Samura O, Kinutani M, Hara T, Ohama K. Fetal gender determination in early pregnancy through qualitative and quantitative analysis of fetal DNA in maternal serum. Hum Genet. 2002;110:75–9. doi: 10.1007/s00439-001-0649-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hromadnikova I, Houbova B, Hridelova D, Voslarova S, Kofer J, Komrska V, Habart D. Replicate real-time PCR testing of DNA in maternal plasma increases the sensitivity of non-invasive fetal sex determination. Prenat Diagn. 2003;23:235–8. doi: 10.1002/pd.556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ho SS, Damayanti Z, Chua WY, Ng BL, Peh CM, Biswas A, Choolani M. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal gender using real-time polymerase chain reaction amplification of SRY in maternal plasma. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004;33(Suppl):S61–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.González-González MC, Trujillo MJ, Rodríguez de Alba M, García-Hoyos M, Lorda-Sánchez I, Díaz-Recasens J, Ayuso C, Ramos C. Huntington disease-unaffected fetus diagnosed from maternal plasma using QF-PCR. Prenat Diagn. 2003;23:232–4. doi: 10.1002/pd.570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.González-González MC, Trujillo MJ, Rodríguez de Alba M, Ramos C. Early Huntington disease prenatal diagnosis by maternal semiquantitative fluorescent-PCR. Neurology. 2003;60:1214–5. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000056084.13096.8a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Stenirri S, Fermo I, Battistella S, Galbiati S, Soriani N, Paroni R, Manitto MP, Martina E, Brancato R, Allikmets R, Ferrari M, Cremonesi L. Denaturing HPLC Profiling of the ABCA4 Gene for Reliable Detection of Allelic Variations. Clin Chem. 2004;50:1336–43. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.033241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Vision are provided here courtesy of Emory University and the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, P.R. China

RESOURCES