Abstract
Simian foamy viruses (SFV) are ancient retroviruses of primates and have coevolved with their host species for as many as 30 million years. Although humans are not naturally infected with foamy virus, infection is occasionally acquired through interspecies transmission from nonhuman primates. We show that interspecies transmissions occur in a natural hunter-prey system, i.e., between wild chimpanzees and colobus monkeys, both of which harbor their own species-specific strains of SFV. Chimpanzees infected with chimpanzee SFV strains were shown to be coinfected with SFV from colobus monkeys, indicating that apes are susceptible to SFV superinfection, including highly divergent strains from other primate species.
Simian foamy viruses (SFV) and their nonhuman primate hosts demonstrate coevolution (20). Despite the fact that SFV strains have been described for most Old World primate species, no human-specific foamy virus has yet been identified (16). However, zoonotic transmissions of SFV from various nonhuman primates to zookeepers and central African hunters or others having close contact with nonhuman primates are known to occur (5, 8-10, 21, 22). Such viruses have sequences that show a close relationship to SFV sequences from several nonhuman primate species (Fig. 1). Until now, it has been unclear whether such interspecies transmission can also take place when the hunter is naturally infected with its own species-specific SFV. Wild chimpanzees that regularly hunt and consume western red colobus monkeys (4) provide such a situation.
FIG. 1.
Phylogenetic tree of 389-bp fragments of the SFV integrase-encoding regions of SFVcpz, SFVwrc, and other representative SFV strains. The tree was generated using the neighbor joining method (PHYLIP 3.572 package). Bootstrap resampling with 1,000 replicates was employed to place approximate confidence limits on individual branches. Percentages of bootstrap support for internal nodes are shown for values above 50. Dots represent SFV strains for the corresponding species, indicated by the vertical bar. Stars represent foamy viruses found in humans. For sequences generated in this study, exact names are given. Names of chimpanzees with double infection with SFVcpz and SFVwrc are in boldface and enlarged. An SFV spider monkey sequence (X83298) was used as an outgroup. Other sequences used were SFV sequences from African monkeys (Allenopithecus nigroviridis, AM492842; Colobus guereza, AY278791; Cercocebus atys, AF049079; Papio ursinus, AY686179; Cercopithecus neglectus, AY278782; Mandrillus sphinx, AY583781), Asian monkeys (Macaca silenus, AY686201; Macaca cyclopis, X83290; Macaca tonkeana, DQ354075 and DQ354089; Rhesus sp., X83292), and great apes (Pongo sp., AM492904 and AY686203; Gorilla sp., AY195688 and AY27879; Pan paniscus, AF049086 and AJ627550; Pan troglodytes vellerosus, AY639141 and AY639122; Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii, AY195675, AY195676, EU1027480, EU1027409, and EU1027490; Pan troglodytes troglodytes, AY639126, AY639123, and AY639128; Pan troglodytes verus, AY195685, X83297, X83296, AY195682, DQ142644, DQ142659 to 142666, EU248952 to EU248954) and foamy virus sequences from humans (AY195698, AY278776, and X83294).
Wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) and western red colobus monkeys (Piliocolobus badius) sharing a rainforest habitat, the Taï National Park, Côte d'Ivoire, were tested for SFV infection. The chimpanzees have been under human observation for more than 25 years and are known individually as a result of a project focusing on wild chimpanzee behavior. Tissue samples were obtained from 14 chimpanzees that had died of anthrax, respiratory disease, or other causes (12, 14, 15). Samples of blood, collected in EDTA, from nine red colobus monkeys were obtained under anesthesia, and organ samples were collected from the remains of a further two that had been killed and eaten by chimpanzees (15). All represented adult animals.
Using the SFV primers for the integrase gene (19), previous analyses revealed that 12 of the 14 chimpanzees harbored SFV strains (SFVcpz) corresponding to strains described for the chimpanzee subspecies Pan troglodytes verus (details will be published elsewhere). Also 11 red colobus monkeys were tested positive for SFV using the same primers and standard conditions (96°C for 5 min; 40 cycles 96°C for 1 min, 56°C [first PCR] or 60°C [nested PCR] for 30 s, 72°C for 1 min; and a final elongation step at 72°C for 10 min). PCR products were purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and sequenced directly in both directions without interim cloning.
Phylogenetic analysis using the neighbor joining method (BioEdit, PHYLIP 3.572 package) of these 389-bp sequences was performed (18). Bootstrap resampling with 1,000 replicates was employed to place approximate confidence limits on individual branches. The tree revealed a species-specific SFV lineage (SFVwrc) unique to red colobus monkeys. Based on sequences derived from SFVwrc, species-specific primers were designed for a first-round PCR (SFVwrc 1s, 5′ CATACAATTACCACTCCAAGCCT; SFVwrc 2as, 5′ CAGACAAATCCAGTCATACCATC; 473 bp). Consecutively, two seminested PCRs combining primer SFVwrc 1s with SFVwrc 3s (5′ CTCAGTACTGGTGGCCAAATCTTAGA; 220 bp) and SFVwrc 2as with SFVwrc 4as (5′ CCAGTCATACCATCGACTACTACAAGG; 423 bp) were performed. SFV sequences were amplified from spleen DNA of 2 of the 14 wild chimpanzees by using the SFVwrc-specific primers. All PCR products were sequenced, aligned, and compared to the public database using BLAST NCBI (Table 1). High similarity of the sequences derived from the chimpanzees using the SFVwrc primers and the colobus monkey sequences was seen (similarity of 98 to 99%). In contrast, the SFV chimpanzee sequences derived through PCRs using the generic SFV primers were only distantly related (78 to 81%), pointing to a double infection with two different SFV isolates.
TABLE 1.
Chimpanzees from the Taï National Park (Côte d'Ivoire) analyzed for SFVcpz and SFVwrc infection
| Chimpanzee name | Group/age (yr)/sexa | PCR result forb:
|
STLV result for LTR (8/14)c | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Int_all (12/14) | Int_wrc (2/14) | |||
| Gisèle | N/∼5/f | + | − | + |
| Gargantua | N/∼10/m | + | − | + |
| Dorry | N/∼10/f | + | − | + |
| Loukoum | N/∼27/f | + | − | + |
| Lefkas | N/∼8/m | + | − | − |
| Leonardo | N/∼2/m | − | − | − |
| Leo | M/∼29/m | + | + | + |
| Noah | M/∼7/m | + | − | − |
| Kady | M/∼30/f | + | − | + |
| Rafiki | S/∼19/m | + | − | + |
| Tita | S/∼20/f | + | − | − |
| Virunga | S/∼25/f | + | − | + |
| Ophelia | S/∼2/f | − | − | − |
| Olduvai | S/∼8/m | + | + | − |
+, positive result; −, negative result; Int_all, generic integrase primer used for the detection of SFVcpz; Int_wrc, colobus-specific integrase primer. Fractions of positive results are in parentheses.
STLV results are taken from reference 13. LTR, long terminal repeat. The fraction of positive results is in parentheses.
Sequences were aligned using BioEdit, and phylogenetic analyses using the neighbor joining method as well as the maximum likelihood algorithms (PHYLIP 3.572 package; data not shown) revealed two well-separated clusters of colobus and chimpanzee SFV strains. Sequences obtained from chimpanzee samples using SFVwrc-specific primers showed that 2 of the 14 chimpanzees already infected with SFVcpz were simultaneously infected with SFVwrc (Fig. 1). Two chimpanzees were SFVcpz negative; however, these were infants, and it has been shown that seroconversion usually occurs when primates get older (3, 11). These two chimpanzees were also negative for SFVwrc. It should be noted that chimpanzee and colobus samples were collected at different times on different occasions and handled separately at all times and that extensive precautions were taken to avoid cross-contamination during DNA preparation and PCR analysis.
The two dually infected chimpanzees harbored unique SFVwrc strains, indicating the introduction of SFVwrc on independent occasions, rather than onward transmission of SFVwrc among chimpanzees. Several studies have shown that exposure to saliva is a predominant route of SFV transmission (6, 7, 10, 21). It is thus likely that the two chimpanzees acquired SFVwrc in the context of predation, as especially the males are frequent hunters and may be bitten by their prey. In addition, male chimpanzees consume significantly more monkey meat than females and chew entire bones, a habit that may cause lesions in the oral cavity (4). The two SFVwrc-positive chimpanzees were both males, known to hunt frequently. We had previously demonstrated infection of these chimpanzees with another retrovirus, the simian T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (STLV-1), as a result of red colobus monkey consumption. However, in that study no preexisting infection with a chimpanzee-specific STLV was found (13). Noninvasive methods, such as those described by others (15a), will allow specific and more-extensive molecular epidemiological screenings of entire chimpanzee populations for SFVcpz and for strains specific to other primate species. Others have, for example, shown the presence of one Cercopithecus SFV among 177 SFV-positive chimpanzee fecal samples (15a). However, generic integrase primers were used for this study. The use of species-specific foamy virus primers would most likely reveal a higher prevalence of SFV from other monkey species in the predator chimpanzee. Such screenings will provide further insight into interspecies SFV transmission and will help to identify risk factors associated with SFV transmission, such as hunting frequency and feeding strategies documented in the behavior studies. Our results demonstrate that, in addition to the presence of a species-specific SFV in a given host, transmission of other SFV from other species can occur in a natural primate predator-prey system, resulting in infections with divergent SFV isolates.
Moreover, prior infection with SFVcpz does not seem to exclude infection with other SFV strains, a finding that may have important implications for foamy viruses as vaccine vectors (2). Coinfection has the potential to generate recombinants if the coinfecting viruses replicate in the same cell, possibly resulting in new pathological properties of viruses, as has been shown for simian immunodeficiency virus (1). Further studies are needed to specifically test for strain recombination and the existence of recombinant SFV lineages in wild chimpanzees. At this point, the phylogeny of the chimpanzee SFVcpz strains described here clearly supports the cospeciation hypothesis suggested by others (20).
The high prevalence of SFVcpz may be explained by intense social interactions, such as biting, whereas the low prevalence of SFVwrc in the chimpanzees suggests that SFVwrc is not or is rarely transmitted between the chimpanzees. This points to a dead-end infection of the superinfecting strain, as observed (albeit with a limited number of cases) in humans infected with SFV strains from nonhuman primates (5, 17, 21). Again, noninvasive methods will help address these issues, using wild chimpanzees as a model to investigate the fate of species-specific and new SFV in a host.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
New sequences of integrase-encoding regions of SFV strains were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers EU545383 to EU545395.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Ivorian authorities for their long-term support, in particular the Ministry of the Environment and Forests, as well as the Ministry of Research, the directorship of the Taï National Park, and the Swiss Research Centre in Abidjan.
We thank Steven Norley and Beatrice Hahn for helpful discussions and copy editing and Julia Tesch and Angelina Kus for technical support with sequencing.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print on 28 May 2008.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bailes, E., F. Gao, F. Bibollet-Ruche, V. Courgnaud, M. Peeters, P. A. Marx, B. H. Hahn, and P. M. Sharp. 2003. Hybrid origin of SIV in chimpanzees. Science 3001713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bastone, P., F. Romen, W. Liu, R. Wirtz, U. Koch, N. Josephson, S. Langbein, and M. Lochelt. 2007. Construction and characterization of efficient, stable and safe replication-deficient foamy virus vectors. Gene Ther. 14613-620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Blewett, E. L., D. H. Black, N. W. Lerche, G. White, and R. Eberle. 2000. Simian foamy virus infections in a baboon breeding colony. Virology 278183-193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Boesch, C., and H. Boesch-Achermann. 2000. The chimpanzees of the Taï forest: behavioural ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
- 5.Boneva, R. S., W. M. Switzer, T. J. Spira, V. B. Bhullar, V. Shanmugam, M. E. Cong, L. Lam, W. Heneine, T. M. Folks, and L. E. Chapman. 2007. Clinical and virological characterization of persistent human infection with simian foamy viruses. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 231330-1337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brooks, J. I., E. W. Rud, R. G. Pilon, J. M. Smith, W. M. Switzer, and P. A. Sandstrom. 2002. Cross-species retroviral transmission from macaques to human beings. Lancet 360387-388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Calattini, S., F. Wanert, B. Thierry, C. Schmitt, S. Bassot, A. Saib, N. Herrenschmidt, and A. Gessain. 2006. Modes of transmission and genetic diversity of foamy viruses in a Macaca tonkeana colony. Retrovirology 323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Calattini, S., E. B. Betsem, A. Froment, P. Mauclere, P. Tortevoye, C. Schmitt, R. Njouom, A. Saib, and A. Gessain. 2007. Simian foamy virus transmission from apes to humans, rural Cameroon. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 131314-1320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Heneine, W., W. M. Switzer, P. Sandstrom, J. Brown, S. Vedapuri, C. A. Schable, A. S. Khan, N. W. Lerche, M. Schweizer, D. Neumann-Haefelin, L. E. Chapman, and T. M. Folks. 1998. Identification of a human population infected with simian foamy viruses. Nat. Med. 4403-407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jones-Engel, L., G. A. Engel, M. A. Schillaci, A. Rompis, A. Putra, K. G. Suaryana, A. Fuentes, B. Beer, S. Hicks, R. White, B. Wilson, and J. S. Allan. 2005. Primate-to-human retroviral transmission in Asia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 111028-1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jones-Engel, L., K. A. Steinkraus, S. M. Murray, G. A. Engel, R. Grant, N. Aggimarangsee, B. P. Y.-H. Lee, C. May, M. A. Schillaci, C. Somgrid, T. Sutthipat, L. Vojtech, J. Y. Zhao, and M. L. Linial. 2007. Sensitive assays for simian foamy viruses reveal a high prevalence of infection in commensal, free-ranging Asian monkeys. J. Virol. 817330-7337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Köndgen, S., H. Kühl, P. K. N′goran, P. D. Walsh, S. Schenk, N. Ernst, R. Biek, P. Formenty, K. Mätz-Rensing, B. Schweiger, S. Junglen, H. Ellerbrok, A. Nitsche, T. Briese, W. I. Lipkin, G. Pauli, C. Boesch, and F. H. Leendertz. 2008. Pandemic human viruses cause decline of endangered great apes. Curr. Biol. 18260-264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Leendertz, F. H., S. Junglen, C. Boesch, P. Formenty, E. Couacy-Hymann, V. Courgnaud, G. Pauli, and H. Ellerbrok. 2004. High variety of different simian T-cell leukemia virus type 1 strains in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) of the Taï National Park, Côte d'Ivoire. J. Virol. 784352-4356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Leendertz, F. H., H. Ellerbrok, C. Boesch, E. Couacy-Hymann, K. Mätz-Rensing, R. Hakenbeck, C. Bergmann, P. Abaza, S. Junglen, Y. Moebius, L. Vigilant, P. Formenty, and G. Pauli. 2004. Anthrax kills wild chimpanzees in a tropical rainforest. Nature 430451-452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Leendertz, F. H., G. Pauli, K. Maetz-Rensing, W. Boardman, C. Nunn, H. Ellerbrok, S. A. Jensen, S. Junglen, and C. Boesch. 2006. Pathogens as drivers of population declines: the importance of systematic monitoring in great apes and other threatened mammals. Biol. Conserv. 131325-337. [Google Scholar]
- 15a.Liu, W., M. Worobey, Y. Li, B. F. Keele, F. Bibollet-Ruche, P. Goepfert, M. L. Santiago, J.-B.L. Ndjango, C. Neel, S. L. Clifford, C. Sanz, S. Kamenya, M. L. Wilson, A. E. Pusey, N. Gross-Camp, C. Boesch, V. Smith, K. Zamma, M. A. Huffman, J. Mitani, D. P. Watts, M. Peeters, G. M. Shaw, W. M. Switzer, P. M. Sharp, B. H. Hahn. Molecular ecology and natural history of simian foamy virus infection in wild-living chimpanzees. PloS Pathog., in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Meiering, C. D., and M. L. Linial. 2001. Historical perspective of foamy virus epidemiology and infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14165-176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Murray, S. M., and M. L. Linial. 2006. Foamy virus infection in primates. J. Med. Primatol. 35225-235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Saitou, N., and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4406-425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schweizer, M., and D. Neumann-Haefelin. 1995. Phylogenetic analysis of primate foamy viruses by comparison of pol sequences. Virology 207577-582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Switzer, W. M., M. Salemi, V. Shanmugam, F. Gao, M. E. Cong, C. Kuiken, V. Bhullar, B. E. Beer, D. Vallet, A. Gautier-Hion, Z. Tooze, F. Villinger, E. C. Holmes, and W. Heneine. 2005. Ancient co-speciation of simian foamy viruses and primates. Nature 434376-380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Switzer, W. M., V. Bhullar, V. Shanmugam, M. E. Cong, B. Parekh, N. W. Lerche, J. L. Yee, J. J. Ely, R. Boneva, L. E. Chapman, T. M. Folks, and W. Heneine. 2004. Frequent simian foamy virus infection in persons occupationally exposed to nonhuman primates. J. Virol. 782780-2789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wolfe, N. D., W. M. Switzer, J. K. Carr, V. B. Bhullar, V. Shanmugam, U. Tamoufe, A. T. Prosser, J. N. Torimiro, A. Wright, E. Mpoudi-Ngole, F. E. McCutchan, D. L. Birx, T. M. Folks, D. S. Burke, and W. Heneine. 2004. Naturally acquired simian retrovirus infections in central African hunters. Lancet 363932-937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

