Skip to main content
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 1982 May;64(3):183–185.

A randomised prospective trial of two drainage methods after cholecystectomy.

I Fraser, N W Everson, J R Nash
PMCID: PMC2493965  PMID: 7081917

Abstract

A prospective trial is described in which simple tube drainage was compared with suction drainage after cholecystectomy. Postoperative chest infection and infected or painful drain wounds were both significantly more common with simple tube drains. Postoperative discomfort was more frequent with tube drains in situ and wound infection more common in the suction group, but neither of these differences was statistically significant. The mean volume of fluid drained and duration of hospital stay did not differ between methods. It is concluded that both methods are satisfactory, but suction drainage is recommended.

Full text

PDF
183

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chilton C. P., Mann C. V. Drainage after cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1980 Jan;62(1):60–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fowler R. S. Cholecystectomy Without Drainage. Ann Surg. 1931 Mar;93(3):745–748. doi: 10.1097/00000658-193103000-00011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gupta S., Rauscher G., Stillman R., Fitzgerald J., Powers J. C. The rational use of drains after cholecystectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1978 Feb;146(2):191–192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kambouris A. A., Carpenter W. S., Allaben R. D. Cholecystectomy without drainage. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1973 Oct;137(4):613–617. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lumley J. S., Britton B. J., Chattopadhyay B. The physical and bacteriological properties of disposable and non-disposable suction drainage units in the laboratory. Br J Surg. 1974 Oct;61(10):832–837. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800611020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Maitland A. I., Mathieson A. J. Suction drainage. A study in wound healing. Br J Surg. 1970 Mar;57(3):193–197. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800570310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Todd G. J., Reemtsma K. Cholecystectomy with drainage. Factors influencing wound infection in 1,000 elective cases. Am J Surg. 1978 May;135(5):622–623. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(78)90121-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Williams C. B., Halpin D. S., Knox A. J. Drainage following cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1972 Apr;59(4):293–296. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800590412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES