Abstract
Interventional cardiology is an expanding field within cardiovascular medicine and today it is generally accepted that cardiologists require specific training, knowledge and skills. Hospitals where coronary interventions are performed must be properly equipped and able to provide specialised care. Percutaneous coronary interventions are frequently used for coronary revascularisation. The public should have confidence in the uniformity of high quality care. Therefore, such quality of care should be maintained by certification of the individual operators, general guidelines for institutional requirements and formal audits. The Netherlands Society of Cardiology (NVVC) will be implementing a new registration system for cardiologists with a subspecialisation that will include registration for interventional cardiology. The NVVC asked the Working Group of Interventional Cardiology (WIC) to update the 1994 Dutch guidelines on operator and institutional competence, and requirements for training in interventional cardiology in order to incorporate them into the official directives. The present guidelines represent the expert opinion of the Dutch interventional cardiology community and are in accordance with international regulations.
After two rounds of discussion, the NVVC approved the guidelines in November 2004 during the autumn meeting.
Keywords: guidelines, interventional cardiology, cardiovascular medicine
Full text
PDF






Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Andersen Henning R., Nielsen Torsten T., Rasmussen Klaus, Thuesen Leif, Kelbaek Henning, Thayssen Per, Abildgaard Ulrik, Pedersen Flemming, Madsen Jan K., Grande Peer. A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 21;349(8):733–742. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa025142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Antoniucci David, Valenti Renato, Migliorini Angela, Moschi Guia, Trapani Maurizio, Buonamici Piergiovanni, Cerisano Giampaolo, Bolognese Leonardo, Santoro Giovanni Maria. Relation of time to treatment and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 2002 Jun 1;89(11):1248–1252. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02320-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bashore T. M., Bates E. R., Berger P. B., Clark D. A., Cusma J. T., Dehmer G. J., Kern M. J., Laskey W. K., O'Laughlin M. P., Oesterle S. American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Jun 15;37(8):2170–2214. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01346-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Block P. C., Peterson E. D., Krone R., Kesler K., Hannan E., O'Connor G. T., Detre K., Peterson E. C. Identification of variables needed to risk adjust outcomes of coronary interventions: evidence-based guidelines for efficient data collection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Jul;32(1):275–282. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00208-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonnefoy Eric, Lapostolle Frédéric, Leizorovicz Alain, Steg Gabriel, McFadden Eugène P., Dubien Pierre Yves, Cattan Simon, Boullenger Eric, Machecourt Jacques, Lacroute Jean-Micel. Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a randomised study. Lancet. 2002 Sep 14;360(9336):825–829. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09963-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Luca Giuseppe, Suryapranata Harry, Ottervanger Jan Paul, Antman Elliott M. Time delay to treatment and mortality in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: every minute of delay counts. Circulation. 2004 Mar 8;109(10):1223–1225. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000121424.76486.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dehmer Gregory J., Gantt D. Scott. Coronary intervention at hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery: are we pushing the envelope too far? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Feb 4;43(3):343–345. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Epstein Andrew J., Rathore Saif S., Volpp Kevin G. M., Krumholz Harlan M. Hospital percutaneous coronary intervention volume and patient mortality, 1998 to 2000: does the evidence support current procedure volume minimums? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 May 19;43(10):1755–1762. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirshfeld J. W., Jr, Banas J. S., Jr, Brundage B. H., Cowley M., Dehmer G. J., Ellis S. G., Ewy G. A., Faxon D. P., Holmes D. R., Jr, Jacobs A. K. American College of Cardiology training statement on recommendations for the structure of an optimal adult interventional cardiology training program: a report of the American College of Cardiology task force on clinical expert consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Dec;34(7):2141–2147. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00477-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirshfeld J. W., Jr, Ellis S. G., Faxon D. P. Recommendations for the assessment and maintenance of proficiency in coronary interventional procedures: Statement of the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Mar 1;31(3):722–743. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00009-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimmel S. E., Berlin J. A., Laskey W. K. The relationship between coronary angioplasty procedure volume and major complications. JAMA. 1995 Oct 11;274(14):1137–1142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Magid D. J., Calonge B. N., Rumsfeld J. S., Canto J. G., Frederick P. D., Every N. R., Barron H. V., National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 and 3 Investigators Relation between hospital primary angioplasty volume and mortality for patients with acute MI treated with primary angioplasty vs thrombolytic therapy. JAMA. 2000 Dec 27;284(24):3131–3138. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.24.3131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McGrath P. D., Wennberg D. E., Dickens J. D., Jr, Siewers A. E., Lucas F. L., Malenka D. J., Kellett M. A., Jr, Ryan T. J., Jr Relation between operator and hospital volume and outcomes following percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of the coronary stent. JAMA. 2000 Dec 27;284(24):3139–3144. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.24.3139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh Mandeep, Ting Henry H., Berger Peter B., Garratt Kirk N., Holmes David R., Jr, Gersh Bernard J. Rationale for on-site cardiac surgery for primary angioplasty: a time for reappraisal. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Jun 19;39(12):1881–1889. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01901-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith S. C., Jr, Dove J. T., Jacobs A. K., Kennedy J. W., Kereiakes D., Kern M. J., Kuntz R. E., Popma J. J., Schaff H. V., Williams D. O. ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 2001 Jun 19;103(24):3019–3041. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.24.3019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Widimský P., Budesínský T., Vorác D., Groch L., Zelízko M., Aschermann M., Branny M., St'ásek J., Formánek P., 'PRAGUE' Study Group Investigators Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial--PRAGUE-2. Eur Heart J. 2003 Jan;24(1):94–104. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00468-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
