Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 1992 Jul;74(4):265–268.

Consequences of immediate failure of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.

M W Armstrong 1, E P Torrie 1, R B Galland 1
PMCID: PMC2497619  PMID: 1416680

Abstract

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is often used for patients who would not previously have been treated, due for example, to their poor general condition or their symptoms being relatively mild. The approximate overall initial success and complication rates are 80% and 10%, respectively. Iliac angioplasties fare rather better than superficial femoral dilatations. There is little information on the outcome of those patients in whom the procedure cannot be completed satisfactorily or who have complications. From 1985 to December 1990, 318 PTAs have been attempted on our unit, the majority within the last 3 years. In 53 (17%) the dilatation was not carried out, due to inability to position the guidewire (31) or balloon (16) satisfactorily, to disease progression (3) or systemic problems (3). None of these patients was made worse and 10 subsequently had a successful angioplasty. Complications occurred in 28 (9%). These included distal embolisation (10), bleeding (9), dissection (1), thrombotic occlusion (4) and vessel rupture (4). Complications were more common after superficial femoral, compared with iliac angioplasty (P < 0.02, chi 2 test). Eight patients with occlusion or embolus were treated with thrombolysis, five successfully. Three of these patients, and seven others, had surgical intervention (three within 6 h of angioplasty). Ten patients were treated conservatively, one died. Of the 28 patients who sustained complications, 27 were improved compared with their status before angioplasty, once their complication had been dealt with. PTA is a generally safe procedure and when complications occur most can be dealt with effectively.

Full text

PDF
265

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson J. B., Wolinski A. P., Wells I. P., Wilkins D. C., Bliss B. P. The impact of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty on the management of peripheral vascular disease. Br J Surg. 1986 Jan;73(1):17–19. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800730108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barr H., Lancashire M. J., Torrie E. P., Galland R. B. Intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy in the management of acute and chronic limb ischaemia. Br J Surg. 1991 Mar;78(3):284–287. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Belli A. M., Cumberland D. C., Knox A. M., Procter A. E., Welsh C. L. The complication rate of percutaneous peripheral balloon angioplasty. Clin Radiol. 1990 Jun;41(6):380–383. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)80595-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergqvist D., Takolander R., Jonsson K., Karlsson S., Hellekant C. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of arteriosclerotic lesions in the pelvis and lower extremities. Acta Chir Scand. 1984;150(6):445–449. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Browse D. J., Barr H., Torrie E. P., Galland R. B. Limitations to the widespread usage of low-dose intra-arterial thrombolysis. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1991 Aug;5(4):445–449. doi: 10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80178-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Greenfield A. J. Femoral, popliteal, and tibial arteries: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980 Nov;135(5):927–935. doi: 10.2214/ajr.135.5.927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jeans W. D., Danton R. M., Baird R. N., Horrocks M. The effects of introducing balloon dilatation into vascular surgical practice. Br J Radiol. 1986 May;59(701):457–459. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-59-701-457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kalman P. G., Johnston K. W. Outcome of a failed percutaneous transluminal dilation. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1985 Jul;161(1):43–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lamerton A. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Br J Surg. 1986 Feb;73(2):91–97. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800730203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pfeiffer R. B., Jr, String S. T. Adjunctive use of the balloon dilatation catheter during vascular reconstructive procedures. J Vasc Surg. 1986 Jun;3(6):841–845. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rogers W. F., Kraft M. A. Outpatient angioplasty. Radiology. 1990 Mar;174(3 Pt 1):753–755. doi: 10.1148/radiology.174.3.2137634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wilson S. E., Sheppard B. Results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for peripheral vascular occlusive disease. Ann Vasc Surg. 1990 Jan;4(1):94–97. doi: 10.1007/BF02042698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wilson S. E., Wolf G. L., Cross A. P. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus operation for peripheral arteriosclerosis. Report of a prospective randomized trial in a selected group of patients. J Vasc Surg. 1989 Jan;9(1):1–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES