Skip to main content
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 1993 Jan;75(1):23–25.

Should we still stitch the subcutaneous fat layer? A clinical and ultrasound assessment in 50 hip operations.

K Kong 1, N Jeyagopal 1, S J Davies 1
PMCID: PMC2497730  PMID: 8422139

Abstract

Wound haematoma is an undesirable complication of surgery. We report a prospective trial to establish whether a subcutaneous fat stitch affects haematoma formation in hip surgery. A series of 50 patients undergoing hip surgery were randomised to have either a fat stitch or no fat stitch during wound closure. The wounds were assessed clinically with a minimum follow-up of 5 weeks. Subcutaneous haematomas were seen more easily with the patient standing. As clinical assessment for haematoma formation may be unreliable, each patient also had an ultrasound scan. Although the incidence of subcutaneous haematoma was slightly higher in the no fat stitch group (36% compared with 24% in the fat stitch group) this difference was not statistically significant (chi 2 test, P < 0.5). There were no significant differences in the incidence of wound infection and healing rate. From our study we also showed that ultrasound examination was twice as sensitive as clinical examination in diagnosing subcutaneous haematomas and that subcutaneous haematomas are common after hip surgery.

Full text

PDF
23

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Behre H. M., Nashan D., Nieschlag E. Objective measurement of testicular volume by ultrasonography: evaluation of the technique and comparison with orchidometer estimates. Int J Androl. 1989 Dec;12(6):395–403. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1989.tb01328.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bis K. G., Slovis T. L. Accuracy of ultrasonic bladder volume measurement in children. Pediatr Radiol. 1990;20(6):457–460. doi: 10.1007/BF02075208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ferris B. D., Wickens D., Bhamra M., Sibly F., Muirhead-Allwood W., Dormandy T. To stitch or not to stitch the fat? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1989 Mar;71(2):115–116. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fornage B. D., Toubas O., Morel M. Clinical, mammographic, and sonographic determination of preoperative breast cancer size. Cancer. 1987 Aug 15;60(4):765–771. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19870815)60:4<765::aid-cncr2820600410>3.0.co;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Milewski P. J., Thomson H. Is a fat stitch necessary? Br J Surg. 1980 Jun;67(6):393–394. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800670604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES