Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 1985 Jul;67(4):216–221.

A quantitative assessment of results with the Angelchik prosthesis.

J H Wyllie, D A Edwards
PMCID: PMC2497828  PMID: 4037629

Abstract

The Angelchik antireflux prosthesis was assessed in 15 unpromising patients, 12 of whom had peptic strictures of the oesophagus. Radiological techniques were used to show the effect of the device on gastro-oesophageal reflux, and on the bore and length of strictures. Twelve months later (range 6-24) most patients were well satisfied with the operation, and all considered it had been worthwhile; there was radiological evidence of reduction in reflux and remission of strictures. The device never surrounded the oesophageal sphincter; in all but 1 case it encircled a tube of stomach.

Full text

PDF
216

Images in this article

220Fig. 5
on p.220
221Fig. 6
on p.221

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Angelchik J. P., Cohen R. A new surgical procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux and hiatal hernia. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979 Feb;148(2):246–248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benjamin S. B., Knuff T. K., Fink M., Woods E., Castell D. O. The Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. Effects on the lower esophageal sphincter of primates. Ann Surg. 1983 Jan;197(1):63–67. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Collins F. J., Matthews H. R., Baker S. E., Strakova J. M. Drug-induced oesophageal injury. Br Med J. 1979 Jun 23;1(6179):1673–1676. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6179.1673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gear M. W., Gillison E. W., Dowling B. L. Randomized prospective trial of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis. Br J Surg. 1984 Sep;71(9):681–683. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800710911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Habibulla K. S. The diaphragm as an anti-reflux barrier. A monometric, oesophagoscopic, and transmucosal potential study. Thorax. 1972 Nov;27(6):692–702. doi: 10.1136/thx.27.6.692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kozarek R. A., Phelps J. E., Sanowski R. A., Grobe J. L., Fredell C. H. An anti-reflux prosthesis in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux. Ann Intern Med. 1983 Mar;98(3):310–315. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-98-3-310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lobello R., Edwards D. A., Gummer J. W., Stekelman M. The anti-reflux mechanism after cardiomyotomy. Thorax. 1978 Oct;33(5):569–573. doi: 10.1136/thx.33.5.569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lobello R., Stekelman M., Edwards D. A. Lower oesophageal sphincter tone in patients with peptic stricture. Thorax. 1978 Oct;33(5):574–578. doi: 10.1136/thx.33.5.574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Samelson S. L., Weiser H. F., Bombeck C. T., Siewert J. R., Ludtke F. E., Hoelscher A. H., Abuabara S. F., Nyhus L. M. A new concept in the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux. Ann Surg. 1983 Mar;197(3):254–259. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198303000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Starling J. R., Reichelderfer M. O., Pellett J. R., Belzer F. O. Treatment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux using the Angelchik prosthesis. Ann Surg. 1982 Jun;195(6):686–691. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198206000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Temple J. G., Taylor T. V., Alexander-Williams J. A simple operative prosthetic treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1984 Jan;29(1):16–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES