Skip to main content
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 1985 Jul;67(4):241–242.

Girth measurement is not a reliable investigation for the detection of intra-abdominal fluid.

R J Aitken, P C Clifford
PMCID: PMC2497834  PMID: 4037636

Abstract

Routine measurement of abdominal girth after suspected trauma is still recommended as a predictor of intraperitoneal bleeding but there is little evidence to support its accuracy. Girth measurements were taken on 12 recumbent adult patients by independent observers and repeated after infusion of 550 ml aliquots of dialysate to a maximum of 2000 ml. Girth increase per 500 ml infusion varied from -0.46 cm to 2.1 cm (mean 0.84 +/- 0.65 SD) giving a range in excess of 2.5 cm. In some cases the girth decreased after a further 500 ml infusion. A change in patient position altered the girth at a constant volume by 1.32 cm (+/- 0.75 SD). Observer error was low at 0.33 cm (+/- 0.35 SD). These results preclude girth as a reliable clinical indicator of intraperitoneal haemorrhage.

Full text

PDF
241

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Finlayson D. F., Muirhead A. G. Is measurement of girth of value in assessing intraperitoneal bleeding after trauma? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Sep 10;287(6394):728–728. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6394.728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES