Skip to main content
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 1993 Sep;75(5):335–338.

Physical status is the principal determinant of outcome after emergency admission of patients with colorectal cancer.

R D Kingston 1, S H Walsh 1, J Jeacock 1
PMCID: PMC2497987  PMID: 8215150

Abstract

A prospective study of 825 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer presenting to three general surgeons in a district general hospital over a 10-year period are reported. In all, 735 patients had an operation and are grouped according to whether their operation was within 24 h of admission (n = 63), more than 24 h after admission (n = 151), or elective (n = 521). Operative mortalities for these groups were 15.9%, 15.2% and 6.5%, respectively, significantly higher in both the emergency groups. Delayed surgery to allow complete resuscitation did not improve the operative mortality when compared with those patients having urgent surgery. Both groups of emergency patients, delayed (27%) urgent (19%), showed poorer 5-year survival than the electively treated patients (36%), many dying of non-cancer causes. Patients who undergo emergency surgery for colorectal carcinoma are more likely to be in poorer physical condition than patients undergoing elective surgery for the same condition. It appears that the physical status is the principal determinant of outcome after emergency colorectal surgery rather than any other factor.

Full text

PDF
335

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chester J., Britton D. Elective and emergency surgery for colorectal cancer in a district general hospital: impact of surgical training on patient survival. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1989 Nov;71(6):370–374. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Darby C. R., Berry A. R., Mortensen N. Management variability in surgery for colorectal emergencies. Br J Surg. 1992 Mar;79(3):206–210. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800790305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fielding L. P., Stewart-Brown S., Blesovsky L. Large-bowel obstruction caused by cancer: a prospective study. Br Med J. 1979 Sep 1;2(6189):515–517. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6189.515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kingston R. D., Kiff R. S., Duthie J. S., Walsh S., Spicer A., Jeacock J. Comparison of two prophylactic single-dose intravenous antibiotic regimes in the treatment of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in a district general hospital. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1989 Aug;34(4):208–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Koruth N. M., Hunter D. C., Krukowski Z. H., Matheson N. A. Immediate resection in emergency large bowel surgery: a 7 year audit. Br J Surg. 1985 Sep;72(9):703–707. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800720910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Turunen M. J., Peltokallio P. Surgical results in 657 patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1983 Sep;26(9):606–612. doi: 10.1007/BF02552974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Waldron R. P., Donovan I. A., Drumm J., Mottram S. N., Tedman S. Emergency presentation and mortality from colorectal cancer in the elderly. Br J Surg. 1986 Mar;73(3):214–216. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800730320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES