Skip to main content
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 1987 Mar;69(2):54–56.

Polydioxanone suture in the gastrointestinal tract.

D A Gillatt, A P Corfield, R E May, D C Bartolo, D J Leaper
PMCID: PMC2498366  PMID: 3105412

Abstract

A randomized prospective trial was undertaken of polydioxanone suture (PDS) versus conventional suture material in 98 patients undergoing anastomoses in the gastrointestinal tract. Nine patients died within 6 months of surgery, one of these being related to an anastomotic leak. All other patients were followed up for between one and three and a half years. In 57 colonic anastomoses, 30 were randomized to a single layer of 2/0 (BPC) interrupted PDS and 27 to a single of 2/0 (BPC) interrupted silk. Follow up sigmoidoscopy and barium enemas were used to confirm the clinical suspicion of 6 benign anastomotic strictures, 5 of which occurred in the PDS group. At this stage, the colonic arm of the trial was discontinued because the 19% stricture rate with PDS was deemed unacceptable. In a second limb of the study, patients were randomized to two layers of 2/0 (BPC) continuous PDS or 2/0 (BPC) continuous chromic catgut. There were no significant differences in 32 gastric or small bowel anastomoses and in particular, no anastomotic strictures were apparent. The reasons for the high rate of stricture formation when using PDS for large bowel anastomoses are unclear. However, it would seem to be a suitable alternative to chromic catgut when confined to the stomach and small intestine.

Full text

PDF
54

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hoile R. W. The use of a new suture material (Polydioxanone) in the biliary tract. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1983 May;65(3):168–171. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Irvin T. T., Goligher J. C. Aetiology of disruption of intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg. 1973 Jun;60(6):461–464. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800600612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Khoury G. A., Waxman B. P. Large bowel anastomoses. I. The healing process and sutured anastomoses. A review. Br J Surg. 1983 Feb;70(2):61–63. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800700202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Leaper D. J., Allan A., May R. E., Corfield A. P., Kennedy R. H. Abdominal wound closure: a controlled trial of polyamide (nylon) and polydioxanone suture (PDS). Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1985 Sep;67(5):273–275. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Leaper D. J., Benson C. E. Subcuticular skin closure after inguinal surgery. A controlled trial of polypropylene or polydioxanone. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1985 Aug;30(4):234–236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Leese T., Ellis H. Abdominal wound closure--a comparison of monofilament nylon and polydioxanone. Surgery. 1984 Jan;95(1):125–126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McGeehan D., Hunt D., Chaudhuri A., Rutter P. An experimental study of the relationship between synergistic wound sepsis and suture materials. Br J Surg. 1980 Sep;67(9):636–638. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800670909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Polglase A. L., Hughes E. S., McDermott F. T., Pihl E., Burke F. R. A comparison of end-to-end staple and suture colorectal anastomosis in the dog. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981 Jun;152(6):792–796. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES