Skip to main content
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 1987 Sep;69(5):235–236.

To tunnel or not to tunnel catheters for parenteral nutrition.

K T Moran 1, G McEntee 1, B Jones 1, R Hone 1, J P Duignan 1, E O'Malley 1
PMCID: PMC2498565  PMID: 3118752

Abstract

The effect of subcutaneous catheter tunnelling on the incidence of catheter sepsis and on catheter life span in the absence of a nutrition team was determined in a prospective controlled clinical trial. Eighty one patients who received 92 courses of parenteral nutrition had 110 catheters inserted. Alternate catheters were tunnelled. Four patients who received parentheral nutrition for less than 48 hours were excluded from the study. Catheter related sepsis occurred in one tunnelled (1.8%) and 4 non-tunnelled catheters (7.6%) (P greater than 0.05 NS). Mean life span of tunnelled catheters was 21 days (range 5-37 days) compared to 12.6 days for non-tunnelled (range 3-19 days) (P less than 0.05). Six non-tunnelled catheters became displaced, a complication which did not occur with tunnelled catheters (P less than 0.01). In conclusion subcutaneous tunnelling of silicone catheters prolongs catheter life span but does not significantly influence catheter sepsis.

Full text

PDF
235

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cleri D. J., Corrado M. L., Seligman S. J. Quantitative culture of intravenous catheters and other intravascular inserts. J Infect Dis. 1980 Jun;141(6):781–786. doi: 10.1093/infdis/141.6.781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Keohane P. P., Jones B. J., Attrill H., Cribb A., Northover J., Frost P., Silk D. B. Effect of catheter tunnelling and a nutrition nurse on catheter sepsis during parenteral nutrition. A controlled trial. Lancet. 1983 Dec 17;2(8364):1388–1390. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)90922-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. McEntee G., Moran K., Duigan J. P., O'Malley E. A nutrition team is not essential for optimal parenteral nutrition therapy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1987 Jan;69(1):39–39. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mitchell A., Atkins S., Royle G. T., Kettlewell M. G. Reduced catheter sepsis and prolonged catheter life using a tunnelled silicone rubber catheter for total parenteral nutrition. Br J Surg. 1982 Jul;69(7):420–422. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800690722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nehme A. E. Nutritional support of the hospitalized patient. The team concept. JAMA. 1980 May 16;243(19):1906–1908. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Powell-Tuck J. Skin tunnel for central venous catheter: non-operative technique. Br Med J. 1978 Mar 11;1(6113):625–625. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6113.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Riella M. C., Scribner B. H. Five years' experience with a right atrial catheter for prolonged parenteral nutrition at home. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976 Aug;143(2):205–208. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ryan J. A., Jr, Abel R. M., Abbott W. M., Hopkins C. C., Chesney T. M., Colley R., Phillips K., Fischer J. E. Catheter complications in total parenteral nutrition. A prospective study of 200 consecutive patients. N Engl J Med. 1974 Apr 4;290(14):757–761. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197404042901401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sitges-Serra A., Jaurrieta E., Liñares J., Pérez J. L., Garau J. Bacteria in total parenteral nutrition catheters: where do they come from? Lancet. 1983 Mar 5;1(8323):531–531. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92219-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Snydman D. R., Gorbea H. F., Pober B. R., Majka J. A., Murray S. A., Perry L. K. Predictive value of surveillance skin cultures in total-parenteral-nutrition-related infection. Lancet. 1982 Dec 18;2(8312):1385–1388. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)91281-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. von Meyenfeldt M. M., Stapert J., de Jong P. C., Soeters P. B., Wesdorp R. I., Greep J. M. TPN catheter sepsis: lack of effect of subcutaneous tunnelling of PVC catheters on sepsis rate. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1980 Sep-Oct;4(5):514–517. doi: 10.1177/014860718000400516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES