Abstract
Anthropometric measurements were performed on 51 normal, supine, barium enema examinations to determine the position of the lower pole of the caecum and the base of the appendix relative to palpable bony landmarks (the anterior superior iliac spine and the symphysis pubis). Four quadrants were defined (iliac, umbilical, inguinal and pelvic) by the intersection of the right lateral line and the interspinous line (the line joining the left and right anterior superior iliac spines). The position of the lower pole of the caecum was iliac in 12%, inguinal in 37%, and pelvic in 51%. The appendix or appendix stump was visualised on 53% of the barium examinations. The position of the appendix was iliac in 15%, umbilical in 15%, inguinal in 11%, and pelvic in 59%. The positions of the lower pole of the caecum and base of the appendix are lower and more medial than previously described. 70% of appendices were found to lie inferior to the interspinous line, contrary to established surgical teaching, which assumes McBurney's point to be the surface landmark for the appendix.
Full text
PDF
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Amir-Jahed A. K. The cul-de-sac approach for appendectomy. Am J Surg. 1977 Nov;134(5):656–658. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(77)90457-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Askew A. R. The Fowler-Weir approach to appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 1975 Apr;62(4):303–304. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800620413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buschard K., Kjaeldgaard A. Investigation and analysis of the position, fixation, length and embryology of the vermiform appendix. Acta Chir Scand. 1973;139(3):293–298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collins D. C. The Length and Position of the Vermiform Appendix: A Study of 4,680 Specimens. Ann Surg. 1932 Dec;96(6):1044–1048. doi: 10.1097/00000658-193212000-00012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El-Boghdadly S. A., Abel K. Pfannenstiel incision for appendicectomy in females. Br J Clin Pract. 1984 Jan;38(1):17–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jelenko C., 3rd, Davis L. P. A transverse lower abdominal appendectomy incision with minimal muscle derangement. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1973 Mar;136(3):451–452. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McBurney C. IV. The Incision Made in the Abdominal Wall in Cases of Appendicitis, with a Description of a New Method of Operating. Ann Surg. 1894 Jul;20(1):38–43. doi: 10.1097/00000658-189407000-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moody R. O. The Position of the Abdominal Viscera in healthy, young British and American Adults. J Anat. 1927 Jan;61(Pt 2):223–231. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]