Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Netherlands Heart Journal logoLink to Netherlands Heart Journal
. 2001 Nov;9(8):322-326, 327.

A nineteen-millimetre aortic valve prosthesis: is this really a risk?

P Lipiec, L Noyez, RMHJ Brouwer
PMCID: PMC2499651  PMID: 25696754

Abstract

Background

Aortic valve replacement in patients with a small aortic root is a subject of ongoing controversy. We summarised our clinical experience with aortic valve replacement with 19 mm valves and combined this with a review of literature.

Methods

Between January 1994 and December 1999, 603 patients underwent aortic valve replacement; 51 of these patients (8.3%) received a 19 mm heart valve prosthesis. The mean age was 72±9.7 years. Twenty-eight patients had concomitant coronary artery disease, six patients a combined mitral or tricupid valve disease. In four patients, the intervention was a reoperation. The mean EuroSCORE of the total group was 6.4±2.8, and 34 patients had a high operative risk.

Results

Hospital mortality was 7.8% (4/51 patients). Follow-up of 47 hospital survivors was complete. At 12 months the survival was 90%, at 24 months 85% and at 48 months 60%. NYHA class improved at least one class in 35 patients (85%), and 34 patients declared that their quality of life had improved since the operation.

Conclusion

Aortic valve replacement with a small (19 mm) prosthesis can be performed with an acceptable operative mortality and results in excellent symptomatic improvement and quality of life.

Keywords: aortic valve replacement, mortality, morbidity, quality of life

Full text

PDF
322

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams D. H., Chen R. H., Kadner A., Aranki S. F., Allred E. N., Cohn L. H. Impact of small prosthetic valve size on operative mortality in elderly patients after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: does gender matter? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Nov;118(5):815–822. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(99)70050-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arom K. V., Goldenberg I. F., Emery R. W. Long-term clinical outcome with small size Standard St Jude Medical valves implanted in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis. 1994 Sep;3(5):531–536. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chiu R. C. Cardioplegia: from the bedside to the laboratory and back again. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991 Dec;52(6):1209–1210. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(91)90001-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Connolly H. M., Oh J. K., Orszulak T. A., Osborn S. L., Roger V. L., Hodge D. O., Bailey K. R., Seward J. B., Tajik A. J. Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Prognostic indicators. Circulation. 1997 May 20;95(10):2395–2400. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.10.2395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. González-Juanatey J. R., García-Acuña J. M., Vega Fernandez M., Amaro Cendón A., Castelo Fuentes V., García-Bengoechea J. B., de la Peña M. G. Influence of the size of aortic valve prostheses on hemodynamics and change in left ventricular mass: implications for the surgical management of aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 Aug;112(2):273–280. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(96)70249-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. He G. W., Grunkemeier G. L., Gately H. L., Furnary A. P., Starr A. Up to thirty-year survival after aortic valve replacement in the small aortic root. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 May;59(5):1056–1062. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00075-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Konno S., Imai Y., Iida Y., Nakajima M., Tatsuno K. A new method for prosthetic valve replacement in congenital aortic stenosis associated with hypoplasia of the aortic valve ring. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1975 Nov;70(5):909–917. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kumar P., Zehr K. J., Chang A., Cameron D. E., Baumgartner W. A. Quality of life in octogenarians after open heart surgery. Chest. 1995 Oct;108(4):919–926. doi: 10.1378/chest.108.4.919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lund O., Emmertsen K., Nielsen T. T., Jensen F. T., Flø C., Pilegaard H. K., Rasmussen B. S., Hansen O. K., Kristensen L. H. Impact of size mismatch and left ventricular function on performance of the St. Jude disc valve after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 May;63(5):1227–1234. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00313-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Medalion B., Blackstone E. H., Lytle B. W., White J., Arnold J. H., Cosgrove D. M. Aortic valve replacement: is valve size important? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 May;119(5):963–974. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(00)70091-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Medalion B., Lytle B. W., McCarthy P. M., Stewart R. W., Arheart K. L., Arnold J. H., Loop F. D., Cosgrove D. M., 3rd Aortic valve replacement for octogenarians: are small valves bad? Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Sep;66(3):699–706. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00691-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nashef S. A., Roques F., Michel P., Gauducheau E., Lemeshow S., Salamon R. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Jul;16(1):9–13. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00134-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nicks R., Cartmill T., Bernstein L. Hypoplasia of the aortic root. The problem of aortic valve replacement. Thorax. 1970 May;25(3):339–346. doi: 10.1136/thx.25.3.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. O'Brien M. F. An exceedingly low operative mortality given by stentless autologous, homologous, and heterologous aortic valves for aortic valve replacement. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Oct;11(4 Suppl 1):12–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Riley R. D., Hammon J. W., Jr, Adair S. M., Cordell A. R., Kon N. D. Stentless aortic valve replacement with Freestyle or Toronto SPV: an early comparison. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Jul;70(1):48–52. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01559-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sawant D., Singh A. K., Feng W. C., Bert A. A., Rotenberg F. Nineteen-millimeter aortic St. Jude Medical heart valve prosthesis: up to sixteen years' follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Apr;63(4):964–970. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(96)01145-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sim E. K., Orszulak T. A., Schaff H. V., Shub C. Influence of prosthesis size on change in left ventricular mass following aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1994;8(6):293–297. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(05)80088-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sommers K. E., David T. E. Aortic valve replacement with patch enlargement of the aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Jun;63(6):1608–1612. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00127-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Westaby S., Horton M., Jin X. Y., Katsumata T., Ahmed O., Saito S., Li H. H., Grunkemeier G. L. Survival advantage of stentless aortic bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Sep;70(3):785–791. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01736-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wortham D. C., Tri T. B., Bowen T. E. Hemodynamic evaluation of the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis in the small aortic anulus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1981 Apr;81(4):615–620. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Netherlands Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES