Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Assisted Reproduction logoLink to Journal of Experimental & Clinical Assisted Reproduction
. 2008 Jul 10;5:5. doi: 10.1186/1743-1050-5-5

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphisms resulting in suboptimal oocyte maturation: a discussion of folate status, neural tube defects, schizophrenia, and vasculopathy

Piet Hein Jongbloet 1,✉, André LM Verbeek 1, Martin den Heijer 1, Nel Roeleveld 1
PMCID: PMC2500045  PMID: 18616826

Abstract

Several conditions apparent at birth, e.g., neural tube defects (NTDs) and cardiac anomalies, are associated with polymorphisms in folate-related genes, such as the 677C → T polymorphism of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene. Similar associations have been established for several constitutional chronic diseases in adulthood, such as schizophrenia, cardiovascular diseases, dementia, and even neoplasias in different organ systems. This spectrum of developmental anomalies and constitutional diseases may be linked to high-risk conceptions related to preovulatory overripeness ovopathy (PrOO). Some developmental anomalies, such as NTDs, are to a large extent prevented by supplementation of folic acid before conception, but supplementation does not seem to prevent cardiovascular disease or cognitive decline. These diverging results can be elucidated by introduction of the PrOO concept, as MTHFR polymorphisms and inherent low folate levels induce both non-optimal maturation of the oocyte and unsuccessful DNA methylation and demethylation, i.e. epigenetic mutations. The PrOO concept is testable and predicts in a random population the following: (1) female carriers of specific genetic MTHFR variants exhibit more ovulatory disturbances and inherent subfecundity traits, (2) descendents from a carrier mother, when compared with those from a wild-type mother, are more frequently conceived in PrOO high-risk conditions and, thus, (3) disadvantaged in life expectancy. If so, some MTHFR polymorphisms represent a novel, genetically determined, PrOO high-risk conception category comparable to those which are environmentally and behaviorly influenced. These high-risk conditions may cause developmental anomalies and defective epigenetic reprogramming in progeny. The interaction between genetic and environmental factors is a plausible mechanism of multifactorial inheritance.

Introduction

Most theories related to the origin of adult diseases focus on genetic causes and direct environmental effects preceding disease onset by several years at most. The view that diseases in adulthood can partly be explained by conditions earlier in life or even before birth is gaining scientific support. Previously, we proposed non-optimal oocyte ripening or impaired oocyte maturation can be an important cause of developmental anomaly and disease later in adult life [1-4]. The broad spectrum of diseases possibly related to suboptimal oocyte ripening strikingly appears to correspond with diseases that have been associated with the MTHFR 677C → T polymorphism. This genetic variant goes hand in hand with low folate and elevated homocysteine levels. We hypothesize that suboptimal maturation of the oocyte is relevant in the enigmatic relation between MTHFR variants and associated diseases.

In this paper, we review current knowledge on MTHFR polymorphisms and folate levels as they relate to developmental anomalies at birth and selected constitutional disease in adulthood. We also recapitulate the ovopathy concept and posit that the 677C → T variant and inherent low folate levels are accompanied by low estrogenisation, and that this condition induces preovulatory overripeness ovopathy (PrOO). This leads to a high-risk conception mediated by genetic factors, analogous to the environmentally and behaviorally conditioned high-risk conceptions, and an origin ab ovo for some congenital anomalies and constitutional diseases. Indeed, a genetic PrOO determinant emerges as an explanation for the diverging preventive effects of folate in NTDs versus adult diseases. We also discuss the relationship between low folate levels and unsuccessful DNA methylation patterns in the context of epigenetic mutations. Furthermore, testing strategies are proposed to establish the causality of the relation between MTHFR polymorphisms and PrOO conceptions in random populations.

MTHFR-polymorphisms associated with congenital anomalies as well as with chronic diseases in adulthood and diverging benefits of folic acid supplementation

Folate is an important B vitamin that plays a pivotal role in remethylation of homocysteine to methionine, which is essential for DNA-synthesis, DNA-repair, and DNA-imprinting processes [5]. Reduction of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate into 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, the predominant circulatory form of folate is catalyzed by MTHFR, the regulating key enzyme for availability of active folate at the expense of elevated homocysteine levels [6]. In 1995, the most frequently occurring polymorphism in the MTHFR gene 677C → T was identified [7]. This allele is present in heterozygous (CT) or homozygous (TT) carrier state in 40% and 5–15% of individuals [8], respectively, while the specific activity of folate and the folate metabolism is correspondingly reduced by up to 30% and 65%. In the homozygous form, this reduction is associated with a 25% increase of homocysteine levels. Thus, hyperhomocysteinemia is conditioned either genetically or nutritionally, but it can be alleviated by adequate folic acid intake.

It has become evident that the 677C → T variant as well as low-folate intake by the mother contribute to increased risks of NTDs and cardiac anomalies. The underlying pathogenic mechanism which causes this detrimental effect is not fully understood [9,10]. However, important preventive effects up to 50–75% have been effectuated for NTDs by supplementation of between 200 μg to 5 mg folic acid daily, particularly before conception [9,11] or by food fortification, as implemented in USA and Canada [12]. Over the last decade, MTHFR polymorphisms and elevated total plasma homocysteine concentrations have also been associated with a broad range of conditions in adulthood, albeit more modestly, e.g., with schizophrenia, unipolar depression, bipolar disorder [13-15], diabetic retinopathy[16], ovulatory infertility [17,18], cardiovascular disease, atherosclerosis, and thromboembolic events [19,20], renal failure [21], dementia, and cognitive impairment [22,23]. The underlying mechanisms in the pathogenesis of these chronic diseases remain still more poorly understood compared to those of developmental anomalies. However, the general opinion is that the 677C → T variant exerts its influence by ambiently elevated homocysteine levels, i.e. 'the homocysteine hypothesis' [20]. Several large-scale clinical trials evaluating vitamin supplementation were performed to reduce homocysteine concentrations with the goal to reduce cardiovascular disease and dementia, or at least to delay their onset. However, in spite of significant reductions of homocysteine for each nmol/L increase in serum folate, the results remained debatable or even negative [23-26].

An additional enigma is the marginal association between MTHFR polymorphisms and several neoplasias with diverging incidences according to age [27,28]. A meta-analysis of all published leukemia cases revealed that an association with the 677C → T allele was present in adulthood, but this effect was lost in childhood. This was the basis for suggesting a 'protective' role for this allele [29], and a similar diverging finding has been mentioned for colorectal neoplasia [30].

The pre-ovulatory overripeness ovopathy (PrOO) concept

This concept was initially derived from animal research in the 19th and 20th century as well as observations in human reproduction [1-4]. Meiotic progression and optimal developmental oocyte competence in mammals occur during highly critical periods of follicle formation and ultimate oocyte maturation. The molecular, biochemical, and physiological processes in the oocyte are essential for the pleiotropic consequences in both nuclear and cytoplasmic constituents. Ideal concentrations of estrogens and optimally ripened oocytes (OptRO) are apparent during optimal conditions for reproduction. This coincides with optimal maternal age, adequate nutritional state, and post-pregnancy restoration of a regulatory ovulatory pattern, and with the seasonally-bound ovulation peaks, guaranteeing optimal embryo quality and favourable downstream effects on subsequent events, i.e., on life expectancy [1-4]. In fact, adequate estrogen concentrations in healthy women have been associated with achieving clinical pregnancy, intermediate levels with early pregnancy loss, while still lower levels were associated with non-conception cycles [31].

In contrast, abnormal estrogen concentrations cause deficient oocyte maturation which is the basis of preovulatory overripeness ovopathy (PrOO), and leads to fertilization of non-optimally matured oocytes [1-4]. The impact of oocyte attrition before fertilization is hypothesized to entail disadvantageous embryo consequences, including aneuploidy, deficient implantation, intrauterine growth retardation, prenatal loss, and developmental anomalies in various tissue systems. Inappropriate estrogen levels are physiologically conditioned and coincide with transitional stages of reproductive life in which the ovulatory pattern is most variable (i.e., at the extremes of maternal age, after very short and long pregnancy intervals, and with the seasonally-bound restoration and inhibition, i.e., breakthrough and breakdown of the ovulatory patttern). Too low and too high body mass, endocrine disruptors such as pharmaceuticals, narcotics, and toxins may also interact with estrogen levels and influence ovulatory patterns [1-3].

Excessive dysfunctional oocyte maturation results in poor quality oocytes and, after surpassing a certain threshold, in disproportionately increasing numbers of pathological conceptuses. Excess vanishing of pathological outcome will turn into excess preterm loss, and eventually in deficits of pathological births. This is called the dose-response fallacy in reproductive studies described by Selevan and Lemasters [32]. In our opinion, the ovopathy concept is one possible explanation for the dose-response fallacy.

MTHFR polymorphisms and low folate levels as the genetic determinant for PrOO

The spectrum of developmental anomalies associated with MTHFR polymorphisms and/or folate deficiency appears analogous to the spectrum of anomalies related to PrOO induced by endocrine disturbances during the transitional stages of reproductive life and/or by divergent reproductive behavior, e.g. unusual maternal age or pregnancy interval [3] (see Figure 1). Low folate serum levels in Rhesus monkeys have been associated with granulosa cell impairment and with decreased estradiol and progesteron levels. Reduction of follicle growth and delayed ovulation are markers for retardation of embryonic growth and malformation [33]. Folate levels are also essential for sperm maturation, as inadequate folate intake is inversely associated with overall frequencies of several types of aneuploid sperm in healthy men [34]. The MTHFR CT and TT genotypes with inherent low folate status are candidates for compromising oocyte maturation, and may set the stage for a genetically conditioned high-risk conception analogous to those resulting from endocrine disturbances induced by environmental or behavioral conditions (see Figure 1.).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

MHTRF gene polymorphisms as well as behaviorally and/or environmentally influenced high-risk conditions cause PrOO and epigenetic DNA-alterations either independently or in combination. This results in innate developmental defects at birth (e.g. NTDs) or in adulthood (e.g. schizophrenia).

This genetically conditioned high-risk for PrOO explains several unexplained phenomena related to MTHFR variants as well as to low dietary folate. Both conditions are associated with increased fetal loss, intrauterine growth retardation, and heart defects in female mice [35], as well as with women experiencing fetal aneuploidy, recurrent pregnancy loss, early and late pregnancy loss, preeclampsia, preterm premature rupture of membranes, and of particular interest, congenital anomalies [36-39]. These reproductive casualties have been related to non-optimally matured oocytes and aberrant blastocyst nidation [1-4]. The probability for embryos with TT or CT genotypes to arrest at an early stage has been advanced as an explanation for the 'unique distribution' of the 677CT and 677TT genotypes in spontaneously aborted embryos, irrespective of chromosomal integrity [40-43]. This is in line with the dose-response fallacy being inherent to the PrOO concept. Other findings are also in accordance with disproportionate levels of oocyte deterioration and a dose-response fallacy: a dose-specific reduced risk of progeny with cleft lip with or without cleft palate(CL/P) from mothers carrying either one or two copies of the 677C → T variant (RRs: 0.71 and 0.38, respectively), a negative association for children with CL/P (RRs: 1.05 and 0.74) versus a positive one for cleft palate only (CPO; RRs: 2.06 and 1.75), and a fourfold increased risk of orofacial clefts in mothers using folic acid [44].

The finding of MTHFR 677C → T mutations in the mother (but not in children with congenital heart defects) [45] is in general agreement with PrOO as a primary cause of developmental anomalies [46]. Additionally, teratogenic effect appears to be dose-specific in NTDs with 60% heterozygous and 90% homozygous mothers [9], and is also apparent from the increasing male sex preponderance among randomly selected newborns according to maternal MTHFR wild-type, heterozygous, and homozygous carriership: 47%, 50%, and 67% boys, respectively [47]. This sex ratio modulation offers further support for the PrOO concept [4].

It should be noted that periconceptional multivitamin use including folic acid reduces the dose-response risk of preeclampsia and ovulatory infertility [17,18]. In IVF treatment, it results in better embryo quality (defined by cell number), embryo fragmentation rate, or short-term pregnancy outcomes [48]. In contrast, the disappointing curative effect of folate supplements for constitutional diseases associated with MTHFR polymorphisms [23-26] is in line with developmental weaknesses ab ovo. In other words, preventive measures are effective only before conception but not afterward, and that threatened oocytes may be the culprit of specific constitutional diseases encountered long after birth.

The conjecture of a common origin ab ovo for both developmental anomalies and constitutional disease is consistent with the environmental determinants related to non-optimally maturing oocytes [1-4]. This is in particular evident by the sesonally-bound month-of-birth configurations observed in NTDs and cardiac anomalies [1,3,48,49] but equally evident for schizophrenia, eating disorders, subfecundity, DM-1 and DM-2, and childhood leukemia [50-54]. Analogous month-of-birth configurations were also present in three consecutive samples of childhood leukemia in the Netherlands [personal communication]. Interaction between MTHFR genetic determinants, nutrition, and other maternal reproductive determinants should be emphasized in these disease processes, as illustrated in Figure 1.

MTHFR genes, low folate and epigenetic reprogramming

As mentioned previously, adequate folate levels are a prerequisite not only for optimal oocyte maturation but also for remethylation of homocysteine to methionine – the key epigenetic contributor to gene activation and/or reprogramming [6]. These epigenetic processes are essential to confer stability of gene expression during mammalian development and necessary for correct initiation of embryonic gene expression and early lineage development in the embryo. Such epigenetic modulation profoundly influences transcriptional repression, chromatin structure, X-inactivation, and allelic imprinting and silencing.

Incorrect DNA reprogamming results in epigenetic mutation, which does not follow the classic rules of Mendelian inheritance. Active transport of methionine happens in all animal and human oocytes and in early preimplantation embryos. DNA-methylation is concentrated at specific stages when developmental potency of cells changes, i.e., during the final phase of oocyte maturation. In contrast, DNA-demethylation occurs immediately after fertilization [5,55,56]. It follows that maternal reproductive factors can affect fetal development via epigenetic modifications of DNA [57]. Interestingly, ovarian hyperstimulation was the common factor in all twelve reproductive histories of women who gave birth to offspring affected with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome [58], and assisted reproduction technology [55,56] and PrOO [59] have been associated with other imprinting disorders.

The combined effect of PrOO and epigenetic mutations evoked by MTHFR variants (and low folate levels) can explain many developmental puzzles in animals and humans. For example, epigenetic modifications in lambs derived from oocytes retrieved from ewes given a vitamin B12 and folate restricted diet during the periconceptional period, resulted in obesity, insulin resistance, hypertension, and altered immune responses when full grown [60]. This was especially observed in rams, itself a noteworthy finding regarding sex ratio modulation by PrOO [4]. Additionally, pre-conception dietary methyl supplements have been shown to alter the capacity for methylation and expression of the imprinted Agouti gene and strongly affect the phenotype and long-term health of the young in female Agouti mice [61]. Furthermore, insults to the oocyte appear to be responsible for aberrant epigenetic reprogramming events at the zygote stage and even demethylation of the paternal pronucleus in mice seems maternally driven [62]. A number of pathologic conditions have been associated with decreased global methylation, including spina bifida [63], schizophrenia [64], and certain neoplasias [30,65,66].

MTHFR polymorphisms related to the PrOO concept: testing the hypothesis

MTHFR polymorphism status in females is hypothesized to entail a genetically determined propensity to PrOO, which may be likened to the high-risk conceptions elicited by environmental and behavioral conditions. The variant alleles operate either independently or in concert and may strengthen each other. Therefore, we predict that:

1) Heterozygous and homozygous 677C → T carrier females suffer from subfecundity traits in a dose-response manner when compared to females with no mutation (CC). Apart from giving birth to affected progeny, they also experience more menstrual disorders, longer time to achieve pregnancy, longer interpregnancy intervals, and more pronounced reproductive seasonal variation.

2) Offspring from homozygous (and to a lesser extent from heterozygous 677C → T carrier mothers), being genetically more susceptible to environmental triggers than mothers without this mutation, are more frequently conceived in high-risk conditions characterized by ovulatory disturbances. Typical PrOO characteristics are depicted in Figure 2, and include a U-shaped birth distribution related to (2a) maternal age and (2b) interbirth interval, and (2c) a disproportionate seasonally-bound month-of-birth distribution [1-3].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The indexed birth incidence of descendents (average=100) from wild-type MTHFR gene mothers is expected to be conform that in a random population [solid line, black] during (2a) reproductive life), (2b) interbirth interval and (2c) winter and summer birth peak. The PrOO concept predicts disproportional increases of births from heterozygous [interupted line, blue] – and more excessively – from homozygous [interrupted line, red] MTHFR allele carrier mothers. This will occur at (2a) menarche and menopause, (2b) after parturition or long fallow period and (2c) at the onset and the end of the winter and summer birth peak. A dose-response fallacy may be expected at the extremes of maternal age and interbirth interval (2a and 2b) or at the birth troughs (2c).

3) Descendents from homozygous (and to a lesser extent from heterozygous 677 → T carrier women) have reduced life expectancy compared to offspring from mothers without this polymorphism.

These effects may be obscured by early loss before birth as a consequence of preterm premature rupture of membranes and eclampsia associated with MTHFR polymorphisms [36,38] or due to untimely death, often before diagnosis, or due to other poor outcomes related to MTHFR polymorphisms. As this may cause spurious negative associations, as e.g., in childhood leukemia [29], these effects are age-specific and more apparent in younger than in older individuals, as has been demonstrated [personal communication]. Disproportionate levels of oocyte deterioration and dose-response fallacy will in particular occur at the extremes of maternal age, birth interval or at the seasonal transitions (Figure 2a, 2b and 2c).

In conclusion, MTHFR polymorphisms and resulting low folate levels warrant consideration as factors inducing non-optimally matured oocytes before conception. They represent a novel, genetically determined, high-risk PrOO condition comparable to the endocrine disturbances elicited by environmental and behavioral conditions. Further study of the interaction between genetic and environmental factors may indentify mechanisms of multifactorial inheritance and explain many commonly associated enigmata in chronic constitutional diseases.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

The content of this manuscript was subject of the fare-well lecture of PHJ on 12th of June 2007 at the Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Health Technology Assessment at the Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands. The co-authors AV, MdH, and NR participated in the design of the study and the coordination for the manuscript preparation. They revised it critically for important intellectual content and interpretation of the arguments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgements

Wim Lemmens contributed towards the design of the figures.

Contributor Information

Piet Hein Jongbloet, Email: p.jongbloet@skynet.be.

André LM Verbeek, Email: A.Verbeek@epib.umcn.nl.

Martin den Heijer, Email: M.denHeijer@ENDO.umcn.nl.

Nel Roeleveld, Email: N.Roeleveld@epib.umcn.nl.

References

  1. Jongbloet PH. The effects of preovulatory overripeness of human eggs on development. In: Blandau RJ, editor. Aging gametes Their biology and pathology International Symposium, Seattle, 1973. Basel: Karger; 1975. pp. 300–329. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jongbloet PH. The ageing gamete in relation to birth control failures and Down syndrome. Eur J Pediatr. 1985;144:343–347. doi: 10.1007/BF00441775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jongbloet PH. Prepregnancy care: Background biological effects. In: Chamberlain G, Lumley J, editor. Prepregnancy Care: A Manual for Practice. New York: Wiley & Sons; 1986. pp. 31–52. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jongbloet PH. Over-ripeness ovopathy – A challenging hypothesis for sex ratio modulation. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:769–774. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh136. and 1036–1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Morgan HD, Santos F, Green K, Dean W, Reik W. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals. Hum Molec Genet. 2005;14:R47–R58. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Molloy AM, Daly S, Mills JL, Kirke PN, Whitehead AS, Ramsbottom D, Conley MR, Weir DG, Scott JM. Thermolabile variant of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase associated with low red-cell folates; implications for folate intake recommendations. Lancet. 1997;349:1591–1593. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)12049-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Frosst P, Blom HJ, Milos R, Goyette P, Sheppard CA, Matthews RG, Boers GJH, den Heijer M, Kluijtmans LAJ, Heuvel LP van den, Rozen R. A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methyleneterahydrofolate reducase. Nat Genet. 1995;10:111–113. doi: 10.1038/ng0595-111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Guéant-Rodriguez R-M, Guéant J-L, Debard R, Thirion S, Hong LX, Bronowicki J-P, Namour F, Chabi NW, Sani A, Anello G, Bosco P, Romano C, Amouzou E, Arrieta HR, Sànchez BE, Romano A, Herbeth B, Guilland J/C, Mutchinick OM. Prevalence of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677T and 1298C alleles and folate status: a comparative study in Mexican, West African, and European populations. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83:701–707. doi: 10.1093/ajcn.83.3.701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blom HJ, Shaw GM, den Heijer M, Finnell RH. Neural tube defects and folate: case far from closed. Nat Rev/Neurosience. 2006;7:724–731. doi: 10.1038/nrn1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bailey LB, Berry RJ. Folic acid supplementation and the occurrence of congenital heart defects, orofacial clefts, multiple births, and miscarriages. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81:1213S–1217S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/81.5.1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hobbs CA, James SJ, Jernigan S, Melnyk S, Lu Y, Malik S, Cleves MA. Congenital heart defects, maternal homocysteine, smoking, and the 677 C>T polymorphism in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene: Evaluating gene-environment interactions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:218–224. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bille C, Murray JC, Olsen SF. Folid acid and birth malformations. BMJ. 2007;334:433–434. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39133.386296.BE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Muntjewerff JW, Kahn RS, Blom HJ, den Heijer M. Homocysteine, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and risk of schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2006;11:143–149. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zintzaras E. C677T and A1298C methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and depression: a meta-analysis of genetic association studies. Psychiatr Genet. 2006;16:105–115. doi: 10.1097/01.ypg.0000199444.77291.e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gilbody S, Lewis S, Lightfoot T. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) genetic polymorphisms and psychiatric disorders: A huge review. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165:1–13. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zintzaras E, Chatzoulis DZ, Karabatsas CH, Stefanidis I. The relationship between C677T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphism and retinopathy in type. J Hum Genet. 2005;50:267–275. doi: 10.1007/s10038-005-0250-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bodnar LM, Tang G, Ness RB, Harger G, Roberts JM. Periconceptional multivitamin use reduces the risk of preeclampsia. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164:470–477. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chavarro JE, Rich-Edwards JW, Rosner BA, Wilett WC. Use of multivitamins, intake of B vitamins, and risk of ovulatory infertility. Fertil Steril. 2007;89:668–676. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. den Heijer M, Lewington S, Clarke R. Homocysteine, MTHFR and risk of venous thrombosis: a metaanalysis of published epidemiological studies. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:292–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01141.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cronin S, Furie KL, Kelly PJ. Dose-related association of MTHFR 677T allele with risk of ischemic stroke Evidence from a cumulative meta-analysis. Stroke. 2005;36:1581–1587. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000169946.31639.af. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Födinger M, Sunder-Plassmann G. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms and renal failure. In: Ueland PM, Rozen R, editor. MTHFR polymorphisms and Disease. Georgetown, Texas, USA: Eurekah.com/Landes Bioscience; 2005. pp. 170–178. [Google Scholar]
  22. Elias MF, Sullivan LM, D'Agostino RB, Elias PK, Jacques PF, Selhub J, Seshadri S, et al. Homocysteine and cognitive performance in the Framingham offspring study: Age is important. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162:644–653. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Clarke R. Commentary: An updated review of the published studies of homocysteine and cardiovascular disease. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:70–71. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.1.70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Clarke R. Homocysteine, B vitamins, and the risk of dementia. Am J Nutr. 2007;85:329–330. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/85.2.329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S. Folate supplementation and cardiovascular disease. Lancet. 2005;366:1679–1681. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67676-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wald DS, Moris JK, Law M, Wald NJ. Folic acid, homocysteine, and cardiovascular disease: judging causality in the face of inconclusive trial evidence. BMJ. 2006;333:1114–1117. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39000.486701.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zintzaras E. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene and susceptibility to breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Clin Genet. 2006;69:327–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00605.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zintzaras E. Associations of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms with genetic susceptibility to gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. J Hum Genet. 51:618–624. doi: 10.1007/s10038-006-0405-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zintzaras E, Koufalis T, Ziakas PD, Rodopoulou P, Giannouli S, Voulgarelis M. A meta-analysis of genotypes and haplotypes of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21:501–510. doi: 10.1007/s10654-006-9027-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Crott JW, Mason JB. MTHFR Polymorphisms and colorectal neoplasia. In: Ueland PM, Rozen R, editor. MTHFR polymorphisms and Disease. Georgetown, Texas, USA: Eurekah.com/Landes Bioscience; 2005. pp. 178–196. [Google Scholar]
  31. Venners SA, Liu X, Perry MJ, Korrick SA, Li Z, Yang F, Yang J, Lasley BL, Xu X, Wang X. Urinary estrogen and progesterone metabolite concentrations in menstrual cycles of fertile women with non-conception, early pregnancy loss or clinical pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2272–2280. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Selevan SG, Lemasters GK. The dose-response fallacy in human reproductive studies of toxic exposures. J Occup Med. 1987;29:451–455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wynn M, Wynn A. The Caroline Walker Lecture. London: Caroline Walker Trust; 1993. No nation can rise above the level of women: New thoughts on maternal nutrition; pp. 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  34. Young SS, Eskenzi B, Marchetti FM, Block G, Wyrobek AJ. The association of folate, zinc and antioxidant intake with sperm aneuploidy in healthy non-smoking men. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1014–1022. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Li D, Pickel L, Liu Y, Wu Q, Cohn JS, Rozen R. Maternal methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase deficiency and low dietary folate lead to adverse reproductive outcomes and congenital heart defects in mice. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:188–195. doi: 10.1093/ajcn.82.1.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ferguson SE, Smith GN, Walker MC. Maternal plasma homocysteine levels in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Med Hypoth. 2001;56:85–90. doi: 10.1054/mehy.2000.1116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. George L, Mills JL, Johansson ALV, Nordmark A, Olander B, Granath F, Cnattingius S. Plasma folate levels and risk of spontaneous abortion. JAMA. 2002;288:1867–1873. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.15.1867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Nelen WLDM, Blom HJ. Pregnancy complications. In: Ueland PM, Rozen R, editor. MTHFR polymorphisms and Disease. Georgetown, Texas, USA: Eurekah.com/Landes Bioscience; 2005. pp. 144–162. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ren A, Wang J. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism and the risk of unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss: A meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:1716–1722. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Isotalo PA, Wells GA, Donelly JG. Neonatal and fetal methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genetic polymorphisms: An examination of C677T and A1298C mutations. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;67:986–990. doi: 10.1086/303082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Isotalo PA, Donnelly JG. Prevalence of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutations in patients with venous thrombosis. Molec Diag. 2000;5:59–66. doi: 10.1007/BF03262024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zetterberg H, Regland B, Palmer M, Ricksten A, Palmqvist L, Rymo L, Arvanitis DA, Spandilos DA, Blennow K. Increased frequency of combined methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T and A1298C mutated alleles in spontaneous aborted embryos. Eur J Hum Genet. 2002;10:113–118. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Bae J, Shin SJ, Cha SH, Choi DH, Lee S, Kim NK. Prevalent genotypes of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR C677T and A1298C) in spontaneously aborted embryos. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:351–355. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jugessur A, Wilcox AJ, Lie RT, Murray JC, Taylor JA, Ulvik A, Devron CA, Vindenes HA, Åbyholm FE. Exploring the effects of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene variants C677T and A1298C on the risk of orofacial clefts in 261 Norwegian case-parent triads. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157:1083–1091. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. van Beynum IM, Kapusta L, den Heyer M, Vermeulen SHHM, Kouwenberg M, Daniëls O, Blom HJ. Maternal MTHFR 677C>T is a risk factor for congenital heart defects: effect modification by periconceptional folate supplementation. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:981–987. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Jongbloet PH. Non-optimal maturation of the oocyte, maternal MTHFR polymorphisms, periconceptional folate, and decrease of congenital heart defects. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2043. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rozen R, Clarke Frazer F, Shaw G. Decreased proportion of female newborn infants homozygous for the 677C → T mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Am J Med Genet. 1999;83:142–143. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19990312)83:2<142::AID-AJMG12>3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Dobson AT, Davis RM, Rosen MP, Shen S, Rinaudo PF, Chan J, Cedars MI. Methyltetrahydrofolate reductase C677T and A1298C variants do not affect ongoing pregnancy rates following IVF. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:450–456. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Miettinen OS, Reiner ML, Nadas AS. Seasonal incidence of coarctation of the aorta. Br Heart J. 1970;32:103–107. doi: 10.1136/hrt.32.1.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Pallast EMG, Jongbloet PH, Straatman HM, Zielhuis GA. Excess seasonality of births among patients with schizophrenia and seasonal ovopathy. Schizophr Bull. 1994;20:269–227. doi: 10.1093/schbul/20.2.269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Marzullo G, Clarke Fraser F. Similar rhythmsof seasonal conceptions in neural tube defects and schizophrenia: A hypothesis of oxidant stress and the photoperiod. Birth Def Res (part A) 2005;73:1–5. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Jongbloet PH, van Soestbergen M, Veen EA van der. Month-of-birth distribution of diabetics and ovopathy: A new aetiological view. Diabetes Res. 1988;9:51–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Jongbloet PH, Groenewoud HMM, Roeleveld N. Seasonally bound ovopathy versus "Temperature at conception" as cause for anorexia nervosa and othe eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2005;38:236–243. doi: 10.1002/eat.20173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Jongbloet PH, Groenewoud HMM, Huber S, Fieder M, Roeleveld N. Month of birth related to fecundity and childlessness among contemporary women. Hum Biol. 2007;79:479–490. doi: 10.1353/hub.2008.0006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Allen C, Reardon W. Assisted reproduction technology and defects of genomic imprinting. BJOG. 2005;112:1589–1594. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00784.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Horsthemke B, Ludwig M. Assisted reproduction: The epigenetic perspective. Hum Reprod. 2005;11:473–482. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmi022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Kelly TLJ, Trasler JM. Developmental biology: frontiers for clinical genetics. Clin Genet. 2004;65:247–260. doi: 10.1111/j.0009-9163.2004.00236.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Chang AS, Moley KH, Wangler M, Feinberg AP, Debaun MR. Association between Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and assisted reproductive technology: a case series of 19 patients. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:349–354. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.07.964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wieczorek D, Ludwig M, Boehringer S, Jongbloet PH, Gillessen-Kaesbach G, Horsthemke B. Reproduction abnormalities and twin pregnancies in parents of sporadic patients with oculo-auriculo-vertebral spectrum/Goldenhar syndrome. Hum Genet. 2007;121:369–376. doi: 10.1007/s00439-007-0336-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Sinclair KD, Allegrucci C, Singh R, Gardner DS, Sebastian S, Bispham J, Thurston A, Huntley JF, Rees WD, Maloney CA, Lea RG, Craigon J, McEvoy TG, Young LE. DNA methylation, insulin resistance, and blood pressure in offspring determined by maternal periconceptional B vitamin and methionine status. PNAS. 2007;104:19351–19356. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707258104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Cooney CA, Dave AA, Wolff GL. Maternal methyl supplements inmice affect epigentic variation and DNA methylation of offspring. J Nutr. 2002;132:2393S–2400S. doi: 10.1093/jn/132.8.2393S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. DeBaun MR, Chang AS. Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:269–270. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Linden IJM van der, Smulders YM, Kok RM, van Beynum IM, den Heyer M, Blom JH. Decreased global DNA methylation in spina bifida patients. One-Carbon Metabolism and Neural Tube defects. Thesis Radboud University Nijmegen; 2008. pp. 89–96. ISBN 978-90-6464-193-0. [Google Scholar]
  64. Crow T. Genes for schizophrenia. Lancet. 2003;366:1829–1830. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13433-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Stams WA, Den Boer ML, Beverloo HB, Meijerink JP, Van Wering ER, Janka-Schaub GE, Pieters R. Expression levels of Tel, AML1, and the fusion products TEL-AML1 and AML1-TEL versus drug sensitivity and clinical outcome in T(12;21)-positive pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:2974–2980. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. James SJ. The molecular dynamics of abnormal folate metabolism and DNA methylation; implications for disease susceptibility and progression. In: Ueland PM, Rozen R, editor. MTHFR polymorphisms and Disease. Georgetown, Texas, USA: Eurekah.com/Landes Bioscience; 2005. pp. 78–99. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Assisted Reproduction are provided here courtesy of Sims Institute Press Ltd.

RESOURCES