Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1969 Aug;99(2):487–490. doi: 10.1128/jb.99.2.487-490.1969

R Factor Transmission In Vivo1

H Jarolmen a, G Kemp a
PMCID: PMC250043  PMID: 4897113

Abstract

Experimental infections were induced in weanling pigs orally both with nalidixic acid (NA)-sensitive and -resistant strains of Salmonella choleraesuis var. kunzendorf, designated RC221 and RC221NA, respectively. Prior to the time of infection, cultures of normal bacterial flora were isolated from swine fecal matter and screened for the presence of R factors. A majority of these bacterial isolates harbored transferable resistances. Both strains RC221 and RC221NA have been shown to be competent recipients in vitro of the R factors present in the normal intestinal flora. The property of NA resistance greatly facilitated recovery of the infecting organism. After infection, salmonellae from liver, lung, spleen, lymph node, intestine, and feces were screened for the presence of R factors. Transfer of drug resistance in vivo was a rare occurrence; however, if infected specimens, particularly intestinal, were incubated in nutrient broth prior to plating, R factor transfer occurred, presumably in the test tube. Changes in recipient cultures were frequently observed after introduction of R factors from organisms of pig origin into the S. choleraesuis var. kunzendorf test organisms. Alterations include changes in typing reaction, granular growth in broth, differences in colony form, and reduction of virulence.

Full text

PDF
487

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ANDERSON E. S., DATTA N. RESISTANCE TO PENICILLINS AND ITS TRANSFER IN ENTEROBACTERIACEAE. Lancet. 1965 Feb 20;1(7382):407–409. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(65)90004-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbour S. D. Effect of nalidixic acid on conjugational transfer and expression of episomal lac genes in Escherichia coli K12. J Mol Biol. 1967 Sep 14;28(2):373–376. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(67)80016-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jarolmen H., Kemp G. Association of increased recipient ability for R factors and reduced virulence among variants of Salmonella choleraesuis var. kunzendorf. J Bacteriol. 1969 Feb;97(2):962–963. doi: 10.1128/jb.97.2.962-963.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Smith H. W., Halls S. Observations on infective drug resistance in Britain. Br Med J. 1966 Jan 29;1(5482):266–269. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5482.266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. WATANABE T. SELECTED METHODS OF GENETIC STUDY OF EPISOME-MEDIATED DRUG RESISTANCE IN BACTERIA. Methods Med Res. 1964;10:202–220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Walton J. R. Infectious drug resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from healthy farm animals. Lancet. 1966 Dec 10;2(7476):1300–1302. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(66)91705-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Walton J. In vivo transfer of infectious drug resistance. Nature. 1966 Jul 16;211(5046):312–313. doi: 10.1038/211312a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES