Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 1994 Jul;76(4):269–275.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England and Wales: results of an audit by the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

D Dunn 1, R Nair 1, S Fowler 1, R McCloy 1
PMCID: PMC2502253  PMID: 8074391

Abstract

The results of an audit of open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy conducted by the Comparative Audit Service of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are presented. Data were submitted by 124 consultant surgeons on 3319 attempted laparoscopic and by 227 consultant surgeons on 8035 open cholecystectomies performed in England and Wales during the 2 years 1990 and 1991. These were contrasted with 9322 attempted laparoscopic cholecystectomies reported in 21 series reported in the world literature between 1991 and 1992, and with five other nations' audit studies. Among attempted laparoscopic cases, conversion to an open procedure was necessary in 175/3319 (5.2%) of cases and overall mortality was 0.15% (5/3319). Major complications were reported in 2.1% and minor complications in 5.9% of cases. Bile duct injury was reported to be significantly more common after attempted laparoscopic cholecystectomy (11/3319, 0.33%) than after open cholecystectomy (4/8035, 0.06%) (95% confidence intervals -0.48 to 0.08), but it was not significantly different from that reported for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the combined world literature (28/9322, 0.3%) (95% confidence intervals -0.19 to 0.25). Most systemic complications were significantly more common after open cholecystectomy. For open cholecystectomy, the mortality was 55/8035 (0.76%), with major complications reported in 3.2% and minor complications in 9.8% of patients. Adoption of the laparoscopic approach was associated with a four-fifths reduction in the mortality of cholecystectomy, and a 40% reduction in the overall complication rate when compared with the open operation. While laparoscopic cholecystectomy has an impressively low mortality and morbidity profile during the first 2 years of its introduction into the UK, prevention of bile duct injury is the most important issue to be addressed in all laparoscopic cholecystectomy training programmes.

Full text

PDF
269

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Attwood S. E., Hill A. D., Mealy K., Stephens R. B. A prospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1992 Nov;74(6):397–400. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailey R. W., Zucker K. A., Flowers J. L., Scovill W. A., Graham S. M., Imbembo A. L. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Experience with 375 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 1991 Oct;214(4):531–541. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199110000-00017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Corbitt J. D., Jr, Cantwell D. V. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with operative cholangiogram. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Dec;1(4):229–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cuschieri A., Dubois F., Mouiel J., Mouret P., Becker H., Buess G., Trede M., Troidl H. The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991 Mar;161(3):385–387. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90603-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Deziel D. J., Millikan K. W., Economou S. G., Doolas A., Ko S. T., Airan M. C. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg. 1993 Jan;165(1):9–14. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80397-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dunn D. C., Fowler S. Comparative audit: an experimental study of 147,882 general surgical admissions during 1990. Br J Surg. 1992 Oct;79(10):1073–1076. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800791028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fitzgibbons R. J., Jr, Schmid S., Santoscoy R., Tyndall S., Hinder R., Filipi C. J., Jenkins J., Fitzgibbons R. J., Sr, Salerno G. M. Open laparoscopy for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Dec;1(4):216–222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grace P. A., Quereshi A., Coleman J., Keane R., McEntee G., Broe P., Osborne H., Bouchier-Hayes D. Reduced postoperative hospitalization after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1991 Feb;78(2):160–162. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Graves H. A., Jr, Ballinger J. F., Anderson W. J. Appraisal of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1991 Jun;213(6):655–664. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199106000-00017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hershman M. J., Rosin R. D. Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: our first 200 patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1992 Jul;74(4):242–247. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Larson G. M., Vitale G. C., Casey J., Evans J. S., Gilliam G., Heuser L., McGee G., Rao M., Scherm M. J., Voyles C. R. Multipractice analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1,983 patients. Am J Surg. 1992 Feb;163(2):221–226. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(92)90105-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McCloy R. Through the keyhole. Health Serv J. 1992 Nov 12;102(5328):26–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Meador J. H., Nowzaradan Y., Matzelle W. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of 82 cases. South Med J. 1991 Feb;84(2):186–189. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Neugebauer E., Troidl H., Spangenberger W., Dietrich A., Lefering R. Conventional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the randomized controlled trial. Cholecystectomy Study Group. Br J Surg. 1991 Feb;78(2):150–154. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Peters J. H., Gibbons G. D., Innes J. T., Nichols K. E., Front M. E., Roby S. R., Ellison E. C. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1991 Oct;110(4):769–778. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rees B. I., Williams H. R. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the first 155 patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1992 Jul;74(4):233–236. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schirmer B. D., Edge S. B., Dix J., Hyser M. J., Hanks J. B., Jones R. S. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Ann Surg. 1991 Jun;213(6):665–677. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199106000-00018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Scott A. D., Greville A. C., McMillan L., Wellwood J. M. Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: results of the technique in 210 patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1992 Jul;74(4):237–241. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Soper N. J., Barteau J. A., Clayman R. V., Ashley S. W., Dunnegan D. L. Comparison of early postoperative results for laparoscopic versus standard open cholecystectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Feb;174(2):114–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Spaw A. T., Reddick E. J., Olsen D. O. Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: analysis of 500 procedures. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Mar;1(1):2–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stoker M. E., Vose J., O'Mara P., Maini B. S. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A clinical and financial analysis of 280 operations. Arch Surg. 1992 May;127(5):589–595. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420050117015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Voyles C. R., Petro A. B., Meena A. L., Haick A. J., Koury A. M. A practical approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991 Mar;161(3):365–370. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90599-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wilson P., Leese T., Morgan W. P., Kelly J. F., Brigg J. K. Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for "all-comers". Lancet. 1991 Sep 28;338(8770):795–797. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90674-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wolfe B. M., Gardiner B. N., Leary B. F., Frey C. F. Endoscopic cholecystectomy. An analysis of complications. Arch Surg. 1991 Oct;126(10):1192–1198. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410340030005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES