Abstract
A prospective study with long-term follow-up was undertaken of 248 patients (137 males, median age 18 years (range 6-81 years), undergoing emergency appendicectomy during a 12-month period. Acute inflammation was present in 182 patients (73.4%) (males 86.1%, females 57.8%; P < 0.001). Before surgery, the positive predictive value of diagnostic accuracy was 82.0% (males 91.2%, females 67.7%). Delaying surgery did not significantly increase the proportion of perforated appendices (22.0%), hospital stay, or frequency of postoperative complications (overall 49.6%). Hospital complications were significantly more common among patients with a perforated appendix. There was no significant difference in the complication rate between patients with or without appendicitis while in hospital, during the first 18 months after operation or 8 years after operation. At 18 months, 17 of 238 patients (7.1%) continued to experience their original pain. After 8 years the original pain was still present in 10 of 155 patients (6.5%). Continued pain was more likely in patients having undergone removal of a normal appendix (P < 0.001)
Full text
PDFSelected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Andersson R., Hugander A., Thulin A., Nyström P. O., Olaison G. Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation. BMJ. 1994 Jan 8;308(6921):107–110. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6921.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arnbjörnsson E. Scoring system for computer-aided diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The value of prospective versus retrospective studies. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1985;74(4):159–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berry J., Jr, Malt R. A. Appendicitis near its centenary. Ann Surg. 1984 Nov;200(5):567–575. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198411000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gilmore O. J., Browett J. P., Griffin P. H., Ross I. K., Brodribb A. J., Cooke T. J., Higgs M. J., Williamson R. C. Appendicitis and mimicking conditions. A prospective study. Lancet. 1975 Sep 6;2(7932):421–424. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)90841-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grunewald B., Keating J. Should the 'normal' appendix be removed at operation for appendicitis? J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1993 Jun;38(3):158–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Izbicki J. R., Knoefel W. T., Wilker D. K., Mandelkow H. K., Müller K., Siebeck M., Schweiberer L. Accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a retrospective and prospective analysis of 686 patients. Eur J Surg. 1992 Apr;158(4):227–231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malt R. A. The perforated appendix. N Engl J Med. 1986 Dec 11;315(24):1546–1547. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198612113152409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nauta R. J., Magnant C. Observation versus operation for abdominal pain in the right lower quadrant. Roles of the clinical examination and the leukocyte count. Am J Surg. 1986 Jun;151(6):746–748. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90057-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paterson-Brown S., Thompson J. N., Eckersley J. R., Ponting G. A., Dudley H. A. Which patients with suspected appendicitis should undergo laparoscopy? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 May 14;296(6633):1363–1364. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6633.1363-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pearson R. H. Ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis. BMJ. 1988 Jul 30;297(6644):309–310. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6644.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rajagopalan A. E., Mason J. H., Kennedy M., Pawlikowski J. The value of the barium enema in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg. 1977 Apr;112(4):531–533. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1977.01370040183029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Surana R., Quinn F., Puri P. Is it necessary to perform appendicectomy in the middle of the night in children? BMJ. 1993 May 1;306(6886):1168–1168. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6886.1168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]