Skip to main content
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 1997 Nov;79(6):451–454.

Optimising a varicose vein service to reduce recurrence.

E P Turton 1, S McKenzie 1, M J Weston 1, D C Berridge 1, D J Scott 1
PMCID: PMC2502972  PMID: 9422875

Abstract

A prospective observational study of 63 legs in 49 patients was undertaken to evaluate the adequacy of primary varicose vein surgery performed by surgical trainees. Appropriate surgery was carried out by a surgical senior house officer (SHO) under direct consultant supervision. All patients underwent pre- and postoperative duplex scanning. The preoperative duplex scan demonstrated incompetence of the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) or long saphenous vein (LSV) in 59 limbs, a mid-thigh perforator (MTP) in 11 limbs, and saphenopopliteal junction (SPJ) in 5 limbs. Surgery successfully abolished all sites of pre-existing reflux. The postoperative duplex scan revealed that 17 new sites of reflux, not identified preoperatively, had developed in 12 limbs. With a consultant-led service and accurate preoperative identification of sites of reflux, the surgical trainee can adequately perform varicose vein surgery. This would seem a reasonable approach to training and eliminating recurrence owing to inadequate surgery. The development of new sites of reflux within 6 months of varicose vein surgery may be owing to altered venous haemodynamics consequent upon this surgery.

Full text

PDF
451

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bradbury A. W., Stonebridge P. A., Callam M. J., Walker A. J., Allan P. L., Beggs I., Ruckley C. V. Recurrent varicose veins: assessment of the saphenofemoral junction. Br J Surg. 1994 Mar;81(3):373–375. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradbury A. W., Stonebridge P. A., Ruckley C. V., Beggs I. Recurrent varicose veins: correlation between preoperative clinical and hand-held Doppler ultrasonographic examination, and anatomical findings at surgery. Br J Surg. 1993 Jul;80(7):849–851. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chant A. D., Jones H. O., Weddell J. M. Varicose veins: a comparison of surgery and injection-compression sclerotherapy. Lancet. 1972 Dec 2;2(7788):1188–1191. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)92607-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jones L., Braithwaite B. D., Selwyn D., Cooke S., Earnshaw J. J. Neovascularisation is the principal cause of varicose vein recurrence: results of a randomised trial of stripping the long saphenous vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996 Nov;12(4):442–445. doi: 10.1016/s1078-5884(96)80011-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lees T., Singh S., Beard J., Spencer P., Rigby C. Prospective audit of surgery for varicose veins. Br J Surg. 1997 Jan;84(1):44–46. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02475.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Negus D. Recurrent varicose veins: a national problem. Br J Surg. 1993 Jul;80(7):823–824. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rivlin S. The surgical cure of primary varicose veins. Br J Surg. 1975 Nov;62(11):913–917. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800621114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Royle J. P. Recurrent varicose veins. World J Surg. 1986 Dec;10(6):944–953. doi: 10.1007/BF01658645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sarin S., Scurr J. H., Coleridge Smith P. D. Assessment of stripping the long saphenous vein in the treatment of primary varicose veins. Br J Surg. 1992 Sep;79(9):889–893. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800790911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sarin S., Scurr J. H., Coleridge Smith P. D. Stripping of the long saphenous vein in the treatment of primary varicose veins. Br J Surg. 1994 Oct;81(10):1455–1458. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800811017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vasdekis S. N., Clarke G. H., Hobbs J. T., Nicolaides A. N. Evaluation of non-invasive and invasive methods in the assessment of short saphenous vein termination. Br J Surg. 1989 Sep;76(9):929–932. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800760919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES