Skip to main content
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 1997 Sep;79(5):341–344.

Aquaflo pump vs FMS 4 pump for shoulder arthroscopic surgery.

G Ampat 1, J Bruguera 1, S A Copeland 1
PMCID: PMC2503041  PMID: 9326125

Abstract

A prospective controlled trial was carried out to compare two different fluid delivery systems used for shoulder arthroscopy. One an advanced pump system that controls both pressure and flow of fluid delivered, the other an air-driven diaphragm pump that only controls fluid pressure. Blood loss, presence of bleeding vessels and visual clarity were parameters used to assess the pump systems. There was no difference between the pumps in straightforward shoulder procedures. However, complicated and prolonged procedures benefited from the use of the advanced pump system.

Full text

PDF
341

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Morgan C. D. Fluid delivery systems for arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 1987;3(4):288–291. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(87)80126-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ogilvie-Harris D. J., Weisleder L. Fluid pump systems for arthroscopy: a comparison of pressure control versus pressure and flow control. Arthroscopy. 1995 Oct;11(5):591–595. doi: 10.1016/0749-8063(95)90137-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES