Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 1998 Jul;80(4):253–256.

Ultrasound-guided Tru-cut biopsy of the breast.

N P Woodcock 1, I Glaves 1, D R Morgan 1, J MacFie 1
PMCID: PMC2503103  PMID: 9771224

Abstract

Ultrasound-guided automated Tru-cut needle biopsy may be used as an alternative to fine needle aspiration cytology for the assessment of discrete mass lesions of the breast. This is a retrospective study of 187 biopsies, comparing the results with a final diagnosis obtained from subsequent excision or outpatient follow-up. Biopsies were performed using a spring-loaded gun under ultrasound guidance. Invasive malignancy was demonstrated in 114 biopsies, 98 of which were subjected to surgery, with no false-positives. Twelve biopsies contained 'atypical cells', pre-invasive malignancy or risk factors for invasive carcinoma, ten of which proved to be invasive malignancy on excision. Normal or benign tissue was found in 61 biopsies, but of those that proceeded to excision biopsy, 16 were invasive or in situ carcinoma. The sensitivity of the procedure for detecting significant pathology was 88.7%, and the specificity 100%. When used as part of triple assessment, the sensitivity increases to 97.9%. Ultrasound-guided Tru-cut needle biopsy is a well-tolerated and reliable procedure for providing a tissue diagnosis of malignancy before definitive treatment, and obviating the need for formal excision biopsy of lesions for which there is a low index of suspicion.

Full text

PDF
253

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carty N. J., Ravichandran D., Carter C., Mudan S., Royle G. T., Taylor I. Randomized comparison of fine-needle aspiration cytology and Biopty-Cut needle biopsy after unsatisfactory initial cytology of discrete breast lesions. Br J Surg. 1994 Sep;81(9):1313–1314. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chare M. J., Flowers C. I., O'Brien C. J., Dawson A. Image-guided core biopsy in patients with breast disease. Br J Surg. 1996 Oct;83(10):1415–1416. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800831029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dahlstrom J. E., Jain S., Sutton T., Sutton S. Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic core biopsy in a mammographic breast cancer screening programme. Histopathology. 1996 May;28(5):421–427. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1996.332376.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dowlatshahi K., Yaremko M. L., Kluskens L. F., Jokich P. M. Nonpalpable breast lesions: findings of stereotaxic needle-core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology. Radiology. 1991 Dec;181(3):745–750. doi: 10.1148/radiology.181.3.1947091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jackman R. J., Nowels K. W., Shepard M. J., Finkelstein S. I., Marzoni F. A., Jr Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology. 1994 Oct;193(1):91–95. doi: 10.1148/radiology.193.1.8090927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jaeger H. J., MacFie J., Mitchell C. J., Couse N., Wai D. Diagnosis of abdominal masses with percutaneous biopsy guided by ultrasound. BMJ. 1990 Nov 24;301(6762):1188–1191. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6762.1188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Liberman L., Dershaw D. D., Rosen P. P., Giess C. S., Cohen M. A., Abramson A. F., Hann L. E. Stereotaxic core biopsy of breast carcinoma: accuracy at predicting invasion. Radiology. 1995 Feb;194(2):379–381. doi: 10.1148/radiology.194.2.7824713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Liberman L., Fahs M. C., Dershaw D. D., Bonaccio E., Abramson A. F., Cohen M. A., Hann L. E. Impact of stereotaxic core breast biopsy on cost of diagnosis. Radiology. 1995 Jun;195(3):633–637. doi: 10.1148/radiology.195.3.7753986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Litherland J. C., Evans A. J., Wilson A. R., Kollias J., Pinder S. E., Elston C. W., Ellis I. O., Yeoman L. J. The impact of core-biopsy on pre-operative diagnosis rate of screen detected breast cancers. Clin Radiol. 1996 Aug;51(8):562–565. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(96)80136-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mikhail R. A., Nathan R. C., Weiss M., Tummala R. M., Mullangi U. R., Lawrence L., Mukkamala A. Stereotactic core needle biopsy of mammographic breast lesions as a viable alternative to surgical biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1994 Sep;1(5):363–367. doi: 10.1007/BF02303806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Parker S. H., Jobe W. E., Dennis M. A., Stavros A. T., Johnson K. K., Yakes W. F., Truell J. E., Price J. G., Kortz A. B., Clark D. G. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology. 1993 May;187(2):507–511. doi: 10.1148/radiology.187.2.8475299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Parker S. H., Lovin J. D., Jobe W. E., Luethke J. M., Hopper K. D., Yakes W. F., Burke B. J. Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology. 1990 Sep;176(3):741–747. doi: 10.1148/radiology.176.3.2167501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rode J. Fine needle cytology versus histology. Histopathology. 1989 Oct;15(4):435–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1989.tb01599.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sadler G. P., McGee S., Dallimore N. S., Monypenny I. J., Douglas-Jones A. G., Lyons K., Horgan K. Role of fine-needle aspiration cytology and needle-core biopsy in the diagnosis of lobular carcinoma of the breast. Br J Surg. 1994 Sep;81(9):1315–1317. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES