Skip to main content
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 1998 Sep;80(5):367–369.

HRGs for benchmarking and contractual arrangements: a poisoned chalice?

D C Berridge 1, D J Scott 1, L Sharp 1
PMCID: PMC2503118  PMID: 9849343

Abstract

A study was undertaken to determine if healthcare resource groups (HRGs) are reliable, reproducible in different centres and accurately reflect clinical activity. During a 3 month period, 385 finished consultant episodes (FCEs) were assessed. Of these, 17 (4.4%) were grouped to U01, i.e. no group allocated as the primary diagnosis was not recorded. For 271 of these episodes, a clinician had also allocated a choice of what he thought the HRG should be. These choices of HRG were then compared with the official grouping determined by the software provided by the National Casemix Office (NCMO). Disparities between 'automatic grouping' and proposed HRG assignment by the consultants occurred in 20.66% (56/271). Version 3 should see some of these disparities and actual grouping software errors reduced, in particular through the introduction of a new vascular surgery chapter. However, the absence of a primary diagnosis will still produce the allocation of group U01 in version 3. Caution should be observed in using the HRG software and in the interpretation of data obtained from it. This could be especially important in benchmarking or contractual settings as there may be adverse implications to the unit/hospitals involved.

Full text

PDF
367

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berridge D. C., Scott D. J., Beard J. D., Hands L. Trials and tribulations of vascular surgical benchmarking. Br J Surg. 1998 Apr;85(4):508–510. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00655.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES